A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 WGISS CEOS WGISS 22, Annapolis September 2006 WGISS – GEO Discussion.
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Days 2 & 3 ID-01 Data Sharing.
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
ID-06 Building a User-Driven GEOSS Essential Components of User Management for GEO Tasks.
ID-04 Building Communities and Increasing Awareness & ID-06 (proposed) Building a user-driven GEOSS.
The GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Network: A spin-off of the EGIDA Project Hans-Peter Plag, Ian McCallum, Steffen Fritz, Shelley Jules-Plag,
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
Remote Sensing at the service of Natural Disasters Warning: the Contribution of the Supersites Concept Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair GEO Institutions.
TVET working group contributions. What are the possible options for obtaining decent living and working conditions without joining the informal economy?
Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.
EGIDA Stakeholder Network and Advisory Board and Their Relevance for EGIDA and GEO Stefano Nativi 1 st Joint Workshop of the EGIDA Stakeholder Network.
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
The CEOS Constellations Status and Way Forward SIT September 2006.
A GEOSS (Data) Citation Standard: Status, Issues, Next Steps Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
Promoting Awareness & Benefits of GEO EGIDA – WP3.
How GEO works  Coordinating activities of Members and Participating Organisations  Supporting the development of capabilities for Observations, Processing.
2016 Transitional GEO Work Programme Discussion & CONSOLIDATION Session 10, 2015 GEO Work Plan Symposium Geneva, 7 May 2015 Alan Edwards (IPWG) Giovanni.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-5 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
Report of the IOC Task Force on the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Ivan DeLoatch, U.S. Geological Survey Alan Edwards, European Commission Co-chairs.
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
1 ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS C1 Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation Hans-Peter Plag IEEE.
6. Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Validating the way forward: Review of feedback from Plenary.
ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS Advance GEOSS through integration of innovations in Earth observation science and technology, also enabling the research.
ST Kick-off Promoting Awareness and Benefits of GEO in the Science and Technology Community Douglas Cripe – GEO Secretariat Frascati/Brussels
Science and Technology Committee GGOS, December 2006.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
Roadmap Activity 2a: A GEOSS citation standard : Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-01 Advancing the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Mapping (EGIDA/GEOSS) Stakeholders and STC Road Map Hans-Peter Plag Michael Nyenhuis.
GEO ADC meeting, Washington DC, USA, Sep Slide # 1 DA DA Virtual Constellations Ivan Petiteville, CEOS GEO ADC Meeting, Washington DC,
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-4 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
A GEO Label: Status, Issues, Next Steps Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Discussion Issues for IIB Presented by Steve Browdy.
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
Robert S. Chen Co-chair/Data Sharing Task Force Geneva, Switzerland 1-3 February 2011 Implementation of the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Data Sharing Task Force Update Ivan DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alan Edwards, EC, DSTF Co-chair ADC/CBC Joint Committees Meeting Sao Paulo, Brazil 28.
An orientation about the activities of ST related to “GEO label” and Data Citation Standard by Bente Lilja Bye and Hans-Peter Plag on behalf of GEO.
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
The GEOSS Science & Technology Stakeholder Network – Workshop Goals Michael Nyenhuis Hans-Peter Plag.
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-6 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS)‏ Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6 November 2015 CEOS and GEO.
Description of an Essential Variable Breakout Session 2.1: Essential Variables for Sustainable Development Goals, Global Boundaries and Safe Operating.
Summary of HEP SW workshop Ian Bird MB 15 th April 2014.
The GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholders: Implementing the Science and Technology Road Map through an open, global networking approach Goals: - Engage.
Science and Technology Roadmap - current progress 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites CEO Team Plenary Agenda Item #13b 29 th CEOS Plenary Kyoto International Conference Center Kyoto, Japan 5 – 6.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.
Helen M. Wood Co-chair / U.S.A. On behalf of the Data Sharing Task Force 22nd Meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland July 2011.
GEOSS Data Sharing: Plans for 2016 and beyond GEO Work Programme Symposium WMO, Geneva, 2 May 2016 Robert Chen on behalf of the DSWG co-chairs (GEO Foundational.
The GEO-Label: a Service for Data Users and a Tool for Facilitating Societal Benefits of Earth Observations Hans-Peter Plag University of Nevada, Reno,
ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS Agenda 1 Acceptance of the Agenda 2 Overview of Task Team membership, Work Status and Commitment to Task Activities.
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
© GEO Secretariat Work Plan Management Update GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012.
Hans-Peter Plag Global Change and Sustainability Research Institute
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
EV Workshop, June 11-12, 2015, Bari, Italy
Presentation transcript:

A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;

- Questions for the Review - Potential Goals for the Label - STC Plan A GEO Label: Scope of Review

Activity 2: Encourage relevant scientists and technical experts to contribute to GEOSS in a truly participatory way. That will result in two levels of activities, i.e. by creating an environment that is generally attractive for scientists and technical experts, and by specifically targeting relevant groups: 2. (Roadmap 2b) Establishing a “GEO label”. Develop a concept for a “GEO label” related to the scientific relevance, quality, acceptance and societal needs for activities in support of GEOSS as an attractive incentive for involvement of the S&T communities. A draft concept will be proposed in early 2010 liaising with existing major Earth observation data providers. ST Task Definition

Question for the Review Questions: - How to measure scientific relevance, quality, acceptance and societal needs and how to display the results? - What is "an attractive incentive for involvement of the S&T communities"? Should a GEO Label be restricted to be "an attractive incentive for involvement of the S&T communities"? What would GEOSS user want most from a GEO Label? Or Should a GEO Label promote, support, ease the utilization of the societal benefits of GEOSS? What should be the role of a GEO Label in a "user-driven GEOSS"?

Some thoughts on goals for the GEO Label: - Be an attractive incentive for involvement of the S&T communities: - give recognition for contributions (needs not be be available to everybody); - enable credits for providers (attribution); - support forward traceability (usage). - Promote data sharing: - signal data availability and conditions. - Inform users: - increase trustworthiness; - characterize quality; - characterize applicability; - ensure backward traceability (data sources) - Inform providers (and their funders): - Provide information on relevance (meeting user needs); - Provide information on usage. Potential Goals for the Label

Design, Concept, Implementation, and Success of a Label depends on the goals, and these goals need to be well-defined and widely accepted. Potential Goals for the Label My opinion: The Goals for the GEO Label should be agreed upon by the GEO Plenary.

A label requires time to get accepted; once established the key characteristics can not be changed. Cavets A label should be associated with GEO/GEOSS, not a specific aspect. There are many examples of labels that failed.

Design, Concept, Implementation, and Success of a Label depends on the goals, and these goals need to be well-defined and widely accepted. Scope of Review Informing the GEO Plenary about the implications of various potential goals on concept, costs, design, acceptance, impacts of a GEO Label as a basis for decission making. Providing a basis for an informed development of a GEO Label.