FLEGT and REDD+ reflections from VPA negotiations 4 October 2011 Julia Falconer, European Commission, DEVCO C2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADDRESSING FOREST GOVERNANCE THROUGH REDD+
Advertisements

VPA Update 7 th FLEGT annual coordination meeting European Commission.
Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
Tackling Illegal Logging and Associated Trade Lessons Learned for REDD Design and Implementation Indonesia Case Study May 28, 2009 AFP Dialogue.
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
Overview of FLEGT processes: opportunities and challenges afforded by the process to build a VPA April 25, FLEGT Week Julia Falconer, European Commission.
FLEGT/VPA & Certification Systems – Experiences from Central Africa Martin Tadoum Deputy Executive Secretary - COMIFAC C ONFERENCE FOR FUTURE G ENERATIONS,
FLEGT and Poverty Alleviation: the Potential of VPAs preliminary findings “ commissioned by the European Forest Institute’s EU FLEGT Facility - funded.
Governance and REDD. Governance failures An illness.
EU strategy for supporting FLEG regional declarations Mathieu Bousquet European Commission, DEVCO F3.
Trade & environment Case study: International Timber trade Trade & environment Case study: International Timber trade.
Law Enforcement and Compliance: Illegal logging Aniko M. Nemeth, REC April 2009.
EU Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Implementing the EU FLEGT Action Plan Bucharest, 13 October 2008 Flip van Helden, DG ENV.
Directorate General “Environment” European Commission, Brussels
FLEGT VPA Independent Market Monitoring (IMM). IMM Background IMM is a condition of some FLEGT VPAs (e.g. Indonesia) Builds on IMM proposal by EFECA in.
FLEGT Week Brussels, 10 th of October 2013 FLEGT and its impact on other drivers of deforestation.
ACRN REGIONAL WORKSHOP 2013 PROGRESS of FLEGT & REDD IN GHANA 24/09/20131.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Participants Committee, 2 nd Meeting, Gamboa, Panama, March 2009 Ghana: Multi-stakeholder Participation.
Operationalising Carbon Finance in Ghana. Roundtable Meeting November 2008 The Role of Governance and Institutions in REDD Operationalising Carbon.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility R-PP Preparation DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION August, 13 – 14, 2009.
Forest Governance, Markets and Climate Programme UK Support for the FLEGT Action Plan Hugh Speechly (DFID)
Bringing FLEGT and Certified Sustainable Supply Chains Together Alexander Hinrichs Carsten Huljus, Thomas Pichet In Producer and Processing Countries.
Links between legality and sustainability Alhassan Attah Executive Director, TIDD, Forestry Commission.
RRI Promoting Rights and Development through Climate and REDD+ Initiatives Progress and Steps Forward 28 October 2013 Oslo, Norway.
FLEGT CAMEROON: Fight against poverty & legal security in the forest sector.
The campaigning NGO for greater environmental and social justice, with a focus on forests and forest peoples rights in the policies and practices of the.
Update on FLEGT VPA processes internationally Presentation by Jannik Vaa, EU Delegation, Accra June 7th, 2011 West Africa Forest Governance Forum.
Illegal Logging and FLEGT - Elements of an IUCN Response Tim Christophersen, IUCN – The World Conservation Union June 22, 2005.
Successful strategies for supporting regional FLEG declarations Regional Conference on ”Update on the 2005 Saint Petersburg Ministerial Declaration” Tbilisi,
EU Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade Update on the EU FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) processes Beijing, 18 June.
Mechanism for Voluntary Mitigation of GHG Emissions in Colombia GEF and Carbon Finance Meeting Washington, DC - November 15 th, 2010.
Timber sector professional associations reinforcement with a view to implementing FLEGT action plan in Congo basin and West Africa Bérénice Castadot 27.
VPA Impact Monitoring. an “evidence-based policy cycle” reiterative/adjustable to steer by based on reality checks to show if implementation leads to.
By Charles K. Miller VPA Support Unit Mamba Point, Monrovia, Liberia West Africa Forest Governance Forum Held at: Grand Royal Hotel Monrovia, Liberia A.
EU FLEGT VPAs & TTAP Emily Fripp EU TTAP Manager Chatham House 9 – 10 July 2007.
Ensuring a Seat at the Table Organisation: FERN and partners Objectives: Ensuring a seat at the table for local NGOs and communities in VPA negotiation.
Critical issues facing REDD+ CPA Conference. Global Mechanisms: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), July 2010.
PRIVATE SECTOR ENGAGEMENT ON REDD+ IN VIETNAM, CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE Prepared by Vu Thanh Nam Vietnam administration of Forestry (VNFOREST)
20 February 2009 Tanzania Natural Resource Forum Carbon-Forestry Working Group 1 Conceptual and Practical Challenges in the Operationalization of REDD.
FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF OSLO REDD Design and Implementation: Legal Challenges Dr. Christina Voigt University of Oslo, Norway, Faculty of Law REDD.
Certification and FLEGT legality verification Duncan Brack Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment and Development Programme, Chatham House Forest certification.
The EU FLEGT initiative Improving governance; excluding illegal products Duncan Brack Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment & Development Programme, Chatham.
The campaigning NGO for greater environmental and social justice, with a focus on forests and forest peoples rights in the policies and practices of the.
Forest Destruction: illegal logging and related trade Chatham House meeting, 19th January 2006 Sébastien Risso, Greenpeace.
Why do corruption risks need to be addressed now? What are corruption risks in REDD+? What are risk mitigation actions? What are the tools? Who can prevent.
Timber Trade Action Plan (TTAP): Combatting illegal logging through engaging the private sector FLEGT Update Meeting: 9th October 2013, Brussels Alastair.
EU Action Plan for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade EU FLEGT Update Chatham House, London, 25 January January 2007.
Ensuring legal timber trade & strengthening forest governance Overview of VPA processes: opportunities and challenges for projects to advance FLEGT Julia.
Duncan Brack Brussels, 27 April Support to timber-producing countries 2. Trade in timber 3. Public procurement 4. Private sector initiatives.
Working Group 2 Chair: Ingwald Gschwandtl Austria Rapporteur: Malgorzata Buszko Briggs LU Oslo Expert meeting on forest law enforcement and governance.
Group 6 Impact Monitoring Session Panel: Paolo Cerutti (chair), Julia Falconer, Jo Van Brusselen Notes: Jo Van Brusselen, Clare Brogan Feedback to Plenary.
Poverty and VPAs Mary Hobley and Marlene Buchy 25 th April FLEGT week.
1 EUFLEGT.EFI.INT THE FOREST LAW ENFORCEMENT GOVERNANCE AND TRADE TEAM OF THE EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE © European Forest Institute Vincent van den Berk.
Forest Stewardship Council … because forests matter Good Forestry needs good investment – FSC as an evaluation tool for Social and Environmental compliance.
Preliminary recommendations, tools and actions Combined Highlights from Kathmandu and Bangkok meetings Estelle Fach 21 October 2011.
Local Governance Anti-Corruption & REDD in Latin America and the Caribbean.
TTF – Views on VPAs. Presentation 1.UK Market Update 2.VPA’s 1.UK Market Update 2.VPA’s.
1 New EU legislation to prevent trading in illegal timber on the EU market SARAWAK INDUSTRY UPDATE Kuching, 20 July 2009 Vincent van den Berk European.
Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in Central Asia Kassel Project financed by the European Union The objective: Promotion of legal and sustainable.
Corruption Risk Assessment for REDD+ : Kenya’s experience Geneva, Switzerland 8 December 2013.
Why do corruption risks need to be addressed now? What are corruption risks in REDD+? What are risk mitigation actions? What are the tools? Who can prevent.
1.What is FLEGT? 2.What is a VPA? 3.What is a FLEGT licence? 4.Which countries issue FLEGT licences? 5.What are the benefits of a FLEGT licence? 6.What.
Advocacy-driven monitoring Chatham House 2015 David Young
FOREST GOVERANCE AND FLEGT MASTERCLASS
Sandra Thiam (Christophe Van Orshoven and Lea Turunen)
FLEGT : lessons for participatory processes
European External Investment Plan
The New Landscape of Legality
Business in Partnership Against Corruption
THE Independent timber market monitoring: analysis of the reception of
Presentation transcript:

FLEGT and REDD+ reflections from VPA negotiations 4 October 2011 Julia Falconer, European Commission, DEVCO C2

What is FLEGT ?  International concern over illegal logging and its impacts: undermining rule of law, costing millions, depressing global prices, causing environmental degradation & fuelling conflict.  EU response: Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) action plan (2003) setting out supply- and demand-side measures to combat illegal logging: Public and business purchase policies to source legal timber Support for Producer Country governments and industry Trade agreements between producer countries and the EU – VPAs Regulation to encourage EU businesses to know their supply chains

Voluntary Partnership Agreement  A legally-binding trade agreement : EU - Partner country Aim to work together to stop illegal logging  Objectives A system to verify legal compliance of all production License and audit assures markets of legal compliance EU customs block entry of non licensed timber from partner country  Contributes to : Good governance & transparency Policy and legal reform, incl. on land tenure, access rights Effective regulation, control, anti-corruption Capacity building : govt services, operators, CSOs Better capture revenues and rents

The challenge: Trade negotiation on sensitive, sovereign issues…. Corruption Governance and accountability Contested rights to land and forest resources: Indigenous peoples rights Effectiveness of judiciary and law enforcement Definitions of legal standards and regulations Often closely linked to political elite or military Linked to Conflicts and Human rights abuses Market access linked to effectiveness of governance

Inclusion of stakeholders in clarifying &developing policy &law Negotiated consensus between stakeholders Clarity in legal framework Simplified control systems- less opportunity for corruption Verification (Evidence) of legal compliance linked to export Independent audit Publication of information on contracts, fee payment, revenue disbursement, audit reports, cases, etc Stakeholder oversight committees/ councils Strategies for Improving Governance in VPA

 Unclear legal frameworks: land use & forest access  Insufficient information systems & transparency mechanisms  Corruption, ineffective law enforcement and judicial systems  Rights/livelihood risks to local communities  Good governance is crucial to fight against illegal logging, maintaining existing forests & reducing forest degradation &loss  Markets can influence governance  Limited capacities can be a challenge FLEGT & REDD: common challenges

FLEGT & REDD common requirements Multi-stakeholder processes (trust and clarification) Credible Measurable Reportable Verifiable systems Establishing buyer confidence (carbon and timber) Control of international leakage and circumvention Mitigation of unintended negative consequences on local communities

FLEGT & REDD: building synergies  Opportunities Stronger political attention on forest issues Clarification of resource rights and tenure Strengthening of law enforcement and judicial systems  Potential areas of synergy: Build strong stakeholder platform- avoid recreating wheel Addressing the drivers of forest loss Addressing challenges of governance and illegality Building effective forest governance and management Designing and implementing robust and effective mechanisms for MRV Promoting harmonised aid delivery  Avoid conflict or competition: build ing from what exists

Key lessons from FLEGT VPA processes  Inclusiveness: Local NGOs / International NGOs Private sector treated as a partner (focus on trade) In Liberia, communities were directly involved  National negotiation in parallel with int’l VPA negotiations: Pressure to maintain momentum because of the bilateral negotiations Time for government, civil society, private sector to form their opinion, engage in the process and build trust Opportunity to actually influence decision taking  Structured process and tangible outputs Roadmap, Agreement content, Implementation structures  Implementation challenges Sustaining political momentum

FLEGT licenses (not yet) System development Formal negotiations underway Moving to negotiations Preparation, in-country consensus building Introduction to VPAs Congo C.A.R. Malaysia Indonesia Cameroon Ghana Liberia FLEGT VPA partner countries October 2011 Gabon DRC Vietnam