AQ Tolerance Proposal Mod 209 – August 2008. Page 2Theme Date Department AQ Tolerances  Provide a view of appropriate tolerances for AQ validation 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2007 E.ON Nexus AQ Requirements To support the current business processes We need to maintain performance and enable market operation as is using current.
Advertisements

Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
© British Gas Further Analysis on Meter Reading Validation Tolerances proposed by Project Nexus March 2014.
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
Single Meter Supply Points Discussion Points for Workstream September 2012.
Mod 270 Potential Options Rob Hill 15/02/2009. Six potential options following discussion at last months Development Workgroup OptionNameDescription 1Elective.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
Analysis of the Xoserve Read Validation Proposal Author: Alex Cullin 27/08/2014.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous Workstream discussion ALLOCATION OF RbD ACROSS RELEVANT PERIOD DNOs’ comments on previous.
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement Issues 1 st November 2011.
Rolling AQ – Initial Calculation
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Options for Mod 640 Replacement
Weekly Progress Update 3rd Aug 2018
Rebecca Knight Mod 644 UIG Analysis.
Capacity/Commodity Split Impact on Suppressed reconciliations
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY AT ALL STAGES
Review Group 178 SSP as Domestic only.
Read Tolerance Scenarios - UNCVR
Modification th July 2008.
Weekly Progress Update 13 July 2018
Load Factor Variation Sallyann Blackett.
Proposed changes Change the market sectors to NDM MWh NDM 73.2 – 732 MWh NDM > 732 MWh Total NDM Total DM Shrinkage Total Distribution.
Rolling AQ Review Group 177.
Weekly Progress Update 15 June 2018
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Sampling results 5 (10%) 74% 10 (20%) 25 (50%) 45 (90%) Sample Size
XRN4790 – Introduction of winter read/consumption reports
Demand Estimation - Non Loggable Meters: Issue
Mod Proposal 0268 : AQ Backstop Date
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
CONFIDENTIAL - Review Group 272 © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc
Actions for Mod209 Workgroup
Genuine Reconciliation
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
Market Differentiation Workgroup Market Sector Flag Analysis
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
Possible Alternative to use of SND in Demand Estimation
AQ Review System Calculation Overview
Development Work Group 0209 Straw Man Update
Review Group 208 / Development Modification Group 194
Algorithm Option A DESC 1/8/2012.
Review Group 177 Rolling AQ.
Modification Proposal 136
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
Meter Read Rejections ..
Meter Reads.
Mod 209 – Rolling AQ.
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
REVIEW GROUP 178 – AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION
Mod565 TSL8 - Nominations Referred Calculations
Further Considerations
Presentation transcript:

AQ Tolerance Proposal Mod 209 – August 2008

Page 2Theme Date Department AQ Tolerances  Provide a view of appropriate tolerances for AQ validation  Looking only to exclude true outliers to minimise magnitude of failures  Data used is from NDM sample information to remove any Shipper impact

Page 3Theme Date Department EUC Band 1 – SSP population  Sample of 2310 sites comparing their consumption changes across three years  Produces a view of an expected AQ change if the AQ calculation reflected actual consumption

Page 4Theme Date Department EUC Band 1  Variation is consistent year on year  Bulk of the population varies between ± 25%  +100% to -80% captures 99.2%-99.8% of the changes  Suggest these may be appropriate tolerances for EUC band 1

Page 5Theme Date Department LSP EUC Bands  Current EUC band break points are, in KWh:  EUC band 2 = 73,200 to 293,000  EUC band 3 = 293,001 to 732,000  EUC band 4 = 732,001 to 2,196,000  EUC band 5 = 2,196,001 to 5,860,000  EUC band 6 = 5,860,001 to 14,650,000  EUC band 7 = 14,650,001 to 293,000,000  EUC band 8 = 293,000,001 to 58,600,000  EUC band 9 ignored as these should be DM sites

Page 6Theme Date Department LSP Bands 2-4  Sample of 5,576 sites comparing their consumption changes across three years  Produces a view of an expected AQ change if the AQ calculation reflected actual consumption, as for SSP

Page 7Theme Date Department EUC Band 2-4  Variation is consistent year on year  Bulk of the population varies between ± 50%  +100% to -80% captures 98.8%-98.9% of the changes

Page 8Theme Date Department Outliers for bands 2-4  Number of outliers for bands 2-4 above 100% only varies slightly by band  (Shows % of those failing 100% tolerance by EUC band)  However the % the outliers vary by is different

Page 9Theme Date Department Tolerances for bands 1-4  Suggested tolerances are:  Band 1+100%-80%  Band 2+300%-80%  Band 3+200%-80%  Band 4+200%-80%  As these tolerances are similar and a small percentage of the population is outside band 4 suggest extending band 4 to cover all other EUC bands