Consultation, Leadership, and Empowerment Presenters: Ernest Cherullo Kim Conlon Felicia Watts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Purpose of Instruction
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
Why/Why Not?. 9 characteristics of true professions: 1 - Acknowledged knowledge base 2 - Rigorous training/certification 3 - Workplace of high consulting.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Using Technical Assistance Teams for Tertiary PBS Carol Davis, Ed. D., Ilene S. Schwartz, Ph. D. University of Washington
Curriculum Leadership The Central Figure is the Principal.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education Principles of Effective Collaboration Success Strategies in the Inclusive Classroom Module.
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Understanding Inclusion Kristin McChesney. Review…  Based on the article, what is the definition – or concept – of inclusion?  The generally accepted.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
March Creating and Sustaining Culturally Responsive Educational Systems High Achievement for All Students, Closing Gaps and Eliminating Disproportionality.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Examining Monitoring Data
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Inclusive Education Defining Inclusive Education Inclusive Education(IE): “ …Means that all students in a school regardless of their differences are.
CULTURAL COMPASS: BARNEGAT TWP SCHOOL DISTRICT (8 points of a compass)
School Administrators of Iowa Annual Conference August 5-6, 2014.
BASED ON THE WORK OF HEIDI HAYES JACOBS, PH.D AND SUSAN UDELHOFEN, PH.D CURRICULUM MAPPING OVERVIEW Revised by Lisa Cohen June 2014.
Inclusion is the full acceptance of all students and leads to a sense of belonging within the school community. Adapted from What is Inclusion pdf FSU.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
The policy environment around employment is changing. Employment First efforts have reinforced the belief that integrated employment is the first and most.
School Improvement Planning Process OSPI PSESD
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
Impacting Teacher Practice to Ensure Student Learning at Discovery Middle School.
Promoting Successful Inclusion Through Collaborative Problem-Solving Group 1 Nancy, Cece, Laura, and Kathy.
Using qualitative data Look for patterns Example 1. How do new teachers feel about their preparation for entering the classroom? I felt prepared as far.
We're doing Response to Intervention???? Tools to assist staff in moving from tough realities to embedded practice MiBLSi Coach’s Conference March 12,
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
Scheduling: Block or Not? Larry Tash Office of School Redesign March 8, 2006 Supporting Increased Student Achievement.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
Knowledgeable and Skillful Leadership
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.
Rethinking Retention Finding an alternative path leading toward promotion for all…
 Together, my Co-Teaching partner and I have 32 first grade students. All of the students listed below are either 6 or 7 years old.  One child has.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Collaborative Problem Solving Methods for Educators Grace Kibuka Dr. Reed Houston Baptist University Diagnostic and Prescriptive Teaching for Exceptional.
What is your biggest instructional problem with LD students in the classroom?
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
To define collaboration To experiment with working collaboratively To reflect on these first experience(s) But first…
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
Marking and Feedback CPD Student approach to marking.
LAKEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP TEAM INSTITUTE September 18, 2012.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Using PLCs to support MTSS Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012 Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012.
The Principal’s Role in Supporting Special Education Teachers.
Inclusive Schooling NWT New Teachers Conference 2015 N2NEC “Building Student Strengths from the Permafrost on UP” Liz Baile Weledeh Catholic School.
Collaboration & Co-Teaching. Collaboration Defining Characteristics of Collaboration Parity – Teachers are equal partners – Equally valued decisions.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Co-Teaching Making it work Downloading Files You can download all of today’s materials in the FILES 2 Pod on the bottom left of your screen.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Principal Realities One-fourth of the country’s principals leave their schools each year 50% of new principals quit during their third year in the role.
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Presentation transcript:

Consultation, Leadership, and Empowerment Presenters: Ernest Cherullo Kim Conlon Felicia Watts

Objective(s) To increase this groups knowledge base of why we should look at collaborative practices To increase knowledge as to why collaboration is needed To increase knowledge of the benefits of teacher and staff empowerment on staff and student performance Challenges to Collaboration

Increasing Knowledge Why look at collaboration? – Collaboration between special and general education teachers has existed for many years – Over the past several decades this collaboration has received increased attention as part of a larger effort to increase inclusive education – The need and federal directive to blur the boundaries between general education and special education McLaughlin (2001)

Why is collaboration needed? What comes to your mind when we talk about collaboration? – Collaboration can have multiple meanings to different people – Collaboration involves teaching practices as well as a community of professionals working together to improve teaching and achievement of ALL students. – Collaboration is considered central to the successful inclusion of students with disability into the regular educational environment. – It is now the LAW that students have access to grade level curriculum! McLaughlin (2005)

Why does collaboration run into problems? – Collaboration can have multiple meanings to different people – Collaboration involves teaching practices as well as a community of professionals working together to improve teaching and achievement of ALL students. Not everyone is sure how to do this? – Collaboration is considered central to the successful inclusion of students with disability into the regular educational environment. If the need special ed how can they be in the regular education environment?

Why is it needed What do the current changes in the law mean to teachers, instructional practices, etc… It means that students are no longer just entitled to be present in a classroom but now have RIGHTS to the curriculum. – What does this mean to teachers? – Principals? – Curriculum Coordinators? – Districts as a whole? Can provide sense of empowerment to teachers, staff and students – McLaughlin (2005) and Seed (2006)

Characteristics of Successful Collaboration in these articles In the research synthesis performed by McLaughlin (2002) several factors to successful collaboration were noted in all of the studies she reviewed: – Schools valued teamwork – Common goals – Shared sense of responsibility – Communication and collaboration as key strategies for teachers

Empowerment and Collaboration With increased accountability schools are re- examining two ideas that have been tried, but not been fully committed to: teacher empowerment and collaboration- Seed (2006).

Empowerment Why look at empowerment of teachers and staff? – Many individuals leaving profession as the curricula is becoming prescriptive. This is leading to the deskilling of teachers Apple (1993). – Greater student performance on testing – Better decisions by teachers – Often better results – Greater assumption of responsibility by those in the process

Barriersto collaboration and empowerment Time Space Longer time to make decisions Administrators had to take the flak for the teams final decisions

Types of Problems Seen in Collaboration “Leadership emerges from, and always returns to, the fundamental wants and needs and values of the followers.” Burns (1974). Taken from Gates, G. & Robinson, S. (2009)

Challenges 1: Technical Work – Educational reform has ushered in many changes to schooling, yet teachers possess a significant repertoire of professional experiences, skills and knowledge basis. – Gates, G. & Robinson, S. (2009) This results in an differentiated playing field for problem solving! Teachers are tasked to engage in a process without adequate training. What are the outcomes if not training is provided? What can we do to fix it?

Challenges 2 – Technical and Adaptive work – Student motivation and variability (variation in preparation and skills) are two factors that often impact learning – Gates, G. & Robinson, S. (2009) Teachers feel frustrated that they cannot accommodate all of the students needs – Feel overwhelmed – Blame the student – If stop here will get ambiguity and inconsistency of practice

Challenges 3: Adaptive Work – Policy makers and reformers argue that they know the various challenges and difficulties inherent to teaching and learning. – Reality is that at the level of implementation teams often are forced to become self-reliant on investigating, stumbling, and uncovering realities of implementation. – Gates, G. & Robinson, S. (2009) – How can administration/ administrators prevent this?

Challenges 4: Nonrational technical work – This again follows a more top down style of implementation. Teachers are being asked to do something they may not believe in while not understanding the problem or even agree that there is a problem. Gates, G. & Robinson, S. (2009) – Often results in staff that feel frustrated and are disempowered from the decision making process and therefore have trouble buying in? How can we create greater buy in from staff?

Benefits to Collaboration and Empowerment Greater teacher self satisfaction Greater student performance Increased sense of a school community and culture (less of “us” and “them”) Less isolation of teachers

References Gates, G., & Robinson, S. (2009). Delving into teacher collaboration: Untangling problems and solutions for leadership. NAASP Bulletin 93(3), McLaughlin, M. (2002). Examining Special Education Collaborative Practices in Exemplary Schools. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13(4) Seed, A. (2006). Making empowerment and collaboration part of the lives of highly qualified team teachers. Middle school journal, 37(5),