By Naeem Amjad 1.  Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Min Song 1, Yanxiao Zhao 1, Jun Wang 1, E. K. Park 2 1 Old Dominion University, USA 2 University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA IEEE ICC 2009 A High Throughput.
Advertisements

ENERGY-EFFICIENT COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS MICROSENSOR NETWORKS W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, Published in 2000.
Presented by Rick Skowyra
Routing Protocols for Sensor Networks Presented by Siva Desaraju Computer Science WMU An Application Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor.
Presentation: Energy Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan.
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Mikhail Nesterenko Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari.
Kyung Tae Kim, Hee Yong Youn (Sungkyunkwan University)
An Application-Specific Protocol Architecture for Wireless Microsensor Networks Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan (MIT)
CLUSTERING IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS B Y K ALYAN S ASIDHAR.
An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Cluster-Based Wireless Sensor Networks Using Ant Colony Optimization Ali-Asghar Salehpour, Babak Mirmobin, Ali.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory Tufts University School Of Engineering Energy-Efficient Structuralized Clustering for Sensor-based Cyber Physical Systems Jierui.
Sensor Network 教育部資通訊科技人才培育先導型計畫. 1.Introduction General Purpose  A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a wireless network using sensors to cooperatively.
Improvement on LEACH Protocol of Wireless Sensor Network
Sec-TEEN: Secure Threshold sensitive Energy Efficient sensor Network protocol Ibrahim Alkhori, Tamer Abukhalil & Abdel-shakour A. Abuznied Department of.
Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy An Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Micro-sensor Networks M. Aslam hayat.
Presented By- Sayandeep Mitra TH SEMESTER Sensor Networks(CS 704D) Assignment.
A novel Energy-Efficient and Distance- based Clustering approach for Wireless Sensor Networks M. Mehdi Afsar, Mohammad-H. Tayarani-N.
1 An Energy-Efficient Unequal Clustering Mechanism for Wireless Sensor Networks Chengfa Li, Mao Ye, Guihai Chen State Key Laboratory for Novel Software.
DAREPage 1 Distance Aware Relaying Energy-efficient: DARE to Monitor Patients in Multi-hop Body Area Sensor Networks Prepared by: Anum Tauqir.
By Areeba Rao with Dr. Nadeem Javaid COMSATS, Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan AM-DisCNT: Angular Multi-hop DIStance based Circular.
Source-Location Privacy Protection in Wireless Sensor Network Presented by: Yufei Xu Xin Wu Da Teng.
A Novel Cluster-based Routing Protocol with Extending Lifetime for Wireless Sensor Networks Slides by Alex Papadimitriou.
PORT: A Price-Oriented Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Yangfan Zhou, Michael. R. Lyu, Jiangchuan Liu † and Hui Wang The Chinese.
Globecom 2004 Energy-Efficient Self-Organization for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Fully Distributed approach Liang Zhao, Xiang Hong, Qilian Liang Department.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha Presented by Ray Lam Oct 23, 2004.
Talha Naeem Qureshi Joint work with Tauseef Shah and Nadeem Javaid
Yanyan Yang, Yunhuai Liu, and Lionel M. Ni Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology IEEE MASS 2009.
Fault Tolerant and Mobility Aware Routing Protocol for Mobile Wireless Sensor Network Name : Tahani Abid Aladwani ID :
Vikramaditya. What is a Sensor Network?  Sensor networks mainly constitute of inexpensive sensors densely deployed for data collection from the field.
M-GEAR: Gateway-Based Energy-Aware Multi-Hop Routing Protocol
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha.
A Framework for Energy- Saving Data Gathering Using Two-Phase Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks Wook Chio, Prateek Shah, and Sajal K. Das Center for.
Multimedia & Networking Lab
2015/10/1 A color-theory-based energy efficient routing algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks Tai-Jung Chang, Kuochen Wang, Yi-Ling Hsieh Department.
Grammati Pantziou 1, Aristides Mpitziopoulos 2, Damianos Gavalas 2, Charalampos Konstantopoulos 3, and Basilis Mamalis 1 1 Department of Informatics, Technological.
Design of a distributed energy efficient clustering (DEEC) algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks.
Patch Based Mobile Sink Movement By Salman Saeed Khan Omar Oreifej.
Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Prolonging Network Lifetime and Ensuring Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Yong-hwan Kim Korea.
Wireless Sensor Network Protocols Dr. Monir Hossen ECE, KUET Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KUET.
ENERGY-EFFICIENT FORWARDING STRATEGIES FOR GEOGRAPHIC ROUTING in LOSSY WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Presented by Prasad D. Karnik.
Improving Routing in Sensor Networks with Heterogeneous Sensor Nodes Xiaojiang Du & Fengjing Lin Vehicular Technology Conference,2005 Spring,Volume 4.
Selection and Navigation of Mobile sensor Nodes Using a Sensor Network Atul Verma, Hemjit Sawant and Jindong Tan Department of Electrical and Computer.
REECH ME: Regional Energy Efficient Cluster Heads based on Maximum Energy Routing Protocol Prepared by: Arslan Haider. 1.
An Energy-Aware Periodical Data Gathering Protocol Using Deterministic Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) Mohammad Rajiullah & Shigeru Shimamoto.
ELECTIONEL ECTI ON ELECTION: Energy-efficient and Low- latEncy sCheduling Technique for wIreless sensOr Networks Shamim Begum, Shao-Cheng Wang, Bhaskar.
MMAC: A Mobility- Adaptive, Collision-Free MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Muneeb Ali, Tashfeen Suleman, and Zartash Afzal Uzmi IEEE Performance,
Authors: N. Javaid, M. Aslam, K. Djouani, Z. A. Khan, T. A. Alghamdi
Copyright © 2011, Scalable and Energy-Efficient Broadcasting in Multi-hop Cluster-Based Wireless Sensor Networks Long Cheng ∗ †, Sajal K. Das†,
A Multi-Channel Cooperative MIMO MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks(MCCMIMO) MASS 2010.
MCEEC: MULTI-HOP CENTRALIZED ENERGY EFFICIENT CLUSTERING ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR WSNS N. Javaid, M. Aslam, K. Djouani, Z. A. Khan, T. A. Alghamdi.
Energy-Efficient Wake-Up Scheduling for Data Collection and Aggregation Yanwei Wu, Member, IEEE, Xiang-Yang Li, Senior Member, IEEE, YunHao Liu, Senior.
Group Members Usman Nazir FA08-BET-179 M.Usman Saeed FA08-BET-173
Data Dissemination Based on Ant Swarms for Wireless Sensor Networks S. Selvakennedy, S. Sinnappan, and Yi Shang IEEE 2006 CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS and NETWORKING.
ICIIS Peradeniya, Sri Lanka1 An Enhanced Top-Down Cluster and Cluster Tree Formation Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks H. M. N. Dilum Bandara,
Prolonging the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks via Unequal Clustering Stanislava Soro Wendi B. Heinzelman University of Rochester IPDPS 2005.
Ben Miller.   A distributed algorithm is a type of parallel algorithm  They are designed to run on multiple interconnected processors  Separate parts.
“LPCH and UDLPCH: Location-aware Routing Techniques in WSNs”. Y. Khan, N. Javaid, M. J. Khan, Y. Ahmad, M. H. Zubair, S. A. Shah.
Abstract 1/2 Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) having limited power resource report sensed data to the Base Station (BS) that requires high energy usage.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Wireless Access and Networking Technology (WANT) Lab. An Efficient Data Aggregation Approach for Large Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Globecom 2010 Lutful.
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010)
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan Presented.
Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC) Routing Protocol
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
SEP routing protocol in WSN
Leach routing protocol in WSN
Project Net 435.
Leach routing protocol in WSN
Edinburgh Napier University
Presentation transcript:

By Naeem Amjad 1

 Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2

 Energy efficiency  Maximum Network Lifetime  Coverage Ability  Increased Throughput  Low delay  Efficient routing  Cluster Head selection technique 3

 Wireless Sensor Network is a collection of small randomly dispersed devices that provide the ability to monitor physical and environmental conditions in real time.  WSNs are independent when deployed into the field because they have the ability of self- configuration and survival. 4

There are two types of Clustering:  Clusters once constructed and never be changed throughout network lifetime, are called Static Clusters.  Clusters based on some sort of network characteristics and are changing during network operation are known as Dynamic Clusters.  DREEM-ME is based upon static clustering. 5

 All the nodes are homogeneous  All nodes are proactive (continuously monitoring data).  Base station is in the center of the network.  Maximum energy based cluster head selection is used. 6

 Clustering technique of LEACH does not assure a fix number of CHs in each round.  In LEACH protocol, the number of CHs selected are not optimum.  We select the nodes as CHs which carry maximum energy in a particular region. So, this technique assures the optimum number of cluster heads in every round. 7

 For efficient use of energy and improvement of coverage, DREEM-ME divides the total area into small sub-regions  These sub-regions are treated separately for the nodes distribution. 8

Here, k= length of message in bits d= distance of transmission Eelec= Energy to run the transmitter or receiver’s circuitry Eamp= Energy to amplify the signal 9

 The target is to maximize the network coverage.  There exists a trade off between coverage and the energy.  So we have localized the whole network and divided the network into sub-regions that helps in avoiding the coverage hole. 10

 In DREEMME, the CH selection is entirely based upon the maximum energy.  In a particular region, the node with maximum energy is selected as the CH for that region in the current round. 11

12 Total Nodes = 90 Nodes in each Region = 10

 All non-CH nodes of outer regions (6, 7, 8, 9) check their distances from CHs of six regions which are close to them.  For example, each node of Region 6 checks its distance from CHs of its nearby regions (2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9) and then finds the minimum of these six distances.  So every non-CH node of outer regions sends its data to the CH which is at minimum distance. 13

 In DREEMME, all nodes of Region 1 are using Direct communication because they are at smaller distance to the BS as compared to the nodes of other regions.  All the other regions are considered as static clusters. 14

 Multi-hop technique is used for CH-CH communication.  CH of region 9  CH of region 5  BS  CH of region 8  CH of region 4  BS  CH of region 7  CH of region 3  BS  CH of region 6  CH of region 2  BS  Means sending the data 15

 We take a 100m x 100m area for our network  Total nodes are 90.  We divided the area into three concentric circles with 20m, 35m and 50m radii.  Simulations are done in MATLAB.  Packet Drop Model is also implemented.  Average of 5 simulations is plotted in the results. 16

17

 The results fluctuate to-and-fro around a mean value in every simulation.  Confidence interval is the interval in which we are pretty confident about our results.  We have observed the range of variance of our desired results and then defined their upper and lower values and the mean. 18

 Nodes of regions of outermost circle die first because area of each outer region is greater than middle or inner circle..  Then nodes of regions of middle circle start to die.  And the Direct Communication nodes die in the last because they are much closer to the BS. 19

20

 According to our network strategy packets sent to the BS per round should ideally follow the explanation below: Packets sent to BS by 1st Region DT nodes  10 Packets Sent to BS by 2nd Region CH Node  1 Packets Sent to BS by 3rd Region CH Node  1 Packets Sent to BS by 4th Region CH Node  1 Packets Sent to BS by 5th Region CH Node  1 Total Packets Sent to BS per round  14  As long as all the nodes are alive the packets sent remain

22

 In DREEM-ME, Packet Drop concept is used which makes it more close to the reality situation.  In reality the wireless links are not perfect or ideal.  There is always a probability that some of packets may be dropped on their way. 23

24

 We calculated the dropped packets with the probability of dropping as 0.3 out of 1.  But it is also practically possible that the probability of packet loss is less than 0.3.  Packets received are not the same as the packets sent in each round because of the packet drop technique. 25

26

 In this paper, we have proposed a new clustering technique for WSNs.  DREEM-ME uses static clustering and maximum energy based CH selection.  Multi-hop route is used for the CHs at long distance to sink.  The network field is divided evenly into circles and sectors to reduce the distance between CHs and BS.  In MATLAB simulations we compared our results with LEACH and LEACH-C.  CH selection technique of DREEM-ME provides better results than its counterparts, in terms of network lifetime, stability period, area coverage and throughput. 27

28