Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
The impact of switching to etravirine on efavirenz-related CNS toxicity. Laura Waters 1, Martin Fisher 2, Alan Winston 3, Chris Higgs 1, Wendy Hadley 2,
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV/r vs DRV/rATADAR. ATV/r 300/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd N = 91 N = 89 DRV/r 800/100 mg + TDF/FTC qd  Design Randomisation 1: 1 Open-label.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV - SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV STR  Design TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  SWIFT Study. SWIFT Study: Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  Design Campo R, CID 2013, Jan 29 (epub ahead of print) LPV/rATV/rFPV.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch

Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design Randomisation 1: 1 Open-label  Objective –Primary Endpoint: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL, on-treatment and ITT, M=F –Secondary endpoints: change in CD4, CD8, metabolic parameters (lipids and glucose), safety, patient satisfaction ETRASWITCH 43 HIV+ adults Stable PI/r + 2 NRTI ≥ 12 months HIV RNA 6 months No resistance to NRTI or NNRTI, or prior virologic failure At least 1 one of the following : LDL-c > 130 mg/dl, triglycerides > 150 mg/dl, on lipid-lowering agent, ARV-related gastro-intestinal disturbances, dissatisfaction with current regimen Echeverria P. PLOS One 2014;9:e84676 W48 * 4 x 100 mg pills dissolved in water

Baseline characteristics and disposition * Frequency of individual events similar in both groups except for insomnia (75% vs 39%, P = 0.024) PI/r group N = 21 ETR group N = 22 Median age, years4647 Female24%36% Time on ART, median years8,18,3 Time on PI, median years5,23,6 Reason for change Dyslipidemia43%55% Gastro-intestinal disturbances10%14% Posology (BID)/RTV48%32% Use of lipid-lowering agent10%18% NRTI : TDF/FTC ; ABC/3TC62% ; 33%59% ; 36% Baseline PI/r : ATV / LPV / FPV / SQV57 % / 19 % / 14% / 10%51% / 32% / 14% / 5% Discontinuation by W48 1 (wish to simplify) 2 (diarrhea, withdrawal) ETRASWITCH Echeverria P. PLOS One 2014;9:e84676 Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR

Virologic and immunologic outcomes at W48 PI/r + 2 NRTIsETR + 2 NRTIs % On-TreatmentITT, M = F N=  No difference in CD4 change HIV RNA < 50 c/ml ETRASWITCH Echeverria P. PLOS One 2014;9:e84676 Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR

Metabolic parameters and satisfaction PI/r groupETR group Baseline N = 21 W48 N = 20 p Baseline N = 22 W48 N = 20 p Total cholesterol, mg/dl ns < HDL-cholesterol, mg/dl ns ns HDL:Total cholesterol ratio ns ns LDL-cholesterol, mg/dl ns ns Triglycerides, mg/dl ns < Glycemia, mg/dl ns Satisfaction65.3ns7.79.2< 0.01  Safety No Grade3-4 clinical adverse events No significant changes in liver enzymes in either group, no Grade 3-4 elevations ETRASWITCH Echeverria P. PLOS One 2014;9:e84676 Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR

 Conclusion –Switch from a PI-based regimen to a once-daily combination based on ETR maintained undetectable VL during 48 weeks in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients while lipid profile and patient satisfaction improved significantly Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR ETRASWITCH Echeverria P. PLOS One 2014;9:e84676