APPELL LIFE SCIENCES York College of Pennsylvania Joshua Martz | Dr. Srebric | April 11, 2011 Image Courtesy of RLPS, Ltd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DOUG BOSWELL MECHANICAL OPTION APRIL 16, 2008 Temple University Tyler School of Art.
Advertisements

Kevin Edstrom Mechanical Option 2011 Senior Thesis April 12 th, 2011 Georgetown University New Science Center Washington, DC.
STEM Center Delaware County Community College – Media, PA Thesis Final Presentation Dan Saxton Mechanical Option.
West Virginia University Alumni Center Gregory Smithmyer | Mechanical Option | Penn State University | April 15, 2009 | Advisor: Dr. Srebric.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC NUCLEAR ENGINEERING HEADQUARTERS DANIEL AUGHENBAUGH - MECHANICAL OPTION Westinghouse Nuclear Engineering Headquarters Daniel Aughenbaugh.
Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Kaylee Damico – Mechanical Option April 12 th, 2011 Presentation Outline Project Team Project Overview.
Integration of Mechanical System Redesign Geothermal Heat Pump Redesign Wesley S. Lawson Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Pennsylvania State.
Building Systems Integration - Energy and Cost Analysis The Milton Hershey School New Supply Center Justin Bem AE Senior Thesis – Spring 2007 Mechanical.
Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center Zachary Lippert Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Treado.
The Edward St. John Student Center Zachary Haupt Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 11 April 2011.
North Pocono High School
Technology and Engineering Development (TED) Building Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport News, VA David Blum | Mechanical Option Dustin.
1 Medical Office Building. 2 Occupancy – 400 persons 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. Monday - Friday Building Characteristics Three stories 40,000 square feet (200’ x.
Rebecca S. Allen THE PALESTRA BUILDING Optimizing Energy Efficiency of the Palestra Building London, England.
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Central High School MID-ATLANTIC REGION ADAM BROWN MECHANICAL OPTION SPRING 2014 Introduction Existing Mechanical System Thesis Proposal.
Presentation Outline Introduction System Optimization Analysis Acoustical Breadth Conclusion Acknowledgements Questions Thesis Final Presentation Army.
The New RLPS Architects Office Building Lancaster, PA Brice Ohl – Mechanical Option Presented on 4/10/13.
SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION
City of Hope Amini Medical Center Christopher Bratz Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Jelena.
Berks Classroom and Lab Building Reading, Pennsylvania Julia Broskey Mechanical Option AE 482 – Senior Thesis Faculty Advisor :Dr. William P. Bahnfleth.
N VAV system varies the air quantity rather than temperature to each zone n Single main duct is run from AHU n Branch duct are run from this main through.
Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Ft. Detrick Defense Medical Logistics Center Building Systems Redesign April 16, 2008 Senior Thesis Presentation.
Ray & Joan Kroc Corps Community Center Mathias Kehoe | Mechanical Option April 09, 2012.
NRUCFC Headquarters Building Sterling, VA Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Margaret McNamara | Mechanical Option Advisor | Dr. Stephen Treado.
University Ridge at E ast Stroudsburg University Matthew Carr Spring 2007 Mechanical Option Faculty Advisor: Dr. Freihaut.
Hilton Hotel at BWI Airport Nathan Patrick The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering – Mechanical Option.
Army Reserve Center Newport, Rhode Island Alexander Hosko Mechanical Option.
UNIFIED SCIENCE CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON SCRANTON, PA DALE E. HOUCK MECHANICAL OPTION.
The Health Care Center Dauphin County, PA Ken Lorenz Penn State University Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 17, 2007.
VIMS Seawater Research Laboratory Dan DiCriscio AE Senior Thesis Mechanical Option 2007.
Bronx School for Law Government & Justice Yulien Wong Mechanical Option 2006 Senior Thesis Bronx, New York.
Tri-Valley Jr./Sr. High School Hegins, PA Senior Thesis, Spring 2004 Studying The Feasibility of a Dedicated Outdoor Air System.
Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Mechanical System Redesign Saint Joseph Medical Center Chris Nicolais.
Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Andrew Rhodes Spring 2007 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Bahnfleth.
University of Maryland’s Gossett Field House College Park, MD Jason Borowski Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Pennsylvania State University.
Jonathon Gridley Senior Thesis – Spring 2007 Mechanical Option Energy Efficient Mechanical System Alternatives South Jefferson High School S OUTH J EFFERSON.
Greenbriar East Elementary School Fairfax, Virginia Michelle L. Siano Mechanical Option Spring 2005 Senior Thesis.
Straumann USA 60 Minuteman Road Andover, MA Kevin Kaufman Mechanical Option The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering.
Building Systems Integration - Energy and Cost Analysis The Milton Hershey School New Supply Center Justin Bem AE Senior Thesis – Spring 2007 Mechanical.
INOVA Fairfax Hospital South Patient Tower Falls Church, VA Senior Thesis 2012 Mike Morder Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth.
Flood Athletic Center Woong June Chung Penn State University Mechanical Option Thesis Advisor : DR. Willam Bahnfleth, P.E.
Malory J. Faust ∙ Mechanical Option ∙ Senior Thesis 2007.
Twin Rivers Elementary/Intermediate of McKeesport Area School District Tessa Bauman Mechanical Option Technical Consultant: Laura Miller 1600 Cornell St.,
BUILDING: LOCATION: SIZE: OCCUPANT: ARCHITECT: ENGINEERS: St. Francis Friary Hanceville, Alabama 59,900 square feet, 2 floors above grade Archdiocese.
Jesse A. Fisher Mechanical Option Spring 2005 Riverpark Corporate Center, Phase 1 Salt Lake City, Utah.
Hamot Women’s Hospital Erie, PA Michael Galleher Mechanical Option l AE-Senior Thesis l April 12, 2011 l Advisor Dr. Jelena Srebric.
Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this training one should be able to: Identify hydronic chilled water system applications. Define the difference between.
The New Student Housing Building at The Mount St. Mary’s University Emmitsburg, Maryland Erik Shearer Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. Srebric Spring 2007.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
New Castle Center for Delaware Hospice, Inc Zachary Klixbull Penn State University – Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Advisor: Professor Bahnfleth.
NOLAN JAMES AMOS Dr. William Bahnfleth, Faculty Consultant architectural engineering senior thesis mechanical option PHOENIXVILLE EARLY LEARNING CENTER.
Manoa Elementary School Amanda Cronauer Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 14 April 2010.
Michael Reilly, Jr. – Mechanical Option Advisor – James Freihaut, PhD & Dustin Eplee The Pennsylvania State University Nassau Community College Life Sciences.
Lecture Objectives: Discuss HW3 parts d) & e) Learn about HVAC systems
Harley-Davidson Museum
Lecture Objectives: Discuss Final Project
ENVIROCENTER PHASE II JESSUP, MD
David Anderson Mechanical Option
Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning
Grunenwald Science and Technology Building
Eastern Pennsylvania Laboratory Facility
Lecture Objectives: Discuss HW3 parts d) & e) Learn about HVAC systems
Lecture Objectives: Answer questions related to HW 4
Heating, Ventilating, and Air-Conditioning
Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA
LONGWOOD AT OAKMONT HEALTHCARE CENTER
Senior Thesis Presentation
Abbas Shirian, PE Certified GeoExchange Designer
Virtua Replacement Hospital -Voorhees NJ
Objective Revie the Cooling Cycle Learn about air distribution systems
Presentation transcript:

APPELL LIFE SCIENCES York College of Pennsylvania Joshua Martz | Dr. Srebric | April 11, 2011 Image Courtesy of RLPS, Ltd.

Project Background  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline Project Team : Owner: York College of Pennsylvania Architect: RLPS, Ltd. CM: Kinsley Construction Structural: Macintosh Engineering Civil: LSC Design, Inc. MEP: JDB Engineering Project Information Size:102,000 SF Location:York, Pa Cost: $16 million Stories:3/Basement Construction Date: January 2010-August 2011 Delivery Method:D-B-B/CM gives GMP Site Plan

Building Layout  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline Life Sciences Building Basement First Floor Classroom/Laboratory Mechanical/Electrical Office Spaces Stairs

Building Layout  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline Life Sciences Building Second FloorThird Floor Stairs Mechanical/Electrical Classroom/Laboratory Office Spaces

Building Layout  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline Greenhouse Building BasementFirst FloorSecond Floor Stairs Mechanical/Electrical Classroom/Laboratory Office Spaces Greenhouses

Existing Mechanical Summary  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline  Mechanical Equipment Summary  Ton Chiller  3 Gas-fired Boilers  2 Cooling Towers  Chilled/Hot/Condenser Water Pumps  5 Air Handling Units  Fan Coil Units  VAV Boxes  Office Spaces  AHU-1 and AHU-3  VAV Boxes AHU-1 (1 st Floor) AHU-3 (3 rd Floor)AHU-3 (2 nd Floor)

Existing Mechanical Summary  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline  Classroom/Laboratory Spaces  AHU-2, AHU-4, AHU-5  Pre-treated Outdoor Air  Fan Coil Units AHU-2 (1 st Floor) AHU-5 (3 rd Floor) AHU-4 (2 nd Floor)

Existing Mechanical Summary  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline  Greenhouse Building  Labs  Fan Coil Units (Direct Outdoor Air)  Other Spaces  Direct Outdoor Air  Greenhouses  Evaporative Coolers, Natural Ventilation  Wall Insert Heaters/Horizontal Unit Heaters Basement (FCUs)1 st Floor (FCUs) 2 nd Floor (WIHs)

Design Objectives  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline  Improve System Performance  Energy Consumption  Total System Cost  Emissions  Comparison of Proposed System Performance

Ground Source Heat Pumps  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Outline  Systems to be replaced:  Cooling:  Chiller  Cooling Towers  Chilled Water Pumps  Sump Tank  Heating:  Boilers  Hot Water Pumps

Borehole Sizing Outline Design Information  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Chapter 32: 2007 AHSRAE Handbook-HVAC Applications

Borehole Optimization Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Assumptions : Pipe: 1-1/4” High Density Polyethylene (HDPE)  $0.69/ft (40 ft lengths)  Welding  $4.79/weld  $40.25/day per machine  Grout:  Cooling: $2,775  Heating: $3,125 Cooling: Heating:

Borehole Optimization Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Results  70 Boreholes  212 ft per Borehole  $64,673 Total Installation Cost  80 Boreholes  212 ft per Borehole  $67,854 Total Installation Cost

Construction Schedule Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cooling:Heating:

Life Cycle Cost Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cooling:  20 Year Equipment Lifetime  $246,673 First Cost  $58,330/year Energy Cost  $10,200/year Maintenance Cost  Based off $0.10/SF  Life Cycle Cost:  $1,104,478 Heating :  20 Year Equipment Lifetime  $221,904 First Cost  $30,456/year Energy Cost  $10,200/year Maintenance Cost  Based off $0.10/SF  Life Cycle Cost:  $724,799

Borehole Layout Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cooling: (layout of pipes per AHU)Heating: (layout of pipes per AHU)

Pump Selection Outline  Ground Source Heat Pumps  Sized by sensible load required  Circulation (Supply) Pumps  Sized by gpm required and head loss  3 gpm/ton  Head loss calculated from longest run  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Pump Curves Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Pumping Schematic

Energy Usage and Cost Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cooling:Heating:

Chilled Beams Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Advantages  Low Operating Cost  High-Efficiency  Low Maintenance  Low Amount of Noise  Reduce Supply Air  Disadvantages  Not Great at Heating Spaces/Supplementary Heating  Not Well Known Systems  Formation of Condensation on Unit

Energy Consumption Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Chilled Beam Amount

Life Cycle Cost Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  20 Year Equipment Lifetime  $297,686 First Cost  $13,344/year Energy Cost  $10,200/year Maintenance Cost  Based off $0.10/SF  Life Cycle Cost:  $587,328

Run-around Coil System Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Advantages  Airstreams not Adjacent  Relatively Space Efficient  Heating/Cooling Equipment Size Reduced  No Cross-contamination between Airstreams  Disadvantages  Adds to First Cost  Adds pump, piping, expansion tank  Airstreams must be clean/Filtration Required

Energy Consumption Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Ground Source Heat Pumps Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As Designed

Energy Consumption/Month Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Energy Cost/Month

Annual Energy Cost Savings Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  GSHP Cooling  Savings: $137,495/year  Includes Chilled Beams  GSHP Heating  Savings: $78,436/year  Includes Chilled Beams Simple Payback

Annual Emissions Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GSHP Cooling : As Designed :

Final Recommendations Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Energy Consumption and Cost Savings  Cooling GSHP System  Lowest First Cost  Heating GSHP System  Lowest Emissions  Cooling GSHP System  Chilled Beams vs. Fan Coil Units  Chilled Beams  Run-around Coil vs. Heat Wheel  Heat Wheel

Acknowledgements Outline  PROJECT BACKGROUND  EXISTING MECHANICAL SUMMARY  DESIGN OBJECTIVES  GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS  CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT BREADTH  CHILLED BEAMS  RUN-AROUND COIL SYSTEM  SYSTEM COMPARISON  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  Penn State University AE Faculty and Staff  Dr. Srebric, Thesis Advisor  Thomas Leary, P.E.; JDB Engineering  Family and Friends

QUESTIONS? Joshua Martz | Dr. Srebric | April 11, 2011 Image Courtesy of RLPS, Ltd.