1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Advertisements

Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Investigate the Life History of Spring Chinook Salmon and Summer Steelhead in the Grande Ronde River Basin Project Brian Jonasson Oregon Department.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Phase I Okanogan River Spring Chinook Production Proposal #29050 Sponsored By: Colville Confederated Tribes Presented By: Stephen Smith.
SELECT AREA FISHERY EVALUATION BPA Project # CEDC, ODFW, WDFW.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
UMATILLA RIVER FISH PASSAGE OPERATIONS
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Assessment of Bull Trout Populations in the Yakima River Watershed.
Spatial scales of homing and the efficacy of hatchery supplementation of wild populations Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin: What Have We Achieved and What Have We Learned After 30 Years? Richard W. Carmichael Oregon Department.
Supplementation with local, natural-origin broodstock may minimize negative fitness impacts in the wild Initial results of this study were published in.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
Rachel C. Johnson Cramer Fish Sciences & University of California Davis The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: Can hatchery and natural.
Reduced Recruitment Performance in Natural Populations of Anadromous Salmonids Associated with Hatchery- reared Fish Pacific Coast Steelhead Meeting –
Tribal Hatchery Science Principles "Knowledge is a tool, and like all tools, its impact is in the hands of the user(s)“ - Dan Brown, The Lost Symbol.
Kathryn Kostow Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife A Demonstration of Modified Selection Pressures in a Steelhead Hatchery Program on the Hood River,
Management strategies for balancing hatchery functions with natural fish protections Brad Cavallo.
Coho Reintroduction in the Upper Columbia: Using Adaptive Management to Achieve Success Fisheries Resource Management Yakama Nation.
Where are we going? Regional monitoring and evaluation of hatchery/supplementation programs.
Tucannon Endemic Steelhead – An Integrated Program picture.
Overview  Modeling to date: –Distribution of mortality –Achieving improvements with specific actions  Building scenarios  Dealing with uncertainty –
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
New genetic technology for the management of Columbia River salmon and steelhead Proposal : Parentage Based Tagging Matthew Campbell Idaho Department.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Review of relative fitness (RF) of hatchery- and natural-origin salmon and steelhead Barry Berejikian NOAA Fisheries Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
By Richard Hinrichsen, Shawn Narum, Matt Campbell, Mike Ackerman, Craig Steele, Maureen Hess, Bill Young, Barbara Shields, Brian Maschhoff Funded by: Bonneville.
ISAB Snake River Spill-Transport Review ISAB – Presentation to Council September 17, 2008.
In Search of the Lost Legions Attempting to account for Hatchery-origin steelhead returns to the Snake River Herb Pollard – NOAA –National Marine Fisheries.
ISAB Snake River 2010 Spill-Transport Review ISAB – Presentation to Council April 14, 2010.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
The Influence of Hatchery Rearing on Tucannon River Spring Chinook Michael Gallinat WDFW.
Grande Ronde Basin Spring Chinook: Relative Reproductive Success in Captive Chinook Salmon Melissa Baird 1, Ewann Berntson 1, Timothy Hoffnagle 2, Steve.
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
Evaluating Fish Response to Habitat Restoration Overview of Intensively Monitored Watershed Research in the PNW Rationale for IMW approach Extent of current.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
Evaluation of Recovery Options for Cheakamus River Steelhead Josh Korman Carl Walters Steve Martell Eric Taylor.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
CSS Oversight Committee ISAB November 15, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.
Recovery Patterns of Coded-Wire Tagged Spring Chinook Salmon in the Upper Willamette River Basin David S. Hewlett Cameron S. Sharpe Oregon Department of.
Variation in the effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing, and release practices among three supplemented steelhead populations - Hood Canal, WA.
Estimating Viable Salmonid Population Parameters for Snake River Steelhead using Genetic Stock Identification of Adult Mixtures at Lower Granite Dam Tim.
Joe Bumgarner Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Release Strategies to Improve Post-Release Performance of Hatchery Summer Steelhead in Northeast Oregon. Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Hatcheries as Habitat, Integrated vs. Segregated Hatchery Programs, and Rehab for Hatchery Fish John Carlos Garza Southwest Fisheries Science Center &
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Oncorhynchus mykiss : The Quandary of a Highly Polymorphic Species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act by: Kathryn Kostow Oregon Department of Fish and.
Performance of a New Steelhead Line Derived from Hatchery Parents Collected in Autumn in the Grande Ronde River Lance Clarke, Michael Flesher, Shelby Warren,
Implementing Hatchery Reform The Dawn of a New Beginning or more of the same old thing? Mike Delarm NOAA Fisheries.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
YKFP Spring Chinook Supplementation Assessment
On Recruitment of Steelhead in Mid Columbia Subbasins
Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop
Risk Management of Non-target Fish Taxa as Related to Salmon Supplementation Presented by: Gabriel M. Temple.
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

1 Independent Scientific Advisory Board June 12, 2003 A Review of Salmon and Steelhead Supplementation

2 Supplementation 1 is an artificial production strategy to increase abundance of a natural population, while maintaining fitness of the natural population and limiting ecological impacts on non-target species 1 RASP (1992) time Salmon Abundance

3 Conventional Strategy - Segregated Population Natural Population Hatchery Population Conventional Artificial Production vs. Supplementation Natural-origin smolts Natural-origin adults Common Migration and Marine Environments Mixture of hatchery-origin and natural-origin fish Hatchery-origin smolts Hatchery-origin adults Hatchery Strays

4 Supplementation Strategy - Integregated Population Natural Population Hatchery Population Conventional Artificial Production vs. Supplementation Natural-origin smolts Natural-origin adults Common Migration and Marine Environments Mixture of hatchery- origin and natural-origin fish Hatchery-origin smolts Hatchery-origin adults Natural-origin adults

5 Requires females spawning in a hatchery to exceed the productivity of females spawning naturally Hatchery Productivity (R a ) Natural Productivity (R w )

6 Requires reproduction of hatchery-origin adults in the wild Hatchery Component Natural Component N = 5 N = 6 N = 7 T0T0 T1T1 T2T2

7 Uncertainties Habitat: Genetic/Evolutionary: Demographic: The question still remains, is supplementation effective?

8 NOAA request: Consider the benefits and risks of supplementation to natural populations of salmon and steelhead. Council request: Can artificial and natural production be integrated to increase the capacity and productivity of the combined population over the foreseeable future.

9 The ISAB Investigated:  Ecological and Genetic Theory Applied to Supplementation  Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments  Supplementation Risk-benefit Assessment Tools

10 Genetic Theory: Genetic risks to a natural populations Natural Population Gene Pool Domestication Selection Adaptation to hatchery spawning, rearing, and release Inbreeding Depression small founding numbers produce large numbers of related individuals Outbreeding Depression horse x donkey = sterile mule fall x spring chinook = ?

11 Genetic Theory: Domestication Selection-Adaptation to a Hatchery Environment Selection is a consequence of the differential survival (production) of adults by different families Differential success of reproduction in Forks Hatchery steelhead Differential reproduction can be large among hatchery- spawned families providing the opportunity for domestication selection

12 Ecological Theory: Any benefit to population abundance depends on: Intrinsic biological parameters of the stock in its environment  Productivity of the hatchery (R a ) and natural (R w ) spawners Policy constraints and management control variables  Broodstock mining rate  Proportion of natural population that consists of hatchery-origin adults  Harvest rate  Harvest selectivity

13 Ecological Theory: Conclusions from Modeling  Ongoing supplementation can be expected to increase the number of naturally spawning salmon and the potential for harvest.  The increased population size and productivity attributable to supplementation will likely not persist once supplementation ceases.  Supplementation can reduce natural spawning fitness which will persist for some number of generations after the termination of supplementation.  Natural spawning fitness can decrease with increases in the broodstock mining rate, the harvest rate, and in the proportion of hatchery-origin versus natural-origin adults taken for broodstock.

14 Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards Abundance: Abundance of Natural-Origin Adults Abundance of Hatchery-Origin Adults Productivity: Replacement rate of Natural spawning (R w ) Replacement rate of Hatchery spawning (R a ) Long-term Fitness: R w after supplementation ceases

15 Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Adult Abundance Natural-origin and hatchery-origin adult abundance is required to confirm that hatchery-origin adults are “adding to”, not replacing or substituting for, natural- origin adults. Natural Adults Hatchery Adults Natural Adults Demographically Successful Supplementation Unsuccessful Supplementation Total Adults

16 Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Reference Streams The challenge to quantifying supplementation effects is detecting treatment effects against a background of high natural variability Productivity Variation in Oregon Steelhead

17 Reference sites are required to distinguish effects of supplementation from local background variation and out-of-basin effects. Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Reference Streams

18 Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Reference Streams Judging Supplementation as a Success or Failure? Supplemented Natural spawning adults of natural origin Supplemented Natural spawning adults of natural origin

19 Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Reference Streams Demographically Successful Supplementation Supplemented Reference Natural spawning adults of natural origin Supplemented Reference Unsuccessful Supplementation Natural spawning adults of natural origin Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Reference Streams Judging Supplementation as a Success or Failure?

20 Quantifying Benefits and Risks: Performance indicators and standards - Cohort Analysis Estimating population statistics is difficult because salmon and steelhead have very complex life-histories. Brood Year Return Year 12 3

21 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments Projects: 1. Hood River winter-run steelhead 2. Umatilla River summer-run steelhead 3. Yakima River spring-run chinook 4. Wenatchee River spring-run chinook 5. Similkameen River summer-run chinook 6. Tucannon River spring-run chinook 7. Imnaha River spring-run chinook 8. Imnaha River summer-run steelhead 9. Idaho Supplementation Studies spring-run chinook

22 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments What is known about supplementation and largely undisputed. A. There is a juvenile survival benefit attributable to rearing in the protected hatchery environment Egg-to-Smolt Survival Rate Hatchery Hood River winter-run steelhead68.0% Tucannon River spring-run chinook73.0% Natural Hood River winter-run steelhead 1.2% Tucannon River spring-run chinook 4.2%

23 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments B. Smolt-to-adult return rates (SARs) are typically higher for natural-origin adults than for hatchery-origin adults. Smolt-to-Adult Survival Rate Hatchery Hood River winter-run steelhead0.68% Tucannon River spring-run chinook 0.22% Yakima River spring-run chinook 5.85% Natural Hood River winter-run steelhead3.80% Tucannon River spring-run chinook1.63% Yakima River spring-run chinook6.50%

24 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments C. Adult replacement rate (adult recruits per spawner) is greater for hatchery than for naturally reared juveniles Adult Recruits Per Spawner Hatchery (Ra) Imnaha River spring-run chinook4.00 Tucannon River spring-run chinook 2.52 Hood River winter-run steelhead8.49 Umatilla River summer-run steelhead2.86 Natural (Rw) Imnaha River spring-run chinook0.50 Tucannon River spring-run chinook0.86 Hood River winter-run steelhead 0.94 Umatilla River summer-run steelhead0.60

25 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments D. SARs for hatchery produced smolts were substantially lower than programs targets. Consequently, the yield of adult salmon and steelhead did not achieve performance standards. 1. Based on different sets of years

26 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments E. Hatchery-origin adults on the spawning grounds in the late 1980s and early 1990s did not prevent declines in the abundance of natural-origin adults in the mid-1990s. Imnaha River Summer-run Steelhead

27 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments E. (continued) Tucannon spring-run chinook

28 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments F. Relatively large proportions of hatchery-origin adults are being used as broodfish in hatchery spawning Proportion of hatchery-origin adults used as broodfish in hatchery spawning As the proportion of hatchery-origin adults are used in hatchery spawning, projects will become increasingly more “conventional” in their management. Hatchery-origin adults from conventional production have poor natural spawning fitness.

29 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments G. Stray adults from conventional hatcheries compromise experimental designs Stray hatchery chinook salmon recovered in ISS study streams in the Clearwater subbasin during carcass surveys.

30 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments H. Stray adults from conventional hatcheries are producing de facto supplementation with the worst possible breeding protocol. ODFW data

31 Assessing Columbia River Basin Supplementation Experiments H. The full suite of performance indicators is available for only a few projects

32 ISAB Recommendations  Use supplementation sparingly.  Only use natural-origin adults from the target population as parents in hatchery spawning.  Establish and monitor performance standards.  Conduct all supplementation projects with explicit experimental designs.  Coordinate the multiple supplementation projects as a basinwide adaptive management experiment.  Ensure that individual projects are collecting the data necessary to test their effectiveness and ensure regional coordination of the multiple experiments.

33 NOAA Question NOAA: What are the benefits and risks of supplementation to natural populations? ISAB response: Benefit – Supplementation has the potential to forestall imminent extinction. Risk – Supplementation will cause a reduction in natural spawning fitness to the target population.

34 Council Question Council: Can production (natural and artificial) be integrated to increase productivity? ISAB response: Yes, but at some cost to the capacity of the natural population to be self-sustaining.