Syllogisms and Visual Rhetoric Danna Prather. Syllogistic form puts an argument into three statements in order to illustrate the data, claim, and warrant,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Advertisements

Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Syllogisms Formal Reasoning.
Reason & Argument Lecture 3. Lecture Synopsis 1. Recap: validity, soundness & counter- examples, induction. 2. Arguing for a should conclusion. 3. Complications.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
The Conditional Syllogism otherwise knows as: The Hypothetical Syllogism “If I had a millions dollars, then I’d buy you a house” The Barenaked Ladies.
Review: Logic. Fallacy: Appeal to Novelty New is better.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Un-rules for Good Writing 1. Don’t use no double negatives. 2. Make each pronoun agree with their antecedent. 3. Join clauses good like a conjunction should.
Your name Mediate Inference. your name Mediate Inference Commonly called as argument Has two major types: –Deduction/Deductive Arg./Syllogism Categorical.
Patterns of Deductive Thinking
Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning
FALLACIES CHAPTERS 8 & 9. DEDUCTIVE REASONING From general to specific; have a law, premise, or principle Insert a specific fact or event regarding that.
The Conditional Syllogism otherwise knows as: The Hypothetical Syllogism “If I had a millions dollars, then I’d buy you a house” The Barenaked Ladies.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Chapter 1 Section 1.2 Symbolic Logic. Sentences vs Statements A truth value is one of two words either true (T) or false (F). A statement is a particular.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
The Science of Good Reasons
The Logical Structure of Argument
Deductive Arguments.
Definition: “reasoning from known premises, or premises presumed to be true, to a certain conclusion.” In contrast, most everyday arguments involve inductive.
Reasoning. Inductive and Deductive reasoning Inductive reasoning is concerned with reasoning from “specific instances to some general conclusion.” Deductive.
Persuasive Appeals Logos AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION.
Mike McGuire MV Community College COM 101 A Closer Look at Logos Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies ENGL102 Ordover Fall 2008.
Review from Yesterday…. Rhetoric vs. Dialectic Deduction : conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from the previously stated facts (premises). Remember.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
UNIT 5 REVIEW GAME Citizenship Influencing the Government Political Parties Republicans v. Democrats Voting Elections.
Propositional Logic A symbolic representation of deductive inference. Use upper case letters to represent simple propositions. E.g. Friday class rocks.
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze, and evaluate deductive arguments.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Hypothetical Syllogism If/Then Statements. Parts Major Premise: Two-part statement: – 1) "if," statement, known as the antecedent; – 2) consequent Minor.
Chapter 23: Enthymemes, Argument Chains, and Other Hazards.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Elements of Argument Logic vs. Rhetoric. Syllogism Major Premise: Advertising of things harmful to our health should be legally banned. Minor Premise:
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Structures of Reasoning Models of Argumentation. Review Syllogism All syllogisms have 3 parts: Major Premise- Minor Premise Conclusion Categorical Syllogism:
Formal logic The part of logic that deals with arguments with forms.
L = # of lines n = # of different simple propositions L = 2 n EXAMPLE: consider the statement, (A ⋅ B) ⊃ C A, B, C are three simple statements 2 3 L =
SYLLOGISM - FORM & LOGICAL REASONING. WHAT IS A SYLLOGISM? Syllogism – the formal structure of logical argument. Three statements - Major Premise, Minor.
Persuasive Appeals AP LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION Logos
Critical Thinking and Arguments
Deductive Arguments.
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Persuasive Speaking Structures and Appeals
Disjunctive Syllogism
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
Intro to Fallacies SASP Philosophy.
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Chapter 8: Recognizing Arguments
Syllogism, Enthymeme, and Logical Fallacies
Rules and fallacies Formal fallacies.
Logical Forms.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Recognizing arguments
Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.
Arguments in Sentential Logic
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Dorothy Edgington Paris June 2019
Presentation transcript:

Syllogisms and Visual Rhetoric Danna Prather

Syllogistic form puts an argument into three statements in order to illustrate the data, claim, and warrant, but uses special terms to designate these. Syllogistic form puts an argument into three statements in order to illustrate the data, claim, and warrant, but uses special terms to designate these.

Syllogistic Form- Categorical Syllogisms All history professors are poor lecturers (Major premise) All history professors are poor lecturers (Major premise) Dr. Fred is a history professor (Minor premise) Dr. Fred is a history professor (Minor premise) Dr. Fred is boring (Conclusion) Dr. Fred is boring (Conclusion) Major term: history professors Major term: history professors Middle term: poor lecturers Middle term: poor lecturers Minor term: Dr. Fred Minor term: Dr. Fred

The Categorical Syllogism - Tests 1. The middle term must be used in a universal sense in one of the premises. All people breath All people breath Rachel is a person Rachel is a person Rachel breathes Rachel breathes This example passes - why? This example passes - why?

The Categorical Syllogism – Tests 2. If a term is universal in the conclusion, it must be universal in the premises. All people with cars must take driving lessons All people with cars must take driving lessons Many college graduates have cars Many college graduates have cars All college graduates should take driving lessons All college graduates should take driving lessons This example fails – why? This example fails – why?

The Categorical Syllogism - Tests 3. At least one of the premises must be an affirmative statement. 3. At least one of the premises must be an affirmative statement. No Republicans vote Democrat No Republicans vote Democrat Matt is not a Republican Matt is not a Republican Matt votes democrat Matt votes democrat Fails – why? Fails – why?

The Categorical Syllogism - Tests 3. If one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. 3. If one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. No North Texans believe in the hollow earth No North Texans believe in the hollow earth Julie is a North Texan Julie is a North Texan Julie doesn’t believe in the hollow earth Julie doesn’t believe in the hollow earth Passes – why? Passes – why?

Syllogistic Form – Hypothetical Syllogism Major premise is concerned with an uncertain condition Major premise is concerned with an uncertain condition If a universal health care system is financed through income tax, it will win approval If a universal health care system is financed through income tax, it will win approval The proposed health care system is financed through an income tax The proposed health care system is financed through an income tax It will win approval It will win approval

The Hypothetical Syllogism- Tests 1. If the minor premise affirms the antecedent (the conditional clause), the conclusion must affirm the consequent. 1. If the minor premise affirms the antecedent (the conditional clause), the conclusion must affirm the consequent. If you run with scissors, you will cut yourself If you run with scissors, you will cut yourself You will run with scissors You will run with scissors You won’t cut yourself You won’t cut yourself Fails – why? Fails – why?

The Hypothetical Syllogism- Tests 2. If the minor premise denies the consequent, the conclusion must deny the antecedent. 2. If the minor premise denies the consequent, the conclusion must deny the antecedent. When I eat too much, I get sick When I eat too much, I get sick I didn’t get sick I didn’t get sick I didn’t eat too much I didn’t eat too much Passes – why? Passes – why?

The Disjunctive Syllogism The Major premise presents alternatives, usually indicated by an “either–or” or “neither—nor” The Major premise presents alternatives, usually indicated by an “either–or” or “neither—nor” Either you will go to class this afternoon or you will fail Either you will go to class this afternoon or you will fail You didn’t go to class You didn’t go to class You are going to fail You are going to fail

The Disjunctive Syllogism - Tests 1. If the Minor premise affirms (or denies) one of the alternatives, the conclusion must deny (or affirm) the other alternative 1. If the Minor premise affirms (or denies) one of the alternatives, the conclusion must deny (or affirm) the other alternative Either I have to get a part time job or I will have to quit school Either I have to get a part time job or I will have to quit school I didn’t get a part-time job I didn’t get a part-time job I will have to quit school I will have to quit school Passes – why? Passes – why?

The Disjunctive Syllogism – Tests 2. The alternatives presented in the first premise must be mutually exclusive. 2. The alternatives presented in the first premise must be mutually exclusive. Either we take our time or we will be unfair Either we take our time or we will be unfair We will take our time We will take our time We will not be unfair We will not be unfair Fails – why? Fails – why? Either we will take our time or we will be quick Either we will take our time or we will be quick We took our time We took our time We were not quick We were not quick Passes – why? Passes – why?

The Disjunctive Syllogism - Tests 3. The major premise must include all of the possible alternatives. 3. The major premise must include all of the possible alternatives. Jay does poor work so he must either be stupid or lazy Jay does poor work so he must either be stupid or lazy Jay is not stupid Jay is not stupid He must be lazy He must be lazy Fails – why? Fails – why?

Enthymemes and Visual Rhetoric Enthymeme - as we learned yesterday, an enthymeme is a rhetorical syllogism Enthymeme - as we learned yesterday, an enthymeme is a rhetorical syllogism An argument where part is implied. Invites audience participation. An argument where part is implied. Invites audience participation. “Santa Claus is coming” “Santa Claus is coming” Data for the unstated claim, You better be good Data for the unstated claim, You better be good “Everybody graduates sometime” “Everybody graduates sometime” Data for the unstated claim you will graduate also Data for the unstated claim you will graduate also

Importance of Cultural History for Visuals

Now and Then