Discussion of open issues. Cases of meaning equivalence Creative Language use – Metaphorical language Al7ayah ba2a lwnha bamby 5ales [Egyptian Arabic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit Issues: Opportunities and Challenges Tuesday, March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit NIST.
Advertisements

Languages & Inference Appropriate layering Do we need a logic? Do we need Description Logic? Legacy data; database storage vs inference Tolerant/anytime.
Kees van Deemter Matthew Stone Formal Issues in Natural Language Generation Lecture 4 Shieber 1993; van Deemter 2002.
Great Leaders. From Where Do our Ideas about Leadership come?
Map of Human Computer Interaction
© 2012 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. For Internal MITRE Use Evaluation and STS Workshop on a Pipeline for Semantic Text Similarity (STS)
Elements of Constructivist Teaching Practices EdSe 4244 Social Studies Methods.
“Why Are We Bringing The Fish?” Matching Methods and Culture Martha Ann Carey, PhD, RN Kells Consulting Media, PA, USA 72 nd ICP Conference, Paris, France.
Languages & The Media, 5 Nov 2004, Berlin 1 New Markets, New Trends The technology side Stelios Piperidis
Value for Your Dollar: The Social Enterprise Impact Assessment Project.
IE 366 IE 366: Work Systems Engineering Introduction.
Design Activities in Usability Engineering laura leventhal and julie barnes.
The Semantic Web Week 13 Module Website: Lecture: Knowledge Acquisition / Engineering Practical: Getting to know.
Enhancing the assessment of student learning Richard James
How can Computer Science contribute to Research Publishing?
Semantics For the Semantic Web: The Implicit, the Formal and The Powerful Amit Sheth, Cartic Ramakrishnan, Christopher Thomas CS751 Spring 2005 Presenter:
Materials video clip 6 copies of LOI selected elements HO: plus/delta 6 copies: Balanced Math Framework Curriculum map 1.NBT.2a Chart paper for elements.
Enriching the Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) to Improve Its Suitability for Web Service Annotations Chaitanya Guttula, Alok Dhamanaskar,
Data to Discovery The iPlant Collaborative Community Cyberinfrastructure for Life Science Nirav Merchant iPlant / University.
Deploying Trust Policies on the Semantic Web Brian Matthews and Theo Dimitrakos.
Basic Impact Evaluation Course Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) Poverty Analysis Initiative (C102) World Bank Institute Attacking Poverty Program.
1 Data Integration Community of Practice Meeting September 15, 2009 Science Data Integration.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse
What is Usability? Usability Is a measure of how easy it is to use something: –How easy will the use of the software be for a typical user to understand,
Ontology Summit 2015 Track C Report-back Summit Synthesis Session 1, 19 Feb 2015.
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Value Set Resolution: Build generalizable data normalization pipeline using LexEVS infrastructure resources Explore UIMA framework for implementing semantic.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
MASC The Manually Annotated Sub- Corpus of American English Nancy Ide, Collin Baker, Christiane Fellbaum, Charles Fillmore, Rebecca Passonneau.
Grooming the Next Generation of Public Library Leaders Lindsay Brock, Middlesex County Library Julie DeVries, Middlesex County Library Anne Marie Madziak,
Modelling Human Thematic Fit Judgments IGK Colloquium 3/2/2005 Ulrike Padó.
11 Chapter 19 Lexical Semantics. 2 Lexical Ambiguity Most words in natural languages have multiple possible meanings. –“pen” (noun) The dog is in the.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Indirect Supervision Protocols for Learning in Natural Language Processing II. Learning by Inventing Binary Labels This work is supported by DARPA funding.
Immediate Impacts  Networking which led to increased access to data providers, tool specialists, educators; to others expertise  Rejuvenation in our.
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain Sunday 29 th of May, 2005 Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël.
Christoph F. Eick University of Houston Organization 1. What are Ontologies? 2. What are they good for? 3. Ontologies and.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Semantic Web: The Future Starts Today “Industrial Ontologies” Group InBCT Project, Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä, 29 April 2003.
Cyberinfrastructure What is it? Russ Hobby Internet2 Joint Techs, 18 July 2007.
PLCS DEXs Trine Hansen DNV 20 April Content OASIS / PLCS Organization PLCS DEXs DEX architecture Process – define and verify capabilities Way forward.
Scientific Workflow systems: Summary and Opportunities for SEEK and e-Science.
Results of the 2000 Topic Detection and Tracking Evaluation in Mandarin and English Jonathan Fiscus and George Doddington.
OVERVIEW Framework Overview – From Programming to Music Dimensions in Detail – Visibility, Progressive Evaluation, Consistency, Viscosity, Abstraction.
Toward an Open Source Textual Entailment Platform (Excitement Project) Bernardo Magnini (on behalf of the Excitement consortium) 1 STS workshop, NYC March.
WSMO in Knowledge Web 2nd SDK cluster f2f meeting Rubén Lara Digital Enterprise.
Cyberinfrastructure: Many Things to Many People Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
The Research Problem and Objectives Lecture 6 1. Organization of this lecture Research Problem & Objectives: Research and Decision/Action Problems Importance.
SALSA-WS 09/05 Approximating Textual Entailment with LFG and FrameNet Frames Aljoscha Burchardt, Anette Frank Computational Linguistics Department Saarland.
HLG MOS Flexibility and Adaptability HLG MOS Workshop November 24, 2015 The Hague Pádraig Dalton 1.
Overview of Statistical NLP IR Group Meeting March 7, 2006.
CIMA and Semantic Interoperability for Networked Instruments and Sensors Donald F. (Rick) McMullen Pervasive Technology Labs at Indiana University
Selected Semantic Web UMBC CoBrA – Context Broker Architecture  Using OWL to define ontologies for context modeling and reasoning  Taking.
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND THE EU COHESION FUND: LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE Massimo Florio and Silvia Vignetti University of Milan and.
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit Issues: Opportunities and Challenges Tuesday, March 14, 2006 Upper Ontology Summit NIST.
Welcome – Do Now 1. Write your name on a Post-it-Note 2. Choose the goal that is most valuable to you, this afternoon. 3. Jot a note down on the post-it.
In this lecture, we will learn about: Translation.
EUDAT receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme - DG CONNECT e-Infrastructures. Contract No EUDAT Aalto Data.
Activity Design Goal: work from problems and opportunities of problem domain to envision new activities.
Representing and Reasoning with Heterogeneous, Modular and Distributed ontologies UniTN/IRST contribution to KnowledgeWeb.WP 2.1.
Role Play #1 You are doing support on a unit & a staff member become very hostile & argumentative. This is occurring at the nurses station with others.
11 Thoughts on STS regarding Machine Reading Ralph Weischedel 12 March 2012.
Alessandro Lenci University of Pisa
Q1 issues: Lack of staff agreement in the decisions as to if and how to utilize volunteers within the agency Absence of job descriptions or support and.
OPM/S: Semantic Engineering of Web Services
Knowledge Management Systems
Performance Evaluation of Adaptive MPI
Elements of Constructivist Teaching and learning Practices
Presentation transcript:

Discussion of open issues

Cases of meaning equivalence Creative Language use – Metaphorical language Al7ayah ba2a lwnha bamby 5ales [Egyptian Arabic BOLT data] [gloss] the-life became colored pink extremely [Trans1] Life is so pink [Trans2] Everything is extremely hunky dory [Trans3] Life is quite rosy – Sarcasm Great, now I have to be at work at 5am Great, now I have to be at work at 10am – Etc. – Pronominal Usage He ate the apple She ate the apple – The notion of salience and the role it plays with respect to context (the IBM example, Sameer’s presentation)

Current Tools and Resources Current semantic technologies – WSD, WSI, Lexical substitution, SRL, modality, distributional compositionality, MWE, scoping, conversion from surface form to logical structure Current resources – WN, ontologies (SUMO), MRD, ontonotes, UVI, verbnet, propbank, framenet

What other things are needed? Tools – Creative language use detectors (work by Veale, Muresan, also some by us here on sarcasm) Metaphor, irony, sarcasm – Register/style/salience detectors Resources – Generalizable predicate relations detectors (extend the UVI to be more comprehensive) – Annotations for pragmatic stuff – What data do we annotate? (Multi)MASC

What platform to adopt? Should we go with something like UIMA, or with Nancy’s grant – We can probably start with UIMA and then transfer over especially if we want webservices and cloud computing capabilities

What semantic interoperability standards do we adopt? CAS OWL KAF Etc.

Precursor issues Refine STS definition – Create an inventory of possible relations we observe between two textual snippets – Devise set of diagnostics for each of these relations in the inventory Equivalence (substitutability) Entailment Contradiction Specificity Subset etc – What role does the Topic/domain play – What role does the context play – What role does the native language/culture play

Refine the STS Annotation Framework Adopt and work on Diana, Alessandro Lenci, Ido, Bernardo, Alon’s insights on how to modularize and concretize the task of STS for humans Three types of annotations – Cast as an alignment + scores – Decouple alignment from overall scores – Just scores How do we obtain the annotations – Turkers? – Trained people?

Evaluation Issues Intrinisic vs Extrinsic measures – What is desirable – How does it correlate with application needs

Should we attempt multilingual STS from the get go?

Next steps Balancing act of functionality/utility/ontological issues Create this community – Committees to work on the different aspects Shared Task – *SEM as a venue – Use Nancy’s challenge idea Seek funding from different resources – NSF – DARPA – AirForce – IARPA Potential for European/Asian collaboration