Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on effective volumes and energy reconstruction A. Trovato, INFN - LNS.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
Particle interactions and detectors
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Special Issues on Neutrino Telescopy Apostolos G. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University School of Science & Technology Particle and Astroparticle Physics.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
Measurement of through-going particle momentum by means of Multiple Scattering with the T600 TPC Talk given by Antonio Jesús Melgarejo (Universidad de.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
1 ANTARES a Neutrino Telescope in the Mediterranean Sea 31/01/2014 Salvatore Mangano.
Special Issues on Neutrino Telescopy Apostolos G. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University School of Science & Technology Particle and Astroparticle Physics.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Data collected during the year 2006 by the first 9 strings of IceCube can be used to measure the energy spectrum of the atmospheric muon neutrino flux.
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
1 Raghunath Ganugapati(Newt) Preliminary Exam 08/27/04 Strategies for the search for prompt muons in the downgoing atmospheric muon flux with the AMANDA.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano, Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
C.Distefano KM3NET ‘Physics and Simulation (WP2)’ Oct 24 – 25, 2006 LNS NEMO software Carla Distefano for the NEMO Collaboration KM3NET ‘Physics and Simulation.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Reconstruction code and comparison between Genie and Genhen A. Trovato, C. Distefano, R. Coniglione and P. Sapienza Kick-off ORCA meeting: 6 September.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara Chiba University.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Status of Sirene Maarten de Jong. What?  Sirene is a program that simulates the detector response to muons and showers  It is based on the formalism.
Italy Pizza, Mozzarella di Buffala Switzerland Roesti, Cheese Fondue
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
K+e+γ using OKA detector
Signal and Background MonteCarlo generation
Simulation and Reconstruction code using Mathematica
Signal ,Background Simulation and Data
Newt Ganugapati and Teresa Montaruli
Systematic uncertainties in MonteCarlo simulations of the atmospheric muon flux in the 5-lines ANTARES detector VLVnT08 - Toulon April 2008 Annarita.
Calculation of detector characteristics for KM3NeT
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
FLUCTUATIONS OF MUON ENERGY LOSSES
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
Atmospheric muons in ANTARES
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
Ultra-high energy upward going muons in Super-Kamiokande II
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)

Muon energy loss Energy loss ~ a + bE Below 1 TeV: Continuous energy loss Above 1 TeV: Discrete energy loss Large energy fluctuation  Electromagnetic showers 1.Do we see showers? 2.Is number of showers correlated with energy? water total ionisation pair production bremsstrahlung photonuclear

Shower Identification Method Muon emits: continuously Cherenkov photons and sometimes discrete electromagnetic showers Project photons onto reconstructed muon track =>Search for clusters

Goals Study shower multiplicity Additional input for energy estimators Distinguish event topologies

Algorithm 1. Reconstruct muon track 2. Calculate photon emission positions Photons with early arrival times (|20 ns|): Calculate photon vertex assuming emission under Cherenkov angle Photons with late arrival times ( ns): Calculate photon vertex assuming spherical emission 3. Search shower candidates with a peak finding algorithm

MC simulation Full detector simulation including realistic optical background Primary energy range 1 to 10^5 TeV (Corsika) Down going (between vertical and 85 degrees) Horandel model Hadronic interaction model QGSJET At detector: Resulting muon energy range 1 to 10^5 GeV

Selection Muon selection Muon track length L>125m Shower selection Hard cuts (high purity): 10 hits in 10m distance interval along track Soft cuts (high efficiency): 5 hits in 20m distance interval along track at least 5 hits from different floors (reduce fake showers)

Photon emission along MC muon track all reconstructed emission points of the photons on muon trajectory hits selected by the algorithm positions of generated showers along the muon direction Use MC to quantify performance of shower reconstruction

MC study: muon and shower energy Average muon energy: Average shower energy: All: 1.2 TeV 160 GeV Soft: 2.4 TeV 200 GeV Hard: 3.2 TeV 460 GeV

Shower efficiency and purity Algorithm starts to be efficient for showers with energies above 1 TeV with reasonable purity

Shower charateristics Light deposit of showers More light => higher shower energy Number of showers More showers=>higher muon energy

Shower multiplicity for different primary models Different models = Different energy spectrum All models normalized to one Challenging task to distinguish primary models ¨´ ¨

Shower multiplicity MC shows (Horandel): Shower energy 0.5TeV Muon energy with shower 3.7TeV Position resolution 5m Shower Efficiency 5% Shower Purity 70% No reconstruction efficiency used Tested for 2007 data (47 days of livetime) Main systematic errors: Water absorption length PMT acceptance

Conclusion Analysis idea: project photons onto reconstructed muon track search for clusters => identification of showers along muon track Goals of ongoing analysis: shower multiplicity to distinguish different primary models input to energy estimator

Back up slide

Position resolution

Hit efficiency and purity

Downgoing muon (5 lines) Detected photon Used in fit Result of muon reconstruction Flat distribution of photons on muon trajectory

Downgoing muon with shower Peak=Shower position on muon trajectory Result of the 3D shower reconstruction

Shape of number of showers entries with 0 rec. shower entries with 0 gen. shower entries with 1 gen shower times efficiency not to detect a shower entries with 2 gen. showers times (efficiency not to detect a shower) Driven by Binomial formula! 2 (Works only for high purity)