Last Revised: 10/01/15. Senate Bill 290 has specific goal-setting requirements for all licensed and administrative staff in the State of Oregon. In 2015-16,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Advertisements

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives. 2 Student Learning Objectives Framing A Student Learning Objective is a long term, measureable, academic goal that educators.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. CONNECTING.
Welcome! Please sit with your PLC folks….
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Student Growth Objective (SGO) Evaluating SGO Quality
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Group 3 Teachers: No Growth Model Classes
Oregon Framework Focus on Student Learning & Growth Goals
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
For Charter Planning Groups. Mission Goals Educational Program Need.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Student Learning Goals
Putting the Pieces Together…. Understanding SLOs.
Teacher Evaluation Training June 30, 2014
Student Growth Goals: How Principals can Support Teachers in the Process Jenny Ray PGES Consultant KDE/NKCES.
June  Articulate the impact SLG goals have on improving student learning  Identify the characteristics of assessments that measure growth and.
Student Learning targets
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
State Scoring Guide Professional Development: Assessing the Essential Skill of Reading Level 2 -- Introduction Information provided by Oregon Department.
S TUDENT G ROWTH G OALS Fall A GENDA /T ARGETS 1. I will reflect on the Student Growth Goal (SGG) process from last year. 2. I will identify the.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
SMARTR Goals for School-Based Administrators
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES Condensed from ODE Teacher Training.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
South Dakota Student Learning Objectives Dianna Tyler.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
HOME High Quality Assessments in Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (PEPG) Systems.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
ANALYSIS AND ATTRIBUTES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENTS Coastal Carolina University.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
DISTRICT NAME HERE Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Summary)
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Office of Service Quality
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
Student Growth Goals Work Session. Goals for the day 1.Develop questions to ask teachers to determine if the SGG meets the criteria established in the.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives How to Create an SLO.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation: Writing SLOs August 2014 Presented by Aimee Kirsch.
Student Learning Objectives Briana Timmerman, Ph.D. for Rinice Sauls.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives Teamwork in Motion.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Teacher SLTs
Student Learning Goals (SLGs): Introduction and Overview
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Outcomes Review 8 components of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Understand requirements for scoring SLG goals Recognize the role of SLG goals.
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations
Student Learning Goals (SLGs): Introduction and Overview
Your SLO.
Teacher SLTs
Student Growth Measures
Presentation transcript:

Last Revised: 10/01/15

Senate Bill 290 has specific goal-setting requirements for all licensed and administrative staff in the State of Oregon. In , licensed staff and administrators must write two (2) Student Learning Goals (SLGs).

“…a change in student achievement for an individual student between two or more points in time.” Growth is… US Department of Education (2009)

1Student2 Points in Time 1 Growth Outcome Elements of Growth

Content Standards/Skills A clear statement which identifies the relevant content or skills students will grow in mastery of over the course of this goal. Example: 8.3S.2 Organize, display, and analyze relevant data, construct an evidence-based explanation of the results of a scientific investigation, and communicate the conclusions including possible sources of error. Suggest new investigations based on analysis of results. Assessments / Data Source The assessment or instrument which will be used to measure student learning and growth. Oregon currently divides assessments into one of two categories (see below). In addition to identifying the category, the specific measure (e.g., DRA, AP Test – US History) must be explicitly identified. Assessment Categories Category 1 – SMARTER Balanced and Extended Assessment *Not used in 2015/16* Category 2 – All other measures of student learning and growth. Please Note: Per ODE, a Category 2 measure must be consistently administered and scored either district- wide or school-wide. Using this guidance, a PLC-developed measure, such as a common pre-and-post assessment, would be valid for use in a SLG. A measure developed and used in only one classroom would not be considered valid for use.

Context/Students Identification of the number of students measured by the SLG, and a description of the relevant demographics, characteristics, and learning needs of the student population. Relevant characteristics are unique to each SLG, and may include (but are not limited to):  Gender / Race / Ethnicity  TAG Status  ELL Status  IEP/504 Status Context should be used, when appropriate, to inform decisions regarding growth targets and appropriate strategies/supports. Baseline Data Information regarding students’ current performance, which will be used as the “starting point” from which growth will be measured. Baseline data should generally be derived from the same measure/assessment (or type of measure/assessment) that will be used at the conclusion of the goal. It may be helpful to summarize trends or patterns in the baseline data. Sources of baseline data will vary by school, grade, and/or subject. Data can be presented in a variety of ways, including as a list, table, or as an attached file.

Student Growth Goal (Targets) / Goal Statement A clear statement of desired student growth outcomes for 100% of the student population measured by the SLG. The goal statement should specifically identify the length of the goal, both the baseline and end-of-goal data sources, and differentiated growth expectations. Growth expectations should be rigorous, yet realistic. An example goal statement structure is: By [[DATE]], 100% of [[SCHOOL NAME]]’s [[STUDENT POPULATION]] students will demonstrate growth in their [[ASSESSMENT AND RESULT BEING MEASURED]] as compared to their [[SPECIFIC BASELINE DATA]]. Growth will be differentiated as follows: Rationale A detailed description of the reasons for selecting this specific goal and growth targets. A complete rationale should explain why the goal is important to students, and why the growth targets are appropriate. Baseline Data PointGrowth Outcome 12 23

Strategies Identification of the ways in which the educator (or administrator, for principals/assistant principals) will support students in attaining the goal statement and growth outcomes identified. Strategies can be adjusted throughout the year, and should provide concrete steps by which the goal’s author will attempt to accomplish the goal. Professional Learning and Support Opportunity for the goal’s author to identify areas where additional learning, resources, or support are needed to assist students in successfully completing the goal and attaining the growth outcomes identified. This section is most powerful if then used to inform the educator’s Professional Growth Goal and to focus upon impactful or high-leverage professional learning opportunities.

Oregon’s State Assessments Smarter Balanced Extended Assessments Category 1 Commercially or Locally Developed Measures; Other State Measures DRA OAKS Science PLC-Developed Pre- and Post-Assessments for Units of Study District-Developed Assessments Other (With Principal Approval) ELPA is not recommended for , as with testing changes the baseline may not inform new results. Category 2 Category 1 is not required to be used as a data source for ! (see next slide)

The SLG Approval Checklist Baseline DataYesNo Is baseline data used to make data-driven decisions for the SLG goal, including student information from past assessments and/or pre-assessment results? Student Growth Goal (Targets) Is the SLG goal written as a “growth” goals v. “achievement” goal? (i.e. growth goals measure student learning between two or more points in time and achievement goals measure student learning at only one point in time.) Does the SLG goal describe a “target” or expected growth for all students, tiered or differentiated as needed based on baseline data? Rigor of Goals Does the goal address specific knowledge and skills aligned to the course curriculum and based on content standards? Is the SLG goal measurable and challenging, yet attainable?

By June 2016, 100% of XYZ Elementary’s 3 rd grade students will demonstrate growth in their DRA reading levels by attaining a DRA level of 38, which is considered to be “on grade level” for the end of 3 rd grade.

By June 2016, 100% of XYZ Elementary’s 3 rd grade students will demonstrate growth in their DRA reading levels as compared to their Spring 2015 DRA results. Growth will be differentiated as follows: DRA Level – Spring 2015DRA Level by June – – – – – – – 4050

Level 4 (Highest) This category applies when approximately 90% of students met their target(s) and approximately 25% of students exceeded their target(s). This category should only be selected when a substantial number of students surpassed the overall level of attainment established by the target(s). Goals are very rigorous yet attainable, and differentiated (as appropriate) for all students. Level 3 This category applies when approximately 90% of students met their target(s). Results within a few points, a few percentage points, or a few students on either side of the target(s) should be considered “met”. The bar for this category should be high and it should only be selected when it is clear that all or almost all students met the overall level of attainment established by the target(s). Goals are rigorous yet attainable and differentiated (as appropriate) for all students. Level 2 This category applies when 70-89% of students met their target(s), but those that missed the target missed by more than a few points, a few percentage points or a few students. Goals are attainable but might not be rigorous or differentiated (as appropriate) for all students. Level 1 (Lowest) This category applies when less than 70% of students meet their target(s). If a substantial proportion of students did not meet their target(s), the SLG was not met. Goals are attainable, but not rigorous. This category also applies when results are missing or incomplete.