Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating a Roadmap for Change: Utilizing School Planning to Reculture Schools Darius S. Adamson, Sr. School Transformation Coach District and School Transformation.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
Summer Institutes 2013 Change Teacher Practice Change Student Outcomes.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Evaluating the 21st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Pitt County Schools January, 2012.
Session Materials  Wiki
NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.
Panorama High School Professional Development Teaching and Learning Framework January 10, 2013 California Standard for the Teaching Profession Engaging.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
The North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards (NCPTS) & Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) “ Beginning the School Year” Facilitated by Brian Foster.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview Jessica Garner Professional Development Lead Region 6
NC Educator Evaluation System Inter-rater Reliability Carteret County Schools Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Setting the Context 10/26/2015 page 1. Getting Students READY The central focus of READY is improving student learning... by enabling and ensuring great.
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Standards Aligned System for CFF 2008 Bootcamp Goal: Introduce and Review the Pennsylvania Department of Education’s Standards Aligned System and it’s.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
A brief introduction to
Teacher Leadership Specialist Standards and Evaluation Process Overview.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Evaluation with Fidelity A Refresher Course for School Executives Plymouth December 13,
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Completing the Summary Rating Form and End-of-Year Summative Conferencing.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
Evaluation with Fidelity A refresher course for teacher-evaluators.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Beaufort County Schools April 19, 2012.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards These standards serve as the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development.
Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity School Executive Training Pitt County Schools January, 2012.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
The Year of Core Instruction
NC Educator Evaluation System Overview
Align Combine Design.
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
English Teacher of School “Naslednik”,
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1

DRAFT Outcomes Understand the numerous roles of the school executive during the transformation to the Common Core State Standards and North Carolina Essential Standards Clear, relevant knowledge of how the 21 st century teacher and classroom will look Clear steps to move forward Knowledge of Standards 6 and 8 Inter-rater Reliability

3 Focus on Leadership Image from Microsoft Office If it isn’t important to you…it won’t be important in your school.

Numerous roles of support 4

Assessing Your Readiness Are you ready to model 21 st century instruction?

Activity Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher. What would you see? What would you hear? What would the students be doing or saying? At your table: Discuss and record your thoughts on the chart paper provided.

DRAFT So what is 21st century education? It is bold. It breaks the mold. It is flexible, creative, challenging, and complex. It addresses a rapidly changing world filled with fantastic new problems as well as exciting new possibilities. 8

20 th Century Classroom vs. 21 st Century Classroom Teacher Centered Students work in isolation Memorizing facts Textbook Driven Student Centered Students work collaboratively Solving Problems Research Driven 9

10

11

Interactive Stations: Increase Engagement and Understanding

Classroom Observations The Quick Visit

Elements of the “Quick Visit” Content What are the students learning? How are students making sense of the content? NCPTS3: Teachers Know the Content They Teach Alignment How does this learning connect to standards? NCPTS 4: Teachers Facilitate Learning for Their Students NCPTS3: Teachers Know the Content They Teach Strategies What are the students and teacher doing? What approach are students using to attack and/or solve problems? NCPTS2 : Teachers Establish a Respectful Environment for a Diverse Population of Students Impact How does it maintain student interest and attention? Describe the impact of the strategy on students. What misconceptions do students hold and where do those misconceptions originate? 14

Let’s Practice with Standard 4 View the video Record evidence that supports Standard 4 Discuss your observations with your table The elements of a “quick visit” 15 visits/public-lessons-comparing-linear-functions/264-comparing-linear- functions-introduction ? visits/public-lessons-comparing-linear-functions/264-comparing-linear- functions-introduction

Table Activity As a group: Go to the McRel demo site –Username: Principaldemo (any number 1-40) –Password: Open a “New Observation” Complete an Abbreviated Observation using the rubric Use the “Checking Evidence” guide to review the evidence collected by your group Discuss and share your impressions with the group 16

Checking Evidence Use the self-check questions to review your evidence collection  Have I recorded only facts (not my opinion)?  Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being examined?  Whenever possible, have I avoided using words such as few, some, most?  Have I used quotation marks when quoting a teacher or student?  Does my selection or documentation of evidence indicate any personal or professional biases? 17

Next Steps? 18 Image from Microsoft online gallery

Let’s work smarter because we can’t work harder. Know all your resources. Organize your resources to work for you. Clearly communicate this initiative as a priority...it is what’s right for students. Transform your expectations for instruction. Make your expectations transparent to everyone. Meet teachers where they are, then push forward. 19

Transform your expectations for instruction 20

Make your expectations transparent to everyone. 21

Clearly communicate this initiative as a priority...it is what’s right for students. 22

Meet teachers where they are, then push forward. 23

Know all your resources 24 StateLocalSchool

Organize your resources 25

Resources Wikis 26 MESSAGING TOOLKIT

5 Minute Break

What is our goal? Student Readiness Achievement and growth for all students Great Teachers and Leaders An effective teacher in every classroom and leader in every school Before Teaching and Leading Develop effective teachers and leaders in preparation programs ▲ During Teaching and Leading Use meaningful evaluation and professional development to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders

Growth Model ▲ Teachers Principals 6 Contribute to Academic Success Academic Achievement Leadership 8 Standards 6 and 8 are measures of Growth

Growth Model ▲ Teachers Principals 6 Contribute to Academic Success Academic Achievement Leadership 8 We will use Educator Value-Added Assessment System EVAAS for standards 6 & 8 when possible

Growth Model ▲ Teachers Principals 6 Contribute to Academic Success Academic Achievement Leadership 8 How do Value-Added models work? They measure growth by predicting how well a student will perform on an assessment. How do they predict how well the student will do? They look at previous test scores and estimate how well the student should perform at the end of the year. Every student must grow based on where they start.

NCEES Wiki

Inter-rater Reliability Activity

Standard 1 Scenario with Mr. Washington Without Rubric: With Rubric:

Standard 5 Scenario with Mrs. Jones Without Rubric With Rubric:

Contact Information 38 Kimberly Simmons (c) kim.simmons222 (Skype)