A. Friedman, J. J. Barnard, R. H. Cohen, D. P. Grote, S. M. Lund, W. M. Sharp, LLNL A. Faltens, E. Henestroza, J-Y. Jung, J. W. Kwan, E. P. Lee, M. A.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Analysis for Modular versus Multi-beam HIF Drivers * Wayne Meier – LLNL Grant Logan – LBNL 15th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion.
Advertisements

SPACE CHARGE EFFECTS IN PHOTO-INJECTORS Massimo Ferrario INFN-LNF Madison, June 28 - July 2.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
Beam steering capability for target position uncertainty Simon Yu & Enrique Henestroza Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ARIES Meeting October 3, 2002.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Plasma Dynamics Lab HIBP Abstract Measurements of the radial equilibrium potential profiles have been successfully obtained with a Heavy Ion Beam Probe.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory ARIES-IFE Meeting Atlanta, Georgia September 4, 2003 “Modular Solenoid with Assisted Pinch” by S. Yu,
Acceleration of a mass limited target by ultra-high intensity laser pulse A.A.Andreev 1, J.Limpouch 2, K.Yu.Platonov 1 J.Psikal 2, Yu.Stolyarov 1 1. ILPh.
SLAC is focusing on the modeling and simulation of DOE accelerators using high- performance computing The performance of high-brightness RF guns operating.
Before aperture After aperture Faraday Cup Trigger Photodiode Laser Energy Meter Phosphor Screen Solenoids Successful Initial X-Band Photoinjector Electron.
Wayne R. Meier Lawrence Livermore National Lab Heavy Ion Driver Model Update* ARIES IFE Meeting LLNL March 8-9, 2001 * This work was performed under the.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Alignment and Beam Stability
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Highly Compressed Ion Beams for Warm Dense Matter Science * Alex Friedman 1,2, John J. Barnard 1,2, Richard.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Analytical and Numerical Studies of Ion Beam Plasma Interaction for Heavy Ion Driven Inertial Fusion Igor.
Results from measurement and simulation methods (LW, PIC, Astra) and setup About LW & Astra Simulations of The Pitz Gun comparison LW  Astra more analysis.
Modelling of the ALICE Injector Julian McKenzie ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory IOP Particle Accelerators and Beams Group Status and Challenges of Simulation.
Agenda / Logistics John J. Barnard Twelfth US - Japan Workshop on Heavy Ion Fusion and High Energy Density Physics September 7-8, 2009 Intercontinental.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
ASTRA Injector Setup 2012 Julian McKenzie 17/02/2012.
Alex Friedman Fusion Energy Sciences Program, LLNL (for the NDCX-II team) ARPA-E Visit to LBNL, September 4, 2013 * This work was performed under the auspices.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Pulsed Normal Quadrupoles for a Heavy Ion Fusion Driver Final Focus Section D. Shuman, S. S. Yu, LBNL.
1 Development and testing of a pulsed helium ion source for probing materials and warm dense matter studies Qing Ji a, Peter Seidl a, Will Waldron a, Jeff.
LBNL 88'' cyclotron operations Status of the 88-Inch Cyclotron High-Voltage upgrade project December 14, 2009 Ken Yoshiki Franzen.
International Symposium on Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion June 2004 Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton University “Stopping.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Heavy Ion Fusion Sciences Virtual National Laboratory Warp simulations illustrate the novel acceleration strategy Design Studies for NDCX-II W. M. Sharp,
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf,
Toward a physics design for NDCX-II, a next-step platform for ion beam-driven physics studies * A. Friedman, D. P. Grote, W. M. Sharp, LLNL E. Henestroza,
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory The collective effects on focusing of intense ion beams in neutralized drift compression I. D.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Neutralized Transport Experiment (NTX) P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, S. Eylon, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M.
Advanced Energy Systems Inc. P.O. Box 7455, Princeton, NJ Phone:(609) Fax:(609) Jangho.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 PRoy LINAC06 Neutralized Drift Compression and Related Experiments* P. K. Roy 1, W. L. Waldron.
EMMA: Pulsed magnets Kiril Marinov MaRS group, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory 1.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Question 1: Assess and document target preheat effects from beams and plasma for the various options.
Collective Focusing of a Neutralized Intense Ion Beam Propagating Along a Weak Solenodial Magnetic Field M. Dorf (LLNL) In collaboration with I. Kaganovich,
Slide 1 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Why heavy ions? Target requires: 3.5 – 6 MJ in ~ 10 ns  500 TW Range ~ 0.02 – 0.20 g/cm.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
* This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, Lawrence Livermore National.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory 1 NDCX beam experiments and plans Peter Seidl Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, HIFS-VNL 11th Japan.
Christopher Gerth DL/RAL Joint Workshop 28-29/4/04 Modelling of the ERLP injector system Christopher Gerth ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Velocity bunching from S-band photoinjectors Julian McKenzie 1 st July 2011 Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Ion Source and Injector Experiments at the HIF/VNL J. W. Kwan, D. Baca, E. Henestroza, J. Kapica, F. M.
Oct 6, 2009 The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 1 NDCX-II Project Joe Kwan Project Manager Sept. 7, 2009 San Francisco US-Japan Workshop.
The Heavy Ion Fusion Virtual National Laboratory Erik P. Gilson** PPPL 15 th International Symposium on Heavy Ion Fusion June 9 th, 2004 Research supported.
Generation of anomalously energetic suprathermal electrons by an electron beam interacting with a nonuniform plasma Dmytro Sydorenko University of Alberta,
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
Sharp 10/28/09 NDCX-II Tweaks W M Sharp, A Friedman, D P Grote - LLNL L L Reginato, W L Waldron, J-L Vay - LBNL 12 January 2011.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Acknowledgements Slides and animations were made by Dr. Jon Karty Mass Spectrometry Facility Indiana University, Bloomington.
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Tunable Electron Bunch Train Generation at Tsinghua University
Wakefield Accelerator
Parallel 3D Finite Element Particle-In-Cell Simulations with Pic3P*
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

A. Friedman, J. J. Barnard, R. H. Cohen, D. P. Grote, S. M. Lund, W. M. Sharp, LLNL A. Faltens, E. Henestroza, J-Y. Jung, J. W. Kwan, E. P. Lee, M. A. Leitner, B. G. Logan, J.-L. Vay, W. L. Waldron, LBNL R. C. Davidson, M. Dorf, E. P. Gilson, I. Kaganovich, PPPL ICAP 2009, San Francisco Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory Developing the Physics Design for NDCX-II, a Unique Pulse-Compressing Ion Accelerator * *This work was performed under the auspices of the USDOE by LLNL under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344, by LBNL under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231, and by PPPL under Contract DE-AC02-76CH03073.

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 2 LITHIUM ION BEAM BUNCH (ultimate goals) Final beam energy:> 3 MeV Final spot diameter :~ 1 mm Final bunch length :~ 1 cm or ~ 1 ns Total charge delivered: ~ 30 nC Exiting beam available for measurement TARGET  m foil or foam 30 J/cm 2 isochoric heating  aluminum temperature ~ 1 eV NDCX-II will enable studies of warm dense matter and key physics for ion direct drive

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 3 “Neutralized Drift Compression” produces a short pulse of ions The process is analogous to “chirped pulse amplification” in lasers A head-to-tail velocity gradient (“tilt”) is imparted to the beam by one or more induction cells This causes the beam to shorten as it moves down the beamline: Space charge would inhibit this compression, so the beam is directed through a plasma which affords neutralization Simulations and theory (Voss Scientific, PPPL) showed that the plasma density must exceed the beam density for this to work well z (beam frame) vzvz vzvz 

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 4 NDCX-I NDCX-I at LBNL routinely achieves current amplification > 50x

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 5 ATA induction cells with pulsed 1-3T solenoids Length ~ 15 m Avg MV/m Peak 0.75 MV/m Li + ion injector final focus and target chamber neutralized drift compression region with plasma sources water-filled Blumlein voltage sources oil-filled transmission lines NDCX-II

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 6 LLNL has given the HIFS-VNL 48 induction cells from the ATA They provide short, high-voltage accelerating pulses –Ferrite core: 1.4 x Volt-seconds –Blumlein: kV; 70 ns FWHM At front end, longer pulses need custom voltage sources; < 100 kV for cost Test stand at LBNL Advanced Test Accelerator (ATA)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 7 Outline Introduction to the project 1-D ASP code model and physics design Warp (R,Z) simulations 3-D effects: misalignments & corkscrew Status of the design

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 8 1-D PIC code ASP (“Acceleration Schedule Program”) Follows (z,v z ) phase space using a few hundred particles (“slices”) Space-charge field via Poisson equation with finite-radius correction term  2   d 2  /dz 2 - k  2  = -  /  0 k  2 = 4 / (g 0 r beam 2 ) g 0 = 2 log (r wall / r beam ) Acceleration gaps with longitudinally-extended fringing field –Idealized waveforms –Circuit models including passive elements in “comp boxes” –Measured waveforms Centroid tracking for studying misalignment effects, steering Multiple optimization loops: –Waveforms and timings –Dipole strengths (for steering) Interactive (Python language with Fortran for intensive parts)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 9 Principle 1: Shorten Beam First (“non-neutral drift compression”) Equalize beam energy after injection -- then -- Compress longitudinally before main acceleration Want < 70 ns transit time through gap (with fringe field) as soon as possible ==> can then use 200-kV pulses from ATA Blumleins Compress carefully to minimize effects of space charge Seek to achieve large velocity “tilt” v z (z) ~ linear in z “right away”

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 10 Principle 2: Let It Bounce Rapid inward motion in beam frame is required to get below 70 ns Space charge ultimately inhibits this compression However, so short a beam is not sustainable –Fields to control it can’t be “shaped” on that timescale –The beam “bounces” and starts to lengthen Fortunately, the beam still takes < 70 ns because it is now moving faster We allow it to lengthen while applying: –additional acceleration via flat pulses –confinement via ramped (“triangular”) pulses The final few gaps apply the “exit tilt” needed for neutralized drift compression

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 11 Pulse length vs z: the “bounce” is evident pulse length (m) center of mass z position (m)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 12 Pulse duration vs z -time for entire beam to cross a plane at fixed z +time for a single particle at mean energy to cross finite- length gap *time for entire beam to cross finite-length gap pulse duration (ns) center of mass z position (m)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 13 Voltage waveforms for all gaps “ramp” (here from an ATA cell) “flat-top” (here idealized) “ear” (to confine beam ends) “shaped” (to impose velocity tilt for initial compression) gap voltage (kV) time ( µ s)

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 14 A series of snapshots from ASP shows the evolution of the longitudinal phase space (kinetic energy vs z) and current

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 15 Outline Introduction to the project 1-D ASP code model and physics design Warp (R,Z) simulations 3-D effects: misalignments & corkscrew Status of the design

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 16 Design of injector for 1 mA/cm 2 Li + emission uses Warp in (r,z) extractor ~150 kV emitter ~165 kV Z (m) R (m) 0 10 cm Using Warp’s “gun” mode Using time-dependent space-charge-limited emission and simple mesh refinement

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 17 ASP & Warp results agree (when care is taken w/ initial beam )

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 18 Video: Warp (r,z) simulation of NDCX-II beam For video see:

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 19 Outline Introduction to the project 1-D ASP code model and physics design Warp (R,Z) simulations 3-D effects: misalignments & corkscrew Status of the design

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 20 Video: Warp 3-D simulation of NDCX-II beam (no misalignments) For video see:

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 21 Video: Warp 3D simulation of NDCX-II, including random offsets of solenoid ends by up to 1 mm (0.5 mm is nominal) For video see:

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 22 ASP employs a tuning algorithm (as in ETA-II, DARHT) † to adjust “steering” dipoles so as to minimize a penalty function Head - red Mid - green Tail – blue x - solid y - dashed Dipoles optimized; penalizing corkscrew amplitude & beam offset, and limiting dipole strength Trajectories of head, mid, tail particles, and corkscrew amplitude, for a typical ASP run. Random offsets of solenoid ends up to 1 mm were assumed; the effect is linear. Dipoles off Corkscrew amplitude - black † Y-J. Chen, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 398, 139 (1997).

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 23 Outline Introduction to the project 1-D ASP code model and physics design Warp (R,Z) simulations 3-D effects: misalignments & corkscrew Status of the design

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 24 Key technical issues are being addressed Li + ion source current density –We currently assume only 1 mA/cm 2 Solenoid misalignment effects –Steering reduces corkscrew but requires beam position measurement –If capacitive or magnetic BPM’s prove too noisy, we’ll use scintillators or apertures Require “real” acceleration waveforms –A good “ramp” has been tested and folded into ASP runs –We’re developing shaping circuits for “flatter flat-tops” Pulsed solenoid effects –Volt-seconds of ferrite cores are reduced by return flux of solenoids –Eddy currents (mainly in end plates) dissipate energy, induce noise –We’ll use flux-channeling inserts and/or windings, & thinner end plates

The Heavy Ion Fusion Science Virtual National Laboratory 25 We look forward to a novel and flexible research platform NDCX-II will be a unique ion-driven user facility for warm dense matter and IFE target physics studies. The machine will also allow beam dynamics experiments relevant to high-current fusion drivers. The baseline physics design makes efficient use of the ATA components through rapid beam compression and acceleration.