Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Data and Using Results for Improvement Sallie J. Weaver, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Advertisements

Reaching Consensus.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Closing the Loop Skills, tools and practices in action debriefing to create a culture of conversations that boosts learning and performance.
Leading Teams.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
[Hospital Name | Presenter name and title | Date of presentation]
How to Perform A Lessons Learned Session With Your Project Team
Meeting Management and Roles July MtgMgtRolesv1.ppt Regardless of Your Role, You Are Judged on How You Handle a Meeting Time Management? Executive.
RESETTING PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – MANAGER AS COACH Manager Briefing & Discussion Sessions Winter 2013.
Customer Focus Module Preview
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Team Leadership Behaviors Michael A. Rosen, PhD Assistant Professor,
Principles of Education and Training
Data Warehouse Overview From Calhoun ISD - PowerPoints Data Director and D4SS “Instead of overloading teachers, let’s give them the data they need to conduct.
Have Safety Culture Data, Will Travel?
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
Re-measuring Safety Culture: The Follow-up HSOPS Survey
The Cardiac Surgery Translational Study (“CSTS”) The Quality And Safety Research Group Data We Can Count On Lisa H. Lubomski, PhD April 8, 2011 Immersion.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Using the Online HSOPS & RC Apps for CSTS Armstrong Institute for.
Focus Groups: Understanding Culture Through Storyboards
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Conducting a Culture Check Up Jill Marsteller, PhD, MPP Mike Rosen,
Toward Eliminating Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections.
Learning Objectives 2 2 Explain the role of the senior executive in addressing technical and adaptive work Identify characteristics to search for when.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage I: Engaging Stakeholders.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Content 1: Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Jill A. Marsteller, PhD,MPP August 10, 2011 CSTS: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study Assessing Culture.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
11/10/20111 On The Cusp Journey: Sentara CarePlex Hospital Gail J. Rudder RN, CRNI Infection Preventionist November 10 th, 2011.
CUSP/Stop CAUTI Collaborative Carol Hafley, MHA, BSN, RN Assistant Director Missouri Center for Patient Safety Jefferson City, MO
1 Turning data into action: Using HSOPS and SSI data as part of a meaningful change Sallie Weaver, PhD & Deb Hobson, RN; Julius Pham, MD, PhD & Terry Tsai,
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s.
“No matter how small, acknowledge the achievement.” - Greg Henry Quinn.
Instructional Coaches Academy (ICAD3) 1.  Choose a movie title that describes your school experience and why.  Discuss in your table groups. 2.
Science of Safety and Identifying Defects CUSP 4 MVP-VAP Content Call, Module #2.
Science of Nurture 2H Session Two: Identifying Objectives and Target Audiences. Using Buyer Journeys and Personas.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Revisiting Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
HSOPS & Culture Debriefing1 DRAFT Pending AHRQ Approval ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY SALLIE WEAVER, PHD NASIR ISMAIL, MS, Doctoral.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Title Block HSOPS: So You’ve Done the Survey – Now What? Dolores Hagan, RN, BSN K-HEN Education/Data Manager.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Virginia State University Summer Data Institute: Digging into Data to Identify the Learner-Centered Problem Presented by: Justina O. Osa, Ed.D.
A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Conducting a Culture Check Up Jill Marsteller, PhD, MPP, Mike Rosen, PhD; Sallie Weaver, PhD September 12, 2013.
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Data Collection Training, Part II Nursing Home Survey on Patient Safety Culture Onboarding #3 for All.
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
1 Staff Review and Development (SRD): Practical for those reviewing others Jessie Monck, PPD, Human Resources Division Personal and Professional.
Staff Safety Assessment 1. Learning Objectives To understand Step 2 of CUSP:Identify Defects To understand how to Implement the Staff Safety Assessment.
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT - SONIYA JAYARAMAN.
1 Turning data into action: Using HSOPS and SSI data as part of a meaningful change Sallie Weaver, PhD & Deb Hobson, RN Julius Pham, MD, PhD ARMSTRONG.
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Long-Term Care Safety Toolkit: Building a Culture of Safety National Content Webinar April 16, 2015.
Engaging Senior Executives in SUSP Work Mike Rosen, PhD and Liza Wick, MD December 9 and December 11, 2013.
Making It Better Planning Employee & Patient Satisfaction November 2010.
Setting the context Multiplying leaders to build movements everywhere requires that development be designed around the needs of the individual as.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. FOUNDATIONS OF STUDENT GROWTH GOAL SETTING: DETERMINING STUDENT NEEDS SETTING A BASELINE What do my students.
Sustaining and Spreading Surgical Safety Improvements with SUSP Mike Rosen, PhD Elizabeth Wick, MD ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Senior Leadership of Quality and Safety Initiatives in Health Care.
1 CAREER PATHWAYS Welcome to…. Module 6 Performance Management.
“Are We at Fidelity?”: Annual Evaluation and Action Planning.
Readiness Consultations
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
From Performance Management to Performance Acceleration
Team Check-Up Orientation Briefing
PDCA Cycles Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D.
Presentation transcript:

Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Data and Using Results for Improvement Sallie J. Weaver, PhD

Roadmap 1.I have data….but now what? 2.Some food for thought regarding next steps and debriefing survey results Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 2

Poll question Have you (or your team’s survey coordinator) downloaded or reviewed the HSOPS “aggregate report” for your work area? –Yes –No Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 3

Overall Picture…usually I put the overall baseline scores in chart for a given project/cohort and show it here…is there a chart like this for VAP that you want to show? Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 4

Remember: Culture is Local Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 5

UNDERSTANDING THE HSOPS AGGREGATE REPORT Part I Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 6

7 Survey Coordinators can download HSOPS report(s) from: Survey Coordinators can download HSOPS report(s) from:

8 Select the work area that you want to manage Pre-Op

%0

HSOPS Aggregate Report 10

11

Who completed the survey: Pg. 2-4 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 12 80% (n = 80)

13 Composite Score: Pg. 6-7 Scores = Percent positive responses Interpreting Composite Scores: The big picture view Higher is better

14 Composite Score: Pg. 6-7 Scores = Percent positive responses Interpreting Composite Scores: The big picture view Higher is better

Questions: Pg Percent positive = Green Percent neutral = Yellow Percent negative = Red 15

Questions provide a deeper dive: For positively worded items, more green is better Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 16

Questions: Pg *For negatively worded items, more RED is better

Questions provide a deeper dive: * For negatively worded items, more RED is better Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 18

USING THE CUSP CULTURE CHECK- UP TOOL TO DEBRIEF SURVEY RESULTS Part II Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 19

CUSP Culture Check-Up Tool What is the Purpose of this Tool? –Understand the culture of the unit –Use teammates’ feedback to predict barriers to change and avoid them –Use feedback to make the most of the team’s strengths Who Should Use this Tool? –Safety culture debriefing facilitators Use this tool to help guide the discussion and record group decisions Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 20

How Do I Use this Tool? –Share culture results with everyone on the unit Bring together team members from your work area Follow your debriefing plan –Take notes and recognize recurring themes –Purpose = Open, honest discussion about ideas to make the culture of your work area the best it can be –Focus on identifying system issues that the group can work on improving together instead of individuals NOT used to point fingers at specific individuals –Use the tool to structure meetings and guide conversation –As a group, complete all steps in this worksheet Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 21 CUSP Culture Check-Up Tool

Steps in CUSP Culture Check-Up Tool STEP 1: Your team identifies the general strengths and weaknesses of your unit culture. STEP 2: Your team identifies the specific behaviors and attitudes that make up those strengths and weaknesses. STEP 3: Debriefing facilitator encourages group reflection. Your team chooses opportunities for growth, understanding that cultural strengths can help fix cultural weaknesses. STEP 4: Your team identifies a strategy for fixing the opportunities selected in step three. –AHRQ recommends creating ‘safety briefings’ – short updates for frontline teammates about patient safety issues in the work are. For more ideas, go to: STEP 5: Your team works out the details of putting strategy into action. STEP 6: Your team evaluates your plans. Be sure to meet again and check in on progress at your SUSP team meetings Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 22

Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 23 The “Culture Check Up Tool” = Word Document that Debriefing Facilitator can use to guide conversation & improvement planning

Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 24

Next Steps: Implementing your team’s HSOPS Debriefing Plan Debriefing is… –A semi-structured conversation among frontline clinicians and staff that is usually led by a designated facilitator Purpose… 1.Encourage open communication, transparency, and interactive discussion about the survey results Across all levels 2.To engage clinicians and staff in generating and implementing their ideas about how to create an effective safety culture in their work area Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 25

Some points to cover in your debriefing plan Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 26

Recent Finding #2: CUSP teams that debrief around safety culture perform better Data is data –Debriefing turns data into information Debriefing accelerates improvement Units who used semi- structured debriefing of culture survey 10.2% Reduction in Infection Rates Units who did not debrief survey results 2.2% Reduction in Infection Rates Vigorito MC, McNicoll L, Adams L, Sexton B. Improving safety culture results in Rhode Island ICUs: lessons learned from the development of action-oriented plans. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Nov;37(11):

Changing Culture in Practice: National CLABSI Project Example Baseline HSOPS survey Target non-punitive response to error What did they do? –Clarified the language and definitions of events, errors, glitches with all unit clinicians & staff Education campaign to define and differentiate process errors (e.g., expected behavior not clear, not known) from intentional violations Created shared mental model about expected safety behavior, as well as what to report, when, and when/how to follow-up Follow up…hot off the presses! Non-punitive response, communication openness, supervisor support Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 28

In Sum 1.Review the survey report for your unit 2.Can be helpful to distill the report down into 3-5 key slides 3.Decide when, how, and where to debrief your teammates (and leaders) on these results Be prepared to listen Ask for feedback Ask teammates to help come up with solutions 4.Gather a small group together and use the “culture debriefing tool” to examine the roots of problem areas and begin to formulate strategies for improvement 29

Thank you! 30