EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Well-Seismic Ties Lecture 7 Depth Time Synthetic Trace SLIDE 1
Advertisements

Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Accommodation space, Coluvial wedge. Even in this image, throw is hard to interpret however, there is still geologic insight to be gained. Surface expression.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Multi-Component Seismic Data Processing
Introduction to GeoProbe
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
Processing: zero-offset gathers
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Fundamentals Introduction Seismic waves: Propagation Velocity and Amplitudes Seismogram Measurement systems Sources, receivers, Acquisition strategies.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Reflection Field Methods
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave spreads over a larger surface as it travels through the medium. For a spherical wave, the wave energy falls off as the square of the distance. Its.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
GG 450 April 16, 2008 Seismic Reflection 1.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
The ray parameter and the travel-time curves P flat and P radial are the slopes of the travel time curves T-versus-X and T-versus- , respectively. While.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 20 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflections. Seismic waves will be reflected at “discontinuities” in elastic properties A new ray emerges, heading back to the surface Energy.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Seismic Imaging in GLOBE Claritas
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Introduction to Seismology
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Reflection seismograms
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
1 Geophysical Methods Data Acquisition, Analysis, Processing, Modelling, Interpretation.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Stacked sections are zero offset sections
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Single fold vs. Multi-fold CMP seismic profiling
Reflection velocity analysis
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Elements of 3D Seismology: Introduction to Interpretation
Static Anomalies and Energy Partitioning
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Common MidPoint (CMP) Records and Stacking
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Presentation transcript:

EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS

EARTH MODEL

NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER 1  2 = DENSITY OF LAYER 2 V 2 = VELOCITY OF LAYER 2 DENSITY  1 VELOCITY V 1 DENSITY  2 VELOCITY V 2 REFLECTION COEFFICIENT TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT

SEISMIC ACQUISITION

GEOPHONE STRUCTURE

GEOPHONE TYPES & FREQUENCY

SOURCE TRUCKS

3D-SEISMIC COVERAGE

CDP & FOLD STACK

MARINE SEISMIC CABLE LAYOUT

MULTIPLE RAYPATH

FACTORS AFFECTING AMPLITUDE

ATTENUATION TECHNIQES

SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING

PROCESSING FLOWCHART

OBJECTIVE OF PROCESSING REAL EARTH EARTH PROPERTIES PULSE SEISMIC TRACE PROCESSING MODEL EARTH

EFFECT OF STACKING ON NOISE SIGNAL PLUS RANDOM AT SIX-DETECTOR ARRAY SIGNAL SIGNAL + NOISE NOISE SIGNAL + NOISE EACH RECEIVER SUMMED OUTPUT

SEISMIC-WELL TIES PURPOSE: TO COMBINE TWO DATA SETS FOR A MORE COMPLETE INTERPERATION SEISMIC DATA TWO WAY TIME SEISMIC VELOCITY SEISMIC IMPEDENCE SEISMIC SEQUENCES SEISMIC FACIES STRUCTURE WELL DATA LINEAR DEPTH VELOCITY DENSITY GEOLOGIC AGE LITHOLOGY FAULT ORIENTATION

ACOUSTIC STRUCTURE OF EARTH LAYERED EARTH SONICDENSITYRC

CONVOLUTION

DETAILED SYNTHETIC SEISMOGRAM

POST-STACK PROCESSING RESIDUAL STATICS DISPLAY ENHANCEMENT MIGRATION ATTRIBUTE ANALYSIS INVERSION TIME-DEPTH CONVERSION

SUMMARY OF SEISMIC PROCESSING DATA ARE GATHERED AND CMP-ORDERED GATHERS ARE FORMED VELOCITY ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED ON SELECTED GATHERS THE GATHERS ARE MOVEOUT CORRECTED, STACKED, AND PLOTTED STACKING MAY BE FOLLOWED BY ADDITIONAL PROCESSING

VELOCITY ANALYSIS NORMAL MOVEOUT (NMO) X TXTX = T X - T 0 IMAGE POINT WHERE T 0 = ZERO OFFSET TIME T0T0 T0T0

NMO-ISOTROPIC LAYER A X C Z IMAGE POINT B D WHERE THEREFORE

MULTI-LAYER CASE FOR LAYER 1: FOR LAYER 2: V NMO = NORMAL MOVEMEOUT VELOCITY ASSUMED RAYPATH FOR V NMO CALCULATION X T X,1 Z V1V1 T 0,1 T 0,2 T X,2 ACTUAL RAYPATH

HOW IS VNMO DETERMINED? FOR EACH TRACE T AND X VALUES ARE DETERMINED

VELOCITY ANALYSIS HYPERPOLA PLOTS AS A STRAIGHT LINE ON T 2 - X 2 GRAPH T 2 - X 2 PLOT X2X2 OFFSET 2 t2t2 Y=b+mX WHERE

VMNO CORRECTION KNOWING THE VNMO, T  AND OFFSET, THE TIME CORRECTION NECESSARY TO SHIFT EACH TRACE CAN BE CALCULATED

INTERVAL VELOCITY DETERMINATION FROM SEISMIC FROM VELOCITY ANALYSIS, WE KNOW VNMO 1,T 0,1 VNMO 2, T 0,2 SUBTITUTING THESE VALUES INTO THE DIX EQUATION

MIGRATION EFFECTS FLAT HORIZONS REMAIN UNCHANGED IF THERE ARE NO VELOCITY ANOMALIES ABOVE DIPPING HORIZONS BECOME STEEPER, SHALOWER, AND MOVE LATERALLY UPDIP SYNCLINES BECOME BROADER, WITH ANY BOW TIES ELIMINATED ANTICLINES BECOME NARRWER DIFRACTIONS COLLPSE TO POINTS

RAY PATH MIGRATION WHERE  = TRUE DIP OF REFLECTOR  = APPERENT DIP OF REFLECTOR V= VELOCITY REFLECTION REFLECTOR x t

WHY MIGRATE? IF BEDS ARE DIPPING, APPERENT POSITION OF EVENTS ON A STACKED SECTION DIFFERS FROM THEIR TRUE POSITION DEPTH MODEL DEPTH TIME ARRIVAL TIMES 7 KFT/SEC 11 KFT/SEC 9 KFT/SEC

ASSUMPTION UNDERLYING MIGRATION ALL EVENTS ARE PRIMARIES- NO NOISE, NO MULTIPLES, NO SHEAR WAVES ALL EVENTS COME FROM THE PLANE VERTICALLY BENEATH THE SEISMIC LINE- NO SIDEWIPE VELOCITY ARE KNOWN EVERY WHERE

MIGRATION MOVES DIPPING HORIZONS

FOCUSING EFFECT OF A SHARP SYNCLINE

DEFOCUSING EFFECT OF AN ANTICLINE

FOCUSING EFFECT OF A SYNCLINE

3-D MIGRATION ELIMINATES ASSUMPTION OF 2--D MIGRATION THAT ALL DATA COMES FROM WITHIN PLANE OF SECTION REQUIRES 3-D DATA COLLECTION TO INSURE CLOSELY SPACED TRACES IN BOTH X, Y DIRECTIONS MOVES ENERGY IN BOTH INLINE AND CROSSLINE DIRECTIONS INLINES AND CROSSLINES TIE AFTER 3-D MIGRATION MAP MIGRATION IS AN ALTERNAIVE FOR COARSE GRID OF 2-D LINES

TIME VS. DEPTH SECTIONS

CDP GATHER AFTER DEMULTIPLEXING

CDP GATHER AFTER AMPLITUDE CORRECTION

CDP GATHER AFTER DECONVOLUTION

VELOCITY ANALYSIS

CDP GATHER AFTER NMO CORRECTION

CDP GATHER AFTER MUTING STRETCHED ZONES

CDP STACKED SECTION

CDP STACKED SECTION WITH TVF FILTER