The Nuts and Bolts of Submitting a Successful IRB Application Gail Widener, Chair, SMUIRB Research Rounds March 29, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIPAA – Privacy Rule and Research USCRF Research Educational Series March 19, 2003.
Advertisements

Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Informed Consent.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Human Subjects Protection in Research Carnegie Mellon University Regulatory Compliance Administration 5000 Forbes Avenue, UTDC Bldg., Rooms 108 & 109 Pittsburgh,
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Ethical Issues in Research
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
HIPAA Business Associates Leadership Group Meeting June 28, 2001.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Welcome New IRB Members! Today we will discuss: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Office of Human Research (OHR) Quality Improvement Program Patrick Herbison Heather Krupinski.
Research Involving Human Subjects
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Privacy and Security in the US Lecture b This material (Comp11_Unit7b) was developed by Oregon Health & Science University.
Welcome New IRB Member! This brief presentation covers: Your Role in the IRB: What to Know The IRB Review Process Resources Human Research Protections.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09. Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Office of Human Research (OHR) Quality Improvement Program Patrick Herbison Heather Krupinski.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
The Protection of Human Participants in Research A Brief Overview.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
The Protection of Human Participants in Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Human Participants Research
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

The Nuts and Bolts of Submitting a Successful IRB Application Gail Widener, Chair, SMUIRB Research Rounds March 29, 2012

Objectives  Introduce members of the SMUIRB  Describe the history and basic tenants of IRBs  Describe the process of IRB application including the appropriate document completion  Identify common errors in application  Describe best practices in response to IRB requirements/review

IRB at SMU  SMUIRB established in 1997  Compliance with federal guidelines under the Department of Health and Human Services DHHS)  OHRP is the Office for Human Research Protections  Federalwide Assurance Number  Required for federal funding  Members appointed by President  Requirements  One non-scientific member  One member not affiliated with institution  Representatives of different knowledge areas and types of research

Current SMUIRB Members  Nicole Christensen, PhD, PT, MAppSc  Cecily Cosby, PhD, FNP-C/PA-C  Jamie Hirota, MPA, IRB Administrator  Bruce Richardson, PhD  Eric Stamps, DPM  Kristi Wessenberg, non-scientist, non-institutional member  Gail Widener, PhD, PT, Chair

History of IRB  Atrocities of human experimentation/exploitation  Nazi war crimes ( s)  Tuskegee syphilis experiments ( )  Nuremberg Code (1947)  10 principles of research ethics involving human subjects  Belmont Report (1979)  Respect for persons  Beneficence  Justice

Ethical Principles  Respect for Persons  Consent  Coercion, undue influence  Confidentiality/privacy  Beneficence  Benefit versus risk  Justice  Equitable selection of participants

HIPAA  HIPAA enacted in 1996  Protects people from inappropriate disclosures of protected health information  Privacy Rule enacted in April, 2003  Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information applied to research  Enforced by Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

Protected Health Information  Names  Geographical subdivisions smaller than a state  Phone number  Fax number  address  SSN  Medical Record Number  Health plan beneficiary numbers  Dates related to individuals (except year)  Account numbers  Certificate/license numbers  Vehicle identifiers  Device identifiers  URLs  Internet Protocol (IP) addresses  Biometric identifiers  Full face photo images  Other unique identifying number, characteristic, or code

Main Function of IRB Review  IRB must assure that  Risks are minimized  Risks are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits (risk/benefit ratio)  There is informed consent  Rights and welfare of participants are maintained

Risks Associated with Research  Direct harm versus potential benefit  Physical (injury)  Social (reputation)  Psychological  Economic (financial or employability)  Coercion or undue influence in recruitment  Disclosure of research objectives/methods  Confidentiality of records/data

Confidential versus Anonymous  Anonymous  Researchers cannot identify who is participating  Not anonymous if  If researchers know individual participants or  Collect any identifying information about the participants  Size of the sample is so small, identity can be uncovered  Confidential  Data must be coded so that identifying information is protected  Master list of participants with codes kept locked  Can’t keep IC forms with subject data, keep in separate location

Types of Review  Full committee  Reviewed by the full committee  Turn in first of each month  Expedited  Reviewed by at least 2 members of the committee  Can be turned in any time  Exempt  Subjects are anonymous  Names are never associated with individual data  Can be turned in any time

Categories of Exempt Review  Research in educational settings - no identifiers  Research that uses cognitive diagnostic aptitude or achievement tests  Public officials  Research about  Public benefit or service programs  Procedures that explain benefits or services  Collection or study of  Existing data, records or documents, specimens available publicly  Data that contain no identifiers – BLINDED data sets

Expedited or Full Review?  Expedited review  Essentially includes studies where risks are minimal  Minor changes to approved research  Full review  Higher risks  Vulnerable population

When is IRB Review Required?  SMUIRB MUST approve all RESEARCH involving SMU students, staff or faculty – even if it occurs at locations outside of SMU campuses NO EXCEPTIONS

When is SMUIRB Review Required: Other IRB Approvals  All research involving SMU faculty, students or staff  Research occurring at other institutions in which SMU people are participating  Researchers must provide  IRB approval from other institution  Recruitment plan for individuals at SMU  Research occurring at another location involving SMU faculty, students and staff from other institutions must supply SMUIRB with their current IRB approval

Forms to Complete  Protocol Approval form  Make sure you look at whether you need to answer all questions  Full review does NOT require answering questions 7-11  Exempt studies require all questions to be answered  Must be signed by PI, co-PI, students, mentors  Protocol Format  Fully answer questions  Make sure appendices are clearly labeled  IC form should be written at the 5 th grade level  Checklist  Go through each item on the checklist to make sure you have completed each applicable item

Certification of IRB Training  Training certificates required for ALL members of the research team dealing with participants or data  This includes researchers, students, research assistants, recruiters, etc.  Anyone who will come into contact with subjects of subject data  Link to the training is located on SMUIRB webpage  Two ways to complete (both are free)  NIH training  CITI through Sutter Health

Response to IRB Recommendations  Response letter should include:  IRB number and title of project  Take each point raised by the IRB and respond how you addressed it in the documents  Attach corrected documents with corrections highlighted in some way  BOLD,  Italics,  highlighted

Reimbursement for Research Volunteers  IRS does not require reporting of a thank you gift given as entertainment  Movie tickets, etc.  Does not need to be reported if given to SMU employee  Cash or gift cards of $25 or less are not considered taxable item (cash and gift cards are equivalent to IRS); however anything over $25 is taxable income  If the volunteer is a SMU employee - need to report since the employee may receive $25 from more than one source and therefore the income is taxable.  If giving gift cards, keep a log and have volunteers sign when receiving the card

Questions?  SMUIRB page on the SMU website  Ask any IRB member  Jamie will connect you with a member  Jamie Hirota