2005 PLUS International Conference The New Face of Employment Litigation: Class Actions and Beyond Lucy Ann Galioto VP - National Union/AIG David Keenan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preventing Discrimination & Harassment. Equal Employment Opportunity Cuesta College is an Equal Opportunity employer. All employees who participate on.
Advertisements

The EEOC and Trends for Working Women: Current and Emerging Issues 2007 National Equal Opportunity Professional Development Forum Edana E. Lewis, Esq.
Presented By: EEOC Initiatives & Trends Charles H. Wilson.
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF THE WORKPLACE: Background Employees are the most important resource for most firms in the Virtual State Management needs to build.
EPL& EPLI Underwriting Trends: Baby Boomers Come of Age Panelists: Laura R. Zaroski, Esq. Donohue Brown Mathewson & Smyth LLC Donohue Brown Mathewson &
Diversity in the Workplace
Oh No! … It’s an EEOC Charge! How to Respond Effectively. HR Women’s Breakfast Briefing June 11, 2008 Washington, DC Kara M. Maciel, Esq.
Jury Verdict Survey a presentation by: Matt Dow Jackson Walker L.L.P.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMAT IVE ACTION All materials provided in this training, including the contents of linked pages, are provided for general.
Legal Issues in HR OS352 HRM Fisher Sept. 2, 2004.
Legal Issues in HR OS352 HRM Fisher Jan 19, 2005.
3-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Understanding Equal Opportunity and The Legal Environment Chapter 3.
Minimizing Employment Liability Risk Staff Affirmative Action Office (SAAO) May 2009.
Copyright ©2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or.
Major EEO Laws (1960s- 1970s) Major EEO Laws (1990s- Current) TERMS The Legal Environment TERMS The Legal Environment and Sexual Harassment TERMS The.
Legal Issues in HR OS352 HRM Fisher Sept. 4, 2003.
Fundamentals of Employment Law OS652 HRM Fisher Sept. 2, 2004.
Bolton HR Consulting and Leadership Development. Facts About Retaliation-Definitions Retaliation occurs when an employer, employment agency or labor organization.
WELCOME TO THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) OFFICE White Sands Missile Range, NM Prepared by EEO Officer.
Discrimination and Harassment in Employment Law: Overview and Helpful Hints Kenneth Tanji WorldEsquire Law Firm LLP 80 S. Lake Avenue, #708, Pasadena,
California Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Supervisors and Managers 1 Preventing, Identifying & Correcting Harassment in the Workplace Poker.
Human Resource Management, 8th Edition
Dawn D. Bennett-Alexander Laura P. Hartman. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Chapter 2 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill.
EPLI in the New Millennium: Current Trends and Emerging Issues John L. Barber, Esq. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP California/New York.
© 2007 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC The Value of Employment Practices Liability Insurance Andrew L. Levy McNees Wallace & Nurick.
Presented by Employment Practices Liability And Litigation Trends.
Title Line 1 Title Line 2 Attorney Name Michigan Works! Annual Conference October 13, :15-10:45 am Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort.
Providing Equal Employment Opportunity and a Safe Workplace
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Discrimination Decisions made on the basis of characteristics which are not relevant to the position, which result in harm suffered by persons –on the.
EMPLOYMENT CONSIDERATIONS FOR SMALL BUSINESS 1 Trusted GC John R. Flanders, Attorney 2600 S. Lewis Way, Suite 103 Lakewood, CO
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
EMPLOYMENT AND LABOR LAWS  These laws:  Prevent discrimination and harassment in the workplace.  Outline workplace poster requirements.  Set wage.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 42: Equal Employment Opportunity Law.
 One example is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights set out by the UN in 1945  See page 24 of your text.
EEO Best Practices: Addressing and Preventing Discrimination February 12, 2013 MHRMA.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 28 Employment Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Practical impacts of the Fair Work Ombudsman’s combined agency powers and new discrimination jurisdiction Presentation for the 8 th Annual Workforce Conference.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
Chapter 43: Discrimination Part III May 16, 2007.
AB203 HR Management EEO and OSH ~ Unit 2 ~. AB203 HR Management – Unit 2 Seminar ~ Agenda ~ U.S. Federal Government Three Branches’ Involvement EEO Definition.
DEALING WITH THE PROBLEM EMPLOYEE John Ashby
© Zurich Re EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY Peter Szendro Zurich Reinsurance (North America), Inc.
Chapter 19 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.19-2 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Regulations That Protect Employees.. Discrimination Laws Workplace discrimination laws are designed to give every person an equal opportunity in any company.
FACULTY DIRECTOR TRAINING OFFICE OF EDUCATION ABROAD 1 Legal Issues and Education Abroad.
2 Equal Opportunity and the Law 2 Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 2-1.
Diversity in the Workplace “Diversity Beyond the Color: Do You Really Know Me?” Presenter Dr. Arthur Holmes Chief Officer of Human Resources and Administrative.
Managing Strategic Human Resources Today Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter 19.  Equal opportunity in employment: The rights of all employees and job applicants  To be treated without discrimination  To be able to sue.
Diversity Awareness. Objectives  Analyse what is meant by Diversity  Demonstrate an awareness of the dimensions of diversity including gender, ethnic.
Chapter 41 Equal Employment Opportunity Law Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter 2 Managing Equal Opportunity and Diversity 2-2 Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
D. Scott Landry Chaffe McCall, L.L.P United Plaza Blvd., Suite 103 Baton Rouge, LA Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Association of Levee.
What is Employment Discrimination?  You may be familiar with the word "discrimination." But do you know what it really means? And do you understand how.
SLO:I can understand the purpose of unions and statutes that protect worker’s rights.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
NOHRPS Labor & Employment Law Update April 28, 2011 Family Responsibility Discrimination Presented By: Robert S. Gilmore, Esq.
Chapter 3 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Discrimination In Employment
Corporate Counsel Women of Color
Our clients’ rights in the workplace
Human Resource Management, 8th Edition
The Buck Stops with You: When a Supervisor Can Be Liable A Special Presentation for the 2018 EANE Management Conference Presented By: Mark Adams,
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Cultural Diversity in the Workplace
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Labor and Employment Law Update
Presentation transcript:

2005 PLUS International Conference The New Face of Employment Litigation: Class Actions and Beyond Lucy Ann Galioto VP - National Union/AIG David Keenan VP – EPL Claim Manager, Chubb John Lozada Chief of Enforcement, Mass. Comm. Against Discrim. Jack McCalmon, Esq. Partner: Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon Philip R. Voluck, Esq. Partner: Kaufman, Schneider & Bianco, LLP Lucy Ann Galioto VP - National Union/AIG David Keenan VP – EPL Claim Manager, Chubb John Lozada Chief of Enforcement, Mass. Comm. Against Discrim. Jack McCalmon, Esq. Partner: Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon Philip R. Voluck, Esq. Partner: Kaufman, Schneider & Bianco, LLP

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND AGENDAAGENDA  Explore Current Trends In Employment Litigation (Lucy)  Impact of Class Actions (Dave)  State and Federal Protections in the Workplace (John)  Loss Prevention Strategies (Philip)  Explore Current Trends In Employment Litigation (Lucy)  Impact of Class Actions (Dave)  State and Federal Protections in the Workplace (John)  Loss Prevention Strategies (Philip) Jack McCalmon, Esq. – Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Overview of 2004 EEOC EPLI Statistics  Employees filed 79,432 charges in FY  This presents a decrease in the number of charges filed when compared to those filed in FY 2002: 84,442 and 2003: 81,293.  This decrease is the result of more plaintiffs filing state charges where there are no caps on punitive damages.  During 2004 the EEOC recovered a record $419 M in compensatory damages for employees.  $251 M was recovered through pre-litigation resolutions and $168 M was recovered through lawsuits filed in federal district court.  Employees filed 79,432 charges in FY  This presents a decrease in the number of charges filed when compared to those filed in FY 2002: 84,442 and 2003: 81,293.  This decrease is the result of more plaintiffs filing state charges where there are no caps on punitive damages.  During 2004 the EEOC recovered a record $419 M in compensatory damages for employees.  $251 M was recovered through pre-litigation resolutions and $168 M was recovered through lawsuits filed in federal district court.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND EEOC EPLI Statistics  RACE DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 27,696 charges; EEOC recovered $61 M for these complainants.  SEX DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 24,000 charges; EEOC recovered $100 M for these complainants.  AGE DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 17,837 charges; EEOC recovered $69 M for these complainants.  DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 15,000 charges; EEOC recovered $47 M for these complainants.  RACE DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 27,696 charges; EEOC recovered $61 M for these complainants.  SEX DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 24,000 charges; EEOC recovered $100 M for these complainants.  AGE DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 17,837 charges; EEOC recovered $69 M for these complainants.  DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 15,000 charges; EEOC recovered $47 M for these complainants.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND EEOC EPLI Statistics  SEXUAL HARASSMENT: Employees filed 13,000 charges; EEOC recovered $37 M for these complainants. 15% of the sexual harassment charges were filed by males.  NATIONAL ORIGIN: Employees filed 8,000 charges; EEOC recovered $22 M for these complainants.  RELIGION: Employees filed 2,500 charges; EEOC recovered $6 M for these complainants.  PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 4,500 charges; EEOC recovered $11 M for these complainants.  SEXUAL HARASSMENT: Employees filed 13,000 charges; EEOC recovered $37 M for these complainants. 15% of the sexual harassment charges were filed by males.  NATIONAL ORIGIN: Employees filed 8,000 charges; EEOC recovered $22 M for these complainants.  RELIGION: Employees filed 2,500 charges; EEOC recovered $6 M for these complainants.  PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION: Employees filed 4,500 charges; EEOC recovered $11 M for these complainants.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND EEOC Litigation Against Small and Mid-Size Employers  Since 2002 the EEOC has aggressively pursued small and mid- sized companies who have allegedly engaged in discriminatory practices.  Many of these settlements have been in excess of $1 M.  Since 2002 the EEOC has aggressively pursued small and mid- sized companies who have allegedly engaged in discriminatory practices.  Many of these settlements have been in excess of $1 M.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Examples of EEOC Litigation Against Small and Mid-Size Employers  Apollo Colors: Apollo Colors, a Chicago paint manufacturer with 200 employees, settled a racial harassment action brought by the EEOC on behalf of African American employees of Apollo Colors for $1.8 M.  NY Lutheran Medical Center at Brooklyn: Hospital settled a sexual harassment suit brought by the EEOC on behalf of female employees for $5 M.  Long Prairie Packing: A Minneapolis packing company with 235 workers settled a male-on-male sexual harassment matter brought by the EEOC on behalf of male employees for $1.9 M.  Apollo Colors: Apollo Colors, a Chicago paint manufacturer with 200 employees, settled a racial harassment action brought by the EEOC on behalf of African American employees of Apollo Colors for $1.8 M.  NY Lutheran Medical Center at Brooklyn: Hospital settled a sexual harassment suit brought by the EEOC on behalf of female employees for $5 M.  Long Prairie Packing: A Minneapolis packing company with 235 workers settled a male-on-male sexual harassment matter brought by the EEOC on behalf of male employees for $1.9 M.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Employment Litigation Statistics  Today 1/5 of the employment practice matters brought to trial result in a plaintiff’s award of $1 M or more.  More than 1 in 5 Americans have experienced employment discrimination according to a FindLaw Survey released July  The 2004 Jackson Lewis Workplace Survey revealed that respondent employers experience an increase in gender discrimination and sexual harassment complaints filed against them:  In % of respondents defended gender discrimination complaints compared to 48% in  In % of respondents defended sexual harassment matters compared to 57% in  Today 1/5 of the employment practice matters brought to trial result in a plaintiff’s award of $1 M or more.  More than 1 in 5 Americans have experienced employment discrimination according to a FindLaw Survey released July  The 2004 Jackson Lewis Workplace Survey revealed that respondent employers experience an increase in gender discrimination and sexual harassment complaints filed against them:  In % of respondents defended gender discrimination complaints compared to 48% in  In % of respondents defended sexual harassment matters compared to 57% in 2003.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Employment Litigation Statistics (cont.)  According to USA Today, an estimated 550 employment lawsuits are filed in the United States every day.  57% of the Retaliation claims brought in Federal Court are won by Plaintiffs.  The National Compensatory Jury Award Median for Employment Practices Liability in 2003 was $250 K. That same award in 2001 was $168 K. (Jury Verdict Research 2004)  According to USA Today, an estimated 550 employment lawsuits are filed in the United States every day.  57% of the Retaliation claims brought in Federal Court are won by Plaintiffs.  The National Compensatory Jury Award Median for Employment Practices Liability in 2003 was $250 K. That same award in 2001 was $168 K. (Jury Verdict Research 2004)

JURY AWARDS National Compensatory Jury Award Median for Discrimination Cases ( ): National Compensatory Jury Award Median for Discrimination Cases ( ): 2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Age $255,143 Disability $210,000 Sex $151,625 Race$150,000

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND CLASS ACTIONS

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Mass. General Law 151B: Employment Engaging in harassment and other employment actions based on these factors is unlawful:  Age  Color/Genetics  National origin or ancestry  Disability  Religion  Retaliation  Criminal records (applications only)  Race  Sexual Orientation  Active Military Status  Sex/Gender Engaging in harassment and other employment actions based on these factors is unlawful:  Age  Color/Genetics  National origin or ancestry  Disability  Religion  Retaliation  Criminal records (applications only)  Race  Sexual Orientation  Active Military Status  Sex/Gender

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Complaints by Type Employment 85% Housing 9% Public Accommodation 5% Other 1%

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Sex 24% Race/Color 22% Sexual Orientation 2% Age 11% Children 1% Creed 2% Disability 20% Family 1% Other 8% National Origin 8% Public Assistance 1% Bases of Complaints (100% = 4,323)

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Loss Control  Employee Handbooks  Training  Arbitration Agreements  Audit Pay Classifications and Payroll Products and Policies  Recruit and Maintain a Diverse Workforce  Hold Managers Accountable  CONSULT EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL BEFORE THE DECISION!  Employee Handbooks  Training  Arbitration Agreements  Audit Pay Classifications and Payroll Products and Policies  Recruit and Maintain a Diverse Workforce  Hold Managers Accountable  CONSULT EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL BEFORE THE DECISION!

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND What the Future Holds  Chief Justice Roberts  Justice ___________?  Partnering of Govt. Agencies  More Claims  More Defense Costs  More Settlements  Chief Justice Roberts  Justice ___________?  Partnering of Govt. Agencies  More Claims  More Defense Costs  More Settlements

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Emerging Issues The smoke bomb:  Weyco Inc. terminated four employees because they smoked…on their own time.  21 states do not protect the rights of smokers, including Michigan.  Estimated $157 billion spent annually on medical expenses related to smoking and lost productivity.  Michigan courts do not view nicotine addiction as a disability. The smoke bomb:  Weyco Inc. terminated four employees because they smoked…on their own time.  21 states do not protect the rights of smokers, including Michigan.  Estimated $157 billion spent annually on medical expenses related to smoking and lost productivity.  Michigan courts do not view nicotine addiction as a disability. Jack McCalmon, Esq. – Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Emerging Issues The obesity bomb:  New Stanford study shows that obese employees earn $3.41 less than non-obese counterparts.  One possible reason: Employers believe obese workers cost more than non-obese in health care costs.  90% of American men and 70% of American women become overweight at some point in their life.  31% of U.S. adults are obese.  Obesity is claimed to increase health care spending by 10x.  Costs $1244 more per year to treat an obese person.  Obesity tied to a 64% increase in diabetes.  Fraser v. Goodale, 342 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2003), eating is declared a major life activity. The obesity bomb:  New Stanford study shows that obese employees earn $3.41 less than non-obese counterparts.  One possible reason: Employers believe obese workers cost more than non-obese in health care costs.  90% of American men and 70% of American women become overweight at some point in their life.  31% of U.S. adults are obese.  Obesity is claimed to increase health care spending by 10x.  Costs $1244 more per year to treat an obese person.  Obesity tied to a 64% increase in diabetes.  Fraser v. Goodale, 342 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2003), eating is declared a major life activity.

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Emerging Issues The chicken bomb:  When the Asian bird flu crosses over, how will employers react to employees afflicted? The chicken bomb:  When the Asian bird flu crosses over, how will employers react to employees afflicted? Jack McCalmon, Esq. – Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Questions & Answers Jack McCalmon, Esq. – Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon

2005 PLUS International Conference THE NEW FACE OF EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION: CLASS ACTIONS AND BEYOND Thank You!  Lucy Ann Galioto  Vice President, National Union/AIG  David Keenan  VP – EPL Claim Manager, Chubb  John Lozada  Chief of Enforcement, Mass. Comm. Against Discrim.  Jack McCalmon, Esq.  Partner: Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon  Philip R. Voluck, Esq.  Partner: Kaufman, Schneider & Bianco, LLP  Lucy Ann Galioto  Vice President, National Union/AIG  David Keenan  VP – EPL Claim Manager, Chubb  John Lozada  Chief of Enforcement, Mass. Comm. Against Discrim.  Jack McCalmon, Esq.  Partner: Titus, Hillis, Reynolds, Dickman & McCalmon  Philip R. Voluck, Esq.  Partner: Kaufman, Schneider & Bianco, LLP