FSMFN 2008 Review of Winter Term student survey. Less winter respondents ChoicesFall 07 Wint er 08 Summer 07 CNEP14744.4% 9141.6% 15646.3 CFNP11033.2%

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Web-Enhanced Course Uses web resources to augment an on campus course. Internet is used to deliver course materials and facilitate communication. There.
Advertisements

Agent-Based Architecture for Intelligence and Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments Punyanuch Borwarnginn 5 August 2013.
Register Laulima Workshop for Instructors Solutions to help you engage your students through Laulima.
Findings from Fall 2001 UM.CourseTools Survey Michelle Bejian, UM Media Union Findings from UM.CourseTools Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001.
On-line Learning Focus Groups  497 currently enrolled Hope students have taken on-line courses at Hope  Focus groups included 16 students: distribution.
Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
Facilitating Online Discussions Jason D. Baker. Topics Discussion Value Discussion Tools Discussion Tips.
The Power of Community: MOOC > Digital Textbook Ronen Plesser Duke University LWMOOCs 2014, Cambridge MA 1.
Ready or Not, Here I Come! Achieving the Dream Strategy Institute 2010.
111 © 2004 Bowdoin College. All rights reserved. Information Technology Division Blended Courses and Boundaries: Residential Students’ Perceptions Christina.
Characteristics of on-line formation courses. Criteria for their pedagogical evaluation Catalina Martínez Mediano, Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis.
Distance Learning Overview TBE 518 Fall What is Distance Learning (DL)? Basic definition: Students and instructor are not in the same physical space.
What is Web 2.0? Purpose of web 2.0 in Education.
Instructional Design and Distance Education Agenda.
Programming 1 Feedback Session. The unit has improved my understanding of programming. 1.Strongly Agree 2.Agree 3.Neutral 4.Disagree 5.Strongly Disagree.
Department of Marketing Sakai Pilot – Experiences & Issues Semester 1, 2007 Peter Wagstaff Unit Leader, MKF1120.
Distance Learning EPSY Fall 1998 Virtual Classroom Syllabus Text- Moore & Kearsley (1996). Distance.
UNIWERSYTET MIKOLAJA KOPERNIKA Turon, Polen – Subject integration through Transitions and boundary crossing Assistant Professor Vibeke.
IT Student Survey 2009 Your name here. Overview Over 1,400 responses were received. Students across all faculties, nationalities and years were represented.
THE ONLINE ON-DEMAND UNIVERSITY for government.
Project Management Take a Tour of the Online Course.
Wendy Urban, CIS Faculty Mike Valenza, Fox Legal Studies Faculty.
2010 FLORIDA STUDENT TEXTBOOK SURVEY FINDINGS Susan (Susie) Henderson May 16, 2011.
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Demonstration: Course Management and Learning Software: My Lab Products Sue C. Spaulding UNC Charlotte Department of Psychology Teaching and Learning with.
A Research Study on the Use of Wimba Classroom Jalynn Roberts, Ph.D. Mary Nell McNeese, Ph.D. Amy Thornton, M.S.
An Online Supplemental Instruction Tool Array Algebra2go Lawrence Perez Patrick Quigley Department.
Academics Forum June 15, 2010 American Society of Safety Engineers Assessment of Student Learning Experiences in Two Different Modes of Course Delivery.
Qatar University Exemplary Online Course Award
Copyright © 2003 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Instructional Design and Distance Education.
The Past, the Present, the Future of the PBS TeacherLine Facilitation Program Lia Dossin Associate Direction, Online Facilitation.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Teaching International Marketing in a blended learning modus - Didactical and Technological Concept of a Blackboard based Course University of Applied.
Business Discipline Breakout Session Summer 2000 ION Conference Facilitated By: Marcy Satterwhite.
Company LOGO John Huss and Shannon Eastep Northern Kentucky University Online Students Are Talking, Are We Listening? Using Student Data to Create a Dynamic.
Welcome to NCVPS An Orientation for Butler Students 10/6/20151.
1. 2 eCampus uses Blackboard as the main delivery channel for online courses. You will be assigned a username and password to access your online courses.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Building Trust & Effective Communication Alisa Cooper, EdD Faculty, Assistant Chair/eCourses Coordinator English Department Glendale.
WELCOME TO UNIT 1. Tonight’s Agenda Tonight I am going to review the following topics with you: The syllabus, the expectations for the course, we will.
Case Study: Redesign of an Online MIS Course to Include Multiple Learning Styles Gary Ury Northwest Missouri State University
On demand education a brief overview A presentation for the….
Biomedical Component 2014 Student & Teacher Summer Institute Results.
Instructional Design and Distance Education Copyright © 2003 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
A Quick Overview of Scholar Learning Technologies FDI Fall 2009.
2009 Assessment of the Learning Edge Academic Program (LEAP) Tony M. Lentz & Talia Carroll.
Delia Torres and Leticia Mendez. Process 1 Looked at gaps and key areas of concern  Content Area Connections  Frequency/Design of Instructional Setting.
Weighing Costs versus Benefits: Evaluating the Impact From Implementing a Course Management System Richard E. West University of Georgia
CLARIS Training on Matlab MATLAB & Practical Applications on Climate Variability Studies DCAO-UBA, Buenos Aires, February 2006 Course delivered by.
Collaboration and communication in the classroom Katie Dorr –
Instructional Design and Distance Education. One-Time Only Events Multiple Session Events Distance Education.
Ways that Adobe Connect Meeting is Used student group meetings office hours student presentations lecture delivery guest speakers webinar-style trainings.
 An eLearning and college management suite for the ease of learning management, college management and student administration.  Social web approach.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Ask a UT System Librarian: Spring and Summer ’04 Joe Dobbs Virtual Reference Coordinator
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
Introduction Moodle is a course management system, designed to help teachers create online courses and manage virtual interactions with their students.
Do you feel there should be a prerequisite for this module concerning the knowledge level? The result of evaluation forms.
Designing Civil Engineering 240 – Geomatics Course objective Introduce engineering applications of surveying and geographical information systems, or GIS,
Collaborate The Live Conference Tool in BB9 Li Jin Fall, 2013.
MA English Language Teaching: Online
Evaluation – general information
Review of Online Course
ME 123 Computer Applications I Lecture 40: Course Review 5/23/03
On-line Learning Focus Groups
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Learning Management Systems Overview
How Faculty Can Achieve Learning Objectives With Online Tools
Presentation transcript:

FSMFN 2008 Review of Winter Term student survey

Less winter respondents ChoicesFall 07 Wint er 08 Summer 07 CNEP % % CFNP % % CWHCNP319.4% 219.6% ADN-MSN4313.0% 209.1% Non-Matric 10.5% MSN Completion 00.0% Total

Where Are We Now? Terms survey results: Satisfaction with FA services – T % T4 – 96.1% T5-98% Satisfaction with Billing services – T % T4 – 96.1% T % Satisfaction with QA processes – T % T % T % T4 – 84.6% T5 – 84.9%

Where are we now? Satisfaction with library –  Resources % T %  Document Delivery – 93.6%

How satisfied overall with Course Work? Transition students Summer 07 Fall 07 Winter 08 VS 18.9 %3528.9% % S 61.6 %7057.9% % D 17%1512.4% 46.6% VD 2.5%10.8% 11.6%

How satisfied with coursework- term students summer 07 Fall 07 Winter 08 VS % % S % % D 105.1% 42.6% VD 10.5% 00.0%

How satisfied…how courses fit into term? –term students Summer 07 Fall 07 Winter 08 VS18.9%1310.7% % S61.6%4839.7% % D17%4940.5% % VD2.5%119.1% 00.0%

Fit to terms- term students Summer 07 Fall 07 Winter 07 VS % % S % % D % 53.2% VD % 00.0%

How Satisfied with Level of Advising? Transition students Summer 07 Fall 07 Winter 08 VS % % S % % D % 58.2% VD % 34.9%

Level of advising-term students summer 07 fall 07 winter 08 VS % % S % % D % 63.8% VD % 10.6%

How satisfied with level of interaction with Course Faculty? Summer 07 Fall 07 Winter 07 VS % % S % % D % % VD % 11.6%

Course faculty-term students summer 07 fall 07 winter07 VS % % S % % D % 127.7% VD % 10.6%

Rate your satisfaction with Terms Schedule Transition Students Either VS or S T1 59.1% T2 66.9% T3 71.7% T4 55% T5 70.5% Term Students Either VS or S T1 0 T2 74.6% T3 84.2% T4 86.1% T5 91% T5 91%

Did you take any incompletes? Transition Students Yes T1 49.6% T2 65.9% T3 52.2% T4 40% T5 36.1% Term Students Yes T1 33.6% T2 39% T3 31.9% T4 13.9% T5 12.8%

Collaborative Activities (CA) T1T2T3T4T5 Did you participate in CA? Yes 61 % 70%65%66%74% Difficult to find a partner? Yes 21 % 19%13%16%18% Clear expectations? Yes 70 % 70%79%79%88% Was partner responsive? VR/ R 69 % 77%81%73%82% A valuable learning exp? Val uab le 65 % 74%80%78%84%

On-line Chats T1T2T3T4T5 Did you participate in online chats? Yes36%31%35%35%48% What level of difficulty in terms of schedule? ND52%55%62%54%35% Technical difficulty? ND73%75%77%67%67% Valuable learning experience? Yes82%83%89%85%88%

Credit: 60 hours per credit? Do you believe that courses take 60 hrs/credit? T2T3T4T5 Yes57%60%42%57% No: More 33%33%48%30% No: Less 10%9%10%13%

Power Point/Audio T5T4 Were audio lectures used? 40%29.4 Was audio effective learning tool? 93%100% Were power point (pp) slides used? 8992% Was pp effective learning tool? 9089% Was pp with audio used? 2730% Was pp with audio effective learning tool? Were videos of faculty explaining content used? Were videos effective? 8797%

Retake Exams Only asked in term 4 TransitionTerms Did you take a retake? yes24%15% Term 5 yes Did retake improve your knowledge? yes62%76%

Computer testing  Directions for use of computer based testing were clear. 98.5% yes  Times available allowed me to complete the exams without delay 84.2%  I am very satisfied with computer based testing. 88.7% yes

Rate Your Level of Connection to the School: Do You Feel a Part of the FSMFN Community? T2T3T4T5 Very Connected 24%26.1%24.5%24.5% Connected48%51.6%48.9%45.3% Somewhat Connected 25%20.3%24.5%25.9% Not Connected 4%1.9%2.2%4.2%

Angel Ease forums Very much % Moderately % Slightly 125.6% Not at All 73.3% Never Used 20.9% Announcements Very much % Moderately % Slightly 136.0% Not at All 209.3% Never Used % Lessons Very much % Moderately % Slightly 199.0% Not at All 104.7% Never Used % Quizzes Very much % Moderately % Slightly 115.1% Not at All 73.3% Never Used % PP Very much % Moderately % Slightly % Not at All 62.8% Never Used % Crosswords Very much % Moderately % Slightly % Not at All 219.8% Never Used 41.9%

How well did Angel contribute to learning? Videos Very much % Moderately % Slightly 7 3.3% Not at All 4 1.9% Never Used % Angel overall Very much % Moderately % Slightly % Not at All 219.8% Never Used 41.9%

Overall satisfaction with FSMFN Either VS or S T1 93.4% T2 94.4% T3 93.6% T4 92.6% T5 95.7%