Earthquake Sensation: integrating GPS and inertial sensors Kenneth W. Hudnut, Ph.D. Chief, So. Calif. Earthquake Hazard Assessment Project Earthquake Hazards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Existing & Future Earthquake Information Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena LA Financial Services Sector Regional Recovery Coalition Meeting 17 November.
Advertisements

ALSM Data Collection Overview Preliminary imagery from GeoEarthScope Northern California LiDAR project. Final data products will be freely available from.
March 25, 2002EarthScope CSIT Workshop Data Archiving and IT Issues for PBO Douglas Neuhauser UC Berkeley Seismological Lab Northern California Earthquake.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
Seismic and Tsunami Threats to Southern California Nancy King, Ph.D. U.S. Geological Survey Pasadena Field Office Northridge earthquake 1994 Northridge.
The trouble with segmentation David D. Jackson, UCLA Yan Y. Kagan, UCLA Natanya Black, UCLA.
U. S. Geological Survey Earthquake Program Geodesy and Deformation Activities Ken Hudnut, Jess Murray, Mal Johnston and John Langbein with contributions.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Faults in Focus: Earthquake Science Accomplishments Thomas H. Jordan Director, Southern California Earthquake Cente r 28 February 2014.
Earthquake Early Warning Research and Development in California, USA Hauksson E., Boese M., Heaton T., Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of.
Wells, Nevada Earthquake February 21, 2008 A 6.0 magnitude earthquake strikes the northeastern edge of the Basin and Range.
Advances in GPS and Imagery Differencing for Observing Vertical Changes and for Restoration of Geodetic Infrastructure After Major Earthquakes April 29,
Southern California Integrated GPS Network (SCIGN) Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey This presentation will probably involve audience discussion,
Active and Neotectonic Structures 1) What's the difference
Earthquake Predictibility, Forcasting and Early Warning Bill Menke October 18, 2005.
1 Southern California Integrated GPS Network Ken Hudnut USGS League of California Surveying Organizations April 5, 2001.
Using Geodetic Rates in Seismic Hazard Mapping March 30, Geodetic and Geologic slip rate estimates for earthquake hazard assessment in Southern California.
Southern California Integrated GPS Network (SCIGN)
Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Pasadena, California Earthquake Hazards Seminar USGS - Menlo Park, California May 13, 2003 Measuring Fault Slip.
PDA-GPS integration for improving response efficiency Ken Hudnut and Keith Stark USGS-SCIGN The EOC in the 21 st Century California Institute of Technology.
Earthquakes recorded in the landscape: Using digital topography to investigate earthquake faulting Christopher Crosby GEON / Arizona State University SDSC.
April Exploring a collaboration between Caltech and the Singaporean government Forecasting giant earthquakes of the Sumatran subduction zone and.
Sri Lanka Earthquake & Tsunami Warning Training Program Session I.1 Introduction to Earthquake Science: A Historical Perspective April 3, 2006 CETRAC,
SCEC - EarthScope (PBO) a confluence of interests Ken Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey, Pasadena.
Earthquake Prediction Methods By Jason Long. Outline Background Statistical Methods Physical and Geophysical measurements and observations Conclusion.
Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Pasadena, California Southern California Earthquake Center --- Workshop on Tectonophysics of Southern California.
Integrating GPS with rotational and inertial sensors Early Warning & DamageMap Kenneth W. Hudnut, Ph.D. Geophysicist USGS, Pasadena Measuring the Rotation.
Fault Slip Sensors and DamageMap: GPS in Rapid Earthquake Response Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena.
2007 NSTA: St. Louis, Missouri Earthquake Prediction and Forecasting: A Case Study of the San Andreas and New Madrid Faults Sponsored by: IRIS (Incorporated.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
Paleoseismic and Geologic Data for Earthquake Simulations Lisa B. Grant and Miryha M. Gould.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Data collection, synthesis, and products Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey SCEC 2000 Meeting SCEC Highlights.
Ken Hudnut U.S. Geological Survey 22 November 2013
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Fault Slip Sensors: GPS, Gyros and DART buoys in Earthquake Early Warning Systems Ken Hudnut USGS, Pasadena California Institute of Technology.
Lisa Wald USGS Pasadena U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101 (EQ101)
Geologic hazards & space geodesy part 1: Introduction.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA West Newport Beach Association Public Forum, Newport Beach City Hall March 5, 2003 Coping with ‘quakes.
Ken Hudnut USGS Pasadena, California CSUN Northridge, California April 23, 2002 … and some aspects of the 1999 Hector Mine earthquake Merging geodesy and.
Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
1 SCEC Broadband Platform Development Using USC HPCC Philip Maechling 12 Nov 2012.
Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.
Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquakes 101.
Some Thoughts on IMW And Opportunity We represent a big area of the ANSS national program Bob Smith Univ. of Utah.
Response of the San Jacinto fault zone to static stress changes from the 1992 Landers earthquake M. Nic Bhloscaidh and J. McCloskey School of Environmental.
GPS: “Where goeth thou” Thomas Herring With results from Jen Alltop: Geosystems Thesis Katy Quinn: Almost graduated Ph.D
“Integrated observational system of systems” (~$200 million) SAFOD: 3.1 km borehole into the San Andreas Fault PBO: 1099 geodetic stations; 81 strainmeter/seismic.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Real Time Data From the Plate Boundary Observatory Continuous GPS Network Mike JacksonUNAVCO PBO Directorand the PBO Staff AGU Joint Assembly May 26, 2009.
Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Pasadena, California Berkeley Seismo Lab Seminar U. C. Berkeley, California March 11, 2003 Measuring Fault Slip.
Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.
Kenneth W. Hudnut USGS, Pasadena, CA Adrian Borsa and Jean-Bernard Minster UCSD, SIO/IGPP, La Jolla, CA Spring AGU G32A-07 Merging geodesy and geomorphology.
Caltech CE Seminar - Jan. 25, 2007 The November 13, 2008 ShakeOut Exercise (GG’08) Threat to Roadway Lifelines: M w 7.8 on the Southern San Andreas Fault.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Earthquake is Inevitable: The Disaster is Not.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
San Andreas MW 7.9 Earthquake: Slip at Critical Lifeline Crossings ShakeOut scenario for southern California Dr. Ken Hudnut U.S. Geological Survey,
San Andreas, showing stream offset. San Andreas – Carrizo plain.
06/22/041 Data-Gathering Systems IRIS Stanford/ USGS UNAVCO JPL/UCSD Data Management Organizations PI’s, Groups, Centers, etc. Publications, Presentations,
Kenneth W. Hudnut U. S. Geological Survey Pasadena, California USGS Coalition Meeting Washington, DC --- January 14, 2005 USGS Earthquake Hazards Program.
Earthquakes 101 (EQ101) Lisa Wald USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
EARTHQUAKES & EARTH’S INTERIOR Measuring Earthquakes CHAPTER 8.2.
TOWARDS PRE-EARTHQUAKE PLANNING FOR POST-EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (PEPPER) EXAMPLES: TOKAI, JAPAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Earthquakes USGS Earthquake Hazards Program Earthquake Basics
What are Earthquakes? The shaking or trembling caused by the sudden release of energy Usually associated with lithospheric plates moving against each other.
DamageMap Prototype Using Real-time GPS Point Positioning
7.3 Measuring and Predicting Earthquakes
LA Basin Story Tectonics Geology Faults Velocity Structure Seismicity
Earthquake and Tsunami Program Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Presentation transcript:

Earthquake Sensation: integrating GPS and inertial sensors Kenneth W. Hudnut, Ph.D. Chief, So. Calif. Earthquake Hazard Assessment Project Earthquake Hazards Team U. S. Geological Survey CENS - UCLA July 25, 2003

2 CENS - UCLA Southern California is the nation’s most dangerous place for earthquakes - why? Silver linings: State-of-the-art earthquake monitoring arrays Many of the world’s best researchers work within this natural laboratory

3 CENS - UCLA San Andreas fault 35 mm/yr slip rate;35 mm/yr slip rate; >70% of total plate boundary motion>70% of total plate boundary motion 1685, 1812, 1857 eq’s1685, 1812, 1857 eq’s Big Bend compressionBig Bend compression 1971 Sylmar (M 6.7)1971 Sylmar (M 6.7) 1994 Northridge (M 6.7)1994 Northridge (M 6.7) SoCal is now heavily ‘wired’ (much like Japan & Taiwan)SoCal is now heavily ‘wired’ (much like Japan & Taiwan) 150+ BB CISN stations150+ BB CISN stations 250+ SCIGN stations250+ SCIGN stations Catalog; SCEC CMM3Catalog; SCEC CMM3

4 CENS - UCLA Improving hazard assessment Temporal variations do occur:Temporal variations do occur: Clustering (e.g., Basin & Range, ECSZ, Asia)Clustering (e.g., Basin & Range, ECSZ, Asia) Discrepant geological and geodetic ratesDiscrepant geological and geodetic rates Sequences involving fault interaction (e.g., Joshua Tree - Landers - Big Bear - Hector Mine; Anatolian system, etc.)Sequences involving fault interaction (e.g., Joshua Tree - Landers - Big Bear - Hector Mine; Anatolian system, etc.) Implement robust research findings into hazard assessmentImplement robust research findings into hazard assessment “Variability does not mean predictability”“Variability does not mean predictability” Courtesy Anke Friedrich

5 CENS - UCLA GPS

6 CENS - UCLA 1 st Year Combined time series ( ) 3 rd Year Real-time earth- quake response 5 th Year Resolve rates on primary LA basin faults (and others) SCIGN Data Products

7 CENS - UCLA

8 CENS - UCLA New methods and data integration Precise topographic mapping of surface ruptures and active fault scarpsPrecise topographic mapping of surface ruptures and active fault scarps slip models for prehistoric eventsslip models for prehistoric events rapid assessment of surface slip and damage patterns after large eventsrapid assessment of surface slip and damage patterns after large events Requires precise integration of GPS & INS for flight navigationRequires precise integration of GPS & INS for flight navigation 1957 Gobi-Altai earthquake surface rupture

High resolution topography along surface rupture of the October 16, 1999 Hector Mine, California Earthquake (M w 7.1) from Airborne Laser Swath Mapping Hudnut, K. W. (USGS), A. Borsa (UCSD), C. Glennie (Aerotec, LLC) and J.-B. Minster (UCSD) Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Special Issue on the Hector Mine earthquake (2002)

10 CENS - UCLA Airborne laser swath mapping (ALSM) precise topographic mapping of surface ruptures and active fault scarps representation of actual fault ruptures recorded and preserved in unprecedented detail Airborne platform navigation must be highly precise and requires high-rate GPS data

11 CENS - UCLA R r v Geolocation Vectors and Error Sources r Vector from CM earth to GPS phase center Magnitude & directional errors both are stochastic, time and location variant. R v Vector from GPS phase center to laser Magnitude error is constant if no airframe flexing. Directional error due to constant and time-varying biases in INS. Vector from laser to ground footprint Magnitude error due to timing, instrument and atmospheric delays. Directional error from constant mirror mounting offsets and time-varying biases in reporting of scan angles (both pitch and roll). Note: additional errors due to imperfect synchronization of GPS, INS, mirror scan and laser firing times must be modeled and removed as well.

12 CENS - UCLA Lavic Lake Roll & Pitch Maneuvers Exploded ordnance (crater) pitch maneuvers

13 CENS - UCLA Photo by Keith Stark (SCIGN) Maximum slip section of the 1999 Hector Mine eq. surface rupture

14 CENS - UCLA Estimating slip on ‘max. slip’ segment of the fault

15 CENS - UCLA

16 CENS - UCLA

17 CENS - UCLA

18 CENS - UCLA

19 CENS - UCLA Laser Scan of the San Andreas Proposal to the NSF EarthScope Science RFP: Prof. Mike Bevis, PI (OSU) Requires high-rate (1 Hz) GPS data from SCIGN sites along fhe fault & special care with IMU-INS

GPS Fault Slip Sensor K. Hudnut, G. Anderson, A. Aspiotes, N. King, R. Moffitt, & K. Stark (all at USGS-SCIGN, Pasadena CA) APEC symposium Proc. Paper, Fall AGU poster, and paper in preparation for Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

21 CENS - UCLA Early Warning The speed of light >> the speed of sound Seismic and GPS Stations Central Computers Utilities Emergency Response Transport- ation (e.g; Wu & Teng, BSSA, 2002; Allen & Kanamori, Science, 2003)

22 CENS - UCLA

23 CENS - UCLA Real-Time GPS Network - Enhancing SCIGN On 15 November 2002, first-ever GPS fault slip sensor deployed across San Andreas fault at Gorman, Calif. On 15 November 2002, first-ever GPS fault slip sensor deployed across San Andreas fault at Gorman, Calif. Augments seismic early warning system - resolves the observational deficiency inherent with inertial sensors that cannot discern tilt from acceleration Augments seismic early warning system - resolves the observational deficiency inherent with inertial sensors that cannot discern tilt from acceleration Upgrade SCIGN telemetry Upgrade SCIGN telemetry DSL, frame relay DSL, frame relay Radio repeaters, WiGate and dedicated links Radio repeaters, WiGate and dedicated links Data buffering Data buffering Augment SCIGN real-time acquisition and processing system Augment SCIGN real-time acquisition and processing system Implemented sub-daily processing (4 hr) for ~100 SCIGN stations (down from 24 hr) Implemented sub-daily processing (4 hr) for ~100 SCIGN stations (down from 24 hr) Implementing multiple real-time streaming GPS processors (commercial software) Implementing multiple real-time streaming GPS processors (commercial software)

24 CENS - UCLA Lone Juniper Ranch and Frazier Park High School First prototype GPS fault slip sensor Spans the San Andreas fault near Gorman, California

25 CENS - UCLA Cleaned-up test results Why is real-time GPS processing noisy and less robust than post-processing? Ambiguity resolution, multipath, atmosphere and clock errors - what can be done?

26 CENS - UCLA Upgrading SCIGN telemetry Low cost options such as frequent FTS dial-up, radio nets, and DSL Development & testing of near real-time GPS precise processing, etc.

27 CENS - UCLA Conclusions: GPS and inertial sensor integration for high- accuracy applications is practical in SoCal because SCIGN can be readily upgraded to support centimeter-level accuracy in real-timeGPS and inertial sensor integration for high- accuracy applications is practical in SoCal because SCIGN can be readily upgraded to support centimeter-level accuracy in real-time Earthquake applications of GPS/INS integration are: Earthquake applications of GPS/INS integration are: societally relevant - significant economic impact and consequences would result from technological innovations societally relevant - significant economic impact and consequences would result from technological innovations scientifically exciting for the very dynamic SCEC research community - major breakthroughs in earthquake source physics are likely to result from collaborations scientifically exciting for the very dynamic SCEC research community - major breakthroughs in earthquake source physics are likely to result from collaborations