SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards and Indicators for Quality McKinney-Vento Programs: New and Improved National Center for Homeless Education May 2006.
Advertisements

Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Theme by Richard Strauss…from 2001 A Space Odyssey, 1968: Also Sprach Zarathrustra State Systemic Improvement Plan : Challenge and Opportunity for the.
State Systemic Improvement Plan: Preparing, Planning, and Staying Informed Presentation to Louisiana ICC July 10, 2013.
SPP/APR/SSIP/SiMR Welcome to More Acronyms. Who is here? Introductions – who are you HERE? Your name cards are color coded by which group you represent.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Overview of Results Driven Accountability Assuring Compliance and Improving Results August.
State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report SPP/APR State Systemic Improvement Plan SSIP / Indicator 17.
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
NC SSIP: Top 5 Things We’ve Learned Mid-South Meeting January 7-8, 2015.
RESULTS DRIVEN ACCOUNTABILITY SSIP Implementation Support Activity 1 OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Overview of Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 1.
Special Education Updates John Payne, Interim Director Office of Exceptional Children.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Academy for New Special Education Leadership 2015.
Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education Welcome on behalf of Teri Chapman Director of Special Education Joanne Winkelman, Office.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  DIVISION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION/EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES JOHNS Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education.
State Systemic Improvement Plan March 18,  All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best supports States in.
Office of Special Education Programs US Department of Education.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Anne Lucas, WRRC/ECTA Ron Dughman, MPRRC Janey Henkel, MPRRC 2013 WRRC Leadership Forum October.
Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work. Region 2 Parent Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Conference Charleston, SC June 25, 2015 Presenter: Terry.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
SSIP Implementation Support Visit Idaho State Department of Education September 23-24, 2014.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Results Driven Accountability PRT System Support Grant Targeted Improvement Plan Cole Johnson, NDE.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
I DAHO S TATEWIDE S YSTEM OF S UPPORT (SSOS) NNSSIL Webinar – Addressing the Needs of All Students through School Improvement September 12, 2012 Steve.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Russell Frank, Ph.D. Director II Assessment and Accountability Services Mike Barney Director II Instructional Services Getting LTELs Ready for College.
Georgia Parent Mentor Kickoff: Inform, Imagine, Inspire with Results-Driven Accountability Ruth Ryder DEPUTY DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Connecticut Part C State Performance Plan Indicator 11 State Systemic Improvement Plan Phase II.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
MDE Office of Special Education Teri L. Chapman, Ed.S., Director February 17, 2016 MAASE.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
1 Stakeholder Engagement State Personnel Development Grantees Directors’ Webinar Beth Moore, Ed.D. June 11, 2015.
Arizona State Systemic Improvement Plan Update State Performance Plan / Annual Performance Report  All indicators are still significant and will be.
LEA Self-Assessment LEASA: Presentations:
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Zelphine Smith-Dixon, State Director of Special Education
Kristin Reedy, Co-Director June 24, 2016
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
School Improvement Grant - SIG 1003(g)
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Presentation transcript:

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE

Update on Idaho’s State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Boise State University Deborah Haley-Hughes Results Driven Accountability Coordinator 2

Results Driven Accountability 3  2014, U.S. Department of Education  Revised accountability system  Shifts focus to outcomes

What is the SSIP? 4 improve outcomes A comprehensive, ambitious, yet achievable multiyear plan to improve outcomes for students with disabilities. o Identify gaps o Analyze state system o Implement reforms

Today’s Goals 5  Review Phase I  Update on work in progress  Outline plan for Phase II

SSIP Phase I: Five Components 6 Component 1:Data Analysis Component 2:Analysis of State Infrastructure Component 3:State-identified Measurable Result Component 4:Selection of Improvement Strategies Component 5:Theory of Action

Component 1: Data Analysis 7 IndicatorRecommendationRationale Indicator 1: Graduation Rates Potential Option Indicator 3: Participation and Performance on Statewide Assessments Potential Option Indicator 7: Preschool Children with Improved Outcomes Potential Option No state-funded preschool in Idaho (Phase I, April 2015)

Component 1: Data Analysis 8 NAEP Reading 4 th grade All Students Proficient or Advanced 33% Students with Disabilities Proficient or Advanced 7% (Phase I, April 2015)

Component 2: Infrastructure Analysis 9 Analyzed state system  Governance  Fiscal  Quality standards  Professional development  Data  Technical assistance  Accountability Infrastructure Analysis Governance Fiscal Quality Standards Professional Development Data Technical Assistance Accountability (Phase I, April 2015)

10 Improvement opportunities based on analysis o Coordinate resources o Expand Professional Development (PD) o Collaboration Component 2: Infrastructure Analysis (Phase I, April 2015)

Component 3: Idaho’s SiMR 11 4th grade students literacy ISAT by Smarter Balance Increase the percent of 4th grade students with disabilities in Idaho who will be proficient in literacy as measured on the state summative assessment, currently ISAT by Smarter Balance. (Phase I, April 2015)

12 o Root Causes o Insufficient/poor professional development o Lack of collaboration within ISDE, LEA’s and schools o Lack of understanding of function and use of assessments o Lack of family involvement (Phase I, April 2015) Component 4: Improvement Strategies

13 o Leverage Points o Capitalize on existing initiatives and resources o Strands of Action o State o LEA o School (Phase I, April 2015)

Component 5: Theory of Action 14 o PD, technical assistance (TA), coaching o Collaboration o Assessment Practices o Family and Community Involvement If ISDE (Improvemen t Strategy) Then districts will… Then schools will… SiMR (Phase I, April 2015)

Why is it happening? How well is the solution working? What is the problem? What shall we do about it? SSIP SSIP - Phase II 15 Develop plan focusing on 1. Infrastructure development 2. Support for LEA’s implementation of evidence-based practices 3. Evaluation of implementation

First step: Narrow the SiMR? 16 Ongoing workgroups o July 2015 o Collaborated o Analyzed Data o Agreed to narrow o Developed options o August 2015 o Reviewed options for narrowing

Next step: Which regions/districts 17 Demonstration Sites o Demonstrated Need o Academic assessments o Fit (commitment to literacy/improvement) o Common core, grants, coaches network o Resources o Personnel, fiscal, PD, data, curriculum

Component 1a: Infrastructure Development 18 Specify o improvements to be made to infrastructure to support LEA’s, based on Phase I data (Phase II) Infrastructure Analysis Governance Fiscal Quality Standards Professional Development Data Technical Assistance Accountability 

19 Specify o steps to align and leverage with current improvement plans (Phase II) Component 1b: Infrastructure Development State Initiatives Idaho Comprehensive Literacy Act Idaho K-3 Comprehensive Literacy Plan Governor’s Task Force for Improving Education ELA-Literacy Division’s Common Core Coaches

20 Specify o steps to align and leverage with current improvement plans (Phase II) Component 1b: Infrastructure Development ISDE Initiatives Boise State Writing Project 21st Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC) Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Division’s School Monitoring Statewide System of Support (SSOS) Idaho Building Capacity (IBC) Project 21 st Century Community Learning Centers (CCLC)

21 Specify o key personnel, resources, expected outcomes and timelines o how ISDE will collaborate and involve stakeholders (Phase II) Component 1c/d: Infrastructure Development

Component 2: Support for LEA Implementation and Evidence-Based Practices 22 Specify o how state will support LEA’s implementing evidence-based practices o steps to implement improvement strategies o PD/TA, collaboration, assessment practices o stakeholder involvement and decision-making roles o how ISDE will involve multiple offices and agencies o how to scale up and sustain (Phase II)

Component 3: Evaluation 23 Specify: o how evaluation is aligned to Theory of Action o how the evaluation includes stakeholders o how ISDE will collect and analyze data related to implementation and outcomes o how ISDE will use the evaluation data to examine effectiveness o how SSIP will be modified as necessary (Phase II)

Phase III - Evaluation 24 Evaluate and Revise o Assess and report progress in implementing the SSIP o Justify, using data from the evaluation, the continued implementation of the SSIP without modifications o Provide a rationale for any revisions made How well is the solution working? What is the problem? Why is it happening ? What shall we do about it? SSIP

Questions and Discussion 25

State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) State Department of Education Division of Special Education Dr. Charlie Silva State Director of Special Education 26 Boise State University Deborah Haley-Hughes Results-Driven Accountability Coordinator

SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE