L ITIGATION UNDER THE P UBLIC I NFORMATION A CT Kimberly Fuchs, Chief, PIA Litigation Section Rosalind Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, PIA Litigation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appeal and Postconviction Relief
Advertisements

© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION LAW AND MOTION.
Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Civil Investigative Demands (Anatomy and Implications) Peter A. Nolan Dawn E. Norman Winstead PC Austin, Texas April 25, 2013.
Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Act Public Act Prohibitions and Enforcement Fracking Industry Seminar Rend Lake College July 30, 2013 LISA MADIGAN.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
American Government and Politics Today
The Texas Public Information Act Texas Municipal League.
Open Records from the OAG Perspective Amanda Crawford Division Chief Open Records Division.
The Public Information Act Rights and Responsibilities of a Governmental Body Local Government Seminar January 29, 2015 Presented by: Barry Gaines.
Chapter 4 – The Court System This chapter presents dispute resolution & the courts, along with the state & federal court systems.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Pretrial Matters: Pleadings & Motions © Professor Mathis-Rutledge.
Blueprint of a Bid Protest. …well, more of a thumbnail of a bid protest.
Motion to Compel A party is entitled to secure discovery from another party without court intervention.
American Tort Law Carolyn McAllaster Clinical Professor of Law Duke University School of Law.
School of Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill© 2004 Attorney Fees in Civil Cases Mark Weidemaier District Court Judges Fall Conference.
 Trial Courts : listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputed situations.
Civil Rules Update Denton County Bench-Bar Conference April 25-26, 2013 Justice Phil Johnson Texas Supreme Court 1.
Introduction to Civil Procedure in the United States Wake Forest LLM Introduction to American Law Alan R. Palmiter – Sep
Michigan Department of Attorney General Open Meetings & Freedom of Information Acts Seminar.
ROCKDALE MEDICAL CENTER April 17 th,  Add in good faith………….  Follow policies  Seek guidance  Document.
Indiana’s Access to Public Records Act Heather Willis Neal Public Access Counselor City and Town Court Conference City and Town Court Conference October.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
Chapter 3. Purpose: Solving legal disputes and upholding legal rights.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
The American Court System Chapter 3. Why Study Law And Court System? Manager Needs Understanding Managers Involved In Court Cases As Party As Witness.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
IN-CAMERA TRIALS PRESENTED BY CLLR. FELICIA V. COLEMAN CHIEF PROSECUTOR/SGBVCU MINISTRY OF JUSTICE.
Setting up a Public Information Coordinator (PIC) System Lauren Downey, Office of the Attorney General Cary Grace, City of Austin Bob Davis, Texas Department.
The Before, During, and After of Non-Compete Agreements (updated October 2015) Presented by: Matt Veech and Andrew Pearce BoyarMiller
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Columbus Police Department August 18, 2009.
When Can You Redact Information Without Requesting an Attorney General Decision? Karen Hattaway Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views.
School District Records Lindsay Hale David Wheelus Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not.
Bidding, Contracts & Proprietary Information James Coggeshall Michael Pearle Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those.
Data Practices in Minnesota December Outline for this presentation Minnesota data practices laws Classification of government data Government entity.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Cost Rules Tamara Strain Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not constitute legal advice and.
Texas Public Information Act: An Overview Sean Nottingham Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not constitute legal.
The Public Information Act: Ethical Considerations Neal Falgoust Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter,
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Practical Tips Question and Answer Neal Falgoust Tamara Strain Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter,
2015 Legislative and Litigation Update Neal Falgoust Matt Entsminger Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General Views expressed are those.
Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee.
The Texas Public Information Act for Beginners Sean Nottingham Assistant Attorney General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter,
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Indiana Association of Cities and Towns Red Flag and Sunshine Workshop.
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
American Government and Politics Today Chapter 15 The Courts.
Chapter 18 The Judicial Branch: The Federal Court System.
GOVERNMENT LAWYER’S REPRESENTATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES Craig E. Leen City Attorney City of Coral Gables *** With special thanks to Yaneris Figueroa,
Filing and Defending a Civil Lawsuit Howard Community College Student Street Law Public Service Message Fall 2014.
Subpoenas and Expunctions
Venue Venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for the trial. Generally, proper venue is whether the injury occurred.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Texas Public Information Act: An Overview
American Government and Politics Today
Legal Basics.
ETHICAL REDACTION OF MEDICAL RECORDS – A PLAINTIFF’S VIEW
Civil Appellate Process and Duties of an Appellate Paralegal in CPS Cases By: Assistant Harris County Attorney Robert J. Hazeltine-Shedd and Sally.
We’ve Received a Public Information Request on a Government Employee – Now What? Olson & Olson 15th Annual Local Government Seminar Crystal Dozier, City.
Chapter 3 Court Systems.
Presentation transcript:

L ITIGATION UNDER THE P UBLIC I NFORMATION A CT Kimberly Fuchs, Chief, PIA Litigation Section Rosalind Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, PIA Litigation Section Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not constitute legal advice and are not official opinions of the Office of the Texas Attorney General

T HREE M OST C OMMON S UITS I.Declaratory Judgment brought by a Governmental Body (GB). II.Declaratory Judgment brought by a Third Party (TP). III.Mandamus brought by the Attorney General (AG) or the requestor. *All section references are to Chapter 552 of the Texas Government Code. Step-by-Step Process of PIA Litigation

Step 1: GB receives a request for public information. Step 2: GB requests a Letter Ruling and must comply with section Step 3: AG issues a Letter Ruling and returns the requested information to the GB. Step 4: To challenge the ruling, GB must file a lawsuit against the AG in Travis County, within 30 days of receipt of the Letter Ruling. Step 5: GB must notify requestor of lawsuit under section (b). Requestor has a right to intervene. I. Suit by a Governmental Body §§ ,.325 (slide 1 of 5)

Step 6: Pursuant to section , a GB may not raise discretionary exceptions not first raised before the AG. Step 7: Discovery is usually conducted under Level II. Section permits the information to be discovered only under a protective order. Step 8: Arrange settings through the Court Administrator's Office at (512) or New Travis County Local Rules: s/Docs/local_rules_civildistrict.pdf I. Suit by a Governmental Body §§ ,.325 (slide 2 of 5)

Step 9: Summary Judgment Hearing or Trial. Parties file requested information with court for in camera inspection under section Step 10: Final Judgment. A court may award attorneys fees and court costs to a substantially prevailing party under section (b). When the GB voluntarily releases withheld documents to a requestor, rendering the controversy moot, the requestor does not meet the requirement that he “substantially prevailed.” See Hudson v. Paxton, No CV, 2015 WL , at *4 (Tex. App.—Austin 2015, pet. denied) (mem. op.). I. Suit by a Governmental Body §§ ,.325 (slide 3 of 5)

I. Suit by a Governmental Body §§ ,.325 (slide 4 of 5) Step 10 continued… Other Orders: Agreed Final Judgment. AG must notify requestor of proposed settlement and requestor must have a reasonable time to intervene under section (c). OR Agreed Order of Dismissal for abandoned or withdrawn request under section

I. Suit by a Governmental Body §§ ,.325 (slide 5 of 5) Step 11: Appeals. Generally, a notice of appeal is due no later than 30 days after the Final Judgment. See Tex. R. App. P An appellant is entitled to one appeal to a court of appeals, but a further appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas is discretionary.

Step 1: GB receives a request for information. Step 2:GB requests a Letter Ruling and notifies Third Party under section TP may submit arguments for withholding the information. GB does not have to submit arguments, but must provide a copy of the requested information. Step 3: AG issues a Letter Ruling and returns the requested information to the GB. Be sure to keep a copy of the documents marked by the AG. II. Suit by a Third Party § (slide 1 of 3)

Step 4: TP must file a lawsuit against the AG in Travis County to challenge the ruling. Sometimes, the GB is also a defendant. Step 5: TP must notify requestor of the suit under section (b). Requestor has a right to intervene. Step 6: TP often seeks a Temporary Injunction to prevent the GB from releasing the information before the court rules. Step 7: Discovery. Pursuant to section , parties seek a copy of information at issue from GB under a Protective Order. II. Suit by a Third Party § (slide 2 of 3)

Steps 8 – 10 are the same as GB suit. Step 8: Settings. Step 9. Summary Judgment Hearing or Trial. Step 10: Final Judgment, Agreed Final Judgment, or Agreed Dismissal. II. Suit by a Third Party § (slide 3 of 3)

Step 1: GB receives a request for information. Step 2: If a GB: Refuses to request a Letter Ruling, Refuses to supply public information, or Reuses to comply with an AG determination, then… The requestor or the AG can file a suit for writ of mandamus against the GB to compel the GB to make the information available. III. Suit for Writ of Mandamus § (slide 1 of 3)

Step 3: Only the requestor or the AG can file a suit for writ of mandamus against a GB. Step 4: The requestor must file suit in the county of the GB’s main office. The requestor can sue the GB even if the AG has not issued a decision. See Kallinen v. City of Houston, 462 S.W.3d 25 (Tex. 2015). The AG must file suit in Travis County unless the suit is against a municipality with a population of 100,000 or less. Step 5: Discovery. Producing the requested information to the requestor, even under a protective order, may moot the controversy. III. Suit for Writ of Mandamus § (slide 2 of 3)

Step 6: Consult the Local Rules of the County where the lawsuit is filed for how to make settings. Step 7: Final Judgment. Step 8: Pursuant to section (a), attorney fees are mandatory for a substantially prevailing party unless the governmental body acted in reasonable reliance on a judgment, appellate decision, or attorney general decision. III. Suit for Writ of Mandamus § (slide 3 of 3)

 S UIT FOR D ECLARATORY J UDGMENT OR I NJUNCTIVE R ELIEF  An action for declaratory judgment or injunctive relief may be brought in accordance with section against a GB for violations of the PIA.  An action under this section is in addition to any other civil, administrative, or criminal action provided by the PIA or another law.  C OST C OMPLAINTS  Pursuant to section , if the GB does not act in good faith computing costs, a requestor can recover three times the amount of the overcharge. Other PIA Suits & Penalties (slide 1 of 2)

 C RIMINAL V IOLATIONS  Section Destruction, Removal, or Alteration of Public Information.  Section Distribution or Misuse of Confidential Information.  Section Failure or Refusal of Officer for Public Information to Provide Access to or Copying of Public Information. This section also sets out several affirmative defenses. Other PIA Suits & Penalties (slide 2 of 2)

Questions? Thank you! Step-by-Step Process of PIA Litigation