BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT Final Report 04.15.2009 Rev.: 22.05.2009 Dr. László Jakab, László Milán.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PH0101 UNIT 1 LECTURE 1 Elasticity and Plasticity Stress and Strain
Advertisements

Study of propagative and radiative behavior of printed dielectric structures using the finite difference time domain method (FDTD) Università “La Sapienza”,
Shawlands Academy Department Of Technical Education
1 Steel balls Topic 3 Taiwan Representative. 2 Outline Question Experimental set up: Vertical collision Materials: Paper, Plastic, and Metal sheets Experimental.
1 My Chapter 19 Lecture Outline. 2 Chapter 19: Magnetic Forces and Fields Magnetic Fields Magnetic Force on a Point Charge Motion of a Charged Particle.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2013 – 12269: Continuous Solution for Boundary Value Problems.
Thermoforming Process
ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
Stencil printing | Squeegee printing. pressure F p speed V p seal force F s alignment solder paste squeegee stencil pcb-board separation speed V s board.
Mechanical Kinetic, Potential (gravitational, elastic) Thermal Chemical Electromagnetic Nuclear Forms of Energy Energy is conserved!
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1–2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire Part of the One Stop Shop program Annex B (informative)
The National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University Un-Constrained Models Comparison For Elastic Roof – Production Roof – Strong Pillars.
Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2005PHYS , Fall 2005 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #16 Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2005 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Charged Particle.
Seal Analysis Jeremy Osguthorpe Mitchell Woolf Jon Blotter 7 / 12 / 2007.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Slide 1 Assignment 3. Slide 2 PROBLEM 1 Calculate the maximum deflection in a beam clamped at the both ends as shown in Figure below where the thickness.
Sheet Metalworking Chapter 20- Part 1
Rolling element bearings A. Lozzi 09
Manual Fine-Pitch Stencil Printer
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
World Archery Judges’ Training Aid – May VENUE & FIELD LAYOUT.
Screen Printing. Main Advantages Can be printed on a wide variety of materials. Can be printed on a wide variety of materials. Preferred over other methods,
Technical University of Łódź Department of Strength of Material and Structures M.Kotelko, Z. Kołakowski, R.J. Mania LOAD-BEARING CAPACITY OF THIN-WALLED.
Deposition of Solder Paste into High Density Cavity Assemblies
TECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT OF LNG CARRIER’S PROPULSION MACHINERY USING JATROPHA BIAO DIESEL FUEL 1 Prof. M. A. Mosaad Naval Architecture and.
FITA Judge Seminar – Bangkok 2010 VENUE & FIELD LAYOUT.
SACE Stage 2 Physics Motion in 2 Dimensions.
Practise questions Answers later.
Reinforced Concrete Design
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Timothy Reeves: Presenter Marisa Orr, Sherrill Biggers Evaluation of the Holistic Method to Size a 3-D Wheel/Soil Model.
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering Investigation of hot deformation characteristics of AISI 4340 steel using processing map.
Transient Thermal Analysis Winter Semester
1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA
WORKSHOP 11 SPACECRAFT FAIRING
Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011PHYS , Fall 2011 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 1444 – Section 003 Lecture #18 Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Torque on a Current.
Lecture 2: 2-D Transformation and Projection Multi-view Drawing
MEMB Multiview Projection Drawing. adzlyanuar © 2004 MEMB113 | Dept. of Mechanical Engineering | UNITEN | MULTIVIEW PROJECTION DRAWING Content.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
FLAT SLAB Flat slab are also known as beamless slab, is a type of slab in which the flooring slab is directly supported on columns without the agency of.
1 Using FE to simulate the effect of tolerance on part deformation By I A Manarvi & N P Juster University of Strathclyde Department of Design Manufacture.
KAYLA KRUPER 11/30/2015 FINITE ELEMENT STUDY TO COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPOSITE AND STEEL ANGLE BARS.
Dynamics of a Gas Bubble in an Inclined Channel at Finite Reynolds Number Catherine Norman Michael J. Miksis Northwestern University.
Multi-view Projection Drawing
Workshop 2 Steel Bracket Modified by (2008): Dr. Vijay K. Goyal Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Puerto Rico at.
Electric field calculation for the neutron EDM SNS experiment. Septimiu Balascuta Ricardo Alarcon ASU, 02/07/2008.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
The Hoover - USA. The Three Gorges - China Thrust on an immersed plane surface P5calculate the resultant thrust and overturning moment on a vertical.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
Roughness and Electrical Resistivity of Thin Films Spencer Twining, Marion Titze, Ozgur Yavuzcetin University of Wisconsin – Whitewater, Department of.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Date of download: 9/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Qs. 1 on VI The coefficient of dynamic viscosity values for a high grade oil and a low grade oil at 40 oC are 15 cp and 60 cp respectively. It is required.

Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
MQXF cable with RRP wires for Q2
SBN Far Detector Installation & Integration
9/10/2018 Red Sea University Faculty of Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering JOURNAL BEARINGS Moataz Abdelgadir Ali Abdelgadir
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
FEA Analysis of the LHCB Velo RF foil
Thermoforming Process
Multi-physics Simulation of a Wind Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Validated by Experimental Results Giuseppe Acciani, Filomena Di Modugno, Ernesto Mininno,
Optimization design of the vibration isolation of AC magnet girder
Stick Together & Civil Structures
BDA30303 Solid Mechanics II.
Implementation of 2D stress-strain Finite Element Modeling on MATLAB
FIDAP Numerical Modeling
E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi
The Effects of Surface Finish on Solder Paste Performance -
Presentation transcript:

BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT Final Report Rev.: Dr. László Jakab, László Milán Molnár, Olivér Krammer FEM simulation of stencil deformation

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 2/59 WORKPLAN OF THE PROJECT Phase one – simulation - measuring the necessary parameters – done - collecting the missing technical data – done - constructing the FEM model for the PCB – was not necessary according to kick-off meeting Milestone 1 – simulation model of the PCB is ready – pilot stencil model was ready instead of the PCB model - measuring the elastic properties of stencil – done - constructing the FEM model of the stencil – done, extended with the FEM model of a real squeegee - running simulations – done Milestone 2 – Decision about the continuance depending on the results of the simulations – project is continued Deadlines from the start of the project ( ) End of 2 nd month End of 4 th month Phase two – Designing and carrying out experiments - setting up experiment – testboard is ready - carrying out stencil printing tests – done - measuring printing transfer efficiency – done Milestone 3 – Comparing simulation and experimental results, evaluation the results of the project – done End of 6 th month

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 3/59 CONTENTS 1.Investigating stencil deformation in case of point loading: Stencil is loaded at the center; different sizes of underside supports were used; pilot FEM model of the stencil was created according to deformation results. 2.FEM model of a real squeegee: Finite Element model of a printing squeegee was created on the base of squeegee deformation experiments; squeegee is inserted into the stencil FEM model. 3.Stencil deformation by squeegee loading: Stencil is loaded at different locations by a printing squeegee; different sizes of underside supports were used; final FEM model of the stencil was created (including the squeegee) according to deformation results. 4.Testboard for stencil printing experiment: Testboard was designed according to BOSCH requirements; thick steps (with different distances from pads) were formed by selective electroplating. 5.Stencil printing experiment: Stencil printing experiment was carried out using testboards with different step thicknesses; the deposited paste height was measured and simulated; keepout area rule was set up on the basis of simulation results.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 4/59 1. Stencil deformation by point loading

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 5/59 STENCIL DEFORMATION EXPERIMENT frame 58x58 cm stencil 50x50 cm underside support 30x30 cm 16 cm Stencil: - stainless steel - lasercut - thickness: 175 µm - ordered from DEK

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 6/59 STENCIL DEFORMATION EXPERIMENT free to move measuring probe fixed micrometer clock clock standstencilclock fixing m loading armclock stencilunderside support 365 mm 953 mm Clock: range: 0…1 mm accuracy: 10 µm Load: 2.26…7.5 kg / 22…131 N

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 7/59 STENCIL DEFORMATION RESULTS

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 8/59 FEM MODEL OF THE STENCIL FOIL FEM model has been created for both 16 cm and 30 cm underside support, to match to both experimental results. The material parameters obtained from Comsol library: Steel AISI 4340 – E: 205·10 9 Pa, ν: 0.28, ρ:7850 kg/m 3 stencil thickness: 175 µm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 9/59 SIMULATION RESULTS measured: 2.84 µm/N, simulated: 3.03 µm/N measured: 1.95 µm/N, simulated: 2.11 µm/N

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 10/59 STENCIL DEFORMATION EXPERIMENT frame 58x58 cm stencil 50x50 cm underside support 30x30 cm 16 cm Stencil deformation experiment has been extended by underside supports of 10x10 cm and 5x5 cm.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 11/59 STENCIL DEFORMATION RESULTS Stencil thickness: 125 µm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 12/59 2. FEM model of a real squeegee

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 13/59 DEFORMATION OF A REAL SQUEEGEE The bending of the squeegee measured with the same loads as the stencil before to create the FEM model of the squeegee.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 14/59 SQUEEGEE UNDER INVESTIGATION Length: 300 mm Blade: stainless steel Thickness: 200 µm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 15/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM SIMULATING SQUEEGEE DEFORMATION FEM parameters of the squeegee: Length: 300 mm Thickness: 200 µm Height: 15 mm Initial angle: 60 ° E : 195·10 9 Pa ν : 0.28 ρ : 7850 kg/m3

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 16/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM SIMULATING SQUEEGEE DEFORMATION

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 17/59 3. Stencil deformation by squeegee loading

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 18/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM MEASURING STENCIL DEFORMATION PUSHED WITH SQUEEGEE x y Squeegee length: 300 mm Stencil thickness: 125 µm Loads are the same as previous: 22…131 N Underside support: 31 cm, 20 cm, 10 cm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 19/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM FEM MODEL OF THE STENCIL WITH SQUEEGEE Stencil dimensions: real size – 580 mm x 580 mm x 125 µm Mesh: 1:1:100 (x:y:z) ratio for numerical accuracy, finer mesh size at pressure area (see figures) Squeegee is pressed from the top side, by uniform pressure Material properties: steel, E=195 GPa, Poisson’s Ratio: 0,28. Boundary conditions: surfaces inside the supported area can move and bend, other surfaces are fixed Squeegee location: y=0 mm Support size in example: 20 cm Width of support system: 30 mm Support size in example: 20x20 cm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 20/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION IN X DIRECTION, 30 cm SUPPORT

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 21/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION IN X DIRECTION, 20 cm SUPPORT

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 22/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION IN X DIRECTION, 10 cm SUPPORT

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 23/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION IN Y DIRECTION, 30 cm SUPPORT

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 24/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION IN Y DIRECTION, 20 cm SUPPORT

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 25/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION IN Y DIRECTION, 10 cm SUPPORT

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 26/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM MEASURING STENCIL DEFORMATION OF THE 150 µm TEST STENCIL Squeegee length: 300 mm Stencil thickness: 150 µm Loads are the same as previous: 22…131 N Point load and squeegee load is applied too Underside support: 20 cm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 27/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION OF 150 µm STENCIL IN CASE OF POINT LOADINGS

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 28/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION OF 150 µm STENCIL IN CASE OF SQUEEGEE LODING AT 55 mm FROM CENTRE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 29/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DEFORMATION OF 150 µm STENCIL IN CASE OF SQUEEGEE LODING AT 25 mm FROM CENTRE Conclusion: including apertures in simulation is not necessary

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 30/59 4. Testboard for stencil printing experiment

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 31/59 THE TESTPATTERN Step in different height from board to board: for example +20 µm, +40 µm, +60 µm The height of steps is formed by selective electroplating The clearance between the steps and the pads is varying from 300 µm to 5 mm Stencil aperture for paste deposition (0.5x0.5 mm), the paste transfer efficiency is not affected by Area Ratio, base thickness 35 µm Clear pad for reference thickness of paste measurement

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 32/59 THE TESTBOARD The testboard was designed according to Bosch requirements. Base thickness: contour and pads Higher steps by selective electroplating

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 33/59 THE TESTBOARD Nine pieces of testboard were made with immersion Ag finish; 3-3 of each step thicknesses: +20 µm, +40 µm, +60 µm.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 34/59 MEASURING THE STEP THICKNESSES The thickness of the steps was measured with a Tencor Alphastep 500. Horizontal range: 2 mm Vertical range: 10 nm…300 µm Vertical resolution: 0.1 µm or 2.5 nm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 35/59 MEASUREMENT POINTS narrow steps square wide steps

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 36/59 RESULTS OF ALPHASTEP MEASURING

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 37/59 5. Stencil printing experiment

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 38/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM STENCIL PRINTING EXPERIMENT Printer model: DEK 248 Accuracy: (achievable) ±25μm Repeatability: ±10 μm Printing speed: mm/s Squeegee force: N Experimental settings: Printing speed: 30 mm/s, squeegee force: 92 N, blade length: 300 mm, separation speed: 6mm/s, 5 testboards were used for process setup. 1. Print 1 testboard -> print 1 fake board -> dry clean of stencil underside (repeated for 3 testboards) 2. Stencil direction / board direction was changed, stencil cleaned by wet wipe and with pressured air 3. Same run steps as No. 1. for another 3 boards

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 39/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM TEST RUN Board ID.:Direction of printing Narrow step height [µm] Wide step height [µm] Square1 height [µm] Square2 height [µm] ID1Vertical ID2Horizontal ID5Vertical ID6Vertical ID7Horizontal ID8Horizontal vertical printing horizontal printing narrow steps wide steps square2 square1

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 40/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM MEASURING DEPOSITED PASTE HEIGHT solder paste solder pad step Measuring equipment: ASC-Visionmaster 150 Maximum sample height: 5.1 cm Resolution: 1.78 μm Maximum measurable height: 365 μm Field of view: 2.1x2.8 mm

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 41/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 2.: STEPS ARE PARALLEL TO SQUEEGEE *Line is only for guide, not simulation result. Paste is higher than Cu step because if the stencil did not bend down to the pad, it lifted the paste during separation.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 42/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 7.: STEPS ARE PARALLEL TO SQUEEGEE *Line is only for guide, not simulation result. Paste is higher than Cu step because if the stencil did not bend down to the pad, it lifted the paste during separation.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 43/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 8.: STEPS ARE PARALLEL TO SQUEEGEE *Line is only for guide, not simulation result. Paste is higher than Cu step because if the stencil did not bend down to the pad, it lifted the paste during separation.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 44/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 1.: STEPS ARE PERPENDICULAR TO SQUEEGEE *Line is only for guide, not simulation result. Paste is higher than Cu step because if the stencil did not bend down to the pad, it lifted the paste during separation.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 45/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 5.: STEPS ARE PERPENDICULAR TO SQUEEGEE *Line is only for guide, not simulation result. Paste is higher than Cu step because if the stencil did not bend down to the pad, it lifted the paste during separation.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 46/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 6.: STEPS ARE PERPENDICULAR TO SQUEEGEE *Line is only for guide, not simulation result. Paste is higher than Cu step because if the stencil did not bend down to the pad, it lifted the paste during separation.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 47/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM STENCIL DEFORMATION OF NARROW STEPS Conclusion: if steps are perpendicular to the squeegee, the deposited paste has higher height with higher deviation, and the stencil can bend less.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 48/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM MEASURING THE DEPOSITED PASTE AREA Paste area was measured when the steps were perpendicular to printing direction The results were averaged from the pads outlined by the red rectangle

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 49/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM MEASURING THE DEPOSITED PASTE AREA Left: ID. 1 - no step Right: ID. 6 – 0.5 mm step distance

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 50/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 3D SIMULATIONS FOR DIFFERENT DIRECTION OF PRINTING Simulations showed basically different printing process depending on the printing direction. The bending of the stencil can be senn in the figures above.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 51/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM DIFFERENT PLOTS IN DIFFERENT CASES -The simulation data for slides (52-57) were extracted from 3D simulations like on the previous slide -BUT there are two different types of simulation plots: -If the printing direction is parallel to the row of pads, the simulation doesn’t show a cross-setion of the bending stencil. -If the printing direction is perpendicular to the row of pads, the simulation data is a cross-section of the stencil. Example: cross-section data from the left image on the previous slide

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 52/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 2.: PADS NEAR TO LARGE Cu SQUARE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 53/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 7.: PADS NEAR TO LARGE Cu SQUARE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 54/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 8.: PADS NEAR TO LARGE Cu SQUARE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 55/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 1.: PADS NEAR TO LARGE Cu SQUARE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 56/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 5.: PADS NEAR TO LARGE Cu SQUARE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 57/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM ID. 6.: PADS NEAR TO LARGE Cu SQUARE

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 58/59 BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM SIMULATING THE KEEPOUT AREA In the simulations 92 N squeegee force and perpendicular steps (as the worst case) were used.

BOSCH - STENCIL_FEM 59/59 SUMMARY -FEM model of the stencil is created including a real squeegee -Printing experiments were carried out. -Steps, perpendicular to squeegee line cause higher paste deposit with higher deviation, and the stencil can bend less. -According to the simulations, the minimum recommended keepout area is 1.6*step_height*stencil_foil_thickness. -This recommendation can be used for step stencils as well (for PIP technology or for mixed-pitch applications) instead of the IPC-7525 standard ’36*step_height’ rule.