What’s This HWA Design Thing All About??? Design Capacity HWA Info from one POTW CITY OF GREENSBORO North Buffalo POTW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
Advertisements

Engineers scientists architects constructors Case Study UV Disinfection Interference From Industry MWEA Industrial Pretreatment Seminar October 24, 2007.
Stone media TF design Example 1
Nutrient Issues at the Blue Plains WWTP February 2004.
Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works
Biological waste water treatment
Paving a Path to Potable Reuse Flexible Treatment for To Be Determined Regulations Michael Watts, PhD, PE Water Technology Leader Garver.
Proposed Reclassification of a Section of the Cape Fear River in New Hanover and Brunswick Counties (Cape Fear River Basin) to Class SC Swamp (SW) with.
Bekkelaget Wastewater Treatment Plant
A Clean Water Agency Quarterly Environmental Compliance Report Presented to the Environment Committee April 28, 2009 Mary Gail Scott Manager, Environmental.
Jerald O. Thaler, P.E. Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. Elaine J. Venema, PE. Fleis & VandenBrink Engineering, Inc.
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
Implementing BMPs as Local Limits Implementing BMPs as Local Limits City of Boise, Boise, Idaho Pretreatment Section Public Works Dept/Environmental Div.
Michigan Water Environment Association Annual Conference June 2013 Curtis M. Goodman Marquette Area Wastewater Treatment Facility Jerald O. Thaler, P.E.
Stabilization Ponds CE General Characteristics Quiescent and diked Quiescent and diked Wastewater enters the pond Wastewater enters the pond Organic.
Nitrification and Denitrification
DESIGN HWA ALTERNATIVES From Meeting Between DWQ and NC Pretreatment Consortium Presented at NC-PC Meeting.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates October 14, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
GALENA WASTEWATER TREATMENT UPGRADES Informational Presentation for the Sassafras River Association Presented by Ryan J. Rangel, PE April 23, 2015.
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Preliminary Seventh Power Plan Energy Efficiency Estimates November 18, 2014 West Point Wastewater Treatment Plant, Seattle.
ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR (RBC) PROCESS
WASTE WATER TREATMENT FOR RITONAVIR PRODUCTION PLANT Presented by Wang Dong Mei July 8, 2000.
New Approaches to Developing Local Limits Industrial & Hazardous Waste Committee Meeting July 18, 2001 by Richard W. von Langen, P.E. New Approaches to.
Lecture 6: Water & Wastewater Treatment
Glycol Treatment for Aircraft Deicing Scott Wallace and Mark Liner – Naturally Wallace Consulting David Cooper and Clodagh Murphy – ARM, Ltd. Russell Knight.
Municipal Wastewater Efficiency Improvements Potential Savings for the 6 th Power Plan September 30, 2008 Regional Technical Forum South Treatment Plant.
Design Considerations for High Strength Wastewater
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Pounds Formula Prepared By Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Operator Training and Certification Unit.
Water quality affected by some anthropogenic influence. Origin - domestic, industrial & commercial or agricultural activities.
Glycol Treatment at London’s Heathrow Airport
Biological Aerated Filtration (BAF) at the Denver Water Recycling Plant 2006 Water Reuse Workshop Golden, CO Russell Plakke, Denver Water.
Evaluation of alternative technologies for upgrading wastewater treatment plants in Minnesota for new phosphorus limits H. David Stensel University of.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
Calculating Numerical Local Limits Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Pretreatment Program.
Wastewater Treatment Processes
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
Using the CPE Approach to Optimize Industrial Waste Treatment Facilities Ronald G. Schuyler and Michael Rothberg Rothberg, Tamburini, and Winsor, Inc.
Lecture 6: Water & Wastewater Treatment Objectives: Objectives: Define primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment Define primary, secondary, and tertiary.
2008 Facility Plan Update May Purpose  Comprehensive Plan through 2033 –Builds on Past Work –Adjust for Changing Conditions  Identify Capacity,
1 Briefing Materials Flow and Nitrogen Issues By: D.C. Water and Sewer Authority February 28, 2008 Blue Plains Regional Committee Presented to: District.
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Construction OF AMMONIA REMOVAL UPGRADES FOR FIRST BROAD RIVER WWTP
November 17, 2015NC AWWA-WEA Annual Conference Planning for the Future --- MSD’s Facility Plan Update Peter Weed and Hunter Carson, MSD Mary Knosby, HDR.
Good at the First Drop: Start-up of the Western Wake Regional WRF Meets Summer Permit Limits 95 TH Annual Conference | November 2015 | Raleigh Convention.
New Hampshire State fish hatchery effluent discharge and EPA/NPDES permit story.
An Introduction To Modeling of Surface Waters For TPDES Permits Mark A. Rudolph, P.E. TCEQ Water Quality Division.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
LOW D.O. OPERATION: EFFECTS ON BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL, OXYGEN TRANSFER EFFICIENCY, DENITRIFICATION, AND ENERGY SAVINGS.
Public Information Meeting Wastewater Treatment January 26, 2016.
ENVE-2110 EXAM III Help Session DCC pm.
COMPARISON OF MBBR AND Suspended growth BNR Performance at the HRWTF
NH International (Caribbean) Ltd Penal Rock Hindu School Presented by : Sudesh Ramroop.
MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT February 2016 Town of Discovery Bay, CA 2373 Days of Safe Operations 107,602 worked hours since last recordable incident.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Water Quality Seminar Austin, TX. September 23, 2015 David James Santiago Velez-Garcia.
City of Fillmore Facing a Chloride Pollution Problem July 7, 2008.
1 HEADWORKS ANALYSIS WORKSHOP 2 Objectives of Pretreatment Program Objectives of Pretreatment Program Purpose of Headworks Analysis Purpose of Headworks.
State Update including Streamlining Jeff Poupart PERCS Supervisor February 7, 2006.
Low Cost Wastewater Treatment by Biofilm Technologies : Trickling Filter Dr.-Eng. Noama Shareef Senior Wastewater Engineering & lecturer at Al-Balqa’
FUTURE REQUIREMENTS AND GOALS
The Nuts & Bolts of TBLL Development
Proposed SEWER IMPACT FEES
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Treatment Costs and Level of Treatment
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
Wastewater Treatment Secondary Treatment.
REGIONAL SAN Proposed SEWER RATES
Clarifier Calculations Prepared By Debremarkos Department of HWRE Water treatment unit.
Presentation transcript:

What’s This HWA Design Thing All About??? Design Capacity HWA Info from one POTW CITY OF GREENSBORO North Buffalo POTW

NORTH BUFFALO POTW  Design Flow: 16 MGD Current Flow = ~10.0 MGD  Primary Treatment  Secondary Treatment Trickling Filters Activated Sludge with Nitrification  Tertiary Treatment Phosphorus removal  Chemical Addition/Precipitation Effluent Sand Filters

NB CURRENT MAHL CALCULATION CBOD [Actual Removal/Actual Flow] NPDES Permit Limit: 8.0 mg/l (summer) Removal Rate: 98.8% (270 data points/MRE) Actual Flow: 14.2 MGD** 8.0 mg/l = 8.0 = 666 mg/l max. allowable influent conc. 666 * 8.34 * 14.2 MGD = 78,952 pounds **DWQ required use of actual flow..flow has dropped since then. These are the approved headworks calculations from December 2003

“DESIGN CRITERIA” NORTH BUFFALO POTW  From Hazen and Sawyer Engineers Original Design (~1980 Upgrade)  BOD = 196 mg/l  TSS = 245 mg/l  Total Phosphorus = 6.0 mg/l  NH 3 -N = 18.5 mg/l

NB “DESIGN CRITERIA” per DWQ MAHL CALCULATION: CBOD  Engineering Design BOD = 196 mg/l Used BOD as CBOD  Engineering Design Flow = 16 MGD 196 * 8.34 * 16.0 = 26,154 pounds MAHL  Current Domestic BOD Loading: 27,615 lbs  20 of last 24 monthly average influent concentrations exceeded 196 mg/l while resulting in average effluent CBOD of <2 mg/l  CAN YOU SPELL OVERALLOCATED?????

NB CURRENT HWA CALCULATION TSS [Actual Removal/Actual Flow] NPDES Permit Limit: 30.0 mg/l Removal Rate: 97.8% (271 data points/MRE) Actual Flow: 14.2 MGD 30.0 mg/l = 30.0 = 1363 mg/l max. allow influent conc * 8.34 * 14.2 MGD = 161,492 pounds **DWQ required use of actual flow..flow has dropped since then. These are the approved headworks calculations from December 2003

NB “DESIGN CRITERIA” CALCULATIONS: TSS  Engineering Design TSS = 245 mg/l  Engineering Design Flow = 16 MGD 245 * 8.34 * 16.0 = 32,693 pounds [Current Domestic TSS Loading: 22,289]  Not overallocated now, but flow is only ~10.0 MGD  Domestic alone will use up the rest of the allocation

IMPLICATIONS  Underestimating POTW Conventional Pollutant Capacities and Capabilities Potential Over-Allocation With Just Domestic Loading! Loss of Potential New Industrial Users Potential Moratorium  “Domestic concentration” is rising due to newer plumbing fixtures  BOD Limits for All SIUs North Carolina Local Limits Policy

North Buffalo Current Loading Situation: DISMAL  Actual Influent CBOD Loading = 19,718 lbs 213 mg/l * 8.34 * 11.1 MGD [24 mo. avg]  DWQ Design Loading = 26,154 lbs 6436 lbs CBOD left…[“domestic” on paper is >MAHL] BOD Limits for Everyone!!!! [75.4% “loaded”]  Actual Influent TSS Loading = 32,401 lbs 350 * 8.34 * 11.1 MGD [24 mo. avg]  DWQ Design Loading = 32,693 lbs Only 292 Pounds of TSS Left…but over 4 MGD of hydraulic capacity left… TSS Limits for Everyone!!!! [~100% “loaded”]

North Buffalo SUMMARY CALCULATION METHOD Influent mg/l MAHL pounds BOD Pass-Thru Cal/Actual Flow66678,952 O&M “Design” (Proposed DWQ)19626,154 TSS Pass-Thru Cal/Actual Flow ,493 O&M “Design” (Proposed DWQ)24532,693