Alternative Methods for Approval: Case Study on Child Restraints US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference June 6-8, 2006 Portland, OR, USA Joseph.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why are children restraint devices necessary in cars? Statistics have proved the increased number of children, less than 12, who are involved in traffic.
Advertisements

Car Seat Safety.
CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY FOR NEW AND EXPECTING PARENTS.
CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT. WHY ARE WE HERE? To Create an Awareness of the importance of Child Passenger Safety Education & ENFORCEMENT.
May 2002 Child Restraint Systems A Field study of Misuse Helena Menezes José Dias.
Jim Rezich A&P, I.A. ATP DAR Introduction to Ejection Seat ownership.
1 “APPROVED PARTS” PRESENTED BY DON E. GARDNER AVIATION SAFETY INSPECTOR CHARLOTTE FSDO #33 (704)
Federal Role & Safety Standards Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
Correct Use of Seatbelts and Child Car Seats Presented by:
Booster Seat Use in Ontario Piotr Wilk Ashley Hartford Middlesex-London Health Unit
What Do You See? Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Video 1 Video 2
Chapter 3 Driver Safety & Rules 1. The New Jersey seat belt law requires: All front-seat occupants of passenger vehicles operated in New Jersey to wear.
Protecting Our Young Riders Child Restraints Name Prosecuting Attorney.
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Child Seat Safety Presented by Bryant Nowlin Lynchburg Police Department.
CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY *FROM INFANT TO TEEN*WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW* Delaware Office of Highway Safety Corporate Outreach Fall 2015.
Lookout For Your Health Topic: GROWING UP BUCKLED UP IN NORTH CAROLINA Guest: Bill Hall, Manager Occupant Protection Program UNC Highway Research Center,
AVS Repair, Alteration and Fabrication Team (RAFT) Results
08 June 2006Portland; Oregon; USAPeter Corbeeel Reducing the risk of smoke and fire in transport airplanes: related EASA rulemaking actions Peter Corbeel.
JAA Cabin Safety Steering Group (CSSG) JAA Future Cabin Safety Plan / Coordination with EASA 4th Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference – Marnix.
APPROVED TRAINING MANUAL’S LESSON PLANS AND COURSEWARE STAR MARIANAS AIR, INC. Recurrent – Flight Crew Part I – Basic Indoctrination Section 1 – Operator.
Motor vehicle safety Child safety
Bringing Home Baby 50 Lessons Over Easy 1. Swaddling a Baby swaddle-a-baby_ bc 2.
Child Passenger Safety in Other Vehicles Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
Chapter 10: Children in Forward- Facing Child Restraints.
Presented to: sUAS ARC Certification Working Group By: Richard Posey, AIR-200, UAS Experimental Certification Team Lead Date: June 26, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 147 Aviation Advisory Committee Working Group Training Updates Presented to: World Aviation Training Symposium.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Chapter 13: Child Passenger Safety in Other Vehicles/Modes of Transportation.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
October 2002 Field Approval Process Improvement. October Topics  Background  FAPIT Recommendations  Status  Volume 2, Chapter 1  M-DAR.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Operational impact of §
Charles Taylor Master Mechanic Award July 12, 2006.
99-1National CPS Certification Training - April 2007 (R1010) What Do You See? Courtesy St. John's Hospital Play Video Scenario 1 Play Video Scenario 2.
Safety Recommendation A “Revise 14 CFR Part 91, 135, and 121 to require that all occupants be restrained during takeoff, landing, and turbulent conditions,
Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS) Presented by: Massoud Sadeghi FAA - Aging Systems Program Manager EAPAS Workshop November 2002.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 0. Federal Aviation Administration 1 1 July 2009 Federal Aviation Administration eFAST Electronic FAA Accelerated and.
County of San Diego Division of Emergency Medical Services EMS Impact of a New Booster Seat Law Barbara Stepanski, MPH Isaac Cain, MFS; Louise Nichols.
Chapter 12: Kids in Seat Belts
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Discussion of Full-Scale Testing of Leather.
TXDPS 06/09 BW CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY BASIC INFORMATION AND LAWS BETH WARREN ADMINISTRATIVE TRAINING UNIT TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference June 6-8, 2006 “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining, Reinforcing, and Streamlining” Aircraft.
The Road Rules and exemptions for children with disabilities or medical conditions Zora Marko Project Manager Early Learning Association Australia.

Child restraint and how to use it
Engaging non-tech Law Enforcement Officers
CPS Continuing Education Presentation Revised: October 2011
Approximation For Parents: Weight X Speed = Restraining Force
Protecting Our Young Riders
What Do You See? Communication Sets the Stage for Learning
FACT SHEET Recreational Vehicles (RV’s) and Child Occupants
Approximation For Parents: Weight X Speed = Restraining Force
What’s Wrong With This Picture?
Approximation For Parents: Weight X Speed = Restraining Force
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
National Standardized CPS Certification Training April 2007 – R1010
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Resources Updated 4/15/2019.
Chapter 12: Kids in Seat Belts
Approximation For Parents: Weight X Speed = Restraining Force
Voluntary Safety Programs Presentation
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Chapter 11: Children in Booster Seats
Approximation For Parents: Weight X Speed = Restraining Force
Approximation For Parents: Weight X Speed = Restraining Force
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Presentation transcript:

Alternative Methods for Approval: Case Study on Child Restraints US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference June 6-8, 2006 Portland, OR, USA Joseph J. Regulski AmSafe Aviation

The FAA recommends: Children under 20 lb. (9.1 kg.) should be restrained in an approved rear facing CRS (Child Restraint System) Children weighing 20 to 40 lb. (9.1 to 18.1 kg.) should be restrained in an approved forward facing CRS Children weighing over 40 lb. (18.1 kg.) should use the standard lap belt that is attached to all airline seats

The Reality is: Most children under 20 lb. fly unrestrained sitting on their parents lap –Lap Children fly free Many parents bring on board dual use automotive car seats for their children weighing 20 to 40 lbs. –In the post 9/11 world, traveling through airports and past security with these seats is a daunting task –The large automotive car seats can be an egress problem on board aircraft

AmSafe CAReS: Child Aviation Restraint System AmSafe’s Toddler Restraint

Installation Does not impede other passengers Easily adjusted Familiar hardware Light weight Can be installed quickly Small storage envelope Single person installation Uses existing seat lap belt

CAReS Dynamic Test Video Lap Belt OnlyCAReS

CAReS Certification: There does not exist a TSO to describe/certify a product like CAReS There are existing regulations prohibiting “vest style harnesses” The STC process (airframe and LOPA specific) would have been far too costly for the commercial roll-out of this product

Other considerations: Most airlines enthusiastically support CAReS but want parents to buy and bring on board like car seats –Hygiene and logistics make an extension belt model harder for airlines to support

AmSafe meets with Senior FAA Team: All agreed that we wanted to see CAReS fly –We recognized that multiple FAA disciplines would need to participate in the process AIR-100, AIR-120, AFS-200, ARM, AVS-1, CAMI –A project team with both FAA and AmSafe personnel was formed to work together to find a cost and time effective solution –Effort began in October 2005, and we expect final certification approval in July 2006

CAReS Certification Basis: Title 14 CFR , Approval of Materials, Parts, Processes, and Appliances, Paragraph (d) –In any other manner approved by the Administrator

CAReS Certification Basis: We jointly developed with the FAA a list of requirements to demonstrate airworthiness –Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS) to TSO-C100b –Key elements of AS 5276/1 and AS8043 –14 CFR testing –Applicable marking and labeling –Installation/Egress evaluation and demonstration

CAReS Certification Basis: AmSafe’s certification demonstration plan was submitted to the FAA in a Project Specific Certification Plan (PSCP) –A wide range of possible seat configurations were considered and evaluated –“Bracketed” dynamic test approach

Lessons Learned : Industry and the government can work together as partners –FAA Leadership is willing to help their organization “Think outside the box” In the early part of the project we self limited ourselves to existing certification options –Don’t be afraid to be open and honest about what you need