Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
ARV-trial.com Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r A5142 Mexican Study NVP vs ATV/r ARTEN EFV vs ATV/r A5202 1

2 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Design Randomisation* 1:1:1 Open-label W48 W144 > 18 years, ARV-naïve CD4 cell count < 400/mm3 for males, <250/mm3 for females Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min N = 188 NVP 400 mg QD** + TDF/FTC N = 188 NVP 200 mg BID** + TDF/FTC N = 193 ATV/r mg QD + TDF/FTC * Randomisation stratified by HIV RNA (< or > 100,000 c/mL) and CD4 (> or < 50/mm3) at screening ** Lead-in of NVP 200 mg QD for the first 2 weeks Objective Non inferiority of NVP (combined groups) compared to ATV/r for primary endpoint: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W24, W36 and W48 by intention to treat with non completers equals failures, (2-sided significance level of 5%, lower margin of the 95% CI for the difference = -12%, 80% power) ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 2

3 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Baseline characteristics and patient disposition NVP QD N = 188 NVP BID ATV/r N = 193 Mean age 38 40 Female 19% 13% 16% HIV RNA (log10 c/mL), mean 5.1 HIV RNA > 100,000 c/mL 62.8% 65.8% CD4 cell count (/mm3), mean 177 187 188 CD4 < 50 per mm3 7.4% 9.0% 6.2% Hepatitis B / hepatitis C coinfection 3% / 9% 4% / 7% Discontinuation by W48 43 (22.9%) 56 (29.8%) 18 (9.3%) For adverse event N = 20 N = 27 N = 5 For lack of efficacy N = 11 N = 21 N = 3 Lost to follow-up N = 6 N = 2 N = 4 Other reasons ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 3

4 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Response to treatment at week 48 25 50 100 75 67 65 Adjusted difference (95% CI) = 1.9% (-5.9% ; 9.8%) 70 74 (95% CI) = - 2.9% (-10.4% ; 4.5%) ITT, NC=F ITT, TLOVR NVP (QD + BID) + TDF/FTC ATV/r + TDF/FTC HIV RNA < 50 c/mL Primary analysis (W24, W36 and W48) % Treatment response similar for NVP BID (66.5%) and QD (67%) ITT, snapshot : response rate NVP : 67.3% ATV/r : 78.8% difference – 11.1% (95%CI : ; ; P = 0.003) Mean CD4/mm3 increase at W48 : + 170 for NVP + 186 for ATV/r ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 4

5 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Adverse events through week 48 NVP QD N = 188 NVP BID ATV/r N = 193 Adverse event, any 85.9% 86.5% Drug-related adverse event 34.6% 48.7% Discontinuation for adverse event 13.6% 3.6% Serious adverse event 9.6% 8.8% Rash Any grade 14.9% 17.0% 12.4% Grade 3 1.6% Leading to discontinuation 3.7% 6.4% Hepatitis 2.1% Grade 3-4 1.0% The majority of rash in NVP groups occurred during the lead-in phase No Grade 4 rashes ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 5

6 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Grade 3 and 4 adverse events and liver enzyme increases Combined NVP N = 376 ATV/r N = 193 Drug-related Grade 3-4 AE in > 1% in either group, any Overall 9.0% 13.5% Increased bilirubin 0.3% 6.2% Increased ALT 1.3% 0.5% Jaundice 3.1% Hyperbilirubinemia 2.6% Rash 1.6% Hypertriglyceridemia 1.0% Grade 3-4 liver related laboratory abnormalities Grade 3 / Grade 4 ALT 3.7% / 3.5% 1.6% / 0 Grade 3 / Grade 4 AST 4.0% / 2.1% 2.1% / 0.5% Grade 3/ Grade 4 total bilirubin 1.6% / 1.6% 44.6% / 8.8% ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 6

7 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
Mean lipid values at baseline, W48 (LOCF) and change from baseline (LOCF) Baseline W48 Change to W48 p* Combined NVP (N = 376) ATV/r (N = 193) ATV/r (N = 193) Combined NVP vs ATV/r TC (mg/dL) 155.68 153.84 180.05 173.46 24.37 19.62 0.0382 TG (mg/dL) 131.61 132.46 131.63 160.26 0.02 27.80 0.0001 HDL-c (mg/dL) 38.79 39.00 48.45 42.89 9.66 3.89 < LDL-c (mg/dL) 91.57 88.83 106.32 99.26 14.98 10.43 0.0110 TC/HDL-c ratio 4.25 4.15 4.01 4.28 -0.24 0.13 ApoA1 (gL) 1.15 1.33 1.23 0.18 0.08 ApoB (g/L) 0.76 0.77 - ApoB/A1 ratio 0.68 0.61 0.64 -0.07 -0.03 0.0080 * ANCOVA controlling for screeening viral load and CD4 cell count ARTEN Podzamczer D. HIV Medicine 2011;12:374-82

8 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Safety Incidence of discontinuation due to adverse event: 13.6% NVP vs 3.6% ATV/r Rash: 16% NVP vs 12.4% ATV/r (discontinuation due to rash : 5.1% vs 0%) Hepatitis: 1.9% NVP vs 0% ATV/r Grade 3-4 liver enzyme elevations: 4% NVP vs 1.5% ATV/r Grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia: 3.2% NVP vs 54.4% ATV/r No cases of Stevens-Johnson, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or death due to liver or skin toxicity Mean change in lipid parameters (mg/dL) at week 48 (LOCF) P = 0.011 Triglycerides HDL-C P = 0.041 p < P < - 5 5 10 15 20 25 30 28.1 10.5 19.6 9.7 15.0 24.3 -0.2 LDL-C Total cholesterol 3.9 NVP ATV/r P = -0.25 -0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.13 -0.24 0.2 Mean change in TC: HDL ratio at week 48 (LOCF) ARTEN Soriano V, Antivir Ther. 2011;16(3):339-48 8

9 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Resistance data Virologic failure : 2 consecutive HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL at least 2 weeks apart NVP QD N = 188 NVP BID ATV/r N = 193 Virologic failure N = 20 N = 24 N = 28 NNRTI resistance mutations Y181C/I/V/S N = 9 N = 15 - Other NNRTI mutations N = 5 NRTI resistance mutations N = 2 M184V/I N = 10 K65R N = 4 N = 8 Protease resistance mutations ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 9

10 ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC
ARV-trial.com ARTEN Study: [NVP (QD or BID) vs ATV/r] + TDF/FTC Conclusion NVP demonstrated at week 48 non-inferior antiviral efficacy compared with ATV/r when given along with TDF/FTC, despite more drug-related discontinuations with NVP than ATV/r NVP BID and QD had similar efficacy and tolerability The application of the recommended CD4+ T-cell thresholds when initiating first-line NVP therapy probably explain relative low rate of liver enzymes increases and discontinuations for liver toxicity NVP was associated with a lower atherogenic lipid profile than ATV/r At virologic failure, there was a high rate of resistance mutations selected by NVP and none with ATV/r ARTEN Soriano V. Antiviral Therapy 2011;16:339-48 10


Download ppt "Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google