Government 1740 International Law Summer 2006 Lecture 9: The Use of Force.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 7 UN Professor O’Malley
Advertisements

Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Just War Theory.
Today’s lesson we will be looking at: Responses to aggression You will be able to:  State two responses to aggression which involve the use of force.
Article X The Members of the League undertake to respect and preserve as against external aggression the territorial integrity.
International Law and Armed Conflict MA Course Lecture: Conduct of Contemporary Warfare.
The Ethics of War Spring Main normative questions When, if ever, is resort to war justified? What can we permissibly do in war? Who are responsible.
Center of Excellence ISSUES IN SOVEREIGNTY Center of Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance.
Humanitarian Intervention Some Legal Aspects. Preamble The Doctrine is new Since 1990 escalation of confrontations raise new questions New terminology.
INTERNATIONAL LAW THE USE OF FORCE. THE PROHIBITION OF FORCE: Art 2 t 3. All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such.
Collective Security Operations ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law June 1, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
h/?id= n.
A 21ST CENTURY SOLUTION TO A DECADES-OLD PROBLEM 1.
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Interventions Old and New.
Collective security: Use of force authorized by the Security Council Current legal issues: The Use of Force in International Law Dr Myra Williamson Associate.
© Michael Lacewing Can war be just? Michael Lacewing
USE OF FORCE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
International Law Unit 9: Use of Force Fall 2005 Mr. Morrison.
Just War Theory Unit #7: The Cold War Essential Question: Was the Cold War a just war?
Cyber Warfare v. Cyber Stability Jody R. Westby, Esq. Forth International Forum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany April 12-15,
Terrorism. Terrorism Act Terrorism Act Agent Terrorism Act Agent Victim.
Government 1740 International Law Summer 2008 Lecture 9: The Use of Force.
Government S-1740 International Law Summer 2006
Operační program Vzdělávání pro konkurenceschopnost Název projektu: Inovace magisterského studijního programu Fakulty ekonomiky a managementu Registrační.
The Middle East, Young & Kent: International Relations since 1945.
INT 3131 Lecture Summary ( ) 1. The Organization of the UN (cont’d) Trusteeship Council Secretariat International Court of Justice.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Situating International Humanitarian Law (IHL) ATHA Specialized Training on International Humanitarian Law May 31, 2010 Stockholm, Sweden.
INT 3131 INT 313: INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Fall November 2002 The United Nations I: An Introduction.
Hezbollah “The Party of God”. What led to the creation of Hezbollah? The Iranian Revolution of 1979 The Israeli invasion of Southern Lebanon in 1982.
PUBLIC INT’L LAW CLASS EIGHT USE OF FORCE Prof David K. Linnan USC LAW # /07/03.
From Right to Responsability
International Law War: International and Civil. Just War: Avenging injuries against a foe that fails to punish wrongs committed by its citizens.  “that.
International law and IR theories The invasion of Iraq, 2003.
The law of war: Humanitarian law THE STORY BEHIND THE STORY.
Interventions, Institutions, Regional & Ethnic Conflicts : Class Notes #2.
Just War When is war the answer?.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory Just War Theory   Jus ad bellum: proposals to justify the use of force in a particular type of situation   Jus.
Justice in Action: Just War Theory PHI 2604 January 25, 2016.
Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY Chapter Seventeen.
COLLECTIVE SECURITY Hobbes & Rousseau: Do we need an international Leviathan that imposes its will? What are the main advantages and problems with this.
The Use of Force Unit 11. Introduction Before the U.N. Charter, before 1945, many states followed the Just War doctrine. Just War theory states that war.
International Law and the Use of Force (LG566) Topic 4: Self-Defence.
Conceptual Overview. Jus ad Bellum (start) Jus in Bello (middle) Jus post Bellum (end)
International Law and the Use of Force (LG566)
Use of Force Including War An Introduction. Use of Force Including War Rules Governing Inter-state Warfare: Two categories: Jus ad bellum Jus in bello.
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT POLS 309. R2P doctrine  Canadian government sponsored the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty.
Use of Force and International Law General Treaty for the Renunciation of War, 1928/ Briand Kellog Pact ‘solemnly declare in the names of their respective.
Enforcement of Human Rights and Sanctions.  The enforcement of human rights is a complicated business, given the different categories of rights involved.
Introduction to the UN human rights system UN TRAINING FOR TRANS ACTIVISTS SEPTEMBER 2015.
LEGALITY OF THE THREAT OR USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS ICJ, Advisory Opinion,
International Law and the Use of Force (LG566) Topic 1: Introduction.
Article 2(4) of the UN Charter A textual analysis.
Date____ Page____ Title: Global Terrorism. What is terrorism? The use of violence against people or property to force changes in societies or governments.
THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT POLS 309. R2P Learning objectives 1. Contemporary notion of sovereignty 2. The UN and the legitimate use of force 3. R2P.
University of Colorado – Denver
International Law.
P.J. Blount University of Mississippi School of Law
Threats to World Security Chapter 33 Section 3.
Document A.
This is Why you can’t just blow stuff up.
Fundamental rights.
Just War Theory. Just War Theory JWT is not Pacifism Pacifism says that war is always unjust, and therefore always wrong. This is an absolute statement.
War and Violence Can war be just?.
President of the Russian Association of International Law
The norms on the use of force in a nutshell
Fundamental rights.
Is there a Right of Acess to Mediation?
Introduction to IHL: Application and Basic Principles
The legality of airstrikes against Syria Presentation: Ayaan Hersi.
Presentation transcript:

Government 1740 International Law Summer 2006 Lecture 9: The Use of Force

Outline I. “Just war” doctrine II. “War” in the twentieth century and the evolution of doctrines of use of force III. Regulation of the right to resort to force A. The League of Nations Covenant B. The Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) C. The Charter of the United Nations (1945) 1. Outlaws wars of aggression 2. Chapter VII: collective security 3. Recognizes the right of self-defense 4. What about anticipatory self-defense? (Example: the invasion of Iraq) IV. What influences norms regarding the use of force?

I. Just War Doctrine Jus ad Bellum

Just War Doctrine  Competent authority  Just cause  Proportional response  Right intention

II. War in the 20 th Century Warsaw, September 1939.

War in the late 20 th /21 st Century  Reluctance to declare war  International versus civil war  Involvement of non-state entities

Evolution of the Doctrine  Obvious difficulties with JWT for the 20 th century  From “Just” to “Permissible”  Toward a Ban on Offensive Wars

III. Legal Regulation of the Right to Resort to Force Institutions Principles

The League of Nations Covenant  Art. 10: League members to preserve territorial integrity and political independence of all members from external aggression.  Arts : Restricted the rights of members to resort to war  Obligated the members to avoid non-war hostilities. “Muzzled” from the Literary Digest 9/13/19

The Kellogg Briand Pact (1928) ( The Paris General Treaty for the Renunciation of War) Kellogg, with Prittwitz, and Keip. August 27, 1928

The UN Charter Article 2(4): “members agree to... refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” Article 33-38: obligate members to seek peaceful solutions to disputes.

UN Charter Outlaws Wars of Aggression  Chapter VII, Article 39: empowers the Security Council to respond to acts of aggression. FIRST SESSION OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL (London, 17/1/46).

What is “Aggression”?  Use of armed force by a state  First use of force  Activities that constitute aggression  Plus what the Security Council may determine  State responsibility FIRST SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY(London, 10/1/46).

The 2003 Use of Force Against Iraq: A Continuation of Collective Security?  A Chapter VII action stemming from Iraq’s 1990 attack on Kuwait?  Justified by compulsory Security Council Resolutions adopted between ?  Some key SC resolutions: – 660 (August 1990) – 678 (November 1990) – 687 (April 1991) – 1441 (November 2002)

Exhaustion of Peaceful Remedies  Negotiate in good faith  For how long?  How to do this in the case of terrorism?

The Right to Self-Defense Article 51 of the UN Charter: recognizes an inherent right of collective self-defense of member states against armed attack UN IRAQ-KUWAIT OBSERVER MISSION. Burning oil wells and a destroyed Iraqi tank. Kuwait, 25/3/91.

Anticipatory Self-Defense  Clear and present danger of aggression.  No alternatives

Anticipatory Self-Defense and the Invasion of Iraq  New conditions: the problem of weapons of Mass destruction  Customary international law  Practice  Justifies a reformulated test

Proportionality of Means to Ends  The states interest has to be serious enough to justify war as a means.  Must apply force proportionally World Trade Towers, 2001 Baghdad, 2003

Israel, Lebanon and Hezbollah  Is Israel’s use of force legitimate?  Is Israel using its force legitimately?  Does it matter whether Hezbollah “started it”?  Is Hezbollah bound by international law on the use of force? Lebanon?  What are legitimate military targets?  Is it legal to kill civilians?  What about the obligation to negotiate a peaceful settlement?

Prisoner Exchange? Israeli-heldIsraeli-captives Palestinians1 Israeli soldier 19834,700 Palestinians, Lebanese 6 Israeli soldiers Syrians, 20 security prisoners 6 Israelis, 2 bodies of soldiers 19851,150 prisoners3 Israeli soldiers prisoners, 100 Hezbollah bodies 2 bodies of Israeli soldiers prisoners, Hamas leader2 Israeli spies prisoners, 40 Hezbollah bodies 1 Israeli soldier body prisoners, bodies of 59 Lebanese 1 Israeli citizen, 3 soldiers’ bodies

Summary  Current rules are influenced by just war doctrine, but with more emphasis on limiting war than ensuring justice.  21st century wars are difficult to regulate through traditional international law  The resort to force is no longer considered an inherent aspect of state sovereignty  Self-defense is the only legitimate reason for going to war under the UN Charter.  This is may be changing with respect to anticipatory self-defense (in an era of WMD) and humanitarian intervention (a return to a “just cause”?) next week!