George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, and Nicolas Gengler Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD, USA, and Gembloux Agricultural U., Belgium
Advertisements

2006 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Genetic.
Genomic imputation and evaluation using 1074 high density Holstein genotypes P. M. VanRaden 1, D. J. Null 1 *, G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 2, E.E.
Wiggans, 2014CDCB meeting – August 5 (1) G.R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansAlta Genetics.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, L.K. Matukumalli 1,2, R.D. Schnabel 3, J.F. Taylor 3, J.P. Chesnais 4, F.S. Schenkel 5, and C.P. Van.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Jeff O’Connell 1, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4,
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, George Wiggans 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, Tad Sonstegard 2, Jeff O’Connell 1, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4,
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2010 G.R. WiggansDCRC.
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2007 J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. O'Connell 3, C. P. Van Tassell 1,2, T. S. Sonstegard 2, R. D. Schnabel 4, J. F. Taylor 4, and G. R. Wiggans.
Wiggans, 2013Japanese Genomics Tour (1) Dr. George R. WiggansDr. H. Duane Norman Acting Research LeaderInterim Administrator Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansAg Discovery.
Wiggans, 2013SRUC Imputation (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD ,
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Curt Van Tassell, George Wiggans, Tad Sonstegard, and Jeff O’Connell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory and Bovine Functional Genomics.
Wiggans, th WCGALP (1) G.R. Wiggans*, T.A. Cooper, D.J. Null, and P.M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
WiggansBritish Cattle Conference 2015 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansGenomics:
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, L.K. Matukumalli 1,2, R.D. Schnabel 3, J.F. Taylor 3, F.S. Schenkel 4, and C.P. Van Tassell 1 1 Agricultural.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCouncil.
WiggansCDCB industry meeting – Sept. 29, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2007 Paul VanRaden, Melvin Tooker*, George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2009 Can you believe those genomic.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 AIPL Centennial.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2010 Gains in reliability from combining subsets.
Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA Board – 2009 (1)
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansSelect Sire.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
G.R. Wiggans* 1, P.M. VanRaden 1, L.R. Bacheller 1, F.A. Ross, Jr. 1, M.E. Tooker 1, J.L. Hutchison 1, T.S. Sonstegard 2, and C.P. Van Tassell 1,2 1 Animal.
2007 John Cole, Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
2006 GEORGE R. WIGGANS Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, Maryland ,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Considering.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
2006 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Genetic.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Biological Insights.
G.R. Wiggans, T. A. Cooper* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 G.R. Wiggans DNA.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansCouncil.
Genomic Evaluations.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Can you believe those genomic evaluations for young bulls?
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Presentation transcript:

George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (1) 2008 Routine genomic predictions

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (2) Getting started l Select animals to genotype l Assign identification to animals l Collect tissue samples l Extract DNA l Check DNA quality and standardize concentration on mother plate l Propagate to daughter plates

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (3) Infinium ® II assay protocol © 2006 Illumina, Inc.− For research use only Source: Infinium® II Assay Workflow, Illumina ® SNP Genotyping

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (4) Evaluation workflow l Check genotypes for inheritance errors l Calculate genomic relationships l Infer missing genotypes l Estimate SNP effects

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (5) Evaluation workflow – cont. l Combine genomic information with parent average w Based on gain from genomics over parent average for animals with genotypes l Apply to all traits l Distribute results

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (6) First genomic evaluation l 832 animals nominated for genotyping l Over 4,700 predictor bulls from US and Canada l Embryo flushes w AI organization with first choice arranged for genotyping w Genotypes shared by agreement between studs

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (7) First genomic evaluation – cont. l Calves must have unique ID w Holstein offers Easy-ID program l Samples sent to GeneSeek for extraction l BFGL genotypes animals with chips purchased through cooperative research and development agreement l AIPL calculates genomic evaluations

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (8) First genomic evaluation – cont. l April 1 distribution to cooperators w Evaluations sent to AI organizations that paid for chip w Evaluation mailed to owner of animal l Future schedule at least every 2 months

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (9) Proposed mailer (text) This report contains results obtained from studying DNA of bull HOUSA , GENOMICS EXTRAORDINARE-ET, born in Breeders can now determine which genes each animal inherited and include this completely new source of information in genetic evaluations. Predicted transmitting abilities have used pedigrees to calculate probabilities about the genes that relatives share. A new DNA chip developed by the USDA Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory, Illumina, and other research partners can read >50,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) evenly distributed across all 30 chromosomes to determine which alleles are shared. Genetic effects for each SNP were estimated using DNA of 3,119 proven Holstein bulls contributed by members of the National Association of Animal Breeders and by Semex in Canada. The sum of these genetic effects is used to adjust an animal's PTA for each trait and for net merit. Genomic predictions (on reverse side of this letter) for genotyped Holsteins are being distributed to owners to aid in selection decisions, but these should not yet be used in advertising. More research and education is needed before genomic predictions replace official PTAs. Scientific articles describing the statistical methods and results from both simulated and real genomic data are available from The AIPL and BFGL will work closely with industry partners to implement this new technology.

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (10) Proposed mailer (tables) Health traits Trait namePTAPAPTA RELPA REL Net merit Daughter pregnancy rate –1.3– Productive life Somatic cell score

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (11) Proposed mailer (tables) – cont. Yield traits Trait namePTAPAPTA RELPA REL Milk Fat Fat % –0.08– Protein Protein %

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (12) Proposed mailer (tables) – cont. Calving traits Trait namePTAPAPTA RELPA REL Sire calving ease Daughter Calving ease

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (13) Proposed mailer (tables) – cont. Type traits Trait namePTAPAPTA RELPA REL Final score Dairy form Fore udder attachment Rear udder height Rear legs (rear view) etc.

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (14) Future plans l Use genomic information to update evaluations of animals not genotyped (3 times each year) l Genomic evaluations calculated and released more frequently (monthly? weekly?) l Bull evaluations made public when bull enrolled with NAAB l Cow evaluations made public immediately at USDA web site l January 2009 target for public release

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (15) Genomic selection (New Zealand) l Identify top 30,000 bull calves annually based on parent average l Genotype by 6 days old with 768 SNP l Genotype top 500 bull calves with 50k SNP chip l Keep top 100 bull calves

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (16) Genomic selection (NZ) – cont. l At 1 year, limited progeny test to check for undesirable recessives l At 2 years, market as part of DNA team l When progeny tested, graduate best to progeny-proven team

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (17) Research topics l Differential inclusion of X-chromosome effects to predict bulls vs cows l Contribution of cows to accuracy of genomic prediction l Benefit of genotyping more predictor bulls l Optimum methods for combining genomic and current evaluation

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (18) Research topics – cont. l Practicality of screening and parentage verification with low-cost, low-SNP number assay l Potential of freely sharing enough SNP for accurate parentage discovery l Computational methods to improve accuracy, such as haplotyping

G.R. Wiggans 2008 Select Sires’ Sire Committee meeting (19) Summary l Genomic prediction has great promise l Extensive changes in bull acquisition and marketing and in cow selection expected l Routine genotyping and validation will become industry rather than research responsibilities l We are trying to develop a system that makes this new information work for everyone