Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Multiple Trait Selection for Maternal Productivity D. H. Crews, Jr., P. B. Mwansa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilizing Performance Data for Livestock Selection Developed by: Celina Johnson University of Florida.
Advertisements

Lecture 3-22 Exam 3 Breeds FineMediumCoarse Most important breeds? Why so many in US?
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada The Genetics of Feed Efficiency in Cattle Dr. D.H. “Denny” Crews, Jr. Research Scientist,
Making the Web equal Profit Surfing for Genetics Dorian Garrick & Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
EPD 101 PredictingProfit… Red Angus – EPD 101. EPD 101 Members (Seedstock producers) succeed through enabling the success (profit) of their commercial.
Daryl Strohbehn, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor Iowa State University Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Ext. Cow-Calf Specialist Kansas State University.
Systems of Crossbreeding – Experiences in Research & Do’s and Don’ts R. Mark Enns Colorado State University.
G. R. Wiggans, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD M. A. Faust ABS Global,
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Economically Relevant Traits Mark Enns Colorado State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Introduction to Selection Indexes Bob Weaber, Ph.D. State Extension Specialist-Beef Genetics University of Missouri-Columbia
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Fitting cows to your environment Harvey Freetly U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA.
Identifying Genetic Antagonisms Megan Rolf Oklahoma State University.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
Genetic Evaluations & Decision Support to Improve Feed Efficiency Dorian Garrick Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
ANIMAL BREEDING IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN AGRICULTURE FROM SCIENCE TO PRACTICE May 2009 PERINATAL MORTALITY IN DAIRY CATTLE Szűcs, E., Gulyás, L.,
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Selection Decision Tools Revisited Economically Relevant Traits vs. Indicator Traits B. L. Golden California Polytechnic State University, SLO.
Sally L. Northcutt American Angus Association Selection Tools Beef Improvement Federation April 20, 2006.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
AAA Reproductive Database
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Using EPDs in Selection
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Wading through the confusion of EPDs and genomics
Presentation transcript:

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Multiple Trait Selection for Maternal Productivity D. H. Crews, Jr., P. B. Mwansa and R. A. Kemp Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada What is maternal productivity? Reproductive rate –Age at puberty –Heifer pregnancy rate, calving ease and 3 yr old rebreed rate –Persistence into profitable parities Calf growth –Direct genetics for growth –Maternal genetics  milk production Cow maintenance requirements –Weight –Intake Can’t measure this Low heritability, Difficult evaluation Everyone already does this

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Data and Information One obstacle to new index development is capturing information on “new” traits We are often limited by what data is routinely and comfortably recorded in national databases You want to measure what?!?

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Multiple Trait Selection Measure This Growth Cow weight Calves ÷ Reproductive years Evaluate This Maternal Productivity What is your MPI? Moo.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Trait Definitions Direct weaning weight Maternal weaning weight Cow weight at calf weaning –Indicator for maintenance costs Stayability –Pr(3 | 1) = probability that a female will have at least three calves given she became a dam

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Multiple Trait Selection Index: Objective The selection objective was to increase genetic potential to consistently wean heavy calves while maintaining input costs which yielded an aggregate genetic value function: MPI = v 1 WWT + v 2 MLK + v 3 CWT + v 4 STY with resulting economic weights: v 1 = 1.17 v 2 = 0.98 v 3 = v 4 = 2.39

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada MPI NCE Genetic Parameters BWTd BWTm WWTd WWTm WWTpe CWTd STYd BWTd BWTm WWTd WWTm WWTpe CWTd STYd

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Relative Emphasis The relative contribution of component traits to variation in the index –Weaning weight = 30% –Milk = 25% –Cow weight = 13% –Stayability = 27%

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Making the MPI User Friendly The MPI can be interpreted as any other EPD –It is a combination of EPD with relative economic values –The units are $ differences Information packaging is an important part of making indexes useful selection tools rather than only marketing tools The MPI can be expressed with any mean and variance –e.g. mean = 100, SD = 25

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada MPI Validation What differences in animals are we evaluating? –Is the MPI the same as selection for component traits? Separation of MPI evaluation into high and low groups –High = > 2 SD greater than the mean MPI (n = 17,328) –Low = > 2 SD less than the mean MPI (n = 11,496) –Comparison of standardized component EPD between groups What component traits are most related to the MPI?

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Component Traits in High and Low MPI Groups STY CWT MLK WWT

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada To Summarize… The MPI was developed with the breeding objective to increase genetic potential to consistently wean heavier calves over a sustained productive life while maintaining input costs Annual or generational genetic trend is expected to be positive for all component traits, however, cow weight increases would be minimal As a multiple trait index, component trait values vary: –Animals with different component EPD have similar MPI

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada … Summary The MPI places more relative emphasis on maternal characteristics and stayability than on growth Accuracy and intensity are greatly reduced when data (information) is lacking on grandprogeny MPI selection is not equivalent to selection for any of the component traits alone Validation with maternal indexes is a challenge –MPI validation is still largely to be conducted The MPI needs to be expanded to include more components, which will come with data

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada Thank you