Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
February 2007IDEA Partnership1 Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention Fundamentals for Educators and their Partners.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
RtI-MTSS District Leadership Team: Where to Begin LaChawn Smith, NHCS, Director of Instruction Cynthia Shields, NHCS, ELA Lead Teacher.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support Improving Outcomes for All Office of Special Programs.
Addressing the Needs of Students through School Improvement What’s New in North Carolina?
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
January 2010IDEA Partnership1 Response to Intervention: Basics for families and community members.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Overview. Objectives Become familiar with: Common language of MTSS Tier I, II, III 2.
Meeting the Needs of English Learners With Reading Difficulties Through a Multitiered Instructional Framework OSEP Project Directors’ Meeting July 2014.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
Office of Special Education Improving Results for Students with Disabilities.
RtI 101 Part A: The Basics of Assessment and Tiered Instruction.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
SIMS User Training SIMS State-Wide Training
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) Building Common Language and Understanding.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RTI & THE CONNECTION TO PLC’S Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
Response to Intervention: Core Components and Resources Related to Implementation Marie Fisher March 3, 2012.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Welcome! 1.Gather at your table with your team. 2.Before we begin, use sticky dots to answer the 6 statements posted.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
1 Topics to be Covered Wisconsin’s vision for RtI Essential elements High Quality Instructional practice Balanced Assessment Collaboration.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PaTTAN-Harrisburg Update Angela Kirby-Wehr Director, PaTTAN-Harrisburg Response to Instruction and.
The State of the State of NC Presented by: Ivanna Mann Thrower Anderson ESL/Title III Consultant.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia A. Cave February 2014.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
An Educational Framework: EASi RtI/MTSS
Changing Teacher Practice Changing Student Outcomes
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Leaving No Child Behind: Response to Intervention
Presentation transcript:

Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) What’s New in North Carolina?

Objectives Become familiar with the current work of NCDPI regarding Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Know the key differences between the four and three tier RtI model Understand the critical components of RtI as a framework for school improvement

RtI State Leadership Team Angela Quick, Deputy Chief Academic Officer Maria Pitre-Martin, Director, K-12 Curriculum and Technology –Ivanna Mann Thrower, ESL/ Title III Consultant –Amy Scrinzi, Math Consultant –Dan Tetreault, English/ Language Arts Consultant Mary Watson, Director, Exceptional Children –Sherry Thomas, Section Chief, Exceptional Children –Lynne Loeser, SLD/ ADHD Consultant, Exceptional Children Allison Whitaker, Consultant, Federal Program Monitoring and Support

Rick Powers- Statewide RtI Building Administrator Consultant

History of RtI in NC 5

North Carolina Problem-Solving Model 2000 Study began 2004 Five pilot sites 2006 State wide training 2008 Regional training & trainers 2010 General education partnership 2011 Implementation Science 2012 Transition to RtI three tier model

NC DPI Definition of RtI NC Responsiveness to Instruction (NCRtI) is a multi-tiered framework which promotes school improvement through engaging, high quality instruction. NCRtI employs a team approach to guide educational practices, using a problem-solving model based on data, to address student needs and maximize growth for all. 7

Critical Components of RtI Leadership and Shared Responsibility Curriculum and Instruction Assessment Problem-Solving/Data-Based Decision Making Family and Community Partnerships Sustainability and Integration 8

Current State Work Scaling Up Work Group –Focused work with State Implementation and Scaling up of Evidence-based Practices (SISEP) –Collaboration across DPI Agency and Institutions of Higher Education, and LEA representation Collaboration with RtI and PBIS –Developing one Multi-tiered System of Support Secondary RtI Pilots- Oak Foundation Grant

Currently Implementing 80% of LEAs implementing in at least one school 53% of all K-8 schools are implementing 23% of all High Schools are implementing 45% of all schools (K-12) are implementing 10

Transitioning from Four to Three Tier Model

Adjusting Mindsets Process for some students Framework for total school improvement

Why Shift? Place focus on problem-solving foundational core for total school improvement Increase focus on general education Movement away from viewing RtI as a process to a framework for all students Integrate with Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)

Title I ESL AIG Special Education Educating in silos 14 Slide created by Dale Cusumano, Ph.D.

Title I ESL AIG Special Education Educating Collaboratively 15 Slide adapted from Dale Cusumano, Ph.D.

Problem-Solving Model Evidence-Based Practices Data-Based Decision Making Four Tier RtI Model System of Support for Student Success Three Tier RtI Model

Perceived focus on individual students Individual paperwork at all Tiers 7 Step Problem- Solving Individual student data only Education in silos Perceived as route to Special Ed Focus on Core instruction at all tiers TIPS Monitor all students’ response All students in Tier I Shared Education Core Paperwork at Tier I Four TiersThree Tiers

What Happened? 18

Defining, Analyzing and Monitoring Tiers I, II and III

Layering of Support Differentiated Core Supplemental Support Intensive Support 20

Foundational Core: Tier 1 21 Who: All students are in Tier 1 (Foundational Core) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to produce good outcomes for the majority of students Effectiveness: If at least 80% of all students are meeting benchmarks in Foundational Core alone. What about subgroups?

Tier I – Three Tier Focus on Foundational Core Includes all students Focus on all students across a grade and response to foundational core Document on one grade level problem-solving form Monitor response (of all students) to instructional changes

Tier I – Focus on Foundational Core Enhanced core Increased academic engaged time Less paperwork Less progress monitoring

Analyzing Foundational Core

Are at least 80% of your students proficient in each subgroup with foundational core alone? What is working? Why? How do you know? What’s not working? Why? How do you know? Do teachers have needed skills & content knowledge?

Supplemental Instruction: Tier II Slide adapted from G. Batsche Who: Students needing supplemental support in addition to Foundational Core instruction (approx. 20% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improve performance in Foundational Core Effectiveness: If at least 70-80% of students improve performance toward Foundational Core standards

Tier II – Supplemental + Foundational Core Instruction is connected to core content Supplemental instruction does not supplant core Documentation is on same form for individual student Analysis of effectiveness of Tier II instruction for all students toward Foundational Core standards

Intensive Instruction: Tier III 28 Who: Students needing Intensive support in addition to Supplemental and Foundational Core instruction (approx. 5% of students) What: Evidence-based programs and practices demonstrated to improve performance Effectiveness: If there is progress toward performance in Foundational Core standards Slide adapted from G. Batsche

Tier III – Intensive + Supplemental + Foundational Core Instruction is most intensive in the building Increase intensity and frequency (time, duration, or digging deeper in specific skill) Documentation is on same form for individual student Analysis of effectiveness of Tier III instruction for all students toward Foundational Core Standards

Training, Support and Information State Training –Transition Training (Four Tiers to Three Tiers) Conducted June, July and August 2012 Future dates will be sent out via listserv –New Implementer Training (3 days) Haywood County- Sept 5, 6, 7 Edgecombe County- Oct 3, 4, 5 Winston-Salem/Forsyth County- Oct 10, 11, 12

Training, Support and Information Ongoing Technical Assistance to District Teams through RtI Field Consultants Regional Networking Meetings- –Conducted every other month in each region Listserv – your regional field consultant

NCDPI Responsiveness to Instruction

Contact Information for Training and Support Anne Nixon- Regions 1, 2, 3 Amy Miller- Regions 3, 4, 5 Amy Jablonski- Regions 6, 7, 8 Rick Powers- Statewide Consultant

Questions