Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
INTRODUCING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL PROCESS TO VIRGINIA November 2009.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
THE CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL: Restoring Waters of West Virginia and the Chesapeake Bay Bay TMDL Public Meeting November 4, 2009 Martinsburg, WV Rich Batiuk.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Status Report: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Clean Up Plan Presented to P otomac Roundtable by Jack E. Frye April 9, 2010.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
The Virginia Bar Association October 22, 2009 Richmond, Virginia Reginald Parrish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Update on.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
C hesapeake Bay EPA TMDLs & State WIPs: Implications for Local Governments Presentation to Water Resources Technical Committee November 12, WRTC.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
District of Columbia Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Blue Plains Regional Committee 1 District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Divsion.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL and What It Means for You Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Virginia Municipal.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee October 9, 2009 (revised) Briefing to the Water Resources.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Potomac Round Table Bay TMDL Update 4/1/2011. Schedule Dec 29,2010 EPA established Bay TMDL Dec 29,2010 EPA established Bay TMDL March/April/May/June.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
MACo Winter Conference
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Fitting the pieces together
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Approach to Setting Local Planning Goals
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit Rider The Chesapeake Bay TMDL

What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? Requirement of the Clean Water Act Identifies maximum load to the waterbody to achieve Water Quality Standards –Includes maximum point source loads –Includes maximum NPS loads In other words... a pollution budget

What is a TMDL: Overview of Bay Water Quality Problems Basics of the Bay TMDL TMDL implementation Critical role of the Counties

How did we get here? 1972 – Clean Water Act –All Streams: Fishable and Swimmable –Gives EPA Authority – Focus on Point Source 1983 – Chesapeake Agreement –3 States and DC Agree to Meet H20 Quality Standards in CWA 1999 – American Canoe Association –Consent Decree: Establish Bay TMDL By 2011

How did we get here (cont.)? 2000 – Chesapeake 2000 –Set Cleanup Goals for 2010 – Missed – Chesapeake Executive Council –Set 2 Year Milestones – Not – Pres. Obama Executive Order –Aligns Federal Agencies For Bay Restoration –Reporting Protocol –Strategy for Protection and Restoration

How did we get here (cont.)? Nov. ‘09 – EPA State Allocations –PA: N (Mil.Lbs.) & 3.16 P (Mil.Lbs.) –Sediment – TBD – But Will Be! Dec. ‘09 – Consequences Letter to States –Framework for Accountability June 1, 2010 – Preliminary Phase I WIP Aug. 1, 2010 – Draft Phase I WIP Nov. 1, 2010 – Final Phase I WIP

How did we get here (cont.)? Dec. 1, 2010 – Draft Phase II WIP June 1, 2011 – Final Phase II WIP 2011 – Final TMDL

It’s about water quality! Extensive low to no summer dissolved oxygen conditions persist throughout the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries Source: TMDL

Myth The Bay TMDL will be another paper exercise resulting in limited implementation of nutrient and sediment controls.

Fact The Chesapeake Bay TMDL will be unlike any other, being part of a comprehensive framework for implementation. This will be the most extensive and complicated TMDL ever developed.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL: The Basics Will establish a ‘pollution budget’ for N, P, and S Will establish load caps for all six Bay states and the District of Columbia Planned for completion by December 2010

The Bay science allows a local look… Phase 4 Watershed Model Phase 5 Watershed Model

Who will develop the TMDL? EPA Region 3 WPD establishes Bay Watershed TMDLs – Watershed states provide input and support on the Bay TMDL – A Stakeholder committee (WQGIT) under the CBP provides key input

The Allocation Process Identify Bay- wide target load EPA+ Identify basin- state target loads EPA+ Identify PS/ NPS target loads (Watershed Implementation Plans) States & local

Bay TMDL Schedule Fall 2009 Basin-jurisdiction target loads June 2010 Draft State Implementation Plans June 2010 Draft TMDL December 2010 Final TMDL Approved Fall 2009 TMDL public meetings June – August 2010 Public Comment Period for Final Draft TMDL (EPA) Potential State Meetings on Tributary Strategies

Current State Target Loads State Tributary Strategy Target Load DC DE MD NY PA VA WV Total State Tributary Strategy Target Load DC DE MD NY0.56 PA VA WV Total NitrogenPhosphorus All loads are in millions of pounds per year. 16

Distribution By Sector: Where are we going to get our reductions? Point Source –Treatment Plants –Industrial Dischargers –Regulated Urban Stormwater –Construction –Mines Non-Point Source –Agriculture –Septics –Forest –Harvested Forest –Non-Regulated Urban Stormwater

A TMDL is not enough! Biennial Milestones for closing identified program gaps Identify Gaps between needed controls and existing program capacity Effectiveness monitoring to assess implementation actions Contingencies are employed if effectiveness monitoring indicates that appropriate progress is not being made Chesapeake Bay TMDL: Set total nutrient and sediment caps Wasteload and load allocations Allocate at finer scales if feasible Reference other parts of package Develop Implementation plans Identifying the nutrient and sediment controls needed to meet the Basin caps Evaluate existing capacity (programmatic, funding, technical) to fully implement tributary strategies

So how do we get to a restored Bay? Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs) WIPs Serve as the Vehicle To Meet TMDL Loads

20 Watershed Implementation Plan Includes: 1.Interim and Final Target Loads by Major Basin and Sector 2.Current Program Capacity and Gap Analysis 3.Policies, Rules, Dates for Key Actions to Fill Gaps 4.Mechanisms to Account for Growth 5.Contingencies for Failed or Delayed Implementation 6.Appendix with: a.Loads divided by 303(d) segment drainage and source sector b.2-year milestone loads by jurisdiction – EPA will use to assess milestones c.No later than November 2011: Update to include loads divided by local area and controls to meet 2017 interim target load

Phased Approach Phase I – Final by Nov –Gross Allocations at Basin Level (ie: Susq.) –Broad Scale Approach –General Methods for Achieving Reductions –Not County or Sub-Basin Specific –Commitment to Engage Local Governments

Phased Approach (cont.) Phase II – Final by Nov – Allocations at Sub Basin or County Level (ie: York County) –Finer Scale Approach –More Specific Methods for Achieving Reductions at the Sub-Basin or County Level –Parameters for Engaging Local Governments

Local Government participation is critical! TMDL –Local input on allocation, etc, provide local information Implementation Planning –Identify county level loading targets, controls, support needs from state/federal governments Implementation –Upgrade WWTP – Well Maybe! –Work with conservation districts –Adopt ordinances to reduce nutrients and sediment –Smart Growth –Public Education

Status of PA WIP On Schedule – For Pre. Draft Due June 1 Document Non-Cost Share Improvements Setting Milestones For Existing Programs Reliance on Technology: Point & Non- Point Compliance Stormwater

Potential Effects on York County?

Who’s Paying? $15 Billion Estimated Cost (More Like $30B) $188 Million In Current Farm Bill –For Ag and Non-Point Source $11 Million To States –From EPA $1.5 Billion – Cardin Bill –Stormwater Grants $12 Million – Innovation Grants – NFWF

Further Information Jake Romig, York County Circuit Rider – Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay –