Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Categorical Logic Categorical statements
Question tags. 1. Admit it, they were brilliant, ________________? 2. The sound wasn't brilliant, ____________? 3. Everyone had a good time, ____________?
Categorical Arguments, Claims, and Venn Diagrams Sign In! Review Group Abstractions! Categorical Arguments Types of Categorical Claims Diagramming the.
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
How can it be a syllogism if it doesn’t look like an A,E, I, or O statement? Translating “Ordinary” Sentences into the Standard Forms.
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition By David Kelsey.
C.Eng. 591 Graduate Seminar1 2.How to Give a Seminar Contents Opening Introduction Body Summary / Concluding Comments.
Immediate Inference Three Categorical Operations
Chapter 9 Categorical Logic w07
Categorical Logic l A useful type of “real world” logic commonly used for characterizing relationships l Applications in law, business contracts, natural.
Verbs Definition and Use.
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
 Valerie  Maddie Chase Importance or Predicate Nouns o Without Predicate nouns, our daily grammar would be very useless and also uneducated o People.
Linking Verbs.
 V = verb: in this case, a linking verb  S = subject: noun or pronoun performing the action  PN = predicate nominatives: comes after a linking verb.
Review of Verbs Click to move slide.. Write the verb throw in the following tenses and forms. Subject: The young boy 1.Present Tense - Negative Form 2.Past.
Are used to make jewelry Page Number Guide words: Cook is first word on page and coral is last word on page Entry word: words that are being defined.
Philosophy 148 Chapter 7. AffirmativeNegative UniversalA: All S are PE: No S is P ParticularI: Some S is PO: Some S is not P.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Lecture 1 Sentence Structure. Teaching Contents 1.1. Clause elements 1.1. Clause elements 1.2. Basic clause types and their transformation and expansion.
Verbs p
1 Predicate (Relational) Logic 1. Introduction The propositional logic is not powerful enough to express certain types of relationship between propositions.
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
1.Without talking, please get out your English binder. 2. Put your backpacks in the back of the room. 3. Sharpen your pencil if you need to. If you need.
January 16, 2015 Check Vocab 10, check predicate adj, predicate nominatives, group translations.
4 Categorical Propositions
GRAMMAR DAY 2 Adjectives and Adverbs. TYPES OF ADJECTIVES  Adjective: modifies a noun or pronoun  Predicate adjective: follows a linking verb  Participles.
Subjects and Predicates. Subject Tells whom or what the sentence is about Example: The black pan is very hot.
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Grammar Rules IV Rules Normally, sustain tense throughout a paper, often the past tense. However, when writing a report on a novel or play,
INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING From R. B. McCall, Fundamental Statistics for Behavioral Sciences, 5th edition, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers,
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Preposition Proposition. Parts of Speech  Nouns  Pronouns  Verbs  Adjectives  Adverbs  Prepositions  Conjunctions  Interjections.
A preposition is a word that shows the relationship of a noun or a pronoun to another word.
April 10 th Jasmine and Youngsoo. Simple present tense and its structure affirmative: You work negative: Interrogative:
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Pre positions Words that show how nouns and pronouns relate to other words within a sentence.
Subject Predicate Subject Main verb (Nominative structure) Auxiliary (link) verb.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 13 An Introduction to Truth Tables By David Kelsey.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Categorical Logic A useful type of “real world” logic commonly used for characterizing relationships Applications in law, business contracts, natural and.
Auxiliaries in simple past How to work with “did” and “was-were”
G.L. 4 - Action Verbs Action verbs tell what the subject is or does. A sentence can contain more than one action verb. Action verbs make writing more vivid.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
The World of Verbs.
Parts of a Sentence 8/10/2016.
HOW TO TRANSLATE FROM LATIN INTO ENGLISH!!!
Sentence Fragments Unit 1 Lesson 4.
Diagramming Sentences Notes
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Noun: Owner’s Manual Congratulations on your wise purchase of a NOUN. Your NOUN may be used to fit into the following frame: The____________. Your NOUN.
“Only,” Categorical Relationships, logical operators
Take Notes! Sentence Parts: Subject and Predicate.
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 Translating a Categorical Claim into Standard Form By David Kelsey.
Verbs.
Philosophy 1100 Class #7 Title: Critical Reasoning
Verbs Subtitle.
Verbs.
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey

Categorical Logic Categorical logic is based on the relations of exclusion and inclusion among classes. A class is a set of things Example: Categorical logic gives us a set of rules for making justified inferences about classes of things.

Categorical claims Categorical claims: A claim is categorical if it is about classes of things. Philosophy class example:

Standard form categorical claims A standard form categorical claim: results from putting names or descriptions of classes in the blanks of any of the following 4 sentence forms: A: All ___ are ___. E: No ___ are ___. I: Some ___ are ___. O: Some ___ are not ___. Terms go in the blanks above. Terms can be either nouns or noun phrases.

Terms The subject term: the term that goes in the first blank of a standard form categorical claim. The predicate term: The term that goes in the second blank. The predicate of the claim. It is predicated of the subject term, Examples

Affirmative and negative claims Affirmative claims include one class or part of one class in another. These include all A and I claims. Example: Negative claims exclude one class or part of one class from another. These include all E and O claims.

Translating a categorical claim into standard form Turning a categorical claim into standard form: we can take an ordinary categorical claim and turn it into one of standard form. figure out which type of claim it is, A E I or O, and then just substitute in the claim’s terms. Find the standard form claim it is logically equivalent to.

Translating A and E claims Translating A claims: Consider Every X is a Y Translating E claims: Consider Xs aren’t Ys

Translating into present tense All standard form categorical claims must be in the present tense. Talking about the past: we can still use standard form claims to talk about the past. link the subject and predicate which are about the past with the present tense of the verb ‘to be’. An example: There were creatures weighing more than 4 tons that lived in North America

Translating Only Consider only Xs are Ys, (for some X and some Y). For example: Only sophomores are eligible candidates. Turning this into standard form: 1.) Determine what its terms are. 2.) Determine the form of the claim, A E I or O.

The Only Now consider the only Xs are Ys, (for some X and some Y). For example, The only people admitted are people over twenty one. Is it an A, E, I or O claim?

Rules for Only & The Only The word ‘only’: introduces the predicate term of an A claim. Only sophomores are eligible candidates: The phrase ‘the only’: introduces the subject term of an A claim. The only people admitted are people over twenty-one:

Times Consider ‘I always get nervous when I take logic exams.’ The claim says:

Places Now consider ‘He makes trouble wherever he goes’. The claim says:

Single Individuals Claims about a single individual person Consider ‘Aristotle is a logician’ Represent the individual with a term that refers to only that individual All claims about single individuals are either A or E claims. Individual places: What has just been said about individual persons can also be said about individual places.