1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Business Plan: Balancing the electrical grid load by remote control of electrical consumers Student: Gregor Androjna address student:
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
How Electricity Might Compete with Alternate Fuels for Certain End Uses Presented to: 2006 Business and Financial Workshop American Public Power Association.
1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Time-Varying Retail Electricity Prices: Theory and Practice by Severin Borenstein.
Utility Analysis. Baseline Electricity Analysis  Understanding and documenting current energy use is called developing a baseline. Developing a baseline:
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
1 Demand Response Implementing Demand Response and AMR / AMI Systems used by the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
Vermont Electric Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Draft Findings April 10, 2006.
Interconnection of Small Wind & Solar Systems to Distribution Utilities: A Cooperative Perspective Patrick Parke Midwest Energy Hays, KS September 26,
Strategic Pricing Plan Central District Power Accountants Association Franklin, Tn. March 19, 2015.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
CLEAN ENERGY TO PROMOTE CLEAN AIR & IMPROVE ELECTRICITY PRICE STABILITY Alden Hathaway, ERT Debra Jacobson, GWU Law School April 6, 2006.
Viticulture– Electricity procurement Site / company name and logo here This is an AgriFood Skills Australia Ltd project developed in partnership with Energetics.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 6 th Plan Conservation Resource Supply Curve Workshop on Data & Assumption Overview of Council Resource Analysis.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION. California Perspective on Real Time Pricing Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D. California Energy Commission Committee on Regional Electric.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
September 24, 2007Paying for Load Growth and New Large Loads APPA September 2007.ppt 1 Paying for Load Growth and New Large Loads David Daer Principal.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Electricity pricing Tariffs.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
1 Basic Concepts on Power Supply Agreement (PSA) Francis Saturnino C. Juan Executive Director Energy Regulatory Commission.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Customer Concerns with Implementing Demand Rates NASUCA and NARUC Conferences Austin, Texas November 2015 David Springe Consumer Counsel Kansas Citizens’
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
BLACK HILLS ENERGY 2016 Energy Efficiency Portfolio Annual Results Overview December 8, :00am – 12:00pm MST Mark James – Energy Efficiency Program.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Economic Operation of Power Systems
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.
Customer Dedicated Solar
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting

2 Why do Utilities / Consumers Engage in Demand Response? 1.To gain an economic advantage in their bill. 2.To avoid a short-term capacity shortage. 3.To avoid a long-term capacity investment. Thought - In the long-run, if your pricing signal (rate) encourages demand response, objective number 3 is met through a reaction to that pricing signal.

3 Currently, AR Cooperatives have Approximately 730 MWs of Demand Response - This is Achieved by: 1.Direct control by the member cooperatives. 2.Voluntary control by a retail consumer using cooperative supplied instantaneous and hourly load data. 3.Direct control of industrial loads by AECC. 4.Voltage Reduction during peak periods.

4 Arkansas Co-op. Demand Response Quantified Controlled by Member Cooperatives 107 MW Voluntary Retail Peak Avoidance 80 MW Controlled by AECC 550 MW Total Demand Response ≈ 737 MW

5 Firm Load 73% Load Controlled by AECC 20% C&I Voluntary Control 3% Load Controlled by Member Cooperatives 4% Note: AECC’s 2006 firm load = 1,971 MW

6 How did Demand Response Begin for the Electric Cooperatives?

7 Category # 1 Direct Load Control by the Member Cooperative “It is all economics…”

8 Time-based Metering In 1978, Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation (“AECC”) installed wholesale metering which recorded hourly kW demand by wholesale point of delivery. This hourly data could be processed into simultaneous hourly coincident totals for wholesale points of delivery for each member cooperative.

9 Coincident Peak Rate Design Further, AECC’s Board of Directors approved a wholesale rate design which included billing demands based on the member cooperative’s contribution to AECC’s simultaneous summer peak(s). Billing demands established during the peak(s) were charged until the new peak(s) was set the following summer.

10 Cost-of-Service Cost Allocation Methodology At the same time, AECC’s Board of Directors adopted a cost of service approach which placed its fixed costs in the demand charge while variable costs flowed through the energy charge and fuel adder.

11 By 1985, AECC’s Wholesale Rates were as Follows: Demand Charge$ / kW / month Energy Charge$ per kWh

12 The Short-term Reward for Control Needless to say, the reward for controlling peak was great. If there was potential for a member cooperative to control its annual peak, a load control system might economically be justified. The reward to the member cooperative was a reduced demand billing for the following year.

13 The Long-term Reward for Control The long-term reward for controlling peaks is also great. All (even those who do not have demand response capabilities) benefit through AECC’s ability to avoid building future peaking plants.

14 Early Target Loads for Demand Response 1.Irrigation Water Pumping: (a)row crop, (b)field flooding (rice), and (c)catfish farming 2.Residential: (a)air-conditioning, and (b)water heating

15 Means of Control The member cooperatives control ≈ 107 MW of peak demand using approximately 40,000 radio control switches. Twelve of Arkansas’ seventeen member cooperatives currently engage in direct load control.

16 Reported Member Load Control ,962kW under Control , , , ,706 All numbers represent reported installed control. Achieved control will always be less.

17 Estimated Achieved Load Control by Cooperative Craighead 4,382kWMississippi 10,817kW First 17,235Ozarks - Farmers 2,977North AR 9,219 Southwest -Ouachita - AR Valley -Petit Jean 2,946 Woodruff 47,490So. Central 2,838 Carroll 3,846Ashley-Chicot 4,431 C&L 2,254Rich Mt. - Clay 1,659 Total ≈ 107,117kW

18

19

20

21

22

23 Category # 2 Retail Voluntary Load Control In the 1990’s, member cooperatives began offering C&I retail members rate designs that mirrored AECC’s wholesale firm rate. If the retail member avoided AECC’s peak, then the member cooperative passed along its wholesale savings to the retail consumer.

24 Requirements A communications system that allows the retail consumer instantaneous load data so that the consumer might evaluate potential peak periods. Time based retail hourly metering so that the distribution cooperative can confirm that the retail consumer actually avoided AECC’s billing peaks.

25 Participation Currently, at least ten member cooperatives offer some type of voluntary peak avoidance rate to their retail C&I consumers. There are probably in excess of 29 C&I consumers taking advantage of voluntary peak avoidance rates. AECC believes that voluntary control provides at least 80 MW of peak avoidance.

26

27

28 Category # 3 Loads Controlled by AECC 1.The retail member must be 5 MW or larger. 2.AECC places the load within an assigned block. 3.The retail load has three hour’s notice of interruption. 4.½ of the hours may be interrupted for any reason. * 5.½ of the hours may be interrupted only to avoid the interruption of firm load (for capacity shortage). * 6.The member cooperative implements AECC’s IC Rider with a retail tariff or special rate contract. * Note: Interruptions for any reason will not begin until 1 Jan 2008.

29 Load Limit Maximum Annual Interruption Block ,001 kW to 714,000 kW 1,200 hours Block ,001 kW to 674,000 kW 993 hours Block ,001 kW to 574,000 kW 933 hours Block ,001 kW to 529,000 kW 804 hours Block ,001 kW to 489,000 kW 724 hours Block ,001 kW to 444,000 kW 633 hours Block ,001 kW to 409,000 kW 555 hours Block ,001 kW to 369,000 kW 481 hours Block ,001 kW to 329,000 kW 408 hours Block ,001 kW to 289,000 kW 340 hours Block ,001 kW to 249,000 kW 274 hours Block kW to 209,000 kW 200 hours Interruptible Load Blocks

30 Supplemental Service / Buy-through While AECC may interrupt a load served under the IC Rider, AECC and the member cooperative will, if available, offer supplemental service to prevent the interruptible load from physically being interrupted.

31 Supplemental Service / Buy-through - Continued - When available from the market, AECC will offer interruptible supplemental service * to member cooperative for their interruptible retail members. Supplemental service is offered at an incremental market price plus a small adder. The retail member may accept or decline the supplemental offer. Interruptions for fuel economics, when combined with supplemental service, also introduces an element of “critical time pricing”. Note:Interruptible supplemental service has a five minutes interruption notice.

32 Category # 4 Voltage Reduction Currently, Southwest Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation is using a voltage reduction measure to reduce their peak(s) by approximately one MW. When Southwest’s voltage reduction measures are fully implemented, Southwest estimates that they will reduce their peak(s) by as much as 5 MW.

33 Issues to Consider 1.Don’t allow the interruptible rate or interruptible credit to overcompensate the member cooperative or retail member for peak avoidance. 2.It is best to interrupt your interruptible loads.

34 AR Public Service Commission Docket No R Energy Efficiency One of the goals of the EERs is “Permanent Peak Demand Reduction”.

35 Questions ?