Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC -- Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 University Niigata University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
Advertisements

New test result of MPPC M.Taguchi(kyoto).
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
R&D of Strip/Block Scintillators E.P.Jacosalem, S.Iba, N.Nakajima, H.Ono, A.L.Sanchez, A.M.Bacala & H.Miyata GLD Calorimeter Group 8 th ACFA Workshop on.
The Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jul Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba, Japan 1.Introduction 2.Recent.
Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
Performance of MPPC using laser system Photon sensor KEK Niigata university, ILC calorimeter group Sayaka IBA, Hiroaki ONO, Paul.
Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
Performance of new strip scintillator Jungeun Lee, Jaeyun Choi, Kyungpook National University Minseok Park.
Novel approach for calibration breakdown voltage of large area SiPM
MPPC R&D status Kobe Univ. CALICE collaboration meeting Yuji SUDO Univ. of Tsukuba ~ contents ~ Introduction Linearity curve Recovery time.
GLD Calorimeter Status Oct 学術創成会議 S. Uozumi Shinshu University FJPPL meeting held at the end of September. Preparation underway toward the ECAL.
Status of scintillator KLM study P. Pakhlov (ITEP)
Photo-detector and scintillator studies at ITEP Outline 1. Check of casting form 2. Study of MRS APD’s from CPTA 3. MC simulation of light collection in.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
SiPM: Development and Applications
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL Adil Khan International Linear Collider Workshop 2010 LCWS10 & ILC10, Beijing, China CALICE Scintillator ECAL group.
Systematic Study of Strip/Block Scintillators: Progress Report E.P. Jacosalem, S. Iba, N. Nakajima, H. Ono, A.L. Sanchez, A.M. Bacala & H. Miyata ILCCAL.
MPPC update including plastic connector T2K experiment collaboration meeting 2007/4/18 (Wed) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment PD07 : Photosensor Workshop /6/28 (Thu) S.Gomi T.Nakaya M.Yokoyama H.Kawamuko ( Kyoto University ) T.Nakadaira.
Scintillator tile-SiPM system development for CALICE Engineering AHCAL Prototype Michael Danilov, ITEP & CALICE LCWS10 Beijing March 2010 Outline New scintillator.
Study of the MPPC performance - R&D status for the GLD calorimeter readout – Nov 6-10.
Study of the Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for ILC calorimeter Satoru Uozumi (Kobe University) Atami Introduction of ILC and MPPC The MPPC performance.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group May 29 – Jun 4 DESY Introduction.
Scintillator ECAL for ILC for Calorimeter Review DESY May2007 Tohru Takeshita (CALICE-Shinshu) Idea implementation current status future mile stones.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
1 MPPC update S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira (KEK) Nov KEK.
Development and Study of the Multi Pixel Photon Counter
Systematic Studies of Small Scintillators for New Sampling Calorimeter E.P.Jacosalem, S.Iba, N.Nakajima, H.Ono, A.L.Sanchez, A.M.Bacala & H.Miyata GLD.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) Feb Beijing Introduction Basic performances Future.
R&D status of the Scintillator- strip based ECAL for the ILD Oct LCWS14 Belgrade Satoru Uozumi (KNU) For the CALICE collaboration Scintillator strips.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters(MPPC) Makoto Taguchi Kyoto University.
Performance of SiPM Ryuhei Nakamura (Kobe Univ.) GLC calorimeter group (KEK, Kobe, Konan, Niigata, Shinshu, Tsukuba) Contents ・ Introduction ・ Test results.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group (KNU, Kobe, Niigata, Shinshu, ICEPP.
1 SiPM studies: Highlighting current equipment and immediate plans Lee BLM Quasar working group.
Linearity Tests The laser induced high noise pulses on the APD rendering it useless. We tried several methods to shield and filter the noise. With a stabilized.
Multipixel Geiger mode photo-sensors (MRS APD’s) Yury Kudenko ISS meeting, KEK, 25 January 2006 INR, Moscow.
R&D of Calorimeter using Strip/Block Scintillators with SiPM
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
Performance of new MPPC Nov. 21 Korea-Japan joint meeting Takashi Maeda Hideki Yamazaki Yuji Sudo (University of Tsukuba) --- Contents ---
Beta-ray test for strip scintillator readout MPPC GLD Cal group KEK 06/2/28 (Tue) Niigata university Sayaka IBA.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
R&D of Calorimeter using Strip/Block Scintillator with SiPM E.P. Jacosalem, S. Iba, N. Nakajima, H. Ono, A.L. Sanchez & H. Miyata Niigata University ILC.
Jet Energy Measurement at ILC Separation of jet particles in the calorimeter is required for the PFA  Fine granular calorimeter is necessary. Particle.
WACH4 26/11/2002Julien Cogan CERN/EP/CMA-1- THERMAL STEPS ANALYSIS Goals & Means : –apply a “step function” on the cooling water –look at : APD response.
The Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jul Satoru Uozumi University of Tsukuba, Japan for the GLD Calorimeter.
Study and Development of the Multi-Pixel Photon Counter for the GLD Calorimeter Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu, Japan) on behalf of the GLD Calorimeter Group Oct-9.
ILC-CAL Test status of HPK photon sensors Kobe-U Y.Tamura / K.Kawagoe Confidential: do not distribute outside.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
Study of Geiger Avalanche Photo Diode applications to pixel tracking detectors Barcelona Main Goal The use of std CMOS tech. APD's in Geiger mode (that.
Silicon Photomultiplier Development at GRAPES-3 K.C.Ravindran T.I.F.R, OOTY WAPP 2010 Worshop On behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
February 10, 2009, G-APD Workshop, GSI Darmstadt1 APD Laser Test Setup Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Multi-Pixel Photon Counter Readout Board
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment
md-NUV PET project meeting
R&D of MPPC in kyoto M.taguchi.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC -- Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 University Niigata University HEP-Lab Sayaka IBA Editha P. Jacosalem (Mindanao-U), Hiroaki Ono, Noriko Nakajima, Hitoshi Miyata

Contents 1. Study at Niigata university 2. SiPM study 1. Signal 2. Sensor signal uniformity dependence 3. MPPC study 1. Signal 2. Laser intensity dependence 3. Sensor signal uniformity dependence 4. Summary and future plan

Fine segmentation scintillator Read out by photon sensor -> Study of photon sensor (by Iba) Scintillator (by Editha-san) 1. Study at Niigata university Present design of GLD Calorimeter We might need smaller segmentation calorimeter  10x40x2mm strip type scinti X, Z-layer strip scinti: 10x200x2mm Tile-layer: 40x40x1mm This granularity will be checked by simulation soon MPPC

2. SiPM Study

SiPM from Russia Wire Bonding 2mm 34x34 =1156pixels 1.2mm K A about 30um Using SiPM for read out Micro Avalanche Photo Diode (APD)  Each pixel in Geiger mode Compact Suitable for WLS fiber readout 34x34=1156 pixels in small area Pixel Size : 30x30um High Gain : ~10 6 Operational at low voltage : 60~70V

YAG Laser Wave length & power: 532nm (10mJ/cm 2 ), 1064nm (20mJ/cm 2 ) Use filter : down to10 -8 Trigger : from Laser system Pulse width : <10nsec Spot size : <2um Precision of laser position : ±2um Output Circuit YAG laser & scan table system Logic Setup

Signal of laser(1064nm, 532nm) 532nm signal is smaller than 1064nm 532nm result has many noise than 1064nm  Rise time : ~10ns  Fall time : ~200ns 1064nm 65.0V 532nm 65.0V 532nm 66.0V 20mV 10mV 50nsec

Laser wave length : 1064nm Sensor bias : 66.5V 49points (7x7points) were measured Deviation (RMS) : ~28% Laser output fluctuation range : ~10% Central part showed higher PH Laser hitting area (3x3=9 pixel) 5x5 pixel area Sensor signal uniformity dependent Fluctuation histogram

Cross sectional view Cross section of X-axis line 4 and Y-axis line 4 Y-axis line 4 X-axis line4 Cutting X-axis line-4 Cutting Y-axis line-4

3. MPPC Study

MPPC from HPK MPPC :Multi Pixels Photon Counter Made by HPK and under development Compact device Works with much lower voltage than PMT (~50V) Suitable for wavelength shifter fiber We have two types of MPPC  100pixels : 10x10pixels  400pixels : 20x20pixels MPPC 400pixels MPPC 100pixels (10x10pixels) ~85um ~100um

Setup Output circuit YAG Laser Logic readout YAG Laser Wave length & power: 532nm (10mJ/cm 2 ), 1064nm (20mJ/cm 2 ) Filter : Laser intensity is down to10 -8 Trigger : from Laser system Pulse width : <10nsec Laser beam minimum spot size : <2um Precision of laser position : ±2um MPPC

Signal Rise time : ~10ns, Fall time : ~500ns + tail From the ADC graph, we calculated the Charge output of 1pixel which is ~ 2.5pc and Gain is ~1.6x10 7 for 100pixels MPPC 10mV 500nsec View from oscilloscope MPPC : 100pixels From ADC signal MPPC : 100pixe l s 0pixel (0photon) 1pixel (1photon) 2pixel (2photon) signal trigger

Laser intensity dependence For getting the best laser intensity corresponding to 1photon injection Measurement conditions  MPPC : 100pixels  Pixel position : center (X=5,Y=6)  Laser hitting area : within the 1pixel  Wavelength : 532nm  Used filter : for laser intensity down to10 -8 We think laser intensity 160 corresponds to 1photon injection, because this value is beginning of max of 1photon and min of 0photon Efficiency of 0pe, 1pe vs. Laser intensity ● : Efficiency of 0photon event ▲ : Efficiency of more than 1photon event Laser intensity 160 for 1photon injection

Pixel signal uniformity in one pixel (Position dependence between two pixels) Checked efficiency between two pixels as uniformity measurement Scanned 7points between two pixels Wavelength : 532nm Sensor bias : 49.0V Efficiency of more than 1photon event becomes minimum at the boundary line between 2pixels Efficiency vs Position ▲ : Efficiency of 0photon event ● : Efficiency of ≧ 1photon event Efficiency = # of 0 or 1photon event / # of All events pixel

Sensor signal uniformity dependent on the pixel locations Injected laser single photon to each pixel and got response Measurement conditions  MPPC : 100pixels  Sensor bias : 49.0V  Laser wavelength : 532nm, Intensity : 160  Laser hitting area is smaller than 1pixel area  Measured points are 50points that are shown as gray area ~30um ~35um Laser hitting area (smaller than 1pixel) ~85um Measured points : 50points (Gray pixels)

Pulse height = 1photon mean value – 0photon mean value Deviation of PH (RMS) : 10% Laser long term fluctuation : ≦ 5% Pulse Height 1photon mean 0photon mean Pulse height vs Pixel position Distribution of the PH # of pixels

Cross sectional view (Central part) Cross section of X-axis (line-5 + line-6) and Y-axis (line-5 + line-6) which are shown in previous slide  Central part of sensor Cutting X-axis line-5▲ + line-6▲ Cutting Y-axis line-5▲ + line-6▲ X-axis line-5 +6 Y-axis line-5+6

Cross sectional view (Edge part) X-axis line Y-axis line-9+10 Cutting X-axis line-9▲ + line-10▲ Cutting Y-axis line-9▲ + line-10▲ Cross section of X-axis (line-9 + line-10) and Y-axis (line-9 + line- 10)  Edge of sensor We can see that pulse height level and deviation look same as previous slide

Position dependence of efficiency Compare efficiencies between 0photon events and more than 1photon events Efficiency = #of 0photon (or ≧ 1photon) event / #of all photon events Edge of sensor shows low signal efficiency Central area of sensor has good efficiency Efficiency : 0photon Efficiency : ≧ 1photon

Intensity dependence at other points Efficiency : 0photon position X=8,Y=9 eff: poor position X=4,Y=3 eff: good position X=5,Y=10 eff: too bad Intensity Eff. Efficiency of more than 1photon event vs. Laser intensity 160 flat region

Efficiency : 0photon position X=8,Y=9 eff: poor position X=4,Y=3 eff: good position X=5,Y=10 eff: too bad Intensity Eff. Pulse height vs. Laser intensity 160 down

4. Summary and future plan SiPM study (position dependence)  PH uniformity was 28%(RMS), while laser fluctuation was 10%  Edge part showed low PH MPPC study (pixel position & intensity dependence)  PH uniformity was 10% (RMS), while laser long term fluctuation was less than 5%  Central part of a sensor had good efficiency while edge part showed inefficiency in the light collection  For poor efficiency pixels, their efficiency don’t increase and PH decreases as intensity increases Future of Niigata study  Try to connect scintillator strip and MPC through Wavelength- shifter fiber and to do beta-ray test  Measure more detail for 400pixels