Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

A detailed, systematic spatial assessment of coastal habitat, critical natural resources, and associated human uses in the tidal waters and near-shore.
Public Involvement Open Houses Develop Problem Statement Review plans, policies, regulations, and standards Identify and assess Alternate Mobility.
Maryland Department of the Environment Restoration and Regulation Discussion Presented by: Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Department of the Environment.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
Dragon Run Special Area Management Plan Photo credits: Teta Kain, FoDR David Fuss, MPPDC.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Presented to: 2010 Airports Conference By: Sue McDonald With slides by Tom Klin, CH2M HILL Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Cumulative.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
Transportation leadership you can trust. FDOT Systems Planning White Paper A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis Zones in Florida.
Developing and Refining the Biological Study Area Have you ever wondered where to start when you are setting up a Biological Study Area (BSA) for a project?
South West Study Area Introduction ► Summary of Study Area ► Unified Development Code Amendments ► Points of Interest ► Staff Recommendation ► Review.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Research in State and Provincial Travel Offices Chapter 15 Research Methodologies.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Future Transportation Projects within the Loxahatchee River Basin Florida Department of Transportation District IV 3400 W. Commercial Blvd W. Commercial.
The Importance of Baseline Data More Than Just Counting Things Presentation to Geology Matters November 14, 2013.
A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Transfer of Development Rights
Design for Health May 2007 Preliminary Checklist Cairssa Schively Design for Health.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 Land Use Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process.
S.A.V.E. is a non-profit community organization whose aim is to sustain the southern Chester County region’s rural quality of life and community character.
1 Briefing on the Round 8.0 Cooperative Forecasts Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director Department of Transportation Planning TPB Technical Committee.
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
Montgomery County Travel Forecasting Model Validation — Status Report — Status Report Presented To: TPB Travel Forecasting Subcommittee By: Montgomery.
RPS Land Use and Transportation Modeling Results Presentation to RPS TAC & MPO TAC Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit May 17, 2006.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.
FHWA Peer Exchange – January 27, 2009 A Green Infrastructure Approach.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 4: How to Develop SCEA Land Use Information How to Develop Land Use Information.
CEGR697: Geographic Information Systems Application in Transportation Chapter 3: Data Acquisition and processing Instructor: Min-Wook Kang
Regional Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Benjamin McFarlane, AICP Regional Planner NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 26, 2011.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
1 Maryland’s Scenario Building Efforts: The National Center for Smart Growth Uri Avin, FAICP Practice Leader, Regional Growth Management, PBPlacemaking.
1 Briefing on the Round 8.0 Cooperative Forecasts Paul DesJardin Department of Community Planning and Services COG Board of Directors Meeting November.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
In the ideal world… Transportation planning addresses NEPA principles. Collaboration/involvement starts in transportation planning. Planning leads to early.
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Draft Proposed Forest Legacy Areas Governor’s Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
The Crash Course for Municipal Planning Commission Members in Cumberland County 1.
ROUND 9.0 COOPERATIVE FORECASTS OF FUTURE GROWTH Paul DesJardin COG Director of Community Planning and Services COG Board of Directors March 9, 2016 Agenda.
CE 360Dr SaMeH1 Environmental Eng. 1 (CE 360) Associate Professor of Environmental Eng. Civil Engineering Department Engineering College Majma’ah University.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
1 Draft Round 7.2 Cooperative Forecasts of Population, Households, and Employment Transportation Planning Board Timothy Canan, AICP April 15, 2009 Item.
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Introduction SCEA Organization Scoping Analysis Conclusions Mitigation.
A STATE-WIDE ACTIVITY-BASED
Pre-Proposal Conference March 27, 2019, 1:00 p.m.
Presentation transcript:

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Several sub-boundaries should be considered in establishing SCEA boundary. These include: Resource Boundaries Census Tracts Extent of Preliminary/ Conceptual Alternatives Area of Traffic Influence State and Local Planning Areas Sewer/Water Service Other Several sub-boundaries should be considered in establishing SCEA boundary. These include: Resource Boundaries Census Tracts Extent of Preliminary/ Conceptual Alternatives Area of Traffic Influence State and Local Planning Areas Sewer/Water Service Other

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary SCEA DO The SCEA Geographic Boundary is a synthesis of many sub-boundaries into a single SCEA boundary. SCEA DO The SCEA Geographic Boundary is a synthesis of many sub-boundaries into a single SCEA boundary. How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Resource boundaries - Parks, forest, historic districts, watershed and sub- watershed boundaries, sensitive species protection areas, Chesapeake Bay Critical Area, etc. Census tract boundaries The census tracts which are affected by theproposed alternatives. While boundaries of census tracts may change, they show areas where substantial growth (and resource impacts) have occurred in the past and are likely to occur in the future. Extent of Preliminary/Conceptual alternatives - Area that encompasses all of the preliminary/conceptual alternatives. Resource boundaries - Parks, forest, historic districts, watershed and sub- watershed boundaries, sensitive species protection areas, Chesapeake Bay Critical Area, etc. Census tract boundaries The census tracts which are affected by theproposed alternatives. While boundaries of census tracts may change, they show areas where substantial growth (and resource impacts) have occurred in the past and are likely to occur in the future. Extent of Preliminary/Conceptual alternatives - Area that encompasses all of the preliminary/conceptual alternatives. Sub-Boundaries to Consider When Establishing the SCEA Boundary:

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Area of traffic influence - Geographic extent to which a project will affect traffic levels on nearby roadways. In MPO areas, Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) may be used, as well as travel demand models which can provide the percentage increase/decrease in traffic for the alternatives. The travel forecaster may also use professional judgement in determining the limits of traffic influence, especially for non- MPO areas. State and Local planning area boundaries - Special land use planning areas, such as Montgomery County Planning Areas, that may impact future land development. Sewer and water service locations - Existing and proposed. Other - Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Area, etc. Area of traffic influence - Geographic extent to which a project will affect traffic levels on nearby roadways. In MPO areas, Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) may be used, as well as travel demand models which can provide the percentage increase/decrease in traffic for the alternatives. The travel forecaster may also use professional judgement in determining the limits of traffic influence, especially for non- MPO areas. State and Local planning area boundaries - Special land use planning areas, such as Montgomery County Planning Areas, that may impact future land development. Sewer and water service locations - Existing and proposed. Other - Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Area, etc. Factors to Consider When Establishing the SCEA Boundary - continued

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Factors to Consider When Establishing the SCEA Boundary - continued Sub-Boundary Checklist

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Key Data Sources

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Supporting Documentation The following may be used to document and support SCEA geographical boundary decisions: Document graphically and in your SCEA narrative how the overall SCEA boundary is a synthesis of all sub- boundaries considered. Clearly record comments and recommendations received from resource agencies to use in developing the SCEA boundary. The following may be used to document and support SCEA geographical boundary decisions: Document graphically and in your SCEA narrative how the overall SCEA boundary is a synthesis of all sub- boundaries considered. Clearly record comments and recommendations received from resource agencies to use in developing the SCEA boundary.

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary SCEA was developed in conformance with Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines for Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments (revised 7/21/99). Provides good example of developing and documenting a SCEA Geographic Boundary. The SCEA Geographic Boundary was a synthesis of overlays including: -areas of traffic influence -subwatersheds -Upper Tidal Potomac River Boundary -census tracts -Other SCEA was developed in conformance with Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines for Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments (revised 7/21/99). Provides good example of developing and documenting a SCEA Geographic Boundary. The SCEA Geographic Boundary was a synthesis of overlays including: -areas of traffic influence -subwatersheds -Upper Tidal Potomac River Boundary -census tracts -Other Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary  Select link analysis conducted to determine 2020 traffic volumes with and without the current design alternative.  The difference in traffic volumes/patterns identified the extent of traffic influenced by the project.  MWCOG Round 6.1 Cooperative Forecast land use assumptions are consistent with the future land use assumptions used in the Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis.  Select link analysis conducted to determine 2020 traffic volumes with and without the current design alternative.  The difference in traffic volumes/patterns identified the extent of traffic influenced by the project.  MWCOG Round 6.1 Cooperative Forecast land use assumptions are consistent with the future land use assumptions used in the Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis. Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Area of Traffic Influence

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary  The current design alternative’s area of traffic influence lies within six subwatersheds of the Potomac River Basin including: -Cameron Run, Fairfax County, Virginia -Four Mile Run, Fairfax County, Virginia -Belle Haven subwatersheds, Fairfax County, Virginia -Oxon Run, Prince George’s County, Maryland -Broad Creek, Prince George’s County, Maryland -Hanson Creek, Prince George’s County, Maryland  The current design alternative’s area of traffic influence lies within six subwatersheds of the Potomac River Basin including: -Cameron Run, Fairfax County, Virginia -Four Mile Run, Fairfax County, Virginia -Belle Haven subwatersheds, Fairfax County, Virginia -Oxon Run, Prince George’s County, Maryland -Broad Creek, Prince George’s County, Maryland -Hanson Creek, Prince George’s County, Maryland Subwatersheds Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary  Considered since same land use areas within the areas of traffic influence drain directly into the Potomac River Basin. Not all of the areas within the SCEA Geographical Boundary drain into the subwatersheds.  The Upper Potomac Tidal River Boundary (USGS) is the area that may potentially receive drainage from the areas of traffic influence.  The subwatershed boundaries along with Upper Tidal Potomac River boundary predominantly defined the SCEA Geographic Boundary limits along the Potomac River.  Considered since same land use areas within the areas of traffic influence drain directly into the Potomac River Basin. Not all of the areas within the SCEA Geographical Boundary drain into the subwatersheds.  The Upper Potomac Tidal River Boundary (USGS) is the area that may potentially receive drainage from the areas of traffic influence.  The subwatershed boundaries along with Upper Tidal Potomac River boundary predominantly defined the SCEA Geographic Boundary limits along the Potomac River. Upper Tidal Potomac River Boundary Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary  A total of 192 census tracts are situated within the SCEA Geographical Boundary.  The area of traffic influence is situated within an area that includes 35 of these census tracts.  Census tracts represent areas that can be studied for historic and projected changes in: -population -housing -employment -land use  A total of 192 census tracts are situated within the SCEA Geographical Boundary.  The area of traffic influence is situated within an area that includes 35 of these census tracts.  Census tracts represent areas that can be studied for historic and projected changes in: -population -housing -employment -land use Census Data Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary  Alexandria Historic District (National Register of Historic Places listed).  Maryland communities adjacent to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge (including Forest Heights and Oxon Hill).  Alexandria Historic District (National Register of Historic Places listed).  Maryland communities adjacent to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge (including Forest Heights and Oxon Hill). Other Considerations Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Woodrow Wilson Bridge Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Woodrow Wilson Bridge SCEA Geographical Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Direct Impacts as Shown in the MD 5 Environmental Assessment NOTE: Strikethroughs indicate resources that should not be used in creating a SCEA geographic boundary.

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Consultation with Charles County Planning Department identified no development contingent upon construction of any of the study alternatives retained for detailed study. Secondarily impacted resources therefore were not considered in establishing the SCEA Geographic Boundary.

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Resource Sub-Boundaries (continued)

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Watershed Boundaries

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Subwatershed Boundaries

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Census Tract Boundaries

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Election District and Hughesville Designated Place Boundaries

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project Eastern Boundary Shared sub-watershed boundary/election district boundary Northern Boundary Synthesis of election district boundary and Hughesville Census Designated Place Western Boundary Synthesis of election districts and sub-watershed boundaries Southern Boundaries Election district boundaries Eastern Boundary Shared sub-watershed boundary/election district boundary Northern Boundary Synthesis of election district boundary and Hughesville Census Designated Place Western Boundary Synthesis of election districts and sub-watershed boundaries Southern Boundaries Election district boundaries General Description of the SCEA Geographical Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary MD 5 - Hughesville Transportation Improvement Project SCEA Geographical Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) MRECAS Sub-Boundary Resource Considerations NOTE: Anytime a particular sub-boundary type is not included in the development of the SCEA geographic boundary, be sure to document why it was omitted.

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Employment Center Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Secondary Effects Sub-Boundaries - For this study, the geographical boundary for the secondary effects analysis was identical to the boundaries of the Middle River Employment Center (MREC). The rationale for creating this boundary was the assumption that the planned development within the employment center would constitute the short-term, indirect effects of the proposed project. Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Under current SHA Guidelines, there should not be separate secondary and cumulative effects boundaries. For the MRECAS analysis, the Middle River Employment Center study area boundary should have been synthesized into one larger SCEA geographic boundary. ! CAUTION

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) SHA guidelines recommend that a SCEA boundary synthesize multiple resource sub- boundaries into a single SCEA boundary. In this case, secondary development was assumed to be contained within a single growth boundary defined by the proposed employment center. SHA guidelines recommend that SCEA geographical boundaries be partially defined by resources. Land use is not a resource as defined by the guidelines. Land use is generally used to assess potential effects upon environmental resources. SHA guidelines recommend that a SCEA boundary synthesize multiple resource sub- boundaries into a single SCEA boundary. In this case, secondary development was assumed to be contained within a single growth boundary defined by the proposed employment center. SHA guidelines recommend that SCEA geographical boundaries be partially defined by resources. Land use is not a resource as defined by the guidelines. Land use is generally used to assess potential effects upon environmental resources.

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Direct Impacts Study Area Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Natural Environmental Cumulative Effects Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Socio-Economic Cumulative Effects Boundary

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Cumulative Effects Boundaries - The geographical boundaries for the natural environmental cumulative effects analysis encompassed the contiguous areas of three watersheds: Middle River, Bird River, and Gunpowder River. The geographical boundaries for the socio- economic cumulative effects analysis encompassed 24 Baltimore County census tracts that, together, comprised the same general area as the three watersheds. Cumulative Effects Boundaries - The geographical boundaries for the natural environmental cumulative effects analysis encompassed the contiguous areas of three watersheds: Middle River, Bird River, and Gunpowder River. The geographical boundaries for the socio- economic cumulative effects analysis encompassed 24 Baltimore County census tracts that, together, comprised the same general area as the three watersheds. One single boundary that includes a synthesis of all sub-boundaries would be the appropriate methodology for establishing a SCEA geographic boundary for MRECAS. In the case of MRECAS, a cumulative effects boundary for socio-economic analysis closely reflects the cumulative effects boundary for natural environmental analysis along with other sub- boundaries, but they were not synthesized to one overall boundary. One single boundary that includes a synthesis of all sub-boundaries would be the appropriate methodology for establishing a SCEA geographic boundary for MRECAS. In the case of MRECAS, a cumulative effects boundary for socio-economic analysis closely reflects the cumulative effects boundary for natural environmental analysis along with other sub- boundaries, but they were not synthesized to one overall boundary. ! CAUTION

Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 2: How to Establish the SCEA Geographical Boundary Middle River Employment Center Access Study (MRECAS) Possible Single SCEA Boundary Incorporating the sub- boundaries of Census Tracts, Watershed Boundaries, Employment Center, Extent of Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study and secondary effects.