Seatbelt/Bumper Design Project Prof. Granda ME270 Tyrone Tracy 11/5/07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY Do you think that seatbelts save lives? We all know that seatbelts reduces the probability of death and also.
Advertisements

Driver Responsibility Chapter 3 All Passengers must wear a seatbelt, as well as all drivers and occupants in a vehicle under the GDL Law. Lap Belt= Over.
Natural Laws & Car Control
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY When seat belts are used, the risk of fatal injury to front- seat passenger car occupants is reduced by 45%
12-May-15 Physics 1 (Garcia) SJSU Chapter 6 Momentum Object A hits Object B. What happens?
Newton’s First Law Newton’s first law simply states; every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external.
Chapter 5 Natural Laws and Car Control. Gravity What is gravity? the force that pulls things towards the earth the force that pulls things towards the.
Unit 1 – Natural Forces on a vehicle
ME 270 Car Crash Test By Pramod Krishnani Fall 2007.
Head on Collision By Fabiola Carrasco ME 143 Professor Granda December 25, 2006.
Lecture 15 – Drag Force & Circular Dynamics. Why is the drag force on a piece of paper so large?
CAMP-G/Matlab Vehicle Crash Test
Start Presentation November 15, th Homework - Solution In this homework, we shall model and simulate a mechanical system as well as exercise the.
Vehicle Safety (Egg Cars). Vehicle Safety Features.
Bond Graph Assignment Richard Mullen ME 114 Fall 2006.
Kinetic Energy A moving object has energy because of its motion. This energy is called kinetic energy.
Head-on Collision ME115 FALL 2006 Final Project Instructor: Professor Granda By Blong Xiong Department of Mechanical Engineering California State University,
Do Now for 4/23/13 Take out E78 HW: Complete E78 Analysis Activity 77 and 78 will be checked tomorrow.
Simulation of Motor Bike Suspension System ME 270 Advanced Computer Aided Design of Dynamic System Guided By: Professor Jose J. Granda Department Of Mechanical.
Using the “Clicker” If you have a clicker now, and did not do this last time, please enter your ID in your clicker. First, turn on your clicker by sliding.
Physics Chapter 9 - Gravity
COMPUTER ASSIGNMENT ME 270 BY VAMSHI KRISHNA REDDY CHADA.
MOMENTUM. Momentum is a commonly used term in sports. A team that has the momentum is on the move and is going to take some effort to stop.
Goal: To understand Newton’s 2 nd law and its applications to motions. Objectives: 1)To learn about how accelerations work 2)To understand Newton’s Force.
Momentum.
Problem Transient Response By: Matt Lausmann ME 114 Granda Assignment #3.
ME 115: Dynamics of Machinery Manuel Leija Christian Reyes.
Marine Engine Propeller Marine Engine Propeller ME 270 Dr. Granda Dong-Un Sul.
Vehicle Problem Stephen Moore ME270 Prof. Granda October 30, 2007.
Vehicle Crash Test Dong-Un Sul Dr. Granda ME 270.
Momentum is a physics term; it refers to the quantity of motion that an object has. A sports team which is "on the move" has the momentum. If an object.
Impulse and Momentum Dr P Ramalingam October 13, 2007.
Vehicle Suspension Explained by Bond Graph Modeling Justin Otero ME270 CSUS MSME Program Fall 07.
Final Project ME 270 NASA CDSL 6-DOF Platform Jesse Kaneko.
COMPUTER ASSIGNMENT ME 270 BY Nishith Shah. PROJECT AIM An engineering model and a bond graph model of the car,person,seat belts,bumper needs to be created.
Newton’s First Law of Motion
First Step BOND GRAPH Hand Work Second Step  Put bond graph into CAMP-G  Interface to Matlab  Results: Four Files  campgmod.m, campgequ.m, campgnum.m,
Using CAMP-G to solve the following spring/damper/mass system: F m1m1 m2m2 k1k1 k2k2 b1b1 b2b2 where: k 1 = 40 N/m b 1 = 3 N-s/m m 1 = 2 kg k 2 = 60 N/m.
Constant speed.
Impulse and Momentum.
Momentum and Impulse: Lesson 3.  It`s not how fast you are going: it is how fast you stop  To reduce the impact force, increase the stopping distance.
Physics 211 Lecture 12 Today’s Concepts: a) Elastic Collisions
Practice Problem Set 3 MomentumImpulseEnergy. If both the mass and velocity of an object are doubled, its momentum 1.remains unchanged. 2.is doubled.
Activity 82 Major Concepts Friction is a force that will cause changes in the speed of an object’s motion. The motion of an object can be described by.
Applied Science III - Finau. What is inertia?  An object’s ability to change its motion  A measure of the amount of matter within the object.
Newton’s Second Law of Motion. But first, Let’s Review…. A bowling ball and a volleyball are rolling towards you. Which would be easier to stop? Explain.
Inequalities Ch Equations Vs. Inequalities An equation is a number sentence that states that two expressions have the same value: X+3 =
Forces,Motion,Energy and Momentum Revision Mock 2015.
Section 2: Life and Death: Before and After Seat Belts
Momentum And Energy Review BRYCE TOWLE EDCI 270 Click this Home Button to return to the main menu at anytime. Use this to switch from momentum to energy,
This lesson contains 65 slides. 16 slides are presented here as samples…(the videos are not included in the samples)
ME 270 Vehicle Analysis By: Kevin McClain.
Goal: To understand Newton’s 2nd law and its applications to motions.
Chapter 8 Momentum Object A hits Object B. What happens? 27-May-18.
HONORS PHYSICS DAY 28 Here we go! Today: HW Quiz on the last HW’s
Vehicle Crash Test Lab Justin Otero Fall 2007
Why should I wear my seatbelt?
Damped Forced Vibrations Analysis Using CAMP-G® and Simulink® Modeled Solutions to Problem (
10.7 Safety first Q1. Impact force = change in momentum impact time
8th Homework In this homework, we shall model and simulate a mechanical system as well as exercise the state selection algorithm. We shall first model.
Newton’s Second Law Recall Newton’s Second Law
Vehicle Safety (Egg Cars)
THE PHYSICS OF CAR SAFETY
Motion Chapter 2.
PES 1000 – Physics in Everyday Life
An Introduction to VEX IQ Programming with Modkit
Momentum 2 mph 40 mph.
Motion and Forces.
lesson 9.5 CONTROLLING FORCE OF IMPACT
Presentation transcript:

Seatbelt/Bumper Design Project Prof. Granda ME270 Tyrone Tracy 11/5/07

Assignment A car will crash into a wall going from 25 to 55 MPH. Design the seatbelts and bumper so that the crash dummy will survive the collision. Develop a bond graph model of the car, person, seatbelts, bumper. Simulate system performance using Matlab/Simulink. Injury data and physical parameters provided. Goals Develop model for the crash system. Change the initial seatbelt/bumper values so that the dummy will survive the crash. Obtain plots to prove design’s worthiness. Results The initial values for the bumper and seatbelts did not result in the dummy surviving. The values were changed so now the dummy will survive the crash going from MPH. Exact values provided throughout the report.

Step 1: Develop a bond graph model Wall---Bumper---Car Dummy | Seatbelt C = compliance I = inductive R = resistive

Step 2: Interface CAMPG with Matlab. Change values in campgmod.m to match system parameters. Given initial physical parameters Initial conditions (mph changed to m/s) Plotting graphs to interpret results mdummy= 100 kg k1= 1 x 104 N/m, b1=500 N-s/m Mcar= 1500 Kg, k2= 3 x 105 N/m, b2=8 x 104 N-s/m

Plot: Using given physical parameters and initial velocity set to 25MPH. The dummy is only allowed to move 100cm (1m) before he is deemed injured. The graph below shows that the peak distance traveled by the dummy is about.75m, so he is safe in that regard. The dummy can only feel 6670N on his chest before he is injured, the plot below shows that the dummy feels more than 6670N so he is injured.

Plot: Using given physical parameters and initial velocity set to 55MPH. The graph below shows that the peak distance traveled by the dummy is about 1.8m, so the dummy has collided with the windshield. The dummy feels 1800N on his chest, so he is not injured by the seatbelt.

Step 3: Using loops, determine the values for the bumper and seatbelt so that the resulting plots will show that the dummy is not injured. mdummy= 100 kg k1= N/m, b1=300 N-s/m Mcar= 1500 Kg, k2= N/m, b2= N-s/m My design values

Plot: Using my new physical parameters and initial velocity set to 25MPH. The graph below shows that the peak distance traveled by the dummy is about.4m, so the dummy is safe. The plot below shows that the dummy feels about 1200N of force and since that is less than 6670N he is not injured.

Plot: Using my new physical parameters and initial velocity set to 55MPH. The graph below shows that the peak distance traveled by the dummy is about.8m, so the dummy is safe. The plot below shows that the dummy feels about 2500N of force, since that is less than 6670N he is not injured.

Step 4: Now we must see how adding an additional shoulder strap to the dummy could affect the dummy’s safety. To model 2 safety belts instead of one, I will double the value of the K and B element. The dummy’s force tolerance doubles since the effective area increases; the value increases from 6670N to 13340N. 25MPH 55MPH SAFE

Step 5: How long it would take the dummy to hit the windshield if he were not wearing a seatbelt? To model this situation I set the R value to 0 and the K value very high, meaning that the C (potential energy stoarage, ie seatbelt) element becomes very small. 25MPH. Dummy hits the windshield in about.1 seconds. 40MPH. Dummy hits the windshield in about.075 seconds. 55MPH. Dummy hits the windshield in about.055 seconds.

My design is limited by the distance traveled by the dummy. The critical velocity with these physical parameter values is 61mph. Step 6: I want to see what velocity the car could go and still have the dummy be safe after the collision. To test this I simply entered in different velocity values until I saw either the distance traveled greater than 1m or the force on the dummy’s chest greater than 6670N. I used the physical parameter values of my design.

Step 7: To validate that the Matlab program was simulating correctly, we double check with a Simulink simulation. To do this we need the step response of our system in matlab, which means we have to uncomment the e11 and f8 equations in the campgnum.m file. The plots from Simulink match the one from Matlab.

Conclusions We were given a scenario of a car crashing into a wall with a dummy riding inside. One of the goals was to develop a bond graph model and a Matlab simulation of this system. We used CAMPG and Matlab to model and simulate this scenario. The physical parameters given to us initially were not suffice to keep the dummy safe. Another goal was to obtain new seatbelt/bumper compliance and resistive numbers to keep the dummy safe from 25-55MPH. With my new design values, the plots shows that the dummy was safe up until a critical velocity of 61MPH. Simulink was used to show that the Matlab simulations were valid.

Problems My plots (that used the initial physical parameters) don’t match many of my classmates plots, even though our bond graph models are the same. This makes me think that there may be something wrong with my Matlab interface. If you inspect the plots on slide 5 and slide 6, you can see that the dummy feels more force on his chest going 25MPH than 55MPH. That physically doesn’t make sense to me. So I redid these simulations several times, each time starting from a brand new campG model. I also tried switching computers and redoing the Matlab code, every attempt resulted in the same plots. I would like to see the Professor’s solution to this design project, and get an explanation of why my results turned out the way they did (they may be correct, I’m unsure).