.................................... I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October 2004 1 Damping ring kickers George.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 7, 2007-Beijing (Zisman-DR) Global Design Effort 1 Damping Ring EDR Plans Michael S. Zisman, Jie Gao, Susanna Guiducci, Andy Wolski DR Area System.
Advertisements

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, UTA LC 1/10/031 Speculations About a Fourier Series Kicker for the TESLA Damping Rings George Gollin Department of.
Some Timing Aspects for ILC Heiko Ehrlichmann DESY GDE, Frascati, December 2005.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Injection Session – Close-out Workshop on Accelerator R&D for USRs Working Group J.H. Chen (IHEP), O. Dressler (Helmholtz ZB), R. Hettel (SLAC), Y. Jiao.
Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg NIM A672.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Cornell LC 7/031 A Fourier Series Kicker for the TESLA Damping Rings George Gollin Department of Physics University.
I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Fourier series damping ring kicker for TESLA, Paris, LC Fourier series.
Accelerator R&D on LC - Activities of ATF & STF - 1. Introduction 2. ATF 3. STF 4. Summary Seiya Yamaguchi, KEK The US/Japan Collaboration in High Energy.
Plans for injection/extraction R&D S. Guiducci INFN-LNF KEK - ILCDR07, Dec 207.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
8/28/07RTML EDR KOM1 Cornell Plans for RTML EDR Work G. Dugan Cornell LEPP.
Storage Rings Group Meeting Steve Werkema 24 March 2010.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
Report of 2 nd ILC Workshop (Snowmass) Working Group Kiyoshi KUBO references: Slides of the plenary talks in the workshop by P.Tenembaum and.
I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kicker report, March 9, Fourier Series Pulse Compression Damping.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
ILC Program discussion M. Ross Damping Ring Injection / Extraction Kicker Magnet 1)The TDR Kicker: 1)0.6 mrad (.01Tm), 5GeV, 50 m β, 7e-4 stability,
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kicker, December 15, Fourier Series Pulse Compression Damping.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Fourier engineering… Victoria, LC Fourier engineering: progress on alternative.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
ILC R&D at KEK Beam Control Technology –ATF –ATF2 Acceleration Technology –High-gradient Cavities L-band R&D Stand –Linac System  STF –Construction of.
P I T Z Photo Injector Test Facility Zeuthen Design consideration of the RF deflector to optimize the photo injector at PITZ S.Korepanov.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
TBL experimental program Status and Results  Introduction  Status  Experimental program for 2010 and beyond  Outlook ACE, Steffen Döbert.
1 Experiments with pulse supplies and strip-lines at ATF, Plans for fast extraction kicker for ATF2 1. Fast Kicker R&D at ATF 2. Instrumentation at ATF.
I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, LCRD A Fourier Series Kicker for the TESLA Damping Rings George Gollin Department of Physics University of Illinois.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER DAMPING RING COMPLEX J.N. Corlett, S. Marks, R. Rimmer, R. Schlueter Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley,
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, Novel Schemes for Damping Rings1 Novel Schemes for Damping Rings J. Rogers Cornell University Improving dynamic.
DR Kicker R&D: Goals and Work Scope
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Fast Kicker R&D in the Americas Region
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
George Gollin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Damping Ring Kicker Tests at AØ
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
A Fourier Series Kicker for the TESLA Damping Rings
Fourier Series Pulse Compression Damping Ring Kicker
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
12 Steps to a Cooler Design
Fast kicker beam dynamics simulations
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October Damping ring kickers George Gollin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October Outline The problem The specs Current ideas Opinions from the speaker Illinois/Fermilab efforts ILC-America + ILC-global near term goals

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October The problem Linac beam (TESLA TDR): 2820 bunches, 340 nsec spacing (~ 300 kilometers) Cool an entire pulse in the damping rings before linac injection ILC damping ring beam: 2820 bunches, closely spaced Eject every n th bunch into linac (leave adjacent bunches undisturbed) Minimum damping ring circumference depends on minimum realizable bunch spacing (kicker speed and instability issues) Kicker: 20 ns kicker  17 km circumference (TESLA dog bone) 6 ns kicker  6 km circumference (Fermilab small ring)

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October What an interesting problem! There’s significant global interest in tackling the challenges posed by the damping ring and kicker. We have already started an informal, global “conversation”: see Andy Wolski’s site at for a partial list of who has made contact. There are physicists from ANL, CERN, Cornell, Daresbury, DESY. Fermilab, Frascati, Harvard, Illinois, KEK, LBNL, Minnesota, SLAC, Tokyo so far.

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October What we have to work with Injection: already-orbiting bunches have not damped appreciably, have large transverse sizes (~2 cm); kicker must inject new bunches into damping ring acceptance without losing already-orbiting bunches. Extraction: damping is finished, bunches are small (a few microns in diameter) ; kicker must preserve beam emittance for still-orbiting bunches as well as the kicked bunch. Performance demands on kicker are different for injection/extraction. Should we consider separate designs for injection and extraction?

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October The specs Kicker specs depend, in part, on beam dynamics: phase space volume occupied by a just-kicked bunch must be well separated from that of an unkicked bunch. Dog bone (TESLA TDR) kicker specs: impulse: 100 G-m (3 MeV/c) ± 0.07 G-m (2 keV/c) residual (off) impulse: 0 ± 0.07 G-m (2 keV/c) rise/fall time: < 20 ns Perhaps larger (but less precise) impulse at injection, smaller (but more precise) impulse at extraction will be desirable. Small ring kicker rise, fall times can be asymmetric: leading edge < 6 ns, trailing edge < 60 ns

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October The ideas (1): strip line kicker modules Fast switches dump high voltage pulses into a series of strip line structures. Electromagnetic pulse applies transverse kick to one bunch, but is absorbed in a load in each strip line module before next bunch arrives. switch speed, on-resistance, and stability are concerns adequate precision of strip line termination is challenging TESLA and SLAC are thinking about this

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October The ideas (2): longitudinal kick + dispersion Separate the beam so that it travels along multiple paths. Demands on kicker are less severe: it only sees every 4 th bunch. The system needs to be studied in detail: how to do it, what happens when it is installed in a damping ring. Cornell, Frascati are thinking along these lines.

I PhysicsP I llinois 9 The ideas (3): Fourier engineering Instead of a pulsed kicker, construct a kicking pulse from a sum of its Fourier components. Most interesting (to me) idea now: combine this with a pulse compression system to drive a small number of low-Q cavities. what are stability requirements on RF components? how robust to bunch arrival time errors can the system be made? Illinois, Fermilab, Cornell are involved.

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October The speaker’s opinions (1) The kicker has the potential to be a “show-stopper.” Damping ring architecture (bunch timing structure, injection/extraction optics, etc.) is strongly tied to details of the kicker. A fast pulsed kicker might be simplest to operate BUT switch speed and stability are challenging issues. Significant proof of the feasibility of at least one design is needed before a choice of damping ring design (big ring vs. small ring) will be possible.

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October The speaker’s opinions (2) Fermilab small ring studies incorporate: damping ring bunch trains with ~60 ns inter-train gaps long straight section to allow installation of as-yet unspecified kicker Perhaps these features should be included in all damping ring designs? There are three distinct stages in damping process: injection and assembly of bunch trains damping disassembly of bunch trains and extraction Beam is very different in each of these stages. Should there be distinct subsystems (including different kickers) for each of them?

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October Separating injection, damping, extraction functions Large acceptance injection ring: (340 – 6) = 334 ns circumference assemble a single bunch train by injecting successive bunches into this ring at the tail of the train already orbiting the injection ring transfer entire bunch train into the damping ring in one orbit Large acceptance damping ring (6 ns bunch spacing) Small acceptance extraction ring: ( ) = 346 ns circumference transfer one entire bunch train from the damping ring extract by kicking the last bunch in the train on successive orbits

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October Separating injection, damping, extraction functions Injection and extraction rings differ in circumference by two bunch spacings to allow injection/extraction to/from tail of bunch train.

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October Fermilab/Illinois activities Initial studies: use Fermilab A0 photoinjector beam (16 MeV electrons) for studies: 1.build a fast, simple strip line kicker 2.use the kicker to study the timing/stability properties of the A0 beam 3.build a single-module pulse compression kicker 4.study its behavior at A0 5.perform more detailed studies in a higher energy, low emittance beam (ATF??)

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October A0 photoinjector beam 16 MeV electron beam, good spot size, emittance. EOI submitted to A0 group last spring. Space in beamline will be available ~January 2005

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October Simple kicker for initial tests Start with a simple kicker whose properties are calculable and can be measured independently of its effects on the A0 electron beam. Most important: how well can we measure a device’s amplitude and timing stability with the A0 beam? Fermilab is currently designing this. Probably ready by January 2005.

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October UIUC/FNAL, longer term plans Design, then build one module using existing components. Fermilab RF group is involved UIUC HEP electronics design group’s chief is too. So we’re starting to make progress. Goals: install strip line kicker in A0 by January, 2005 understand A0 by spring, 2005 install small pulse compression kicker at A0 by summer, 2005

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October ILC-America + ILC-global near-term goals Possible goals and timelines: pre-KEK: discuss tentative plans for kicker R&D with our colleagues in America, Asia, and Europe to have a sense of who would like to do what. at KEK: rough-out an R&D plan aimed at choosing a kicker technology in ~2 years at Snowmass (August, 2005): kicker workshop with international participation to assess how well we’ve gotten started, and what we have learned

I PhysicsP I llinois George Gollin, Damping ring kickers, SLAC ILC-America, October End notes The kicker and damping ring scare the daylights out of me. We must build one and make it work before the ILC main linac is completed. More information: Studies Pertaining to a Small Damping Ring for the International Linear Collider, FERMILAB-TM-2272-AD-TDFERMILAB-TM-2272-AD-TD ILC Damping Rings web site: