Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Startup Eligibility Day-Ahead and RUC Make-Whole Settlements ERCOT Settlements & Billing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
Advertisements

IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
March 13, 2013 Day-Ahead Market (DAM) Clearing Process follow-up from February WMS Matt Mereness, ERCOT Manager DAM & CRR.
Concerns with RUC Capacity Short Charge and Energy Trades.
NPRR605 Ancillary Service Make-Whole Payments Under a Watch.
NPRR 336, Authorize ERCOT to Procure Additional RRS During Severe Cold Weather Consideration of Tenaska and Luminant Comments.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Ancillary Services – Day-Ahead & Real Time Markets Mini Market.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 28, 2010.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
1 Settlement Changes R5 (SEP 2015) and R5.5 (OCT 2015) Blake Holt ERCOT COPS 9/14/2015.
Settlement of Mothballed RMR Resources for System Capacity November 15, 2011 RDTF Meeting Ino González ERCOT November 14, 2011.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Commercial Systems COMS CSD Presentation By ERCOT Wednesday, 1/10/2007.
Texas Nodal Section 9: Invoicing ERCOT, Settlements & Billing SDAWG - August 2007.
Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Operations Model Posting Confirmation TAC May 7, 2009 Matt Mereness, ERCOT.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 7, Agenda March 31 minutes DAM Feasibility Study - Questions? Coral Proposal - Discussion Generators and.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Nodal Settlement Delta Calculations and Statements – 7/11/06 Workshop  Objective: Describe design concepts of nodal settlement delta calculations and.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
RCWG Update to WMS May 6, Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events When ERCOT.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 3 (Continuation from 3/5/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes/Sharon Wang TPTF 3/21/2008.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
NPRR 617 Overview and Justifications. Overview Current protocols place restrictions on Day-Ahead Three-Part Supply Offers – Part 1 (Startup Offer) – capped.
ERCOT CWG/MCWG April 24, 2013 DAM Credit Parameters.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 TPTF Update Trip Doggett.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
DAM Self-Commitment Issues & Solutions Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. (512) March 3, 2008.
DAM Self-Commitment Issues & Solutions, Part 2 Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. (512) April 21, 2008.
RUC Startup Discussion. Problem The RUC language in the Nodal Protocols allows little or no ability for a generator to recover risk associated with operating.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.
Analysis for the Determination of X, Y, and Z for Compliance Monitoring NATF.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Day-Ahead Mini Market Mini Market Walk Through for Day-Ahead.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Settlements Business Requirements.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Day-Ahead Market Energy Settlements Business Requirements.
NPRRs 705NPRR Provides Consistency for References to the End Date of the Generation Interconnection Process. In the Resource Interconnection Handbook,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Real Time Voltage Support Settlements Business Requirements.
1 February, 2012 QMWG S&B Protocol Clarifications QSE-Requested Decommitment of a DAM Commitment ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS4 - Approach 11/28/2007.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
WRUC – Long Lead Time Commitments QSE Manager’s Working Group ERCOT Operations March 23, 2016.
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Statements and Calendar Business Requirements Settlements.
Cutover Market Call November 29, :30 PM
ERCOT Market Design & Operations
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
General Overview Of Resource Costs
Ancillary Service Trades and Ancillary Service Settlement
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Vendor Definition of DAM Commitment
Presentation transcript:

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Startup Eligibility Day-Ahead and RUC Make-Whole Settlements ERCOT Settlements & Billing 08/08/2006

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 2 Day-Ahead vs. RUC Eligibility (PR ) Day-Ahead Considers…(PR 5.6.2) RUC Considers… Breaker Status in the Adjustment Period Breaker Status in Commitment PeriodBreaker Status in the Commitment Period Previous Operating Day RUC and DAM Commitments that exist in the Adjustment Period RUC and QSE Commitment Periods immediately before or after the Commitment Period and the time at which each Commitment occurred. An Adjustment Period that starts at 1800 in DA and ends one hour before the start of the Commitment Period. An Adjustment Period that starts 6 hours before the start of the Commitment Period and ends one hour before the start of the Commitment Period.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 3  What is the basic intention of the eligibility test? Suggestion: The intention of the eligibility test is to determine the commitment that initiated the startup.  DAM Commitments When/why do awarded Three Part Supply Energy Offers become DAM Commitments? For purposes of RUC settlement, is a DAM Commitment a “QSE Commitment”?  QSE Commitments How can RUC identify a QSE Commitment if it can be based on both a DAM Commitment or a QSE just choosing to keep the Resource online? Determine Eligibility

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 4  DAM: Apply eligibility to the entire DA Make-Whole Payment (the Protocols appear to say this), Apply eligibility to just the startup portion of the guaranteed cost, or Determine eligibility separately for startup and minimum energy and apply both to the guaranteed cost?  RUC: Apply eligibility to the startup portion of the guaranteed cost. The Resource must generate in order to get minimum energy. Apply Eligibility

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 5 Approaches to Eligibility  Approach 1: Consider breaker status (resource status) Was the Resource offline for the required time in the Adjustment Period? Was the Resource online for the required time in the Commitment Period?  Approach 2: Consider all of the Resource’s commitments and the timing of each commitment If the intention is to determine the commitment that initiated the startup, this approach satisfies this by considering all of the commitments and determining which commitment actually “initiated” the startup. RUC eligibility criteria currently require consideration of all of the commitments, and the timing of each commitment. Determines eligibility for both DAM and RUC at the same time Consider breaker status (offline and online requirements)

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 6 Example Scenarios Approach 1: Approach 2: Eligible Not eligible (if in fact it is considered a DAM Commitment and is subject to this eligibility test) Not eligible for startup cost, or not eligible for startup and minimum energy cost? Eligible

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 7 Example Scenarios Approach 1: Approach 2: Eligible Not eligible (if in fact it is considered a DAM Commitment and is subject to this eligibility test) Not eligible for startup cost, or not eligible for startup and minimum energy cost? Eligible

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 8 Example Scenarios Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 9 PR – Day-Ahead Make-Whole Eligibility (1) A QSE that has a Three-Part Supply Offer cleared in the DAM is eligible for a Day-Ahead Make- Whole Payment, if, for the Resource associated with the offer: (a)The generator’s breakers were open for at least five minutes during the Adjustment Period for the beginning of the DAM commitment; (b)The generator’s breakers were closed for at least one minute during the DAM commitment period; and (c)The breaker open-close sequence for which the QSE is eligible for startup cost compensation in the DAM or RUC for the previous Operating Day does not qualify in meeting the criteria in (a) and (b) above.

Lead from the front Texas Nodal 10 PR – Day-Ahead Make-Whole Eligibility (1)For purposes of this Section 5.6.2, all contiguous RUC-Committed Hours are considered as one RUC instruction. For each Resource, only one Startup Cost is eligible per block of contiguous RUC-Committed Hours. (2)For a Resource’s Startup Costs in the Operating Day, per RUC instruction, to be included in the calculation of the RUC Guarantee for that Operating Day, all the criteria below must be met: (a)When the RUC instruction is given, the Resource must not be QSE-committed in the Settlement Interval immediately before the designated start hour or after the last hour of the RUC instruction; (b)A later RUC instruction or QSE commitment must not connect the designated start hour or last hour of the RUC instruction to a block of QSE-Committed Intervals that was QSE- committed before the RUC instruction was given; (c)The generation breakers must have been open for at least five minutes during the six hours preceding the first RUC-Committed Hour; and (d)The generation breakers must have been closed for at least one minute during the RUC commitment period or after the determined five-minute open breaker in the six hours preceding the first RUC-Committed Hour.