CFC Essential Use Status of Albuterol: Medical Considerations Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 10, 2004 Eugene J. Sullivan, MD,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patent-Extender Drugs: Loop-holes in the Law Sandy H. Yoo 4/14/06.
Advertisements

Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
Decisions of the Parties Related to Essential Use Nominations (EUNs) Ozone Secretariat 6 July 2008 Bangkok.
Consumer Safety and Drug Regulations
Public Health Issues Related to Mutually Conforming Labeling: CDRH Perspective Miriam C. Provost, Ph.D. Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices.
Delisting albuterol CFCs: Economic Considerations Randall Lutter, Ph.D. Chief Economist Office of Policy & Planning OPPl/OPl Randall Lutter, Ph.D. Chief.
Ministério da Saúde Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde - SVS Coordenação Geral de Vigilância em Saúde Ambiental - CGVAM Bangkok - July 6 th, 2008 CONSULTATIVE.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee September 6, 2006 ODAC and the FDA Arms-Length or Arm-In-Arm? Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Preparing an Essential-Use Nomination for CFC MDIs: The U.S. Experience Consultative Meeting on Essential Use Nominations Bangkok, Thailand 6 July 2008.
Experiences and Lessons Learned from Essential Use Nominations in Developed Countries: Industry Perspectives Peter Blenkinsop on behalf of the International.
CFCs in inhalers for asthma and COPD What’s happening? © 2009 United Nations Environment Programme Developed in association with the National Asthma Council.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
FEDERAL REGULATIONS OF MEDICATIONS Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Protect consumers from adulterated and misbranded foods, drugs, cosmetics, or devices.
Pharmaceutical Development and Review Process Rev. 10/21/2014 APGO Interaction with Industry: A Medical Student Guide.
Cross-Labeling: Legal and Regulatory Issues David M. Fox Hogan & Hartson LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
Office of Drug Evaluation IV, CDER FDA/IDSA/ISAP Workshop 4/16/04 Overview of PK-PD in Drug Development Programs: FDA Perspective FDA/IDSA/ISAP Workshop.
Oncology Pediatric Initiatives Richard Pazdur, MD Director, Division of Oncology Drug Products.
Joint NDAC/PAC meeting October 18, 2007 OTC Cold and Cough Products: Use in Children Advisory Committee Meeting October 18, 2007 Joel Schiffenbauer, MD.
1 FDA Thailand By HIV Module/Marketing Group Mr. Manaswee Arayasiri.
1 1 PDUFA & FDA Legislation FDA Regulatory & Compliance Symposium August 2006 Marc Wilenzick, Moderator for Panel: Dan Carpenter, Harvard Dept. of Government.
1 ACPS November 15, Update Nancy B. Sager, Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Food and.
History of the Montreal Protocol, FDA regulation of CFCs and Background to Meeting Robert J. Meyer, MD Director, ODE II / CDER.
PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT ON MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (A CASE STUDY ON HEALTH CENTERS) 8/16/20151 Dr. Anna Nswilla CDHSMoHSW.
1 The Chemoprevention of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Issues Surrounding a Benefit/Risk Analysis in Clinical Trials Mark Avigan MD CM Medical Officer Division.
1 ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES TO CFCs AND HCFCs OZONE CELL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS.
History of the Montreal Protocol, FDA regulation of CFCs and Background to Meeting Robert J. Meyer, MD Director, ODE II / CDER.
Overview of the CFC MDI essential use process Prof Ashley Woodcock MD FRCP FMedSci University of Manchester.
1 POLICIES AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR ODS PHASE-OUT OZONE CELL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FORESTS.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Data protection and extension of patent rights TRIPS requirements & TRIPS-plus provisions Carlos Correa.
Food and Drug Administration Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Drug Products Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 13, 2005 Safety of.
Helping patients breathe more easily with affordable prescriptions Presented to Pulmonary-Allergy Advisory Committee U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
PATRICIA KERBY, MPA HUMAN SUBJECTIONS PROTECTION COMPLIANCE OFFICER OFFICE OF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE What are the FDA’s expectations in 2010?
Experiences and lessons learned from essential use nominations in Article 2 Parties: European Community perspective Dr. Philippe Tulkens European Commission,
Page 1 Implementation of the WTO Decision on TRIPS and Public Health Government of Canada August 2004.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Proposed Gluten Regulations in Argentina Excipient Realities and Global Requirements.
Status Report on Development of a Medicaid Preferred Drug List Program Presentation to: The Medicaid Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee Cynthia B. Jones.
Medicaid Fee-for-Service: Prior Authorization Criteria & the Role of the DUR Board Charles Agte, Pharmacy Administrator Health Care Services June 19, 2013.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
History of Pediatric Labeling
History of the Montreal Protocol and 21 CFR Robert J. Meyer, MD Director, ODE II / CDER.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Patients Will Be Adequately Served Richard P. Rozek* *The underlying economic research was conducted with Emily Bishko. GlaxoSmithKline provided financial.
FDA PADAC Open Public Hearing regarding the possible removal of the essential use designation of albuterol Comments of the American College of Allergy,
FDAAA – Report on DTC Advertising Kristin Davis, J.D. Deputy Director, Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications Office of Medical Policy,
FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium
Nanotechnology - USDA - 18 Nov 2002 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY IN PUBLIC HEALTH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Norris E. Alderson, Ph.D.
Food and Drug Administration Division of Pulmonary and Allergy Drug Products DSaRM Advisory Committee May 5, 2004 Permeability of LDPE Vials: A clinical.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
1 Drug Safety Oversight Board: Recent Activities FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting March 31 st, 2006 Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director.
Initiatives Drive Pediatric Drug Development January 30, 2002.
Drug Regulation, Development, Names, and Information Chapter 3 Copyright (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Neil Flanzraich Vice Chairman and President Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 10, 2004.
FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22-23, 2008 Introduction and Update Helen N. Winkle Director, Office of.
Prepared by: Imon Rahman Lecturer Department of Pharmacy BRAC University.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
Clinical Trials.
Stages of Research and Development
How to Put Together an IDE Application
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Speeding access to therapies
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
CFCs in inhalers for asthma and COPD
Presentation transcript:

CFC Essential Use Status of Albuterol: Medical Considerations Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 10, 2004 Eugene J. Sullivan, MD, FCCP Deputy Director Division of Pulmonary Drug Products CDER, FDA Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 10, 2004 Eugene J. Sullivan, MD, FCCP Deputy Director Division of Pulmonary Drug Products CDER, FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, OverviewOverview Background Currently marketed albuterol MDI products Essential use criteria Other issues Background Currently marketed albuterol MDI products Essential use criteria Other issues

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, BackgroundBackground Dr. Meyer has provided background on the Montreal Protocol, and the FDA regulation concerning the essential use determinations (21 CFR 2.125) The Agency is currently considering whether albuterol has met the criteria for removal from the list of essential uses for CFCs –In keeping with the goals of the Montreal Protocol Phase out of production and importation of ozone- depleting substances (ODSs), including CFCs Approximately ½ of the annual US CFC essential use allocation is for albuterol Two alternative, non-CFC albuterol MDIs are currently marketed in the US –Citizen Petition from “US Stakeholders” group Dr. Meyer has provided background on the Montreal Protocol, and the FDA regulation concerning the essential use determinations (21 CFR 2.125) The Agency is currently considering whether albuterol has met the criteria for removal from the list of essential uses for CFCs –In keeping with the goals of the Montreal Protocol Phase out of production and importation of ozone- depleting substances (ODSs), including CFCs Approximately ½ of the annual US CFC essential use allocation is for albuterol Two alternative, non-CFC albuterol MDIs are currently marketed in the US –Citizen Petition from “US Stakeholders” group

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Currently Marketed Albuterol MDIs CFC MDIs CFCs are Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) Proventil (Schering-Plough) –approved 1981 –Warrick product also marketed under this NDA Generic versions –Four approved (first approved 1995), three marketed Non-CFC MDIs Non-ODS. HFA-134a does not affect the ozone layer Proventil HFA (3M/Schering-Plough) –Approved and began marketing in 1996 Ventolin HFA (GlaxoSmithKline) –Approved in 2001, and marketed since 2002 CFC MDIs CFCs are Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) Proventil (Schering-Plough) –approved 1981 –Warrick product also marketed under this NDA Generic versions –Four approved (first approved 1995), three marketed Non-CFC MDIs Non-ODS. HFA-134a does not affect the ozone layer Proventil HFA (3M/Schering-Plough) –Approved and began marketing in 1996 Ventolin HFA (GlaxoSmithKline) –Approved in 2001, and marketed since 2002

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) 21 CFR –“Use of ozone-depleting substances in foods, drugs, devices, or cosmetics” –Lists specific drug moieties for which the use of CFCs is considered “essential” –Sets 4 criteria that must be met in order to remove a drug moiety from the list of “essential uses” 21 CFR –“Use of ozone-depleting substances in foods, drugs, devices, or cosmetics” –Lists specific drug moieties for which the use of CFCs is considered “essential” –Sets 4 criteria that must be met in order to remove a drug moiety from the list of “essential uses”

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) These four criteria are: 1.At least 2 non-ODS products that contain the same active moiety are being marketed with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use as the ODS products (For active moieties represented by ≥2 NDAs) [Slide 1 of 2] These four criteria are: 1.At least 2 non-ODS products that contain the same active moiety are being marketed with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use as the ODS products (For active moieties represented by ≥2 NDAs) [Slide 1 of 2]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) These four criteria are : 2.Supplies and production capacity for the non-ODS products exist or will exist at levels sufficient to meet patient need 3.Adequate US post-marketing use data is available for the non-ODS products 4.Patients who medically require the ODS product are adequately served by the non- ODS products containing the active moiety and other available products [Slide 2 of 2] These four criteria are : 2.Supplies and production capacity for the non-ODS products exist or will exist at levels sufficient to meet patient need 3.Adequate US post-marketing use data is available for the non-ODS products 4.Patients who medically require the ODS product are adequately served by the non- ODS products containing the active moiety and other available products [Slide 2 of 2]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) 1.“At least 2 … products … containing the same active moiety, with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use…” Same active moiety: albuterol Same route of delivery: oral inhalation Same indication: prevention and relief of bronchospasm in patients 4 [12] years of age and older with reversible obstructive airway disease and the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm [Slide 1 of 2] 1.“At least 2 … products … containing the same active moiety, with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use…” Same active moiety: albuterol Same route of delivery: oral inhalation Same indication: prevention and relief of bronchospasm in patients 4 [12] years of age and older with reversible obstructive airway disease and the prevention of exercise-induced bronchospasm [Slide 1 of 2]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) 1.“At least 2 … products … with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use…” Same level of convenience:  Portability  Preparation before use Cleaning of actuator to prevent clogging  Physical effort/ dexterity [Slide 2 of 2] 1.“At least 2 … products … with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use…” Same level of convenience:  Portability  Preparation before use Cleaning of actuator to prevent clogging  Physical effort/ dexterity [Slide 2 of 2]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) 2.Supplies and production capacity for the non- ODS products exist or will exist at levels sufficient to meet patient need Somewhat difficult because manufacturers (GSK and 3M) would need time to ramp up production GSK has stated that it is “confident that additional internal and external capacity can be installed to ensure adequate supplies and production capacity for Ventolin HFA” and that this could be accomplished within months [GSK comment on the Stakeholder’s Citizen Petition, Docket # 2003P-0029/C2] 2.Supplies and production capacity for the non- ODS products exist or will exist at levels sufficient to meet patient need Somewhat difficult because manufacturers (GSK and 3M) would need time to ramp up production GSK has stated that it is “confident that additional internal and external capacity can be installed to ensure adequate supplies and production capacity for Ventolin HFA” and that this could be accomplished within months [GSK comment on the Stakeholder’s Citizen Petition, Docket # 2003P-0029/C2]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) 3.Adequate US post-marketing use data is available for the non-ODS products Proventil HFA: marketed for 7 years Early reports of actuator clogging No evidence of problems in terms of safety, efficacy, tolerability, patient acceptance Ventolin HFA: marketed for 2 years No evidence of problems in terms of safety, efficacy, tolerability, patient acceptance 3.Adequate US post-marketing use data is available for the non-ODS products Proventil HFA: marketed for 7 years Early reports of actuator clogging No evidence of problems in terms of safety, efficacy, tolerability, patient acceptance Ventolin HFA: marketed for 2 years No evidence of problems in terms of safety, efficacy, tolerability, patient acceptance

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) 4.Patients who medically required the ODS product are adequately served by the non-ODS products containing the active moiety and other available products “Adequately served” encompasses:  Efficacy/ Safety/ Tolerability √ NDA and post-marketing data  Cost Preamble to 2002 Amendment to 21 CFR 2.125: FDA will consider cost in determining whether alternatives meet patient needs 4.Patients who medically required the ODS product are adequately served by the non-ODS products containing the active moiety and other available products “Adequately served” encompasses:  Efficacy/ Safety/ Tolerability √ NDA and post-marketing data  Cost Preamble to 2002 Amendment to 21 CFR 2.125: FDA will consider cost in determining whether alternatives meet patient needs

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) “Adequately Served” – the cost issue –Branded CFC products cost more than generics Actual prices vary considerably among payors Retail cost per day*: –$1.44 for Ventolin –$0.69 for CFC generic –Branded HFA products are priced comparably to the branded CFC products “Adequately Served” – the cost issue –Branded CFC products cost more than generics Actual prices vary considerably among payors Retail cost per day*: –$1.44 for Ventolin –$0.69 for CFC generic –Branded HFA products are priced comparably to the branded CFC products *Average National Retail Price; Data from IMS Health, at

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) “Adequately Served” – The cost issue –Due to existing patents, there are currently no generic HFA products Existing patents will expire in 2010 through 2015 –Given current realities, the removal of the essential use status of albuterol would result in an increase in the price of albuterol MDIs The public health consequences of such an increase are not known and are difficult to predict –Possibly fewer prescriptions filled (albuterol, other) “Adequately Served” – The cost issue –Due to existing patents, there are currently no generic HFA products Existing patents will expire in 2010 through 2015 –Given current realities, the removal of the essential use status of albuterol would result in an increase in the price of albuterol MDIs The public health consequences of such an increase are not known and are difficult to predict –Possibly fewer prescriptions filled (albuterol, other)

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Essential Use Criteria (21 CFR 2.125) “Adequately Served” – The cost issue –Dr. Lutter will discuss the economic aspects in greater detail in the following presentation. This includes descriptions of the various sources of price data, and estimates of how changes in the price of albuterol MDIs might affect utilization. “Adequately Served” – The cost issue –Dr. Lutter will discuss the economic aspects in greater detail in the following presentation. This includes descriptions of the various sources of price data, and estimates of how changes in the price of albuterol MDIs might affect utilization.

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Other Issues Availability of CFCs: Production facilities –Only current source of pharmaceutical grade CFC-11 and CFC-12 for the US is Honeywell’s plant in the Netherlands –The Dutch government has informed Honeywell that CFC production will not be permitted after 2005 –Honeywell states that it will begin production of pharmaceutical grade CFC-11 and CFC-12 at a US plant, and will be able to supply CFCs beyond 2005* Availability of CFCs: Production facilities –Only current source of pharmaceutical grade CFC-11 and CFC-12 for the US is Honeywell’s plant in the Netherlands –The Dutch government has informed Honeywell that CFC production will not be permitted after 2005 –Honeywell states that it will begin production of pharmaceutical grade CFC-11 and CFC-12 at a US plant, and will be able to supply CFCs beyond 2005* [*Docket # 2003P-0029/C9]

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Other Issues Availability of CFCs: Potential actions by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol –CFC “essential use” requests are granted by the Parties annually –Thus far, the Parties have respected the US determination that albuterol is essential, and have granted the CFC volumes requested by the US –However, the Parties have noted the availability of two non-CFC albuterol products in the US, and some have questioned the continued need for CFCs for this purpose –It is not clear how long the Parties will continue to grant CFC requests for use in albuterol MDIs Availability of CFCs: Potential actions by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol –CFC “essential use” requests are granted by the Parties annually –Thus far, the Parties have respected the US determination that albuterol is essential, and have granted the CFC volumes requested by the US –However, the Parties have noted the availability of two non-CFC albuterol products in the US, and some have questioned the continued need for CFCs for this purpose –It is not clear how long the Parties will continue to grant CFC requests for use in albuterol MDIs

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee June 10, Topics for Discussion 1.Please discuss the extent to which you believe the criteria established in 21 CFR for removal of a drug substance from the list of essential uses for CFCs have been met for albuterol. These criteria are: –At least 2 non-ozone depleting substances (non-ODS) that contain the same active moiety are being marketed with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use as the ozone-depleting products –Supplies and production capacity for the non-ODS products exist or will exist at levels sufficient to meet patient need –Adequate US post-marketing use data is available for the non-ODS products –Patients who medically require the ODS product are adequately served by the non-ODS products containing the active moiety and other available products 2.Please suggest any additional data or information you believe would be important to consider in making a determination regarding the essential use status of albuterol. 3.Please comment on any additional issues you believe would be important to consider in making a determination regarding the essential use status of albuterol. 1.Please discuss the extent to which you believe the criteria established in 21 CFR for removal of a drug substance from the list of essential uses for CFCs have been met for albuterol. These criteria are: –At least 2 non-ozone depleting substances (non-ODS) that contain the same active moiety are being marketed with the same route of delivery, for the same indication, and with approximately the same level of convenience of use as the ozone-depleting products –Supplies and production capacity for the non-ODS products exist or will exist at levels sufficient to meet patient need –Adequate US post-marketing use data is available for the non-ODS products –Patients who medically require the ODS product are adequately served by the non-ODS products containing the active moiety and other available products 2.Please suggest any additional data or information you believe would be important to consider in making a determination regarding the essential use status of albuterol. 3.Please comment on any additional issues you believe would be important to consider in making a determination regarding the essential use status of albuterol.