Cold Tuner test overview S1-Global at KEK 5-9 July 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
of LFD Compensation Study S1 Global Cryomodule
Advertisements

J. Branlard ALCPG11 – March 2011 – Eugene OR, USA Results from 9mA studies on achieving flat gradients with beam loading P K |Q L studies at FLASH.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
This lesson covers the following outcomes Unit 54 P1, P7, P8 Unit 6 P10, P11.
1 Unité mixte de recherche CNRS-IN2P3 Université Paris-Sud Orsay cedex Tél. : Fax :
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
Capture Cavity 1at A0 SIMCON2.1 with MATLAB  closed loop with max gain ( 250 )  RMS amplitude noise ≈ 0.07%  RMS phase Noise ≈ 0.2°  closed.
Phase Locked Loop Design Matt Knoll Engineering 315.
Angle Modulation.
Angle Modulation: Phase Modulation or Frequency Modulation Basic Form of FM signal: Constant Amplitude Information is contained in  (t) Define Phase.
Max V Min V 1/e * (Max V – Min V) RF pickup signal (200 ps/pt averaged over 100 pts), 7.5 µs beam τTime (µs) Pickup voltage (V)
Cost comparison of tuners H. Hayano, KEK AWLC14
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Review of LLRF system based on ATCA standard, Dec 3-4, 2007 Piezodriver and piezo control.
Shuichi Noguchi, KEK6-th ILC School, November Auxiliary Components  Input Power Coupler  HOM Dumping Coupler  Frequency Tuner  He Jacket  Magnetic.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
E. KAKO (KEK) 2010' Sept. 10 KEK Global Design Effort 1 Lorentz Force Detuning Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Test infrastructure and test programs at KEK-STF Kirk 2013/3/26TTC meeting
Qualification Tests for the ILC Blade-Tuner Carlo Pagani University of Milano & INFN Milano - LASA Material prepared by: Rocco Paparella & Angelo Bosotti.
1 Results from the 'S1-Global' cryomodule tests at KEK (8-cav. and DRFS operation) Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) LOLB-2 (June, 2011) Outline I. 8-cavity installation.
6.9 How radio works 22 October 2015 What is this image? What other information can you get from it?
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- Module Issues XFEL Linac Review R. Lange/L. Lilje Ongoing Tests Module Designs Future tests.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Lutz Lilje, DESY, TILC08 Tests with the Fast Frequency Tuners in the Saclay-I design Lutz.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
S.Noguchi (KEK) ILC08 Chicago , Nov . 17, Cavity Package Test in STF STF Phase-1 E. Kako, S. Noguchi, H. Hayano, T. Shishido, M. Sato, K. Watanabe,
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
RF system issues due to pulsed beam in ILC DR October 20, Belomestnykh, RF for pulsed beam ILC DR, IWLC2010 S. Belomestnykh Cornell University.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
ILC FAST TUNER R&D PROGRAM at FNAL Status Report CC2 Piezo Test Preliminary Results Ruben Carcagno (on behalf of the FNAL FAST TUNER Working Group) 4/5/06.
Carlo Pagani University of Milano & INFN Milano - LASA WP8 Tuner Status & Perspective ILC-HiGrade Kick-Off Meeting DESY, Hamburg 29 August 2008 Material.
DC-DC Fundamentals 1.5 Converter Control. What is Converter Control? A converter can provide a constant voltage output at various condition because of.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
ALCPG11 1 Comparison of Tuner Performance in S1-G Cryomodule Rocco Paparella, on behalf of S1-Global team.
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
GDE 4/Mar/20081 Lorentz Detuning Calculation for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the.
20 October 2010 – C.Pagani IWLC S1-Global Tuner Performance Study Carlo Pagani, on behalf of INFN Milan team.
SPL waveguide distribution system Components, configurations, potential problems D. Valuch, E. Ciapala, O. Brunner CERN AB/RF SPL collaboration meeting.
Warren Schappert Yuriy Pischalnikov FNAL SRF2011, Chicago.
Overview of long pulse experiments at NML Nikolay Solyak PXIE Program Review January 16-17, PXIE Review, N.Solyak E.Harms, S. Nagaitsev, B. Chase,
Comparison Between AM and FM Reception. 21/06/20162 FM Receiver.
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
Measurement and Instrumentation
SRF Cavities Resonance Control FNAL experience Presented by Yuriy Pischalnikov for Resonance Control Group Fermilab- Los Alamos MaRIE Project Meeting March.
Overview Step by step procedure to validate the model (slide 1 and 2) Procedure for the Ql / beam loading study (slide 3 and 4)
Microphonics Suppression in SRF cavities for Project X Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Project X Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, April 11, 2012.
Shuichi Noguchi, KEKTTC Meeting at IHEP Beijin, Slide Jack Tuner.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
FUNCTION GENERATOR.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
Chapter 6 Tutorial 6.
Latest Results on Beam Loaded Experiments at FLASH/TTF Shilun Pei October 27,
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
COMPUTER NETWORKS and INTERNETS
R. Paparella, INFN-Milan, LASA Laboratory, Segrate, Italy
SCRF 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two.
S1-G for TTC meeting Global Design Effort
Tuner system Zhenghui MI 2017/01/17
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
S1-G Webex meeting Global Design Effort
Mechanical setups Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup
Receiver Performance & Characteristics
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
Performance of Slide-jack tuner in STF-2 Cryomodule
Tuner system for CEPC MI Zhenghui 2016/09/14
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
TTC meeting, Milano Global Design Effort
Presentation transcript:

Cold Tuner test overview S1-Global at KEK 5-9 July 2010

Introduction Issues with slow tuning mechanics on cavities C2 and A4 were initially faced but corrective actions were not possible. The test time has been almost entirely focused on piezo study. Three sets of piezo measurements: – DC performances: DC voltage applied and cavity frequency shift recorded. – Pulsed performances: in view of LFD compensation a simple 2.5 ms half-sin pulse is applied and cavity dynamic response acquired. – Spectral analyses: cavity oscillations recorded both with no piezo action (microphonics) and with a large bandwidth input pulse (square wave) Almost all measurements have been performed with cavity locked in a Phase Locked Loop with 1 kHz/V FM modulation factor. – The modulation input signal is acquired, higher resolution and reproducibility is achieved if compared to direct NA measurements. Just raw data and simple analyses are presented. More detailed analyses are possible and further results could be presented in next webex meetings.

DC response – module C

DC response – module A

DC response analyses results CavityTuner Maximum nominal piezo voltage [V] Piezo configuration Max applied voltage [V] Frequency shift [Hz] C1 – FNALBlade C2 – FNALBlade C3 – DESYDESY/Saclay C4 – DESYDESY/Saclay A1 – KEKSlide Jack cent A2 – KEKSlide Jack cent A3 – KEKSlide Jack lat A4 – KEKSlide Jack lat

SIN pulse response – module C

SIN pulse response – module A

SIN pulse response – All Slide Jack DESY/Saclay Blade

SIN pulse analyses results CavityTuner Maximum nominal piezo voltage [V] Load capacitance at 2 K [  F] Piezo conf. SIN pulse amplitude [V] Maximum frequency shift in 1 ms [Hz] Best lead time from RF pulse start* [ms] Dynamic to static detuning ratio** C1-FNALBlade C2-FNALBlade C3-DESYDESY/Saclay C4-DESYDESY/Saclay A1-KEKSlide Jack cent A2-KEKSlide Jack cent A3-KEKSlide Jack lat A4-KEKSlide Jack lat * *Simple estimation obtained linearly scaling results for different piezo voltages * 0.5 ms fill-time has been considered

And last but not least: thanks to all our KEK colleagues, we had a good time working together!