TDSAT SEMINAR “D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION S CENARIO IN B ROADCASTING S ECTORS ” 30/08/2008 Presented by : Avnindra Mohan ZEE NETWORK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India An introduction.
Advertisements

POLICIES GOVERNING TELECOM SECTOR THE FIRST ATTEMPT TO FORMALIZE A POLICY STATEMENT WAS MADE IN 1994 WHEN THE NATIONAL TELECOM POLICY 1994 (NTP 94)
Dispute Resolution Scenario in Cable & Broadcasting Sectors TDSAT SEMINAR December 2009 This presentation expresses the personal views of the speaker and.
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UK TELEVISION MARKET September 2002.
Amrit Lal Saha, Advocate Gauhati High Court President, Consumers’ Protection Association, Agartala (Member CAG registered with TRAI) Vice Chairperson,
Presentation By Mrs Roop Sharma President, Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) On Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting Sector 17 th July, 2010, Raipur,
What Regulations apply? The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulation, 2004 amended eight times till date. Which.
By Harmeet Singh.  When India became independent in 1947,it already had about 82,000 telephone connections which rose upto 3 million in year 1985.
Presentation By Presentation By Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) We need to Review the DAS Law and Regulations TDSAT Seminar, Gangtok (Sikkim)
MANJUL BAJPAI Indore – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
Overview & Consumer Orientation of the DTH TDSAT Seminar ; Aug 22 nd 09 ; Lucknow Anshuman Sharma Chief Legal & Regulatory Affairs Officer, Tata Sky Ltd.
Challenges of Regulation in a Digital Era 1. A pplicab le Acts 1.Cable / BroadcastingCable Television Networks Regulations Act Cable / BroadcastingBrought.
Parameswaran N., Principal Advisor (Broadcasting & Cable Services) Telecom Regulatory Authority of India.
Overview of Telecom Scenario in India (Telecom, Cable & Broadcasting) Overview of Telecom Scenario in India (Telecom, Cable & Broadcasting) K Sridhara.
Pay Channel Market: Realities & Reforms TDSAT Presentation May 2010.
1 Explosive Growth of Media Enhanced Consumer Choice- Enhanced Consumer Choice- need for convergent regulation need for convergent regulation.
Historical Perspective of Regulations under TRAI Act 1997 and Future Trends K.Sridhara Member (T), TC.
Do We Really Need Denise Huang. Agenda ITV: What’s new Industry overview Consumers’ attitudes and usage patterns What are the demands? Challenges from.
AFRICA ASIA REGULATORY CONFERENCE GAURI MORAGODA ASSISTANT DIRECTOR/LEGAL TRCSL.
TDSAT Seminar 20 th October, 2007 Srinagar Consumer Rights under the TRAI Act, 1997 & Redressal of Consumer Grievances by Indu Malhotra Sr. Advocate Supreme.
1 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Regulation of Broadcasting & Cable TV Services TDSAT Seminar on Dispute Resolution & Redressal of Consumers’ Grievances.
1 STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN BROADCASTING SECTOR IN INDIA. 20/10/2007 By : Jawahar Goel President Indian Broadcasting Federation.
Efficacy Of Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting & Cable Sector © & Presented By: Ashok Nambissan Note: Views expressed are those of the author alone.
APRESENTATIONTO TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (TDSAT) Presented by Presented by Jawahar Goel Jawahar GoelPresident Indian Broadcasting.
Cable TV Industry – INDIA
Challenges of Regulation in a Digital Era 1. A pplicab le Acts 1.Cable / BroadcastingCable Television Networks Regulations Act Cable / BroadcastingBrought.
PRESENTATION ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS UPAMANYU HAZARIKA Advocate HYDERABAD.
“Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom Sector in India” 24 th March, 2007 Ahmedabad Presentation by A.K. Sinha CMD BSNL.
TDSAT Seminar- Guwahati, Dec of 15 Status of Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Telecom & Broadcasting Sectors in India Association of Unified Telecom.
Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General CUTS International Jaipur, India CONSUMER REDRESSAL IN THE TELECOM AND CABLE SECTORS.
0 - Confidential - Project Rainbow - Update 29 October 2013.
Presentation by: Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM.
Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Telecom Sector in India MTNL Mumbai.
INDIAN C&S MARKET– DISTRIBUTION PERSPECTIVE December 18, 2005 Presentation by Shri Anuj Gandhi, President, SET Discovery Pvt. Ltd. at TDSAT Open House.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MSO and the Regulatory Framework. TRUTH AT THE GROUND LEVEL  The charges payable by MSOs to broadcasters are fixed on mutually agreed / lump–sum amounts.
CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER TRAI ACT, 1997 TDSAT SEMINAR, BOMBAY 25 TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 RAMJI SRINIVASAN.
Digital Addressable Systems
DAS - THE FUTURE REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS IN DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS (DAS) KUNAL TANDON ADVOCATE.
1 Status of Broadband New Delhi 15 December 2006 Presentation by S.C. Khanna, Secretary General Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India.
TDSAT SEMINAR Chennai 30 th August 2008 “Dispute Resolution Scenario in Telecom and Broadcasting Sector” Venue : Hotel Park Sheraton.
Slide 1.2 Introduction to Department of Telecommunications: Telecommunication services started in India in the year 1851 with the First Electric telegraph.
Seminar on Dispute Resolution in Telecom and Broadcasting Sectors TDSAT 20 th November 2010, Bangalore.
Digitalisation Heading Nowhere! TDSAT Seminar, Nainital (Uttarakhand)
Presentation By R K Arnold I.T.S. Secretary, TRAI TDSAT Seminar, Chennai on Dispute Resolution in Telecom.
TDSAT SEMINAR DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND REDRESSAL OF CONSUMER GRIEVANCES IN BROADCASTING SECTOR (March 13, 2010) Presented by: A. Mohan Executive Vice President.
Lecture 8 American Media US TV---yesterday A demonstration of television was held at the New York World’s Fair in.
Overview of Sony Pictures Television Networks Materials Presented to Sony Corporation’s Board of Directors July 18, 2011.
Overview of Sony Pictures Television Networks and Indian Regional Channels Opportunity Materials Presented to Sony Corporation’s Board of Directors July.
Consumer Rights under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 & Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – a Background Analysis.
Nov 26th, 06 STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM (FOR TELECOM & BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA Submitted to: submitted by: Tanushri mukherjee Anshul.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD – “REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM, BROADCASTING AND CABLE SERVICE SECTORS”
MANJUL BAJPAI Mumbai – “DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS”
“Growth of broadcasting & cable sectors in India & Challenges ahead” 20 th Jan’08.
The European way to think the Digital World Technological convergence and new business models: the example of TV over DSL Extending ICT Opportunities.
SERBIA Number of inhabitants: 7.2 million GDP per capita: 4,168 (in EUR, information of 2012)
Pine Grove, California Rural CableTV affiliate of The Volcano Telephone Company (ILEC) Licensed as an MVPD by FCC exemption in1983 Serving portions of.
Radio broadcasting is audio content available on platforms for people to hear news, adverts, current affairs, debates and Q&A’s. Radio broadcasting is.
DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS Vibhav Srivastava Advocate
Dispute Settlement Scenario in Telecom Sector By S C Khanna Secretary General Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India 15 th May 2010.
DR. MADABHUSHI SRIDHAR Cable TV Networks (Regulation) Act 1995.
Presentation By Mrs Roop Sharma President, Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) On Redressal of Consumer Grievances December 18th, 2005, Guwahati.
Digital Addressable Systems, Challenges & Way Forward
MANJUL BAJPAI Lucknow –
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM
MANJUL BAJPAI CHANDIGARH –
Digital Addressable Systems
GOING DIGITAL NORTH-EAST PERSPECTIVE
Presentation on Legislative Framework & Licensing
Presentation transcript:

TDSAT SEMINAR “D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION S CENARIO IN B ROADCASTING S ECTORS ” 30/08/2008 Presented by : Avnindra Mohan ZEE NETWORK

This presentation depicts the personal views of the speaker and should not be treated as the views of the Company. 1

I NDIAN T ELEVISION D ISTRIBUTION C HAIN 2 LCOs Broadcaster 7 Broadcaster 4 Broadcaster 5 Broadcaster 6 Broadcaster 1 Broadcaster 2 Broadcaster 3 Content Syndicator (Zee Turner) MSOsHITS DTH Content Syndicator (Star TV) Content Syndicator (One Alliance) LCOs 300 CHANNELS 7,000+ HEADENDS 40,000 LCOs Up linking from IndiaUp linking from Abroad Source :SSKI Reasearch IPTV SUBSCRIBERS

P RESENT S CENARIO Million e CAGR TV households % Change7%3% 4% Pay TV households % Change24%13%5%14% Cable TV households % Change22%11%3%12% DTH households % Change900%100%75%227% 3 Source: FICCI – PWC report 2008

F UTURE P ROJECTIONS  The Broadcasting Sector in India is undergoing a process of sweeping changes driven by advent of new distribution technologies such as DTH, Broadband, CAS, HITS, IPTV, etc.  A recent report by Price Water Cooper (PWC) has projected.  Indian entertainment & media industry is expected to grow at 18% compound annual growth rate (CAGR).  Reach a projected size of Rs.1 lac Crore by 2011 from its present size of Rs.43,700 Crores.  The Television industry is projected to grow 22% CAGR from Rs.19,100 Crores to Rs.51,900 Crores by  Television homes are projected to increase from 115 million in 2007 to 132 million by  The pay TV homes are projected to increase from 74 million in 2007 to 115 million in  Cable homes are projected to increase from 70 million in 2007 to 90 million by 2012 taking their penetration up from 61% of the television homes in 2007 to 68% in

CABLE SERVICES – CATEGORISED AS ESSENTIAL SERVICES  Hon’ble TDSAT in its judgment dt. 27/02/2007 in Case of Set Discovery Vs. TRAI & others has observed as under: “Cable broadcasting may not be an essential commodity in the sense that it is not an item of food without which one cannot survive, yet looking to the figures of TV viewership in this country its importance cannot be underestimated. Available figures suggest a TV viewership of 68 million for the whole country. This shows that television viewing has almost attained the status of an essential service in this country.” 5

DISPUTES 6 LCO Subscriber  Service Quality  Price discrimination  Limited choice of channels  Interruption in cable services  Change in channel placements  No effective consumer redressal system  No value for money  Non availability of channel guides

DISPUTES 7 MSO LCO  Non disclosure of complete subscriber base by LCO.  Piracy of signals/Inserting advertisements.  Non payment of subscription fees.  Non renewal of service agreements.  Frequent change in loyalty of the LCOs i.e. migration from one MSO to another leaving subscription dues/arrears.  Resistance to adapt themselves to changing technology.

DISPUTES 8 Broadcaster MSO  Subscriber base.  Territory issue – transmission in unauthorised areas.  Non payment of subscription fees.  Non renewal of service agreements.  Alleged unreasonable clauses in service agreements.  Piracy of signals/copyrights.  Resistance to adapt to changing technology.  Limited bandwidth capacity.  Change in channel placements.  Interruption of cable services at their own.  Undue advantage of regulations.  Compliance cost.

D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION 9  Main cause of disputes: INTERCONNECTION ISSUES  Resolution: DIGITALISATION AND ADDRESSABILITY i.Transparency ii.Capacity augmentation iii.Piracy checks iv.Capability to provide various value added services

D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION  Keeping consumers’ interest paramount, TDSAT in a case Kartic Chundar v Principal General Manager (2004) 2 CompLJ 86 treated six applications from individual petitioners each challenging increase in their telephone circuit rentals, as the petition from the group of consumers. TDSAT has held that since each of their cases raised the similar questions, they could be treated as group of consumers. Ultimately TDSAT ordered DOT to refund a certain portion of the increase not only to the petitioners but also to all other consumers who were similarly situated.  Section 14A of TRAI Act provides as under:  The Central Government or a State Government or a local authority or any person may make an application to the Appellate Tribunal for adjudication of any dispute referred to in clause (a) of Section 14.  The Central Government or a State Government or a local authority or any person aggrieved by any direction, decision or order made by the Authority may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. 10

H EAVY T AXATION B URDEN  Cost of provision of services increase because of various fiscal levies which need to be rationalised.  Cable and DTH services are subject to both entertainment tax & service tax unlike multiplexes and cinema halls, where no service tax is levied.  VAT on STB rentals  DTH services are subject to :  License fee – 10% of gross revenue;  Service tax – %  Entertainment tax – ranging from 20% – 30%  VAT on rentals / hire purchase of CPE  These taxes are ultimately borne by consumers, thus increasing the cost. TRAI need to take up these issues with the Govt. through its recommendations so as to enable the consumers to receive the services at an affordable price. 11

Issue of receipt and bill.  Every LCO or MSO or broadcaster, as the case may be, are mandatorily required in terms of Tariff Order dated 04/10/2007 to: –  Issue Bill to the Subscriber  Acknowledge the payment made by the subscriber.  Follow quality of service benchmarks laid down for DTH and CAS areas 12 C ONSUMER E MPOWERMENT

D ISPUTES R ESOLUTION  MSO /Cable Operators : maintaining a record of number of franchisees served & their individual HH connections through a transparent system. (Interconnection Regulations – SLR).  Timely payment & renewal of agreement. (Interconnection Regulations – SLR).  Appointing independent piracy check agencies.  Appointing independent subscriber survey agencies.  Roll out of digital addressable systems. 13

Thank You