Design Considerations for a Lightweight Modular Causeway Section (LMCS) James N. Pratt Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory US Army Engineer Research and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
St. Croix River Crossing Project Public Information Meeting
Advertisements

Ying Tung, PhD Candidate
Jimmy E. Fowler Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory
Baudette, Minnesota/Rainy River, Ontario International Bridge
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Design and Simulation of a Novel MEMS Dual Axis Accelerometer Zijun He, Advisor: Prof. Xingguo Xiong Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE. The Use of Temporary Steel Barriers in Construction Zones By Don Pyde Product Manager Trinity Highway Products.
Hydraulics.
Gas Transmission Pipelines
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
Lesson 6 Traffic Safety Protecting People While Stabilizing The Incident.
DHHB, 1ID MAINTENANCE Effects of Cold on Military Vehicles.
Probability of Collision and Damage Size for Early Design George Mermiris Supervisor: Prof. D. Vassalos.
Team Aquifers: Flow Control Device James Berg Jamison Hill Stephen Russo Scott Weeks CEE December 2004.
Solutions for Flaring & Venting CNG Marine Transportation
CE 515 Railroad Engineering
Geotechnical and Structures Laboratory Tommy Bevins US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Vicksburg, Mississippi JLOTS Force Projection from.
Problem No. 1 Figure below shows the merging of two streams to form a river. One stream has a width oh 8.2 m, depth of 3.4 m and current speed of 2.3 m/s.
SELECTION AND INSTALLATION OF BRIDGE EXPANSION JOINTS
Lease Automatic Custody Transfer
Opportunities to Innovate in Aquaculture with Composite Materials Presentation at 1 st Annual Maine Aquaculture R&D Forum January 14, 2015 Stephen Von.
Material Handling Material handling is the function of moving the right material to the right place in the right time, in the right amount, in sequence,
ITW Structural and Strength of Materials Teaching Laboratory Civil & Materials Engineering UIC November 2009.
Off-Shore Wind Energy Technologies
Structural Engineering
One Corps, One Regiment, One Team ……. Serving Soldiers, the Army, the Nation Rapid Infrastructure Development/Enhancement (RIDE) Dr. Albert J. Bush, III.
Discrete Event Simulation in Automotive Final Process System Vishvas Patel John Ma Throughput Analysis & Simulations General Motors 1999 Centerpoint Parkway.
Design Concerns. IN DEVELOPING DESIGN CONCERNS THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES/FEATURES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED Physical Physical Structural Structural.
IM MATERIAL HANDLING. Material Handling Material handling is the function of moving the right material to the right place in the right time, in the right.
THE HYDROFLOW STAR FILTER
Hoan Bridge Failure Analysis Hoan Bridge Failure Analysis Wisconsin Department of Transportation City of Milwaukee, WI December 13, 2001 City of Milwaukee,
IMPROVED CONTAINER LIFTING FRAME (ICLF). IMPROVED CONTAINER LIFTING FRAME - MARK II (ICLF-Mk II) Quantum Engineering Design, Inc (QED) 01/28/04 OBJECTIVES.
Ken YoussefiMechanical Engineering Dept. 1 Design Optimization Optimization is a component of design process The design of systems can be formulated as.
9/7/09NC Science Olympiad Coaches Clinic Under Pressure NC Science Olympiad Coaches Clinic October 3, 2009 Dr. David G. Haase Professor of Physics.
Tritium Extraction from a DCLL Blanket Prepared by: Scott Willms (LANL) Collaborators: Brad Merrill (INL), Siegfried Malang (Consultant), Clement Wong.
Reusable Stacked Design V. 4 Problem Background Tom Amundson, Drew Hanken, Laura Limon & Jacob Pinello Solution Modeling and Simulation Research Testing.
1 Homes take DUSEL NSF Preliminary Baseline Review - April 13-15, 2010 Bob Altes Engineer- ISE Water Shield Engineering Figure Courtesy PDG and LBNL Homestake.
1-1-Why Maintenance HVAC ? Increases equipment life & reliability Reduces size & scale & number of repairs Lowers maintenance costs through better.
Shape Anticipate InnovateLead Shape, Anticipate, Innovate, and Lead MAJ Jim Gray DA G-4 FP DSN JLOTS JIPT Update LCDR Shaugn Ostrowski N422 DSN.
High Speed Vessel Fendering System Design Presenters: Cameron Clark Dave Maharaj Okason Morrison Jean-Pierre Njante Alexandra Ortiz Advisor: Prof. Sadegh.
New ViaFriction General presentation H. Farstad,
LIGHTWEIGHT MODULAR CAUSEWAY SECTION (LMCS) RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOR TSV APPLICATIONS.
UNCLASSIFIED 13 Jan January 2004 LtCol Larry Ryder, USMC MCCDC USMC High Speed Vessel Project Overview.
Lecture 2: Ship structural components
Engineer Research and Development Center US Army Corps of Engineers Nearshore Breakwater System Jeffrey A. Melby, PhD.
Dr. Jimmy E. Fowler Dr. Jimmy E. Fowler Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Army Engineer Research and Development Center (601)
Engineering Analysis October 23, 2006 Team Moondogs Chris Culver Rahul Kirtikar Elias Krauklis Christopher Sampson Michael Widerquist.
FUNCTIONUSERMANUFACTURINGMARKETINGENVIRONMENTALMATERIALS MUST Aid the stability of the kayak both when moving and when stationary. Prevent roll from movement.
Innovation quality reliability Komara 7 Skimmer System (Formally Komara Mini) December 2015.
Innovation quality reliability Vikoma Vikoflex Boom System December 2015.
Chapter 11 – Forces in Fluids. Pressure The amount of pressure you exert depends on the area over which you exert force. Pressure is equal to the force.
Structural Loads.
Innovation quality reliability Vikoma Bulkhead Boom System December 2015.
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELS
(Formally Kormara Midi)
Innovation quality reliability Vikoma Neoprene Shoreguardian Boom System December 2015.
Buzz15 - Ramp Cresting Articulating Chassis System Industrial Design Award Winner 2010 FIRST World Championship FRC Team #33 Killer Bees Jim Zondag.
Summary of Platform and Hilman Rollers Deformation Studies John Amann ILC Mechanical Engineering 7/11/07.
HYDRAULICS & PNEUMATICS
Optimum Pump Performance for Process Applications
Baseline Design for Braidwood
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center’s APT Research
New Bridge Construction
PIANC Work Group SMART Rivers 2017
Forging new generations of engineers
Physics 21.
RAILWAYS, BRIDGES & TUNNELS
Forging new generations of engineers
Chia Po Lin EWTEC Lisbon PhD Thesis Edinburgh University
Effects of Cold on Military Vehicles
Presentation transcript:

Design Considerations for a Lightweight Modular Causeway Section (LMCS) James N. Pratt Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (601)

Outline Objective Desired Causeway Capabilities/Objectives Key Performance Parameters - Transportability - Durability - Deployability and Recoverability - Survivability - Trafficability - Maintainability Concept Evaluation Matrices QuestionsOutline

To convey significant factors that impact design considerations and concepts for a TSV- transportable rapidly deployable lightweight causewayObjective

Lightweight and compact ISO Compatible Rapidly transportable by and deployable from TSV/(HSC?) Minimal shipboard storage requirements Provide up to 150-ft of bridging ship-to-shore Support 70-ton XM1A tank Operate within sheltered ports and harbors (open coast?, rivers?, ?,?) Interface with existing and emerging causeway systems (i.e. INLS, MCS, NL) Interface with JLOTS lighterage and watercraft Meet requirements for maintainability, reliability, MTBF, service life, etc., Desired Causeway Capabilities/Objectives

Rapid Dredge Fill/ Quay Construction - Using Hydrobeam Barrier Modular Causeway Section (MCS) - All Steel or Composite Grounded Causeway Concept (GCC) - Bottom Founded with Hydrobeams Lightweight Modular Causeway Section (LMCS) - Floating using Airbeams Concepts Considered

Transportability Weight of system ISO compatibility - 20 ft. x 8 ft. footprint - Material Handling Equipment (MHE) compatibility TSV storage location - Last on, first off of first TSV 20 ft. 8 ft. Key Performance Parameters

Deployability and Recoverability 1.Causeway Deployment/Recovery method and time/speed - Weight and size (20-ft segment width limit?) - Mooring - Assembling/disassembling  Shipboard vs. sea-state connections/disconnections  Manual vs. automated labor Opening Size in TSV/HSC for deployment 2.Vehicle Cargo and Materials Offload Ramp and causeway interface - Surface deck deflection - Ramp system configurations? Key Performance Parameters

Trafficability Weight and speed of vehicle(s) over causeway - roll stability - deck/joint flexure - sea-state/environmental effects Number of vehicles on causeway  Entire causeway system  Per stiffened section  Clearance between vehicles Maximum lane width relative to causeway section width - M1A1 / M1A2 Abrams is 12 ft. wide Key Performance Parameters

Durability Key Performance Parameters “ Wear and tear” on fabrics - LMCS Floatation devices along ocean floor  Pneumatic tube fabric  Webbing matrix material - Deck surface from trafficking Degradation of mechanical elements (cables, hinges, etc.) - Fatigue: loading and bending life cycles  Material and design Other materials/components useful lifespan

Maintainability In-water vs. shipboard maintenance Time to repair or replace component (routine vs. emergency) Number of loading cycles prior to rehabilitation for system/component Whether or not problem is deemed “critical” - continue with operation or abort until problem is fixed - Ex: LMCS air leak(s)  Number  Location relative to load and/or stiffened section Key Performance Parameters

Survivability Potential system failures (catastrophic or non-catastrophic) - Air leaks in LMCS floatation devices  Number  Location relative to displaced load and/or stiffened section  Being examined by CHL and QED - Breakage in joint connections  Number  Location relative to displaced load and/or stiffened section Other - Severe weather and wave conditions - Collision damage Key Performance Parameters

Air Leak Holes Air Intake Manometer Survivability Floatation Device Air Leak Analysis

Graphical Results Survivability Floatation Device Air Leak Analysis

Preliminary Conclusions Internal pressure change in floatation device can be adequately predicted for non-catastrophic failure conditions Additional efforts to examine effects of multiple tubes/applied loads are ongoing Time of failure due to small arms punctures should be adequate to employ possible failure alternatives for damage control Survivability Floatation Device Air Leak Analysis

MCS: All Steel/Composite Construction GCC: Bottom-Founded With Hydrobeam Supports LMCS: Floating With Airbeam Supports Trafficability 3 Easily accomodates wheeled and tracked vehicles 2 Will accommodate wheeled and tracked vehicles 2 Will accommodate wheeled and tracked vehicles Deployability and Recoverability 1 Days to deploy 2 >12 hours 3 <12 hours Maintainability 3 Fairly easy to maintain 1 Not easily accessible for repair/replacement 2 Replacement of components could be designed for above water operation Durability 3 20 year lifespan 2 Hydrobeams replacement every 5 years 2 Airbeams replacement every 5 years Survivability 3 Will survive small arms fire 2 Can be designed to survive small arms fire 2 Can be designed to survive small arms fire Transportability 0 Not presently TSV- Transportable 2 Could be designed to be TSV transportable 3 Easily TSV-transportable Totals Evaluation of Options Considered Options Parameters Note: Rapid Dredge Fill Option omitted

LMCS Options Presently Being Evaluated Floatation with sectional stiffness derived from straps/tube pressure Floatation with sectional stiffness designed into superstructure – independent of air pressure Trafficability 22 Deployability and Recoverability 22 Maintainability 22 Durability 22 Survivability 1 Air Leaks - Deck stiffness compromised - Sinking – catastrophic - Closed Cell Foam alternative? 2 Air Leaks - Deck stiffness not compromised - Sinking – catastrophic - Closed Cell Foam alternative? Transportability 22 Options Parameters Both options viable at this point

Questions

Numerical Model Coupling of two gas equations (1)(2) Ideal gas equation Subsonic mass flow rate equation for a pressurized gas system Conditions - Subsonic (low pressure) flow - Constant vessel volume for theoretical model Floatation Device Air Leak Analysis Additional Information

Graphical Results 1/8-in., 7/32-in., and 1/2-in. air leaks Deviation in theoretical and experimental plots occurs between 16 to psia Floatation Device Air Leak Analysis Additional Information