National Science Foundation Mathematics & Science Partnerships Program (MSP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Bidder’s Conference March 15, 2008.
Instrument Development for a Study Comparing Two Versions of Inquiry Science Professional Development Paul R. Brandon Alice K. H. Taum University of Hawai‘i.
District Teacher Leaders and School Teacher Leaders Workshop April 29, 2004 Tallassee High School.
Cover Letters for Survey Research Studies
Action Research / Intervention Project Module II Notre Dame of Maryland University.
Welcome to the Southeastern Louisiana University’s Online Employment Site Applicant Tutorial!
What Can Districts and Schools Do to Make Professional Development Work? Andy Porter Vanderbilt University June, 2004.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
Professional Development Activity Log: Comparing Teacher Log and Survey Approaches to Evaluating Professional Development AERA Annual Meeting Montreal,
Models for Evaluating MSP Projects Evaluation of Professional Development Programs MSP Regional Conference Dallas, Texas February 7, 2007 Norman L. Webb.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Longitudinal Study to Measure Effects of MSP Professional Development on Improving Math and Science Instruction: Year 3 Update Report MSP-RETA Project.
Aligning the P-16 Curriculum to Improve Science Teacher Preparation Michael Odell, Ph.D. John Ophus, Ph.D. Teresa Kennedy, Ph.D. Jason Abbitt, Ph.D. Kristian.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Update & Next Steps Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC April 2/3, 2009 The Milwaukee Mathematics.
ESRD-CAHPS Field Test Beverly Weidmer, M.A. RAND Corporation CAHPS RAND Team.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
ACCESS for ELLs ® 101 Title III Conference October 7, 2010.
An Orientation of the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum Ohio ELL Project Carolyn Karatzas Technical Assistance Provider SEC ELL Grant.
Longitudinal Study to Measure Effects of MSP Professional Development on Improving Math and Science Instruction.
Professional Development Activity Log: A New Approach to Design, Measurement, Data Collection, and Analysis AERA Annual Meeting San Diego April 13, 2004.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
1 OGT Assessment Update (C-4) Ohio Department of Education Office of Assessment September
TEAM-Math Teacher Leader Meeting October 28, 2004.
SEC Training and Teacher Orientation for Taking the Surveys Online Put date here Oregon SEC Collaborative SEC 201.
An Orientation to The Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Wisconsin ELL Project Carolyn Karatzas Technical Assistance Provider SEC ELL Grant.
CaMSP Database and APR Webinar Public Works, Inc. CaMSP Database and October 15, 2011 APR Update April 4, 2011 CaMSP Network Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Albert.
Table of Contents Professional Development School Pilot Study.
Empirical Study of the Effects of Professional Development on Improving Mathematics and Science Instruction MSP Goal 3 NSF/RETA Study Website:
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
AERA Annual Meeting 2004, San Diego April, Optimizing Evaluation Quality & Cost Effectiveness Evaluating the University of Texas Master Teacher.
Tim Brower Professor & Chair Manufacturing & Mechanical Engr. Oregon Institute of Technology MSP Regional Meeting, San Francisco, February 14 & 15, 2008.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
Goals for Webinar: Applications of SEC Alignment Analysis
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Standards CurriculumAssessment SEC in Wisconsin It’s all about acronyms.
Welcome to the San Francisco Mathematics and Science Partnerships Regional Meeting March 21-23, 2011.
Introduction to Surveys of Enacted Curriculum Presentation: Introduce SEC to Educators [Enter place and date]
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Survey of Enacted Curriculum— © 2004 CCSSO All rights reserved. Surveys of Enacted Curriculum: An Introduction to Accessing and.
SCS TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group #4 Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Arrive At Essential Understandings: Part 2- Asking Advancing Questions.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
STEM MI Champions SURVEYS OF ENACTED CURRICULUM Teacher Orientation Gary Money August 2 and 3, 2011.
AIM: K–8 Science Iris Weiss Eric Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Learning in Physical Science (LeaPs) Administrator Session Kim Zeidler-Watters – UK PIMSER 1/21/2010.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science Teaching Guidelines for Program Evaluation Presented by Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. Project Manager.

Alignment as a Systemic Tool Classroom Instruction.
Development and Implementation of Online Courses in General Chemistry YU KAY LAW SCHOOL OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND MATHEMATICS, INDIANA UNIVERSITY EAST.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation Spring 2016.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
What if… You could use data to guide professional development? You could have consistency across grade levels? You could know how well aligned your state.
Collaborative Assessment Log
Melanie Taylor Horizon Research, Inc.
Ohio Department of Higher Education Fall 2018 Update to OCTEO
Measuring Differences in the Quality of Professional Development
Introduction to the SEC
Resident Educator Program
SEC & State/District Initiatives
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

National Science Foundation Mathematics & Science Partnerships Program (MSP)

Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Professional Development On Improving Mathematics and Science Instruction Council of Chief State School Officers University of Wisconsin - Madison American Institutes for Research A Collaborative Study conducted by

The Purpose of the Study is to determine: Whether professional development (PD) activities supported by MSP programs are consistent with research-based qualities of PD The effects of PD on mathematics/science instructional practices and content How MSP programs use study findings to improve PD effectiveness

Study Instruments & Data Collection Survey of Enacted Curriculum (SEC) - Spring / Summer of Winter of 2005 Professional Development Activity Log (PDAL) - From Summer 2003 to Summer 2004 Professional Development Interview (PDI) - Fall of 2004

Professional Development Instructional Practices Student Activities Professional Development Instructional Content Winter 2005 Instructional Practices Student Activities Professional Development Instructional Content Summer 2003

School & Class DescriptionHomework AssignmentClassroom PracticesStudent ActivitiesUse of Educational TechnologyAssessment UseInstructional InfluencesInstructional PreparationTeacher OpinionsProfessional DevelopmentTeacher CharacteristicsInstructional Content

Survey of Enacted Curriculum Informed consent - Voluntary - Confidential (seal envelope) Back cover information - Contact information Target class / Reporting period 60 to 90 minutes

Instructions for Selecting the Target Class Mathematics Instruction -- For all questions about classroom practices, please refer only to activities in the mathematics class you teach. If you teach more than one mathematics class, select the first class that you teach each week. If you teach a split class (i.e. the class is split into more than one group for mathematics instruction) select only one group to describe as the target class.

Professional Development Activities Log (PDAL)

Characteristics of the PDAL Provides monthly report of professional development including MSP-sponsored and non-MSP-sponsored activities Documents one-time and recurring activities Captures formal and informal professional development activities

Accessing the PDAL Teachers will receive detailed instructions Each teacher will log in once a month starting at the end of June 2003 and continuing for 15 months On average, takes about 15 minutes per month A reminder notice will be sent before the 15 th of the month, the entry close out date Log entry can be saved and re-accessed later Once finalized, no revisions will be allowed Data are maintained confidentially using user name and password protection

PDAL and Follow-up Interviews A small sample of teachers will participate in interviews about the quality and application of their PD experiences documented in the PDAL Teachers will be asked to maintain copies of PD materials as part of the data resources (for example, course syllabus)

Teacher Incentives Review | Reflection | Planning Examine the alignment of instruction with content standards Secure on-line access to individual results Honoraria

Contact Us: Kwang Suk Yoon American Institutes for Research or Andra Williams Council of Chief State School Officers or