Army BRAC 2005 1 Historic Preservation Opportunities and Challenges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Advertisements

E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A NPS Fire Planning: Managing Fire in the Wilderness National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Southeast.
THE BRAC PROCESS – Not Your Usual Brownfields Redevelopment Mary K. Ryan.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 5 June.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
BRAC: GETTING THE NEXT ROUND RIGHT BASE REDEVELOPMENT FORUM NOVEMBER 2014.
PMOBRAC Ms. Kimberly Kesler Director, BRAC Program Management Office March
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Dr. Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 22.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Jane Yagley Program Manager ANG/A7CVP (301) Cultural.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.
2 Governor’s Principles for Fort Monroe Respect Fort Monroe’s history Maintain Public Access Achieve economic sustainability.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Current and Planned Management Initiatives for DoD’s Historic Infrastructure Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Tier 1 Module 3 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Element 2: Oversight & Enforcement.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Ms. Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
CPT Scott M. Winter / SFIM-AEC-TSS / / DSN / 1 of MAR2005 Future Range Mission Analysis Process.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Track 5 Project FinanceSession 6 Renewables Through Private Financing.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Ms. Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Dana Perkins / IMSE-CS-BRC/SMO / (404) (DSN ) / UNCLASSIFIED 1 of 2420 June 2007 IMCOM-SE BRAC Environmental.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Name/Office Symbol/(703) XXX-XXX (DSN XXX) / addressDate-Time-Group 19 September 2008 Fort Monroe Closure Environmental Planning.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
U.S. Section International Boundary and Water Commission Rio Grande and Tijuana River Flood Control Projects Programmatic EIS.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Paul Lumley Senior Tribal Liaison, ODUSD (I&E)
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Engineer US Army Garrison.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
By: Alyssa Kaiser and Celia Rozanski. Before the Act Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental policy Prior to 1969, the USA had no clear environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Anth January 2012.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
DoD Relative Risk and Indian Lands
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Susan Barnes Vice-Chairman Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Current and Planned Management Initiatives
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
National Historic Preservation Act
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

Army BRAC Historic Preservation Opportunities and Challenges

Army BRAC Framework –Under a NEPA Umbrella NEPA Documentation Levels –Record of Environmental Consideration (REC). Prepared by affected installation. –Environmental Assessment (EA). Prepared by the BRAC NEPA Support Team (NST). Approved by Garrison Commander. –Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Prepared by NST. Signed by Installation. Record of Decision (ROD) signed by the Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management (ACSIM).

Army BRAC BRAC NEPA Documents 8 EISs: Fort Meade Aberdeen Proving Ground Fort Belvoir Fort Lee Fort Benning Fort Carson Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site Fort Sam Houston 177 EAs

Army BRAC –NHPA: Section 106 –Consultation parties SHPO Appropriate Federally-recognized Indian Tribes LRA Local interest (historical and development oriented)

Army BRAC Opportunities –Sympathetic redevelopment Requires structure set up in initial Programmatic Agreement –Local ordinances –Preservation Covenants Requires cooperation between the LRA and SHPO –Following covenants –Continued consultation Possible Tribal Issues

Army BRAC Challenges –BRAC Timeline: Army NEPA completion goals: EAs 6 months, EISs 12 months. Prior ARMY BRAC EIS completion dates ranged between 16 and 48 months. All actions including construction and basing complete by 15 Sep 2011 –Early Transfer Goals –Competing interests Economic redevelopment Historic Preservation –Compliance –Maximum preservation safeguards Tribal Interests

Army BRAC Tribal Interests –500 Years of American Indian law and treaty making –European vs. Tribal concepts of landuse –Government to Government Relationship Government to Government relations between the Tribes and the Federal Government based on Tribal Sovereignty Trust responsibilities Consultation responsibility Not stakeholders

Army BRAC Contemporary Tribal Issues –Preservation of traditional culture –Prevention of disturbance of ancestral remains –Environmental issues –Lands of historic interest, not just Indian country today Consultation is pre-decisional—not pre- announcement

Army BRAC Lessons Learned from Previous BRAC Rounds Have a consistent approach. The Army’s model PA being considered by DoD. Taking maintenance issues into account during real estate appraisal of historic properties. Strive for an economically successful development. To enable, care with restrictions in covenants a necessary element. SHPO awareness of the real estate disposal process. Rapid transfer to avoid properties in ‘mothballed’ state. BRAC project managers must maintain an up-to-date list of all stakeholders and consulting parties.

Army BRAC Links –Army BRAC Website –Army BRAC NEPA Documents Website –Former BRAC Reuse sites –Advisory Council on Historic Preservation –NPS: Historic Tax Credit Basics

Army BRAC Ernie Seckinger BRAC NEPA Support Team