Metadata for Terminology / KOS Resources NKOS Workshop 2008 Marcia Lei Zeng.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC
Alexandria Digital Library Project Integration of Knowledge Organization Systems into Digital Library Architectures Linda Hill, Olha Buchel, Greg Janée.
February Harvesting RDF metadata Building digital library portals with harvested metadata workshop EU-DL All Projects concertation meeting DELOS.
UKOLN is supported by: Bridget Robinson and Ann Chapman From analytical model to implementation and beyond CD Focus Schema Forum, CBI Conference Centre.
A Middleware Registry for the Discovery of Collections and Services Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
ISO/IEC 11179, Part 2: Classification Schemes Jim Carpenter Bureau of Labor Statistics Nancy Lawler Department of Defense Open Forum on Metadata Registries.
Scoping study of KOS registries Doug Tudhope Hypermedia Research Unit University of Glamorgan NKOS workshop 2007.
Vocabulary registries and services Doug Tudhope Hypermedia Research Unit University of Glamorgan Ecoterm, FAO, Rome, Oct 2009.
AIHW Knowledgebase Redevelopment project Trish Ryan –Head, National Data Development Unit Australian Institute of Health and Welfare –
1 Adaptive Management Portal April
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
SC32 WG2 Metadata Standards Tutorial Metadata Registries and Big Data WG2 N1945 June 9, 2014 Beijing, China.
Metadata: An Overview Katie Dunn Technology & Metadata Librarian
A J Miles Rutherford Appleton Laboratory SKOS Standards and Best Practises for USING Knowledge Organisation Systems ON THE Semantic Web NKOS workshop ECDL.
UK LOM Core How and why it came about Charles Duncan, Intrallect
Using IESR Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
Environmental Terminology Research in China HE Keqing, HE Yangfan, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering
Classification and the Metadata Registry Judith Newton NIST IRS XML Stakeholders/ XML Working Group May 18, 2004.
XML DTDs and other Alternatives: Vocabulary Markup Language (Voc-ML) Project & Friends Joseph A. Busch Director, Solutions Architecture NetLab and Friends.
Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.
1 Issues in Reusing and Sharing the Content of Thesauri and Taxonomies in OOR Marcia Zeng NKOS (Networked Knowledge Organization Systems/Services) My participating.
Metadata Registries Workshop April 15, 1998 Slide 1 of 20 ANSI X Douglas D. Mann Stewardship Naming & Identification Classification.
“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry and IEEE LOM Application Profiles Pete Johnston UKOLN, University of Bath CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG,
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Definition of a taxonomy “System for naming and organizing things into groups that share similar characteristics” Taxonomy Architectures Applications.
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. Presentation Title: Day:
Metadata and Documentation Iain Wallace Performing Arts Data Service.
Potential standardization items for the cloud computing in SC32 1 WG2 N1665 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Plenary Meeting, Berlin, Germany, June 2012 Sungjoon Lim,
CaDSR Software Users Meeting 3.1 Requirements Review 9/19/2005 caDSR Software Team Host: Denise Warzel NCICB, Assistant Director, caDSR.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
JISC Information Environment Service Registry (IESR) Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
Metadata Registries Registry: authoritative, centrally controlled store of information – W3C Web Services Glossary, 2004
1 Understanding Cataloging with DLESE Metadata Karon Kelly Katy Ginger Holly Devaul
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk DCMI Affiliates: Implications for Institutions Rosemary Russell UKOLN University.
Overview of SC 32/WG 2 Standards Projects Supporting Semantics Management Open Forum 2005 on Metadata Registries 14:45 to 15:30 13 April 2005 Larry Fitzwater.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Tutorial on XML Tag and Schema Registration in an ISO/IEC Metadata Registry Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries Tuesday, January 21, 2003; 4:45-5:30.
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 Plenary and WGs Meetings Jeju, Korea, June 25, 2009 Jeong-Dong Kim, Doo-Kwon Baik, Dongwon Jeong {kjd4u,
6 th ECDL NKOS Workshop Organisers: Doug Tudhope Traugott Koch Marianne Lykke Nielsen NKOS Workshop, Budapest, 2007.
May 2007 Registration Status Small Group Meeting 1: August 24, 2009.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
Margherita Sini, FAO 1 / 19 Using RSS to Share KOS Metadata Margherita Sini, Gauri Salokhe IV Ecoterm Vienna, Austria April.
Achieving Semantic Interoperability at the World Bank Designing the Information Architecture and Programmatically Processing Information Denise Bedford.
Controlled Vocabulary & Thesaurus Design Associative Relationships & Thesauri.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
Statistical Data and Metadata Exchange SDMX Metadata Common Vocabulary Status of project and issues ( ) Marco Pellegrino Eurostat
IESR, A Registry of Collections and Services: Using the DCMI Collection Description Profile in Practice Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
OASIS ebXML Registry Standard Open Forum 2003 on Metadata Registries 10:30 – 11:15 January 20, 2003 Kathryn Breininger The Boeing Company Chair, OASIS.
The JISC Information Environment Service Registry (IESR) Ann Apps Mimas, The University of Manchester, UK.
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
Semantics and the EPA System of Registries Gail Hodge IIa/ Consultant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 18 April 2007.
An Application Profile and Prototype Metadata Management System for Licensed Electronic Resources Adam Chandler Information Technology Librarian Central.
National Cancer Institute caDSR Briefing for Small Scale Harmonication Project Denise Warzel Associate Director, Core Infrastructure caCORE Product Line.
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.
UNIFIED MEDICAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS (UMLS)
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
Report on Eighth Open Forum on Metadata Registries, Berlin, April 2005
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
Cataloging the Internet
Disseminating Service Registry Records
JISC Information Environment Service Registry (IESR)
Presentation transcript:

Metadata for Terminology / KOS Resources NKOS Workshop 2008 Marcia Lei Zeng

Registry Types Metadata Schemas Registries Metadata Schemas Registries Elements and refinements, application profiles, schemas in different bindings … Elements and refinements, application profiles, schemas in different bindings … e,g., UKOLN e,g., UKOLN CORES RegistryCORES Registry Terminology Registries / Repositories Terminology Registries / Repositories Registries for schemes (metadata) only Registries for schemes (metadata) only Registries of the entries of vocabularies (usually accompanied by scheme’s metadata) Registries of the entries of vocabularies (usually accompanied by scheme’s metadata) e.g., OCLC Terminologies Service; e.g., OCLC Terminologies Service; BioPortal ontology repositoryOCLC Terminologies ServiceOCLC Terminologies ServiceBioPortal ontology repository Service Registries Service Registries Terminology services may be listed in a terminology registry or separately hosted in a service registry Terminology services may be listed in a terminology registry or separately hosted in a service registry Data Standards Registries (integrated) Data Standards Registries (integrated) Registries/repositories of data standards (e.g., data dictionaries, data models, schemas, and code sets) Registries/repositories of data standards (e.g., data dictionaries, data models, schemas, and code sets) Metadata Schemas Registries Metadata Schemas Registries Elements and refinements, application profiles, schemas in different bindings … Elements and refinements, application profiles, schemas in different bindings … e,g., UKOLN e,g., UKOLN CORES RegistryCORES Registry Terminology Registries / Repositories Terminology Registries / Repositories Registries for schemes (metadata) only Registries for schemes (metadata) only Registries of the entries of vocabularies (usually accompanied by scheme’s metadata) Registries of the entries of vocabularies (usually accompanied by scheme’s metadata) e.g., OCLC Terminologies Service; e.g., OCLC Terminologies Service; BioPortal ontology repositoryOCLC Terminologies ServiceOCLC Terminologies ServiceBioPortal ontology repository Service Registries Service Registries Terminology services may be listed in a terminology registry or separately hosted in a service registry Terminology services may be listed in a terminology registry or separately hosted in a service registry Data Standards Registries (integrated) Data Standards Registries (integrated) Registries/repositories of data standards (e.g., data dictionaries, data models, schemas, and code sets) Registries/repositories of data standards (e.g., data dictionaries, data models, schemas, and code sets)

1. Why do we need metadata for terminology resources? 2. What do we need to know about a terminology resource? 3. Is there a standardized set of metadata elements for terminology resources? 1. Why do we need metadata for terminology resources? 2. What do we need to know about a terminology resource? 3. Is there a standardized set of metadata elements for terminology resources?

1. Why do we need metadata for terminology resources?

Basically, metadata for terminology resources will … record specific characteristics of terminology resources facilitate the discovery of terminology resources facilitate the evaluation of the terminology resource for a particular application or use facilitate sharing, reusing, and collaboration record specific characteristics of terminology resources facilitate the discovery of terminology resources facilitate the evaluation of the terminology resource for a particular application or use facilitate sharing, reusing, and collaboration

Types of terminology registries 1) Registries providing metadata for each vocabulary and linking to vocabulary owner/provider 2) Registries providing metadata on (and linking to) any available terminology services 3) Registries providing access to the vocabulary content by downloading the complete vocabulary via access to a vocabulary’s concepts, terms and relationships 1) Registries providing metadata for each vocabulary and linking to vocabulary owner/provider 2) Registries providing metadata on (and linking to) any available terminology services 3) Registries providing access to the vocabulary content by downloading the complete vocabulary via access to a vocabulary’s concepts, terms and relationships - Golub & Tudhope, TRSS Report, 2008

Registry Terms & Vocabularies Services registering machine accessible terminology resources mapping among concepts/terms making KOS content available in different kinds of tools via terminology (web) services A simplified illustration of Terminology registries and services

Related to the terminology registries are services, which may also be listed in a terminology registry or separately hosted in a service registry. These services, based on terminology, are used for automatic classification, term expansion, disambiguation, translation, and semantic reasoning. Related to the terminology registries are services, which may also be listed in a terminology registry or separately hosted in a service registry. These services, based on terminology, are used for automatic classification, term expansion, disambiguation, translation, and semantic reasoning. Terminology-based Services

Terminology registries need to provide information about: sources used creation and revision dates provenance trustworthiness of sources quality assessment metrics for the vocabulary & source materials licensing, IP limitations flexibility for integration with other KOS specific requirements such as performance security maintainability Terminology registries need to provide information about: sources used creation and revision dates provenance trustworthiness of sources quality assessment metrics for the vocabulary & source materials licensing, IP limitations flexibility for integration with other KOS specific requirements such as performance security maintainability -- based on Elisa Kendall, 2008 The need of metadata (1) -- terminology registries

Service registries need to understand and provide information on: Data models Tool interoperability Protocol Querying and accessibility Affectivity – at what time, location, and/or use is the content applicable or valid Available formats Service registries need to understand and provide information on: Data models Tool interoperability Protocol Querying and accessibility Affectivity – at what time, location, and/or use is the content applicable or valid Available formats The need of metadata (2) -- service registries

Different agents, services, and applications need to communicate about KOS data in the form of: transferring exchange transformation mediation migration integration Different agents, services, and applications need to communicate about KOS data in the form of: transferring exchange transformation mediation migration integration The need of metadata (3) -- vocabulary users

2. What do we need to know about a terminology resource? Descriptive metadata Administrative metadata Structural metadata Descriptive metadata Administrative metadata Structural metadata

Creator? Domain or subject area? Copyright? … … ??? Need more descriptive metadata See Glossary at: x.php?option=com_swoogle_ manual&manual=glossary [ Swoogle’s Metadata Scheenshots ]

Domain / subject area? Number of triples? Number of classes? [Useful? Useable?] [ Images of : SchemaWeb Kissology scheme details kissology: classes and properties]

Relation with other vocabularies? From the website: Disease Ontology (v2.1) is based almost entirely on ICD9CM ( International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification) ;Disease Ontology (v2.1) It contains concept nodes. Disease Ontology 3 (revision 21) is based on UMLS vocabularies (including ICD9) and is currently under development.Disease Ontology 3 (revision 21) KOS type? Data model? [Images of: BioPortal 2.0 browse interface Ontology Metadata of Human Diseases

3. Is there a standardized set of metadata elements for terminology resources?

International Standard -- ISO ISO Information Technology -- Metadata registries (MDR) - Part 2 Classification* (*CLASSIFICATION schemes include: key words, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies.) ISO Information Technology -- Metadata registries (MDR) - Part 2 Classification* (*CLASSIFICATION schemes include: key words, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies.)

Figure A.1 — Classification metamodel region. Regions of the MDR metamodel containing classification scheme attributes ISO 11179

Attributes of a classification system that may be recorded in an MDR (slide 1) Designation – name – preferred designation – language identifier Definition – definition text – preferred definition – source reference – language identifier Context – administration record – description – description language identifier Designation – name – preferred designation – language identifier Definition – definition text – preferred definition – source reference – language identifier Context – administration record – description – description language identifier Classification Scheme – type name Classification Scheme Item – value – type name Classification Scheme Item Relationship – type description (boldface: datatypes containing multiple attribute components) ISO 11179

Administration Record – item identifier – registration status – administrative status – creation date – last change date – effective date – until date – change description – administrative note – explanatory comment – unresolved issue – origin Administration Record – item identifier – registration status – administrative status – creation date – last change date – effective date – until date – change description – administrative note – explanatory comment – unresolved issue – origin Reference Document – identifier – type description – language identifier – title – organization name – organization mail address Attributes of a classification system that may be recorded in an MDR (slide 2) ISO 11179

Submission – organization name – organization mail address – contact Stewardship – organization name – organization mail address – contact Submission – organization name – organization mail address – contact Stewardship – organization name – organization mail address – contact Registration Authority – organization name – organization mail address – registration authority identifier – documentation language identifier Registrar – identifier – contact Attributes of a classification system that may be recorded in an MDR (slide 3) ISO 11179

11179 Data Element Registries US National Cancer Institute - Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) US National Cancer Institute - Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Metadata Online Registry (METeOR) Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Metadata Online Registry (METeOR) US Department of Justice - Global Justice XML Data Model GJXDM US Department of Justice - Global Justice XML Data Model GJXDM US Environmental Protection Agency - Environmental Data Registry US Environmental Protection Agency - Environmental Data Registry US Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK) US National Information Exchange Model NIEM US National Information Exchange ModelNIEM Minnesota Department of Education Metadata Registry (K-12 Data) Minnesota Department of Education Metadata Registry (K-12 Data) Minnesota Department of Revenue Property Taxation (Real Estate Transactions) Minnesota Department of Revenue Property Taxation (Real Estate Transactions) US National Cancer Institute - Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) US National Cancer Institute - Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Metadata Online Registry (METeOR) Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Metadata Online Registry (METeOR) US Department of Justice - Global Justice XML Data Model GJXDM US Department of Justice - Global Justice XML Data Model GJXDM US Environmental Protection Agency - Environmental Data Registry US Environmental Protection Agency - Environmental Data Registry US Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK) US National Information Exchange Model NIEM US National Information Exchange ModelNIEM Minnesota Department of Education Metadata Registry (K-12 Data) Minnesota Department of Education Metadata Registry (K-12 Data) Minnesota Department of Revenue Property Taxation (Real Estate Transactions) Minnesota Department of Revenue Property Taxation (Real Estate Transactions)

Important additional items (in addition to “Classification” of ISO 11179) Form -- a collection of CDEs (Common Data Elements) Protocol -- a collection of Forms. For clinical trials applications, Forms correspond to Case Report Forms (CRFs) Protocols correspond to a clinical trial protocol Important additional items (in addition to “Classification” of ISO 11179) Form -- a collection of CDEs (Common Data Elements) Protocol -- a collection of Forms. For clinical trials applications, Forms correspond to Case Report Forms (CRFs) Protocols correspond to a clinical trial protocol Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) -- CDE (Common Data Element) Browser

Cancer Data Standards Repository (caDSR) -- UML (Unified Modeling Language) Model Browser

NKOS Group’s Efforts (1) NKOS Registry - Draft Set of Thesaurus Attributes, 1999 (based on Controlled Vocabulary Registry developed by Linda L. Hill and Interconnect Technologies in 1996, with some modification) NKOS Registry - Draft Set of Thesaurus Attributes, 1999 (based on Controlled Vocabulary Registry developed by Linda L. Hill and Interconnect Technologies in 1996, with some modification) Terminology Registry Scoping Study (TRSS), 2008 (PIs: Kora Golub, Doug Tudhope, Trss Final Report to JISC, UK.)

A – NKOS Registry 1998F – Hodge et al (10 th OFMR) B – NKOS Registry 2001G – National Science Digital Library Registry C – CENDIH – ISO (Information Technology – D – Ecoterm (Environmental Metadata registries (MDR)) Terminology and KOS) I – OCLC Terminology Services E – Food and Agriculture J – SPECTRUM Terminology Bank Organization (FAO) K – Taxonomy Warehouse of UN L– Vocman ( Becta Vocabulary Bank) TRSS survey report 2008 (draft) K. Golub, D. Tudhope, Aug, 7, 2008

NKOS Registry – Metadata Element Set (slide 1) Draft Set of Thesaurus Attributes, 1999 I. Product Information Product Name/Title * Variant Product Name/Title Type of Product * Product Description * Auxiliary Lists Author/Editor Current Version/Edition * Date of Current Version * Product Update Frequency * Available Format(s) and Size * Online Availability Notes URL for Examples Product Name/Title Variant Product Name/Title Type of Product Product Description Auxiliary Lists Author/Editor Current Version/Edition Date of Current Version Product Update Frequency Available Format(s) and Size Online Availability Notes URL for Examples Draft Set of Thesaurus Attributes, 1999 I. Product Information Product Name/Title * Variant Product Name/Title Type of Product * Product Description * Auxiliary Lists Author/Editor Current Version/Edition * Date of Current Version * Product Update Frequency * Available Format(s) and Size * Online Availability Notes URL for Examples Product Name/Title Variant Product Name/Title Type of Product Product Description Auxiliary Lists Author/Editor Current Version/Edition Date of Current Version Product Update Frequency Available Format(s) and Size Online Availability Notes URL for Examples TRSS Study, 2008 Added: Vocabulary type Available terminology services Vocabulary identifier * required

NKOS Registry – Metadata Element Set (slide 2) Added by TRSS Study, 2008 Purpose as given by author/publisher Used by Description of collections where used Usage case study Use in application profiles Rating URL to vocabulary users’ discussion board Change notification details Related vocabularies Overlap with related vocabularies Mappings to other vocabularies URL to tutorial for applying vocabulary Draft Set of Thesaurus Attributes, 1999 II. Scope and Usage Type of NKOS Major Subjects Minor Subjects Description of User Community and Applications Draft Set of Thesaurus Attributes, 1999 II. Scope and Usage Type of NKOS Major Subjects Minor Subjects Description of User Community and Applications

III Detailed Characteristics Language(s) * Type of Terms (e.g. concept terms, geographic names, corporate names, etc.) * Description of Overall Structure * Source of New Terminology * Number of Preferred Terms or Nodes * Number of Non-preferred Terms Types of Relationships * Arrangement of Displays (e.g., alphabetical, hierarchical, graphical) Depth of Hierarchy (maximum number of levels)Language(s) Type of Terms Description of Overall Structure Source of New Terminology Number of Preferred Terms or Nodes Number of Non-preferred Terms Types of Relationships Arrangement of Displays Depth of Hierarchy (maximum number of levels III Detailed Characteristics Language(s) * Type of Terms (e.g. concept terms, geographic names, corporate names, etc.) * Description of Overall Structure * Source of New Terminology * Number of Preferred Terms or Nodes * Number of Non-preferred Terms Types of Relationships * Arrangement of Displays (e.g., alphabetical, hierarchical, graphical) Depth of Hierarchy (maximum number of levels)Language(s) Type of Terms Description of Overall Structure Source of New Terminology Number of Preferred Terms or Nodes Number of Non-preferred Terms Types of Relationships Arrangement of Displays Depth of Hierarchy (maximum number of levels NKOS Registry – Metadata Element Set (slide 3) Added in TRSS, 2008 Total number of terms** Total number of classes** **update automatically

VII. Terms and Conditions Subscription Price by Format Licensing Availability Restrictions (or no- restrictions statement) * Subscription Price by Format Licensing Availability Restrictions (or no- restrictions statement) NKOS Registry – Metadata Element Set (slide 5) Added in TRSS, 2008 Import/download instructions Added in TRSS, 2008 Import/download instructions

Simplified in TRSS, Vocabulary provider Vocabulary provider name Vocabulary provider URL Vocabulary provider contact details NKOS Registry – Metadata Element Set (slide 6) VIII. Vendor/Provider Information … … [14 elements] IX. Contact Information … … [5 elements] X. Additional Information General Note Comments to Registry Maintainer VIII. Vendor/Provider Information … … [14 elements] IX. Contact Information … … [5 elements] X. Additional Information General Note Comments to Registry Maintainer

NEW -- Added in TRSS, 2008: 4 Terminology services Available terminology services and their APIs Type of terminology service If a mappings service, the granularity of the mappings If a mappings service, whether mappings derived automatically or manually Technical specifications (ways of access etc.) NKOS Registry – Metadata Element Set (slide 7)

Registry, Version 3 with Reference Document for Data Elements - Draft For use with Dublin Core core elements only consistent with Dublin Core elements and attributes for each element Draft developed by Diane Vizine-Goetz Last updated: June 21, 2001 Registry, Version 3 with Reference Document for Data Elements - Draft For use with Dublin Core core elements only consistent with Dublin Core elements and attributes for each element Draft developed by Diane Vizine-Goetz Last updated: June 21, NKOS Group’s Efforts (2)

KOS Title (R) Alternative Title (O) Creator (O) KOS Subject (R) Description (O) Publisher (O) Date (R) KOS Type (R) Format (R) Identifier (O) Language (R) KOS Relation (R) Rights (O) KOS Title (R) Alternative Title (O) Creator (O) KOS Subject (R) Description (O) Publisher (O) Date (R) KOS Type (R) Format (R) Identifier (O) Language (R) KOS Relation (R) Rights (O) Entity Type (R) Entity Value (O) Relationships (R) Information Given (O) Arrangement (R) Application (O) Minor Subject (O) [Should this be a qualifier of KOS Subject?] for facilitating the discovery of KOS resources, (DC- based) : for recording specific characteristics, to facilitate the evaluation of the resource for a particular application or use:

NKOS Group’s Efforts (3) KOS Types Gail Hodge, 2000

A Taxonomy of KOS Ontologies Semantic networks Thesauri Glossaries/Dictionaries Pick lists xxxxxpresenting properties xxxxxxxxxestablishing relationships: associative xxx xxxxxestablishing relationships: hierarchical xxxxxxxxx xx xxxx controlling synonyms xxxxxxxxx xxxxx eliminating ambiguity establishing x xx function Two- dimensions Term Lists: Synonym Rings Flat structure Classification & Categorization: Subject Headings Classification schemes Taxonomies Categorization schemes Relationship Models : Gazetteers Directories Authority Files Metadata-like Models: Multiple dimensions Major functions Based on Hodge, 2000, Hill et al. 2002, and Z ; ©M.L.Zeng,

Factors governing types of KOS -- Template Tudhope,05,NKOS, ECDL2005

Factors governing types of KOS -- Thesaurus Tudhope,05,NKOS, ECDL2005

Factors governing types of KOS – [AI] Ontology Tudhope,05,NKOS, ECDL2005

Are there data models defined for KOS types?

Summary Metadata for KOS resources are important to Terminology registries Service registries Vocabulary users Currently there are no standardized metadata element sets A KOS typology needs to be implemented KOS data models need to be developed and tested Metadata for KOS resources are important to Terminology registries Service registries Vocabulary users Currently there are no standardized metadata element sets A KOS typology needs to be implemented KOS data models need to be developed and tested

References Hodge, G.; Salokhe, G.; Zolly, L.; Anderson, N. (2007). Terminology Resource Registry: Descriptions for Humans and Computers. Presentation at Integrating Standards in Practice, 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries, New York City, NY USA, July 9-11, ISO/IEC 11179, Information Technology -- Metadata registries (MDR) Kendall. E. Metadata Support for OMG's Emerging Ontology & Vocabulary Management Initiative. Joint OOR-OntologySummit2008 Panel Discussion: "Developing an Ontology of Ontologies for OOR" Golub, K.; Tudhope, D. TRSS survey report 2008 (draft) Aug, 7, 2008 Hodge, G.; Salokhe, G.; Zolly, L.; Anderson, N. (2007). Terminology Resource Registry: Descriptions for Humans and Computers. Presentation at Integrating Standards in Practice, 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries, New York City, NY USA, July 9-11, ISO/IEC 11179, Information Technology -- Metadata registries (MDR) Kendall. E. Metadata Support for OMG's Emerging Ontology & Vocabulary Management Initiative. Joint OOR-OntologySummit2008 Panel Discussion: "Developing an Ontology of Ontologies for OOR" Golub, K.; Tudhope, D. TRSS survey report 2008 (draft) Aug, 7, 2008

(NKOS Website, announcements, listserv, workshop materials, etc.) Thank you!