LARP Commissioning Plans for the LHC Synchrotron-Light Monitors Alan Fisher SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LARP CM13 Port Jefferson, NY 2009-11-04.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
Advertisements

Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
From LCLS to LHC: Light from Electrons, Protons, and even Lead Ions Alan Fisher ARD Status Meeting 2011 January 6 LHC.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
BSRT Optics Design BI Days 24 th November 2011 Aurélie Rabiller BE-BI-PM.
Matching and Synchrotron Light Diagnostics F.Roncarolo, E.Bravin, S.Burger, A.Goldblatt, G.Trad.
Profile monitors, Injection Matching monitor, BSRT & BSRA LHC OP days - 19 th of January 2010 – Evian Stephane Bart Pedersen, Andrea Boccardi, Enrico Bravin,
Measurement of the absolute efficiency,
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
SCH: LEADE LPM+AG 15/12/031 Non intercepting diagnostics based on synchrotron light from a bending magnet (started as “piggy back” on transverse profile.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
SPS Syncrotron Telescope Software specifications Aurélie Goldblatt BE-BI-PM
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
SPS Synchrotron Light Monitor -BSR- Status G. TRAD E. Bravin, A. Goldblatt, F. Roncarolo.
:00: Prepared new fill B1: Q X =0.293, Q Y =0.269; lifetime = 25h ✔ B2: Q X =0.297, Q Y =0.267; lifetime = 5h ✗ Strong 50Hz and 100hz lines.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
Compton Experiment at ATF Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University for Collaborators (particularly Omori san for slides)
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Abort Gap Monitoring Randy Thurman-Keup 6 / 8 / 2004 LARP Meeting.
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
Matching monitors for SPS and LHC E. Bravin 31 March 2011.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
BSRT UPDATE LMC 02-OCT-2012 F.Roncarolo on behalf of the BSRT team W.Andreazza, E.Bravin, A.Boccardi, J-J.Gras, A.Goldblatt, M.Hamani, T.Lefevre, R.Jones,
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.
F Monitor of Beam in the Abort Gap Randy Thurman-Keup DOE Review of Tevatron Operations at FNAL March 29-31, 2005 a.k.a. Abort Gap Integrator (AGI)
LARP LHC Synchrotron-Light Monitors: Status and Possible Upgrades Alan Fisher SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LARP CM16 Montauk, NY 2011 May 17.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
LARP Additions to the LHC Synchrotron-Light Monitors Alan Fisher SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LARP CM18 Fermilab 2012 May 8.
ODR Diagnostics for Hadron Colliders Tanaji Sen APC.
G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015.
From LCLS to LHC: Light from Electrons, Protons, and even Lead Ions
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
UNIT-3 ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Beam Gas Imaging Kick-off meeting 30-Oct-2012
T980 STATUS AND CHANGES FOR
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Pulse energy measurement for the CTF lasers.
E-beam scanner experience at FNAL
Wednesday :06 Dump fill 3533: interlock BPMS in IP6
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Auxiliary Positron Source
E. Bravin, A. Goldblatt, S. Mazzoni, F. Roncarolo, M. Palm
Summary of experience with Tevatron synchrotron light diagnostics
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Lebanese Teacher Programme 18/04/2017
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
FCC-hh injection group 7
Tue :25 Beams dumped due to RF vacuum interlock
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
High resolution profile measurements
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
Limits on damping times
Status of muon monitor R&D and construction
Wire almost entirely through beam before BLM triggers dump
450 GeV Initial Commissioning with Pilot Beam - Beam Instrumentation
Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?
Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:
Report on Beam Loss Monitors
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Bunch Profiling with a Rotating Mask
Wednesday h18: 228b fill lost just before start of ramp.
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

LARP Commissioning Plans for the LHC Synchrotron-Light Monitors Alan Fisher SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LARP CM13 Port Jefferson, NY

CERN Collaborators Stéphane Bart-Pedersen Andrea Boccardi Gérard Burtin Aurélie Goldblatt Ana Guerrero Thibaut Lefevre

Synchrotron-Light Monitors Two applications: BSRT: Imaging telescope, for transverse beam profiles BSRA: Abort-gap monitor, to verify that the gap is empty When the kicker fires, particles in the gap get a partial kick and might cause a quench. Two particle types: Protons and lead ions Three light sources: Undulator radiation at injection (450 GeV) Dipole edge radiation at intermediate energy (2 to 3 TeV) Central dipole radiation at collision energy (3.5 to 7 TeV) Spectrum and focus change during ramp.

Layout: Emission and Extraction To RF cavities and IP4 To arc Cryostat Extracted light sent below the beamline. 1.6 mrad 70 m 26 m937 mm 560 mm 420 mm D3U 10 m D4 194 mm

Spectrum of Central Dipole Radiation Spectrum near Critical Frequency Normalized emission energy in dipole Frequency normalized to critical frequency Camera responds from near IR to near UV. Proton emission wavelength is too long at injection. Ion emission is too long below 3 TeV. i.e., dipole setting equivalent to 3-TeV protons Critical Wavelength vs Beam Energy Lead ions Protons Camera’s response

Undulator versus Dipole Peak of Undulator SpectrumCritical Wavelength in Dipole Undulator provides response at proton injection. But response is still poor for ions at injection. Lead ions Protons Camera’s response Lead ions Protons Camera’s response

Photoelectrons per Particle at Camera ProtonsLead Ions Dipole center Undulator Combined Dipole edge Undulator Combined Dipole center Dipole edge In the crossover region between undulator and dipole radiation: Weak signal Two comparable sources: poor focus over a narrow energy range Focus moves with energy: from undulator, to dipole edge, and then to dipole center. Dipole egde radiation is distinct from central radiation only for  >>  c

Particles per Bunch and per Fill ProtonsLead Ions Particles in a pilot bunch 5   10 7 Particles in a nominal bunch 1.15   10 7 Bunches in early fills1 to 431 to 62 Bunches in a full ring

Beam Size and Critical Wavelength Beam Energy Beam Size at Source Point Calculated Size on the Camera Increase over Magnified Size (M = 0.3) (TeV) (  m RMS) xyxyxy Protons Ions Calculation includes geometric optics, depth of field, and diffraction. 400-nm wavelength is used, except at injection, where the undulator spectrum is shifted to the red and infrared.

Photoelectrons in the Peak Pixel ProtonsLead Ions In one turn In 20 ms Pilot bunch Single nominal bunch Full ring Emission increases with energy while beam size shrinks, giving a strong variation of the signal on the peak pixel.

Abort-Gap Monitor Gated photomultiplier gets ~15% of collected light. PMT is gated off except during the 3-  s abort gap: High gain needed during gap. No saturation when filled bunches pass by. Pick off before all slits or filters for maximum light. Digitize the gap signal in ns bins. Sum over 100 ms and 1 s. Longer integration needed when emission in PMT band is weak (protons at crossover and ions at injection). Worst case signal-to-noise is 10 for 1-s integration at 10% of threshold. Requirement: Detect whether any bin has a population over 10% of the quench threshold.

Protons/100ns at Quench Threshold Original threshold specification (given only at 0.45 and 7 TeV) was too generous. BLM group provided improved models. We used Sapinski’s calculation. Ions fragment on beam screen, and deposit energy equivalent to Z protons at same point in ramp. Original specification Model for BSRA (Q4 quench) (M. Sapinski) General quench model (B. Dehning)

Re-examining the Optical Design Optical: Add focus adjustment, since source moves during the ramp. Add a calibration source. Mechanical: The optics were housed in a tube (left over from LEP). Replace with an optical table. More space for optics. Better access for adjustment. Calculations: Light level from protons and ions Can the undulator stay on at high energy? Minimize blurring from diffraction and depth of field. Improve the optics for better imaging. Monitoring abort gap even with weak light at injection.

Original Optics Housed in a Tube

Poor Access with the Present Layout

Layout of New Optical Table Alignment laser Focus trombone F1 = 4 m PMT and 15% splitter for abort gap Intermediate image Table Coordinates [mm] Cameras Slit Calibration light and target F2 = 0.75 m Beam Table Extraction mirror Shielding

New Table Installed under Beamline

4-Pass Focus Trombone 600-mm translation stage Outer trombone: 2 passes gives a 1200-mm range. Inserting 2 mirrors converts trombone to 4 passes. With a fixed extra path, the 4-pass mode spans 600 to 3000 mm.

Intensified and Gated Cameras Gated camera (turn by turn) Intensified camera Neutral- density filters 40% beamsplitter

Abort-Gap Monitor PMT Neutral- density filters Pulsed LED Motorized slit Amplifier

Commissioning: Setup for First Beam Undulator at full field Extraction mirror inserted Trombone at minimal delay (100 mm) Source (undulator) is at longest distance Inner trombone switched out No neutral-density or color filters inserted Maximum gain for intensified camera and PMT Maximum integration time for gated camera

Commissioning: 450-GeV Pilot Bunch BSRA (Abort-Gap Monitor): Set a wide gate that includes the pilot bunch. Steer first two mirrors to find a signal on the PMT. Avoid damaging PMT: Software alarm or feedback on high voltage Insert filters as needed. Shorten the gate. Verify timing using the pilot bunch. Calibrate the signal level with the pilot bunch. Reset the gate to span only the abort gap. Remove filters for sensitivity to threshold gap population.

Commissioning: 450-GeV Pilot Bunch BSRT Cameras: Adjust steering as needed to get light on cameras. Check that light remains on the PMT. 10-mm diameter photocathode, placed at intermediate waist. Adjust intensifier gain and gated-camera integration as needed. Focus by scanning the trombone (expect ±100 mm). Determine steering needed to keep light on center of cameras. Determine settings for: Pilot bunch, 1 turn (gated camera) and 20 ms (intensified camera) Nominal bunch, 1 turn and 20 ms Multiple nominal bunches

Commissioning: Ramping the Pilot Don’t change light path at first: Measure beam displacements. Measure intensity changes. But keep the detectors from saturating. At end of ramp: Resteer the light. Adjust intensity. Recalibrate the BSRA and cameras. Build up a calibration table for each energy step: Steering Intensity control

Commissioning: Automatic Operation Automatic (software) control depending on: Particle type (proton/ions) Beam charge Bunch charge Beam energy Adjustments: BSRA settings: Neutral-density filters and PMT high voltage Motorized mirrors Motorized slit on the focal plane of first focusing mirror Camera settings: Color and neutral-density filters Gain and shutter for intensified camera Integration time and framing speed for gated camera

Schedule Stored beam expected in the next couple of weeks. I will go to CERN on Nov. 28 and stay until the holiday shutdown (Dec. 19). A proton photo album for CM14?