Pixel Offline Study Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 11/05/04, Pixel testbeam meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 Oct 2003 UCL 2nd Year Talk 1 Crosstalk Removal to Improve Muon dE/dX Measurements Leo Jenner, UCL.
Advertisements

Collection Of Plots for A Testbeam Paper. List of Possible Plots R/Phi resolution, charge sharing, noise etc. Noise performance and few Landau distributions.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Analysis of chip with 100 events, July 2001 Variation in pixel to pixel average ADC values (fixed pattern noise) Pixel ADC value event to event repeatability.
Update on Analysis of FNAL TB09 Jianchun Wang for the group Syracuse Univesity Jan 29 th,2010.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Signal Processing of Germanium Detector Signals
Offline Code for Next Beam Test Jianchun Wang 08/06/01.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
Pixel Offline Status Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 09/17/04, Pixel testbeam meeting.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
Pixel Beam Test Offline Code Demo Jianchun Wang 05/01/03.
Testbeam 2010 with CAPTAN System Jianchun Wang Syracuse University.
02/14/00Jianchun (JC) Wang1 Outline The idea behind the code Code structure and its usage Test on a magnet run Plan Jianchun Wang 02/14/00.
Status on Testbeam Analysis Jianchun Wang Syracuse University VELO meeting, August 28, 2007.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Pixel Testbeam at Fermilab Jianchun Wang Syracuse University.
L1 Trigger for ACDC Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO ACDC Software Meeting 01/20/2006.
CALICE MAPS Initial Beam Test Analysis Tim Martin, University of Birmingham 29 th February 2008.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector.
RawHits in Pixel/SCT Kohei Yorita The University of Chicago FTK Meeting on Feb. 21 st 2007.
FPIX0 Electronic Test Marina Artuso Paul Gelling Jianchun Wang  The system works fine with charge injection calibration  Gain curve, threshold, and noise.
Responsibility on Next Beam Test Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 10/16/99 CLEO Meeting Outline DAQ problems solved Recent results Status of DAQ Work to be done.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
HBD Meeting 2010 / 11/ 24 Katsuro 1. confirmation plan for HBD simulation performances 2 HBD charge distribution Red: merged cluster Blue: separated cluster.
SLHC Sensors at Meson Test Ryan Rivera ESE/CD, Fermilab All-Experimenter’s Meeting April 19, 2010.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
15 Dec 2010 CERN Sept 2010 beam test: Sensor response study Chris Walmsley and Sam Leveridge (presented by Paul Dauncey) 1Paul Dauncey.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Charge Sharing & Hit Identification & Cluster Information.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group 28 July 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
BTeV Hybrid Pixels David Christian Fermilab July 10, 2006.
Forward Pixel Beamtest Analysis Carsten Rott Purdue University Januar 24, 2001.
IEEE October 16-22, 2004 First Look at the Beam Test Results of the FPIX2 Readout Chip for the BTeV Silicon Pixel Detector First Look at the Beam Test.
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 3 Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.
Test of Single Crystal Diamond Pixel Detector at Fermilab MTEST Simon Kwan Fermilab April 28, 2010.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 23/07/2012.
View of TPC Optimization from Reconstruction Working Group Xin Qian and Tingjun Yang 1.
BTeV Beam Test Results Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing J.A. Appel, J.N. Butler, G. Cardoso, H. Cheung, G. Chiodini, D.C. Christian, E.E.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Gianluca Lamanna TDAQ WG meeting. CHOD crossing point two slabs The CHOD offline time resolution can be obtained online exploiting hit position.
Pixel Offline Status Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 10/28/04, Pixel testbeam meeting.
EUTelescope Testbeam Analysis: Summer 2014
G.Lamanna (CERN) NA62 Collaboration Meeting TDAQ-WG
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Converted photons efficiency
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
Slice Test: Preliminary Data Analysis The Ohio State University
Status of the TOF Detector
BTeV Pixel Silicon Detector
Scintillator tile- SiPM systems R&D
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Presentation transcript:

Pixel Offline Study Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 11/05/04, Pixel testbeam meeting

2 Ghost Track Issue  By requiring that nplane_hit=7, cl_t>0.01, there are ~300 multiple track events out of ~10K events.  Each pair of tracks in the same event is checked to see if there are shared hits.  About ¾ are with 6 shared hits, only a small fraction are real multiple tracks.  It is difficult to separate ghost track from good one most of time. A safe way is to reject events with more than 1 good tracks ( ntrk_good = 1 ).

3 Example of Ghost Tracks event dump>tracks Number of tracks formed: 2 Trk chi2 ndof chi2_t Hits pl hit pl hit col = 9 row=66 col = 9 row=68 Include a nearby Y hit event dump>tracks Number of tracks formed: 8 Trk chi2 ndof chi2_t Hits pl hit pl hit Y hit exchange between two very close tracks. Most ghost tracks are due to that there is no strong constrain between Y planes and X planes.

4 Dead Cell Issue  When a track passes through or near a dead cell/edge, the hit position reconstructed may be wrong as the dead cell might have charge deposition.  Dead cells may result from bump bonding and thus can not be identified by pulse calibration.  10 runs ( ) are used to have a more uniform beam.  Dead cell (shown in magenta) is defined as less than 20% of average number of hits.

5 Effect of Dead Cell and Edge  If a track hit includes one pixel adjacent in row to a dead cell or edge of detector, both the track and the hit are tagged (dead_cell=1, survivor(iz)=1).  In run 1981, about 26% “good” tracks are tagged. The resolution of these tagged tracks are bad as expected.  For serious resolution study these tracks should be removed. Tagged tracks Non-tagged tracks All tracks

6 Unknown Hits For single column track hits I look for extra hits in the same column Track row ID for left side extra hits Row ID of Track Row ID of Extra Hit Plane 5, FPIX1

7 Column ID of Unknown Hits Extra hits tend to happen in the same column as the track hit. (only 1 good track allowed) Column ID of Track Column ID of Extra Hit Plane 5, FPIX1

8 Extra Hits on Different Planes Row ID of Extra hits – Row ID of track Plane 3 FPIX1 Plane 10 FPIX1 Plane 9 FPIX1 Plane 4 FPIX1 Plane 5 FPIX1 Plane 7 FPIX2 Plane 11 FPIX1

9 More Information on Plane 5 N row of Extra Cluster in the Same Column Number of Extra Clusters Whole Plane Same column

10 Possible Sources of These Hits 1)High threshold results in gap in one cluster, especially if there is delta ray. It appears on all planes regardless of threshold. The ADC value of these extra hits are not low, similar to others. 2)Secondary particles from interaction (where?) 3)Power or ground problem when there is a hit: less likely. 4)Readout generates hits that was not seen by the amplifiers: very unlikely. 5)Cross talk has been measured and is negligible. 6)???