NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Laura Rear McLaughlin Center for Operational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INDOT Height Modernization Project Ryan C. Swingley, PLS Andrew D. Baxter, PLS.
Advertisements

1 Michigan HMOD Update Shawn Roy 2014 HMOD National Meeting NOAA Gulf of Mexico Disaster Response Center April 30, 2014 Mobile, AL.
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES NOAA’s Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services : Turning Operational.
Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums State Geodetic Advisor, NGS National Ocean Service, NOAA Sacramento, CA October, 2005 Workshop.
National Ocean Service Budget Update for the NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel Glenn Boledovich, Chief NOS Policy, Planning and Analysis Division.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 5/7/2015 Adopting National Standards for Tidal and Geodetic Datums Jim Garster US Army Corps of Engineers.
Assistant Administrator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service September 18, 2008 John H. Dunnigan Toward National Height.
Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
National Height Modernization Program (NHMP) Update Great Lakes Region Height Modernization Consortium Meeting Columbus, OH October 13, 2011.
Tidal Datums Text and Figures Source: NOAA/NOS CO-OPS Tidal Datums related publications.
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Plan Overview Center for Operational Oceanographic.
Ohio Height Modernization Related Activities Great Lakes Regional Forum Sept 24-25, 2008 Madison, Wisconsin David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
2015 Height Modernization Partner Meeting April 14, 2015.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch
CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES GPS Requirements for the National Water Level Program Applications of GPS/GNSS in NOAA Cross-NOAA.
NOAA National Ocean Service Data and Datum-Informed Decision- Making: Understanding Essential Integrated Data Needs for Informing SAGE Juliana Blackwell.
Texas Height Modernization and Texas Spatial Reference Center Gary Jeffress, Ph.D., RPLS Director, Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas.
Illinois Height Modernization Sheena K. Beaverson.
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD) Overview Coastal Zone 2011 “ Cool Geodetic Resources.
Streamgage Datum Conversion Great Lakes Region Height Modernization Consortium meeting New Cumberland, PA April 13, 2011.
International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
Streamgage Datum Conversion Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Webinar March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Inter-Agency Datum Establishment and Conversion Collaboration in Missouri. Paul H. Rydlund Jr. PLS.
Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers Jim Garster.
NGS HSRP Update Ronnie Taylor, Acting Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA October 13, 2010.
NOAA Navigation Services CO-OPS Update Richard Edwing National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Hydrographic Services.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
2010 Hydrographic Services Review Panel David Steele, PLS DNR Geodetic Survey Director & Spatial Reference Center of Washington.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES 2010 Accomplishments Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Richard.
GRAV-D the International Great Lakes Datum and a Tale of Subsidence Presented at a meeting of the Great Lakes Regional Height Modernization Consortium.
Building the Digital Coast. Priority Coastal Issues Land use planning (growth management) Coastal conservation Hazards (flooding/inundation/storm surge)
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Coastal Zone 2011 Conference “Cool Geodetic Resources For Your Project” A National Ocean Service, NOAA, Presentation 1)TOOLS TO OBTAIN GEODETIC CONTROL.
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
AEC Summit NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Update Brian Shaw Geodesist.
National Spatial Reference System: Present and Future Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers W. Jeff Lillycrop Technical Director Engineer Research and Development Center.
U.S. HYDRO 2007 TIDES WORKSHOP May 17, 2006 UNCERTAINTY WORKSHOP SKGILL SLIDES.
The Importance of Accurate Elevations & Case Studies Edward Carlson Pacific Region Geodetic Advisor National Geodetic Survey (808)
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES CO-OPS NWLON and Seasonal Gauging in the Great Lakes - FY14 Efforts September 16, 2014.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.
2015 International Great Lakes Datum Height Modernization Project Dave Rigney NGS Geodetic Advisor Michigan Great Lakes Region Height.
Texas Height Modernization Dr. Gary Jeffress, RPLS Texas Spatial Reference Center National Height Modernization Partner Meeting NOAA Gulf of Mexico Disaster.
National Ocean Service NGS, NOS, NOAA Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate Navigation Services Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
The Delta Levees Program
National Geodetic Survey Update Hydrographic Services Review Panel Honolulu, HI May 4, 2011 Juliana Blackwell Director National Geodetic Survey.
Understanding your reference datum – it can be a cost saver!
NOAA’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO IOOS Michael Szabados NOAA’s, National Ocean Service.
GREAT LAKES REGION HEIGHT MODERNIZATION CONSORTIUM NATIONAL HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PARTNER MEETING APRIL 14, 2015.
Precise Digital Leveling Section 6 Vertical Datum.
VERTICAL DATUMS APRIL 08, 2008 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES NOAA’s National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.
Debriefing the Geospatial Summit NGS Monthly Webinar Series September 10, 2015.
New Datum: Vertical (Geopotential) FGCS Silver Spring, MD. July 24, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical Datum.
1 Texas Coastal Ocean Observation Network TCOON Professor Gary Jeffress, RPLS Director, Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Division of.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting 11 January 2011 Ronnie Taylor Acting Director,
Overview of Datums Commonly Used in Michigan and the National Spatial Reference System Michigan Society of Professional Surveyors 70 th Annual Meeting.
October 24, 2005 Silver Spring, Maryland MinnesotaDixon Hoyle MichiganDave Rigney Illinois Chris Pearson Ohio Dave Conner KentuckyRoss Mackay Convocation.
Update on National Geodetic Survey Activities Joe Evjen, NGS 02 May 2006.
U.S. Coast & Geodetic Survey/NOAA Steps to Creating a Nautical Chart Historic types of surveys required – Astronomical Observations – Land survey (triangulation)
Presentation transcript:

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Updating the International Great Lakes Datum Laura Rear McLaughlin Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services September 16, 2014 Tomah, Wisconsin

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES The International Great Lakes Datum  History  Roles and Responsibilities  Field Campaigns  Known Unknowns  Impacts  Possible Partnerships

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  History  United States and Canada share management of water resources in the Great Lakes and Interconnecting Channels  Common Datum, IGLD, first defined in 1955 by bilateral committee - Coordinating Committee for Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data (CCGLBHHD)  Datums of 1903 and 1935 were replaced  NAVD88 and IGLD 1985 based on same reference frame  CCGLBHHD coordinates updates to the Datum, necessary due to isostatic rebound - nonuniform The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES The International Great Lakes Datum  History  IGLD 1955 was updated in 1992 to IGLD 1985  Updated IGLD 2020 expected to be released in 2025

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Roles and Responsibilities  United States and Canada must coordinate update through the Coordinating Committee  United States update is coordinated through NOAA Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (CO-OPS) and National Geodetic Survey (NGS)  Canadian update is coordinated through Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment Canada and Natural Resources Canada The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Roles and Responsibilities  U.S. and Canada coordinate simultaneous measurements for GPS and water level measurements  U.S. and Canada determine master stations to reference Low Water Datum for each lake  U.S. and Canada coordinating development of new Geoid models  Canada 2013  U.S The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Field Campaigns  Water levels  53 U.S. National Water Level Observation Network locations and ~30 Canadian stations are foundation for IGLD update  CO-OPS has identified about 140 additional locations for seasonal water level gauging  Funding will determine actual locations  Gauges are deployed for four months (June-September); will take seven years to complete ( );  Datum name is the center year of the measurements The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES The International Great Lakes Datum Operating U.S. and Canada stations

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES The International Great Lakes Datum Possible Seasonal Gauges

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Field Campaigns  GPS  NGS to conduct joint GPS campaign in FY15 and FY20 (with Canada)  GPS measurements will occur at bench mark locations at presently operating water level gauges  GPS measurements/leveling also at seasonal sites The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Known Unknowns  Calculating Low Water Datum – U.S. and Canada will determine the LWD's and methodologies used to determine these elevations.  Accuracies of dynamic heights without running leveling lines  Determination of master stations and nodal points for each Lake  Comparative analysis of past GPS campaigns  Are Gravity measurements needed at the master stations?  Common geoid for US and Canada The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Known Unknowns  Will nautical charts and shoreline information need to be updated?  How much funding will be available for seasonal water level gauging?  Will hydraulic correctors be used? Will they be larger/smaller/the same?  How will anomalous water level variations at Green Bay and Saginaw be handled?  How will Interconnecting Channels be handled? The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Impacts  Navigation:  Low Water Datum (LWD or chart datum) will be changed on nautical charts from IGLD 1985 to IGLD 2020  The reference of the shoreline depicted on nautical charts may also change  Chart depths may need to be changed  Under keel clearance may be affected  Environment  Height references for regulating outflows in the Lakes will require adjustment  Flooding/erosion control heights will change  Restoration project datums will be affected  The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Impacts  Use Planning  IGLD 2020 will be required in new permits submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)  Lake level and benchmark elevations will be based on the new datum  Monthly water level bulletins and weekly water level forecasts published by USACE and the Canadian Hydrographic Service will be on the updated datum  Shared water resources between United States and Canada for power generation will be affected The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES  Possible Partnerships  GPS observations/Local leveling  Seasonal gauges  Master stations  Historic locations  Incorporating data into NGS' Integrated Data Base (Bluebooking Process)  Installing new marks in support of seasonal gauges  Partnering on new CORS stations  Providing feedback on water level needs The International Great Lakes Datum

NOAA’s CENTER for OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHIC PRODUCTS and SERVICES Thank you Laura Rear McLaughlin x128