BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program
Advertisements

Action Effectiveness Monitoring in the Upper Columbia (Chapter 4) Karl M. Polivka, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) and StreamNet NW Power & Conservation Council, Sept. 20, 2006.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)
P4 Tagging Software and MRR Data Model Preview John Tenney, Nicole Tancreto and Craig White Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for.
Fish and Wildlife Program’s Columbia River Basin High Level Indicators Tracking Progress in the Council Fish and Wildlife Program October 2009 Ketchum,
TRIBAL DATA NETWORK COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION.
Documentation of CAX Methods and Protocols Jen Bayer USGS/PNAMP March 16,
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)
Incorporating Spatial Heterogeneity in Temperature into Climate Vulnerability Assessments for Coastal Pacific Streams NOAA, UW, USGS This project will.
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.
WETLANDS WORK AT SFEI. Basic Conceptual Model e.g., juvenile fish, organic carbon, contaminants, detritus e.g., salt, intertidal fishes, suspended sediment.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
RAPID ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (RAP) Terrestrial Ecosystems Freshwater Ecosystems Marine Ecosystems.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
NFHP Science and Data Committee Report Gary E. Whelan (MI DNR) and Andrea C. Ostroff (USGS) NFHP Science & Data Committee Co-Chairs June 2013.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.
Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Integration and Collaboration A Simple Networked Information System.
MESH UK Workshop 19 October 2006 Introduction Dr Paul Gilliland Marine Policy Adviser and MESH Partner Lead Natural England.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Overview 1.Types of monitoring 2.Partnership monitoring needs 3.Current monitoring coordination efforts.
Partnership International Union Forest Research Organizations Global Forest Information System Portland, Oregon August 12-15, 2001.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
PNAMP Mission Statement PNAMP provides a forum to enhance the capacity of multiple entities to collaborate to produce an effective and comprehensive network.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Sep 12-13, Science Policy Exchange - Thursday Sessions - Sponsored by Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Monitoring Challenges for VSP Parameters in the Oregon Portion of the Lower Columbia River Jamie Anthony Monitoring Coordinator.
The concept of a Master Sample: Lower Columbia Example An Update Phil Larsen Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission c/o USEPA 200 SW 35 th St. Corvallis,
Amphibians Birds Contaminants/Toxics/Pollutants Environmental Condition Fish Hydrology/Water Quantity Light Macroinvertebrates Mammals Multi-Species Other,
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia.
Establishing a Network of Intensively Monitored Watersheds in the Pacific Northwest PNAMP Effectiveness Monitoring Workgroup April 7, 2005.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.
Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Technology Exchange Meetings Steve Rentmeester, Environmental Data Services Sean Quigely, Pacific.
A Data Management Approach to Support Aquatic Resources Monitoring.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
What do we have in common? Do more with less! PNAMP Integrated Status & Trend Monitoring Workgroup.
ISEMP Data Management System. Support entire workflow Based on required functions Based on understanding of the data ISEMP Data Management System.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Puget Sound Partnership Action Agenda: Roadmap to Completion.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
Data Stewardship and Data Standards Practices Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Prepared for: USBR Tech Transfer Meeting Jennifer.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
BPA Expectations for Regionally Coordinated RM&E Programs Jim Geiselman – BPA BPA Expectations on the Development of Standard.
Five basic objectives of ISTM
Blaine D. Ebberts Presented at the NPCC Science to Policy Exchange
Presentation transcript:

BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011

BPA Coordination through PNAMP 1. Standardized exchange formats to share data - Adult and Juvenile Abundance - Next: Habitat Conditions (May) - Possible: PIT Tags, Genetics etc. 2. Documentation of metadata to inform data quality through contact requirements with the support of the PNAMP Monitoring Methods and ISTM projects. - Protocol Documentation: (Data collection and analysis methods; indicators/metrics; and designs) - Location Data - Documentation of databases where data is stored

MONITORING METHODS PROJECT Funders PROJECT SPONSORS Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership PNAMP Partners

M ONITORING M ETHODS P ROJECT : O RIGINS 1. Need for better, more consistent documentation of protocols and methods to support research and reporting needs Pacific NW issues BUT…basic need could be found anywhere and could be related to various topics 2. Need for a community forum to discuss and vet methods, metrics and indicators, and study designs to determine best practices expand information in out-of date publications to help each other gain a better understanding of who’s collecting what information, why, and how

Protocol A detailed plan that explains how data are to be collected, managed, analyzed, and reported, and is a key component of quality assurance for natural resource monitoring programs (Oakley et al. 2006). A fully defined Protocol in monitoringmethods.org includes Objectives, Key Assumptions, Study Design, Methods, Metrics, Personnel and Training considerations, etc. Protocols are an important management entity - they are often generated by a Sponsor Organization and later approved by a Funder Organization - and can belong to many Monitoring Programs.Oakley et al. 2006ObjectivesKey Assumptions Study DesignMethodsMetricsSponsor OrganizationFunder OrganizationMonitoring Programs

M ONITORING M ETHODS P ROJECT : O RIGINS

G OALS Help partners meet business needs Provide insight and experience on techniques Develop tools to support consistent documentation, information discovery, community discussions, metadata creation and data exchange Promote coordination and collaboration among monitoring programs USFS

D ELIVERABLES Develop web application and database infrastructure to collect, update, and discuss protocols, methods, metrics and indicators, and study designs Facilitate documentation, information discovery, discussions, collaboration, versioning and electronic management. Live as of – March 2011

L ESSONS L EARNED 1. Terminology - Inconsistent use and disagreement about monitoring terms, definitions, and their relationships. E.g., indicator vs. metric, protocol vs. method. 2. Documentation is hard to get or not always available 3. Ideas have changed – data management, data sharing are more prominent issues now

Additional Capabilities and Example Content Upload Files: including Data Exchange Templates Quality Control and Data Handling Considerations

Content Status As of April 20, 2011: 47 Protocols published out of 406Protocols 325 Methods published out of 815Methods 484 Metric/Indicator SubcategoriesMetric/Indicator Subcategories

Data Repositories PNAMP MonitoringMethods.org

Regional Data Repositories (PNAMP)

PNAMP Integrated Status and Trend Monitoring Project

Integrated Status and Trend Monitoring (ISTM) Goals Integrated Status and Trend Monitoring (ISTM) Goals I. Develop an integrated status and trends monitoring design for ESA-listed salmon and steelhead and their ecosystems. II. Demonstrate utility of approach and design using Lower Columbia River Recovery Domain as demonstration area

Components & Partners ComponentPrimary Partners Fish Status and Trends MonitoringODFW, WDFW, LCFRB Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring ODFW, WDFW, WA Ecology, ODEQ, USFS Statistical Support & Master Sample Tracking ToolOSU Data ManagementWDFW, ODFW Mainstem MonitoringUSGS

Monitoring Objectives: Identify Management Questions and Performance Measures For Status and Trend and Effectiveness Monitoring Biological StatusWatershed Health and Climate Change MandatesFish Birds, Invertebrates, Mammals, Invasive sp., Amphibians, etc. Water Quality Hydrology Riparian Condition Wetland Condition Aquatic Physical Habitat Condition ESA Recovery Plans and Biological Opinions xxxxxxx Clean Water Act xxxxxx Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds xxxxxxx WA State of the Salmon and Watershed Health Report xxxxxxx Northwest Forest Plan xxxxx CBWFA State of the Resource xxxxxxx Lower Columbia River and Estuary EcoSystem Monitoring xxxxxx NWEIS High Level Indicators xxxxx

Five Objectives of ISTM 1. Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives 2. Determine adequacy of existing programs, potential efficiencies, existing gaps 3. Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols, and analytical tools 4. Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for monitoring including priorities and range of budgets 5. Recommendations for implementation, data management, reporting, and adaptive management 1. Identify & prioritize decisions, questions, and objectives 2. Determine adequacy of existing programs, potential efficiencies, existing gaps 3. Identify monitoring designs, sampling frames, protocols, and analytical tools 4. Use trade-off analyses to develop recommendations for monitoring including priorities and range of budgets 5. Recommendations for implementation, data management, reporting, and adaptive management Decisions and questions Review existing programs Identify potential designs Trade-off analyses Implementation recommendations Salmon and steelhead monitoring Habitat & watershed condition monitoring

Fish ISTM Results (Obj 1)

Multiple objectives: Develop species distribution model - This is used to develop a sampling frame for salmon or steelhead monitoring using visual methods on spatial surveys such as redd or Area-Under- the-Curve (AUC). Develop a tool for obtaining a representative sample using Generalized Random Tessellation Stratified (GRTS) designs. Coordinate the sharing of data and site selection from GRTS sampling. PNAMP Master Sample Component

Master Sample and Tracking Tool

Data Management Component (WDFW & ODFW) Data Management Component (WDFW & ODFW) WDFW Goal – Standardize statewide databases, data dictionaries, and field protocols to facilitate summaries, analyses, and reporting. ODFW Goal – Complete data management development steps for the Oregon side of the Lower Columbia River for adult abundance.

ISTM Next Steps - FY12-14 Complete Web-based Management tool Support ISTM approach for use in other recovery domains Support Master Sample Tracking Tool, integrate with MonitoringMethods.org Support monitoring practitioners and coordinated with CHaMP: Statistical expertise for use and analyses of Master Sample based monitoring design Data management of habitat data (data steward)

BPA Contracting PNAMP MonitoringMethods.org

BPA FY 12 Contracting Preview: + Attach a Metadata file to data.