NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Value Added in CPS. What is value added? A measure of the contribution of schooling to student performance Uses statistical techniques to isolate the.
Advertisements

Using Growth Models to improve quality of school accountability systems October 22, 2010.
Putting Together The Standards-Based Puzzle
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Strategizing with Safe Harbor Carissa Moffat Miller, PhD Deputy Superintendent, Assessment Roger Quarles Superintendent, Caldwell.
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
District Accountability Update May February 2007.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Enquiring mines wanna no.... Who is it? Coleman Report “[S]chools bring little influence to bear upon a child’s achievement that is independent of.
Elementary Report Card Revisions
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
Graduating Chariho High School How Do We Get There?
The Use of Trajectory-Modeled Growth as Part of Adequate Yearly Progress: One State's Results Christopher I Cobitz, Ph.D. Reporting Section Chief North.
NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
Demystifying Statewide Assessment for Students with Disabilities September 19, 2007 Central Elementary School.
Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics
Growth and Goals Measures of Academic Progress ® (MAP ® ) Measures of Academic Progress, MAP, and DesCartes: A Continuum of Learning are registered trademarks.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
1 New England Common Assessment Program Guide to Using the 2005 NECAP Reports: Companion PowerPoint Presentation March/April 2006.
1 AMP Results Overview for Educators October 30, 2015.
HOME High Quality Assessments in Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (PEPG) Systems.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
NECAP Presentation Dunn’s Corners School Westerly, RI February 24, 2010.
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
Student Growth Model Salt Lake City School District Christine Marriott Assessment and Evaluation Department Salt Lake City School District State.
Paulding County School District Elementary Parent Presentation New Georgia Elementary Parent Informational Meeting All parents and guardians.
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Standards-based Grading and Reporting
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS
Understanding ITBS Scores
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Maywood School District
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006

Standard Setting NECAP is criterion-referenced not norm- referenced All three states agreed to use the same standards About 84 teachers from RI were part of the standard setting process All teachers in grades 3-8 had the opportunity to be part of the standard setting process

Keep in mind… NECAP and NSRE are not equated It’s not useful or accurate to say we’re doing better or worse than on the NSRE This is the beginning of a new trend line

Also keep in mind… The results are comparable, that is, we’re seeing similar patterns of results We have not lowered our expectations for students

NECAP Achievement Levels Descriptions Proficient with Distinction: Students performing at this level demonstrate the prerequisite knowledge and skills needed to participate and excel in instructional activities aligned with the GLEs at the current grade level. Errors made by these students are few and minor and do not reflect gaps in prerequisite knowledge and skills

NECAP Achievement Level Descriptions Proficient: Students performing at this level demonstrate minor gaps in the prerequisite knowledge and skills needed to participate and perform successfully in instructional activities aligned with the GLE at the current grade level. It is likely that any gaps in prerequisite knowledge and skills demonstrated by these students can be addressed during the course of typical classroom instruction.

NECAP Achievement Level Descriptions Partially Proficient: Students performing at this level demonstrate gaps in prerequisite knowledge and skills needed to participate and perform successfully in instructional activities aligned with the GLE at the current grade level. Additional instructional support may be necessary for these students to meet grade level expectations.

NECAP Achievement Level Descriptions Substantially Below Proficient: Students performing at this level demonstrate extensive and significant gaps in prerequisite knowledge and skills needed to participate and perform successfully in instructional activities aligned with the GLE at the current grade level. Additional instructional support is necessary for these students to meet grade level expectations.

State Results- Reading GradePWDPPPSBP 313%47%24%16%

State Results- Writing GradePWDPPPSBP 512%43%30%15%

State Results- Mathematics GradePWDPPPSBP 312%39%25%

State Results: Placing Results in Context for 4 th Grade Percent at or above Proficient NECAP (05)NSRE (04)NAEP* (05) Reading60%67.2%62% (30%) Math62%51.3%76% (31%) * Percent at or above Basic and at or above Proficient

State Results: Placing Results in Context for 8 th Grade Percent at or above Proficient NECAP (05)NSRE (04)NAEP* (05) Reading55%44.9%71% (31%) Math48%39.3%63% (24%) * Percent at or above Basic and at or above Proficient

Communicating results Provides us with a snapshot of our school’s (district’s) achievement against the GLEs Begins a new trend line for all of us Able to look at grade-by-grade achievement Assists with ongoing instructional and curriculum efforts

Communicating results Expect to have fewer wide fluctuations in results due to changes in test forms

RI’s Accountability System Proposed Revisions in Support of the NECAP Tests

Working assumptions Keep as much as possible from the old system Adjust when necessary Adjust when new flexibilities emerge that benefit schools and districts

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs ) We are able to keep the same AMOs Language ArtsMathematics Elementary Middle

AMOs continued This is the year that the AMOs “jumped” to the next level For example, the Elementary Reading AMO went from 76.1 to 80.1 This change had an impact on high schools even without a change in assessments

Index Scale Proficient with Distinction100 Proficient100 Partially Proficient75 Substantially Below Proficient50 25

Attribution NECAP tests measure the learning that occurred in the prior school year. Therefore, scores will be attributed back to the school where the teaching took place. Participation rates, however, will be based on where the testing occurred. Index scores will be based on the 95% of students who took the test. Zeros will not be added to schools scores.

Cell Size and Error Bands Cell size is 45 for all subgroups and at the school/district levels Error Bands

Safe Harbor for this year Impossible to calculate because the NSREs and NECAP are not equated; the scores are not comparable Appeal Process: Two-step process centered around the reduction in the gap between the school’s index score and the state’s index score on the NSREs and the NECAP Step 1: Reductions in index scores will be compared separately for the two tests (for the school level and/or subgroup level) 2004 NSRE school to 2004 NSRE state compared to 2005 NECAP school to 2005 NECAP state Step 2: Reductions in the percentage of students below Proficient (Partially Proficient and Significantly Below Proficient) One or the other

Safe Harbor, continued Schools must have more than 45 students in both the NSRE and the NECAP groups before a comparison can be made. This could result in a change in the school’s classification

Considerations for principals Ensure that student reports get home to families Host a “School Report Night” for families and the community Think about how to build teacher capacity to use assessment results Make everyone aware of support materials Work with School Improvement Teams to use results Take advantage of the test interpretation workshops

Grades Assessed About 72,000 Rhode Island students in grades three through eight took the exam Mathematics: Grades 3,4,5,6,7,8 Reading: Grades 3,4,5,6,7,8 Writing: Grades 5,8 216,000 students in all three states

Test Interpretation Workshops March 27 th Marriott1:00 – 4:30 March 28 th Marriott8:30 – 12:00 April 5 th Radisson8:30 – 12:00 April 6 th Radisson1:00 – 4:30 April 7 th Best Western8:30 – 12:00 WHO? Curriculum Directors, Principals Lead Teachers, Coaches (substitutes will NOT be reimbursed) Register online at: iregister.measuredprogress.org

Full Academic Year Def.: Students enrolled October 1 of the previous school year For testing: Regardless of length of time enrolled in school, all students must take the NECAP test. Students will be included in all assessment results. For accountability: Students will be removed from accountability calculations.

Communicating Results NECAP is directly aligned to RI’s Grade Level Expectations This assessment is designed to be sensitive to instructional changes This is the first time that we have information that looks at grade-to- grade achievement (3 – 8)

Communicating Results (continued) Districts are in the process of aligning the curriculum and instructional practices to reflect the GLEs Score reports are designed to provide much more information to support school improvement and foster conversations between families and teachers Analyses: “How are we able to support students’ learning with respect to the GLEs” not “Are we doing better or worse than we did on the NSRE?”

Using Results- Some Basics Scale Scores: Every grade level is reported as 3 numbers The first number is always the grade level that was assessed The final two numbers reflect the scale- 00 – is always proficient